अApnaFunda

LAXMI GOLDORNA HOUSE LIMITED (LGHL)

Miscellaneous · figures to Nov '26

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹251.55 latest close · +13.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹251.55 month-end · −12.4% over 12 months

₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹251.55 month-end · +75.7% since Jun '24

₹100₹200₹300₹400Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Nov '25May '26Nov '26 ₹100₹200₹300₹400Jun '24Sep '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹168.00 to ₹357.05 · 1-year volatility 45.4%

Was the rally earned?

-12%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 188.8x to 165.5x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: −12 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−12 ptsP/E changeShare price: −12%−12%Share priceP/E change: −12 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−12P/EShare price: −12%−12%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-12 ptsThe P/E fell from 188.8x to 165.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare with other companies

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-56.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility45.4%annualised
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202120222023202420252026−56.0% 0%−20%−40%−60%202120232025−56.0%
Largest drawdowns

-56.3% (2025-09 peak to 2026-09 low, not yet recovered)

-34.6% (2021-02 peak to 2021-05 low, recovered 2022-08)

-33.6% (2024-05 peak to 2024-08 low, recovered 2024-12)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-14: 8.7x the 50-day median, price -0.8% that day

2026-10-13: 8.3x the 50-day median, price +0.3% that day

2026-10-01: 12.6x the 50-day median, price +9.7% that day

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

165.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history77th percentile
CheapestMedian 135.0xDearest

Usual range 69.3x to 186.9x since 2024-06.

63.3x126.1x189.0x251.8xJun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26Nov '2663.3x126.1x189.0x251.8xJun '24Apr '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median.

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Miscellaneous is valued

What is the price implying?

~42%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 165.5x, the price would imply about 42.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Earnings figures have not updated recently, so the company is left out of the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹251.55
P/E
165.5x
ROCE
17.0%
Market Cap
₹1259 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹94 cr
P/S
13.3x
P/B
19.4x
ROE
11.7%
Operating Margin
18.2%
Debt / Equity
1.6x
Promoter Holding
75.0%
12M Momentum
-12.4%

52-week range

₹168.00₹357.05
44% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.4%

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.4x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 4checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 4.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate24%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Receivable days vs history+28 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 28 days (119 vs 92). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days+43 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +43 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 57 to 2,798 (+4809%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters75.0%75.0%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others25.0%24.9%-0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

2,798shareholders+4809% since Sep '23
571k2k3k Sep '23Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '23: 57
Sep '25: 2,548
Dec '25: 3,053
Mar '26: 2,881
Jun '26: 2,798
571k2k3k Sep '23Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 57
Sep '25: 2,548
Dec '25: 3,053
Mar '26: 2,881
Jun '26: 2,798

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−16.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LAXMI GOLDORNA HOUSE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −32% to +22% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−12.4%, 80% range −18.7% to +2.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SHRENIK · Sep 2020: −94.1% vs market
ROSSELLIND · Apr 2024: −84.5% vs market
COOLCAPS · Oct 2025: −74.1% vs market
ASIANTILES · Mar 2020: −50.5% vs market
IRISDOREME · Sep 2023: −43.8% vs market
STEELXIND · Apr 2023: −43.5% vs market
JINDWORLD · Jul 2024: −42.2% vs market
LEMONTREE · Feb 2020: −41.8% vs market
WESTLIFE · Feb 2025: −38.6% vs market
TAJGVK · Jan 2020: −37.3% vs market
POKARNA · May 2022: −34.6% vs market
ORIENTHOT · Feb 2025: −34.5% vs market
TASTYBITE · Sep 2021: −33.1% vs market
SOBHA · Jan 2022: −29.1% vs market
BIRLAMONEY · Jun 2025: −27.2% vs market
HLEGLAS · May 2025: −26.5% vs market
YASHO · Mar 2025: −24.7% vs market
SBC · Jun 2024: −22.5% vs market
ASALCBR · Sep 2022: −22.4% vs market
NELCO · Oct 2022: −21.6% vs market
JUBLFOOD · Oct 2021: −20.3% vs market
GOCOLORS · Mar 2023: −19.3% vs market
EVEREADY · Sep 2023: −19.2% vs market
MOTILALOFS · Jun 2020: −18.9% vs market
SINCLAIR · Jun 2025: −18.2% vs market
NATHBIOGEN · Apr 2020: −15.0% vs market
EIHAHOTELS · Feb 2025: −12.0% vs market
PRESTIGE · Dec 2024: −10.8% vs market
HATSUN · Jul 2022: −7.5% vs market
ARVSMART · May 2024: +0.5% vs market
GODREJPROP · Aug 2020: +2.4% vs market
PUNJABCHEM · May 2021: +3.0% vs market
HESTERBIO · Aug 2025: +3.5% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Feb 2022: +3.5% vs market
ONEPOINT · May 2024: +10.4% vs market
APOLLOPIPE · Aug 2022: +13.3% vs market
GUFICBIO · Sep 2025: +21.2% vs market
BLUEDART · Jan 2020: +22.6% vs market
CANTABIL · Feb 2022: +27.3% vs market
SHRIRAMPPS · Dec 2022: +28.5% vs market
ITI · Feb 2020: +29.9% vs market
APCL · May 2020: +34.6% vs market
NETWORK18 · Jun 2021: +37.8% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · Nov 2021: +40.8% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Jun 2025: +44.3% vs market
VIJAYA · Jan 2024: +44.9% vs market
MENONBE · Jun 2022: +51.5% vs market
NEOGEN · Sep 2025: +62.5% vs market
MTARTECH · Feb 2025: +150.4% vs market
SCHNEIDER · Apr 2023: +208.7% vs market
Similar setups −16.6%All companies −4.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−16.6%
All companies' median
−4.2%
Beat the market
42% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 38 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
EIHAHOTELS
Consumer Services
Feb 2025 161x13% −12%−36% −12%
MENONBE
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2022 214x15% +5%−33% +52%
NELCO
Electronic Technology
Oct 2022 117x18% +11%−21% −22%
COOLCAPS
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2025 174x16% +19%−17% −74%
HATSUN
Consumer Non-Durables
Jul 2022 —12% +7%−33% −8%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CANTABIL
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2022 124x10% +93%−21% +27%
NETWORK18
Consumer Services
Jun 2021 162x10% +23%−10% +38%
MOTILALOFS
Finance
Jun 2020 48x10% −15%−33% −19%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, revenue growth and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LAXMI GOLDORNA HOUSE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Finance
58%similar
revenuedebt/equity
Health Technology
51%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Producer Manufacturing
49%similar
operating marginrevenue
Consumer Durables
47%similar
P/Edebt/equity
Consumer Non-Durables
41%similar
revenueP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

21 events since May '21

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 12.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-01; price +9.7% that day.
  2. SepPriceFell 56% from the Sep 2025 peak to the Sep 2026 low.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2026-09-30; price +11.9% that day.
  4. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. JunPriceRegained the 2025-03 peak, 2 months after the low.
  6. AprPriceFell 26% from the Mar 2025 peak to the Apr 2025 low.
  7. AprPriceVolume reached 18.8x its 50-day median on 2025-04-21; price -3.2% that day.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 6.1x its 50-day median on 2025-03-28; price -1.0% that day.
Show 13 earlier events
  1. DecPriceRegained the 2024-05 peak, 4 months after the low.
  2. DecPriceVolume reached 84.2x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +20.0% that day.
  3. AugPriceFell 34% from the May 2024 peak to the Aug 2024 low.
  4. MayPriceRegained the 2024-03 peak, 0 months after the low.
  5. MayPriceFell 25% from the Mar 2024 peak to the May 2024 low.
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 14.7x its 50-day median on 2024-04-04; price -1.1% that day.
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 21.1x its 50-day median on 2024-03-12; price +2.9% that day.
  8. AugPriceVolume reached 33.0x its 50-day median on 2023-08-18; price -9.3% that day.
  9. AprPriceVolume reached 20.5x its 50-day median on 2023-04-12; price -4.1% that day.
  10. MarPriceVolume reached 47.0x its 50-day median on 2023-03-10; price -1.1% that day.
  11. AugPriceRegained the 2021-02 peak, 15 months after the low.
  12. JulPriceVolume reached 32.5x its 50-day median on 2022-07-13; price -4.3% that day.
  13. MayPriceFell 35% from the Feb 2021 peak to the May 2021 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history30 months · 2024-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11165.5x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-10159.1x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-09131.6x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-08118.1x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-07135.1x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-06149.0x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-05155.6x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-04169.8x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-03150.1x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-02188.8x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2026-01179.6x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-12186.7x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-11188.8x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-10178.8x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-09251.8x₹94 cr11.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-08140.0x₹193 cr16.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-07134.9x₹193 cr16.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-06136.7x₹193 cr16.7%17.0%1.6x
2025-05122.3x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2025-04115.1x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2025-03118.7x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2025-02133.2x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2025-01125.0x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2024-12123.4x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2024-1177.2x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2024-1063.3x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2024-0969.8x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2024-0863.3x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2024-0765.0x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x
2024-0675.8x₹202 cr19.6%—1.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback