अApnaFunda

BEST AGROLIFE LIMITED (BESTAGRO)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Agricultural · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.48 / 100
Profitability 52Balance sheet 44
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.23 / 100
Price 7Earnings 36FII/DII 28

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹14.86 latest close · −6.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹15₹20Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹15₹20Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹14.86 month-end · −44.4% over 12 months

₹15₹20₹25Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹15₹20₹25Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹14.86 month-end · −78.3% over 3 years

₹20₹40₹60₹80Mar '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60₹80Mar '23May '25Nov '26

₹14.86 month-end · −53.3% since Feb '21

₹50₹100Feb '21Feb '22Feb '23Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26 ₹50₹100Feb '21May '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹12.30 to ₹34.40 · 1-year volatility 58.5%

Was the rally earned?

-44%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 63 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 13.9x to 17.7x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−64 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+18 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −44%−44%Share priceNet profit growth: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−64ProfitP/E change: +18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+18P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −44%−44%Share price
Net profit growth-64 ptsNet profit fell about 57%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+18 ptsThe P/E rose from 13.9x to 17.7x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-80%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 67.3x to 17.7x); per-share earnings took off 14 points.
  • The share count rose 7%.
Net profit growth: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−11 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −66 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−66 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: −80%−80%Share priceNet profit growth: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−11ProfitP/E change: −66 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−66P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: −80%−80%Share price
Net profit growth-11 ptsNet profit fell about 20%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-66 ptsThe P/E fell from 67.3x to 17.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 7%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAV

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-89.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility58.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.023-year daily, correlation 0.29
Volume spikes11last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20222023202420252026−88.6% 0%−25%−50%−75%202220242026−88.6%
Largest drawdowns

-89.2% (2022-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-56.6% (2021-03 peak to 2021-05 low, recovered 2021-07)

-42.6% (2021-11 peak to 2022-05 low, recovered 2022-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-28: 6.2x the 50-day median, price +4.7% that day

2026-10-26: 6.2x the 50-day median, price -7.7% that day

2026-09-03: 8.9x the 50-day median, price +8.1% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

17.7xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history28th percentile
CheapestMedian 27.7xDearest

Usual range 13.2x to 63.1x since 2021-02.

Against Process Industries17.7x vs 18.1x
This company
17.7x
Sector median
18.1x

Close to the Process Industries median.

6.8x30.0x53.2x76.5xFeb '21Apr '22Jun '23Aug '24Oct '25Nov '266.8x30.0x53.2x76.5xFeb '21Jan '23Dec '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE21st▼ 38 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin83rd▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth5th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth12th▼ 76 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓37thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓3rd▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓52nd▼ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum7th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~1%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 5.5x, the price would imply about 0.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹14.86
P/E
17.7x
ROCE
5.0%
Market Cap
₹526 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1272 cr
P/S
0.4x
P/B
0.7x
ROE
3.9%
Operating Margin
20.0%
Debt / Equity
0.6x
Promoter Holding
50.4%
12M Momentum
-44.5%

52-week range

₹12.30₹34.40
12% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
58.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.20

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.95x
Share count, 1Y
+45.8%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate22%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 22.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.95xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.95x (cash from operations ₹361 cr, net profit ₹185 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+40 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 40 days (142 vs 102). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-244 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -244 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 3.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 37,571 to 66,662 (+77%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters50.1%50.4%+0.3 pts
FIIs8.9%5.6%-3.3 pts
DIIs2.5%2.1%-0.4 pts
Public and others38.5%41.9%+3.4 pts

Number of shareholders

66,662shareholders+77% since Dec '23
37k47k58k68k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 37,571
Mar '24: 39,861
Jun '24: 41,570
Sep '24: 40,573
Dec '24: 37,666
Mar '25: 37,494
Jun '25: 36,630
Sep '25: 37,181
Dec '25: 38,180
Mar '26: 68,254
Jun '26: 66,662
37k47k58k68k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 37,571
Mar '24: 39,861
Jun '24: 41,570
Sep '24: 40,573
Dec '24: 37,666
Mar '25: 37,494
Jun '25: 36,630
Sep '25: 37,181
Dec '25: 38,180
Mar '26: 68,254
Jun '26: 66,662

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+0.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BEST AGROLIFE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +42% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.8%, 80% range −8.1% to +9.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
MANGALAM · Aug 2025: −60.3% vs market
PURVFLEXI · Mar 2025: −56.8% vs market
HIMATSEIDE · Oct 2025: −53.2% vs market
PRITIKAUTO · Dec 2024: −48.0% vs market
VIRINCHI · May 2024: −38.9% vs market
ISFT · May 2023: −37.7% vs market
MAWANASUG · Apr 2023: −31.4% vs market
BASML · Oct 2025: −28.3% vs market
SHIVATEX · Oct 2022: −26.8% vs market
NECLIFE · Jun 2022: −26.6% vs market
NAHARSPING · Jun 2023: −26.3% vs market
AKSHOPTFBR · Apr 2020: −26.2% vs market
BCLIND · May 2024: −22.7% vs market
NDL · Jan 2020: −22.5% vs market
AMDIND · May 2024: −20.5% vs market
LAMBODHARA · Feb 2025: −18.4% vs market
KONSTELEC · Sep 2025: −15.7% vs market
HARIOMPIPE · Apr 2025: −15.5% vs market
AHLADA · Sep 2022: −13.1% vs market
OAL · Mar 2024: −10.6% vs market
COASTCORP · Mar 2023: −9.0% vs market
AKASH · Sep 2023: −8.1% vs market
SUTLEJTEX · Dec 2023: −2.6% vs market
SHIGAN · May 2025: −0.1% vs market
BODALCHEM · May 2024: 0% vs market
MITCON · Aug 2025: +1.2% vs market
PATINTLOG · Jan 2020: +4.0% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Jul 2020: +5.7% vs market
TARMAT · Jul 2022: +8.5% vs market
RKEC · Sep 2022: +11.2% vs market
DCMNVL · Jul 2023: +11.8% vs market
KRITI · Nov 2022: +18.2% vs market
KANPRPLA · Mar 2024: +18.6% vs market
DHAMPURSUG · Aug 2025: +34.2% vs market
HPL · Jun 2020: +36.7% vs market
VASCONEQ · May 2020: +38.7% vs market
HTMEDIA · May 2020: +39.8% vs market
GANESHHOU · Feb 2020: +42.7% vs market
NECCLTD · Feb 2020: +53.8% vs market
SHREYANIND · Nov 2021: +56.9% vs market
SKIPPER · Jul 2020: +61.3% vs market
SANGHIIND · Sep 2020: +62.6% vs market
BYKE · Nov 2020: +69.3% vs market
WABAG · Mar 2020: +69.4% vs market
TBZ · Apr 2020: +70.8% vs market
RICOAUTO · Feb 2025: +76.7% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Jan 2021: +97.0% vs market
ORIENTBELL · Mar 2020: +109.2% vs market
LEMERITE · Aug 2023: +143.6% vs market
PARACABLES · Jun 2022: +170.2% vs market
Similar setups +0.6%All companies −1.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+0.6%
All companies' median
−1.2%
Beat the market
50% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AKSHOPTFBR
Electronic Technology
Apr 2020 8x7% −69%−72% −26%
LEMERITE
Miscellaneous
Aug 2023 30x5% −19%−33% +144%
HTMEDIA
Consumer Services
May 2020 —3% −69%−69% +40%
ISFT
Retail Trade
May 2023 16x6% −28%−32% −38%
VIRINCHI
Technology Services
May 2024 23x8% +6%−31% −39%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NECLIFE
Health Technology
Jun 2022 21x5% −42%−50% −27%
TARMAT
Industrial Services
Jul 2022 18x5% −39%−43% +9%
SHIVATEX
Process Industries
Oct 2022 23x— −27%−47% −27%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BEST AGROLIFE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
61%similar
P/Evolatility
Transportation
57%similar
debt/equityrevenue
BIRLA CABLEBIRLACABLE
Producer Manufacturing
52%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Consumer Services
52%similar
revenuemarket cap
Consumer Services
51%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Process Industries
68%similar
ROCEvolatility
Process Industries
64%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
PRECOTPRECOT
Process Industries
62%similar
operating marginvolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '24

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 6.2x its 50-day median on 2026-10-28; price +4.7% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 111.4x its 50-day median on 2026-07-31; price +15.2% that day.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (61.7x).
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JunSharesShare count is up 45.8% over 12 months.
  8. JunPriceVolume reached 15.5x its 50-day median on 2026-06-30; price +4.2% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. MarPriceFell 89% from the Dec 2022 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  3. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  4. JanPriceVolume reached 81.6x its 50-day median on 2026-01-06; price +8.5% that day.
  5. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (70.6x).
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. NovPriceVolume reached 362.1x its 50-day median on 2025-11-27; price +7.7% that day.
  9. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  10. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  11. JulPriceVolume reached 43.9x its 50-day median on 2025-07-01; price +6.8% that day.
  12. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (12.0x).
  13. JunPriceVolume reached 9.4x its 50-day median on 2025-06-30; price +10.0% that day.
  14. AprPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.4 pts over 2 quarters to 7.9%.
  16. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  17. FebPriceVolume reached 17.6x its 50-day median on 2025-02-19; price -7.5% that day.
  18. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  19. OctPriceVolume reached 13.5x its 50-day median on 2024-10-17; price +10.0% that day.
  20. AugPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2024-08-26; price +4.2% that day.
  21. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  22. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history70 months · 2021-02 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1117.7x₹1272 cr3.9%5.0%0.6x
2026-1016.6x₹1272 cr3.9%5.0%0.6x
2026-0920.9x₹1272 cr3.9%5.0%0.6x
2026-0868.6x₹1257 cr1.2%5.0%0.6x
2026-0776.5x₹1257 cr1.2%5.0%0.6x
2026-0661.7x₹1257 cr1.2%5.0%0.6x
2026-0524.0x₹1375 cr3.2%13.0%0.6x
2026-0426.4x₹1375 cr3.2%13.0%0.6x
2026-0318.1x₹1375 cr3.2%13.0%0.6x
2026-0244.9x₹1446 cr1.7%13.0%0.6x
2026-0152.6x₹1446 cr1.7%13.0%0.6x
2025-1270.6x₹1446 cr1.7%13.0%0.6x
2025-1113.9x₹1676 cr9.1%13.0%0.6x
2025-1011.3x₹1676 cr9.1%13.0%0.6x
2025-0912.5x₹1676 cr9.1%13.0%0.6x
2025-0812.2x₹1814 cr9.2%13.0%0.6x
2025-0716.4x₹1814 cr9.2%13.0%0.6x
2025-0612.0x₹1814 cr9.2%13.0%0.6x
2025-0540.5x₹1675 cr3.1%16.0%1.0x
2025-0444.4x₹1675 cr3.1%16.0%1.0x
2025-0331.3x₹1675 cr3.1%16.0%1.0x
2025-0216.6x₹1715 cr5.7%16.0%1.0x
2025-0133.2x₹1715 cr5.7%16.0%1.0x
2024-1240.4x₹1715 cr5.7%16.0%1.0x
2024-1139.3x₹1779 cr5.7%16.0%1.0x
2024-1034.5x₹1779 cr5.7%16.0%1.0x
2024-0935.7x₹1779 cr5.7%16.0%1.0x
2024-0815.0x₹1873 cr16.4%16.0%1.0x
2024-0713.5x₹1873 cr16.4%16.0%1.0x
2024-0615.1x₹1873 cr16.4%16.0%1.0x
2024-056.8x₹1746 cr36.4%34.0%1.1x
2024-047.7x₹1746 cr36.4%34.0%1.1x
2024-03—————
2024-02—————
2024-01—————
2023-12—————
2023-11—————
2023-10—————
2023-09—————
2023-08—————
2023-0714.3x₹1746 cr36.4%34.0%1.1x
2023-0614.2x₹1746 cr36.4%34.0%1.1x
2023-0520.8x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2023-0422.6x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2023-0323.2x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2023-0225.1x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2023-0127.0x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-1234.4x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-1135.6x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-1035.2x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-0928.4x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-0825.0x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-0721.6x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-0618.6x₹1211 cr31.8%41.0%0.8x
2022-0549.8x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2022-0454.1x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2022-0353.3x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2022-0258.1x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2022-0166.3x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-1259.1x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-1167.3x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-1073.3x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-0946.7x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-0844.2x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-0733.0x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-0621.0x₹905 cr28.5%—0.3x
2021-05—₹151 cr0.0%0.0%0.3x
2021-04—₹151 cr0.0%0.0%0.3x
2021-03—₹151 cr0.0%0.0%0.3x
2021-02—₹151 cr0.0%0.0%0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback