अApnaFunda

PVP VENTURES LIMITED (PVP)

Technology Services · Information Technology Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.23 / 100
Profitability 57Growth 5Balance sheet 6
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.73 / 100
Price 97Earnings 68FII/DII 53

Passes these screensHigh Momentum

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹47.33 latest close · +64.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹40₹60Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹40₹60Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹47.33 month-end · +27.6% over 12 months

₹20₹40₹60Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹47.33 month-end · +233.3% over 3 years

₹20₹40₹60Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹20₹40₹60Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹47.33 month-end · +1252.3% since Jan '19

₹0₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Dec '21Mar '23May '24Aug '25Nov '26 ₹0₹20₹40₹60Jan '19Oct '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹23.00 to ₹72.04 · 1-year volatility 61.1%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-58.5%recovered 2021-07
1-year volatility61.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.463-year daily, correlation 0.15
Volume spikes17last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−58.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−58.5%
Largest drawdowns

-58.5% (2019-01 peak to 2019-10 low, recovered 2021-07)

-55.1% (2024-03 peak to 2025-08 low, recovered 2026-08)

-49.7% (2022-01 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2022-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-04: 9x the 50-day median, price +4.7% that day

2026-09-03: 6.1x the 50-day median, price +5.0% that day

2026-09-01: 9x the 50-day median, price -5.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

249.1xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history85th percentile
CheapestMedian 8.9xDearest

Usual range 1.8x to 275.7x since 2019-01.

Against Technology Services249.1x vs 21.1x
This company
249.1x
Sector median
21.1x

1082% above the Technology Services median.

1.7x100.7x199.7x298.8xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.7x100.7x199.7x298.8xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE24th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin91st▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth99thflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth2ndflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓3rd▼ 42 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓29th▼ 58 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓3rd
  • 12M momentum91stflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~21%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 32.5x, the price would imply about 21.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹47.33
P/E
249.1x
ROCE
6.0%
Market Cap
₹1233 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹118 cr
P/S
10.5x
P/B
5.7x
ROE
2.3%
Operating Margin
29.0%
Debt / Equity
1.2x
Promoter Holding
61.3%
12M Momentum
27.6%

52-week range

₹23.00₹72.04
50% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
61.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.41

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.06x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 6checks within range4 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance300%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 300.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate-19%Beyond threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: -18.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.06xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.06x (cash from operations ₹-3 cr, net profit ₹47 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+88 daysBeyond threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 88 days (106 vs 18). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 1.9 pts; FIIs trimmed 0.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 37,026 to 40,079 (+8%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters59.4%61.3%+1.9 pts
FIIs1.0%0.1%-0.9 pts
DIIs0.2%0.0%-0.2 pts
Public and others39.4%38.6%-0.9 pts

Number of shareholders

40,079shareholders+8% since Sep '23
37k40k43k46k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 37,026
Dec '23: 37,553
Mar '24: 45,425
Jun '24: 46,090
Sep '24: 44,679
Dec '24: 44,719
Mar '25: 44,635
Jun '25: 44,309
Sep '25: 43,701
Dec '25: 41,164
Mar '26: 39,942
Jun '26: 40,079
37k40k43k46k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 37,026
Dec '23: 37,553
Mar '24: 45,425
Jun '24: 46,090
Sep '24: 44,679
Dec '24: 44,719
Mar '25: 44,635
Jun '25: 44,309
Sep '25: 43,701
Dec '25: 41,164
Mar '26: 39,942
Jun '26: 40,079

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−3.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like PVP VENTURES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −31% to +29% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.1%, 80% range −12.1% to +9.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
DHANI · Jan 2021: −71.3% vs market
STAR · Jan 2021: −64.4% vs market
HATHWAY · Jul 2020: −56.2% vs market
SEPC · Sep 2024: −52.1% vs market
TEJASNET · Aug 2024: −52.0% vs market
SARTELE · Mar 2025: −46.6% vs market
EIFFL · Mar 2020: −41.1% vs market
PURVA · Dec 2024: −40.4% vs market
INOXWIND · Jan 2025: −38.8% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Jul 2021: −37.7% vs market
ITI · Nov 2020: −37.2% vs market
IMAGICAA · Oct 2024: −34.6% vs market
SPECIALITY · Feb 2023: −31.0% vs market
HNDFDS · Apr 2021: −29.8% vs market
5PAISA · Jun 2021: −29.5% vs market
ATULAUTO · Nov 2023: −28.7% vs market
MAXESTATES · Jun 2025: −14.5% vs market
PROZONER · May 2020: −13.7% vs market
VIPIND · Jul 2022: −13.4% vs market
SHRADHA · Nov 2022: −12.4% vs market
TARC · Jan 2022: −12.0% vs market
CINELINE · Mar 2023: −11.2% vs market
MANINFRA · May 2022: −5.9% vs market
OLECTRA · Sep 2023: −5.0% vs market
KUANTUM · Jan 2023: −4.2% vs market
DEVYANI · Aug 2022: −2.9% vs market
TAJGVK · Jan 2023: −2.5% vs market
SOLEX · Aug 2024: +4.0% vs market
LEMONTREE · Jun 2023: +5.0% vs market
SHAH · Jul 2023: +8.9% vs market
KERNEX · Mar 2025: +13.0% vs market
HINDOILEXP · Jul 2022: +14.1% vs market
DUGLOBAL · Mar 2023: +16.5% vs market
RELTD · Jul 2025: +17.2% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Jun 2024: +17.8% vs market
INDOCO · Jun 2020: +23.9% vs market
COOLCAPS · Nov 2023: +26.1% vs market
GODREJPROP · Mar 2020: +29.7% vs market
SOFTTECH · Sep 2025: +35.7% vs market
MANORAMA · Oct 2025: +36.5% vs market
SERVOTECH · Apr 2024: +39.9% vs market
DBREALTY · Dec 2022: +56.1% vs market
MICEL · May 2023: +70.7% vs market
PANSARI · Feb 2025: +72.2% vs market
APOLLO · Jul 2025: +113.1% vs market
BCONCEPTS · Apr 2023: +116.3% vs market
PGEL · Feb 2022: +129.8% vs market
ANANTRAJ · Nov 2022: +131.3% vs market
DIACABS · Sep 2025: +135.9% vs market
GREENPANEL · Mar 2021: +195.9% vs market
Similar setups −3.6%All companies −2.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 6 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−3.6%
All companies' median
−2.5%
Beat the market
46% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 39 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DBREALTY
Finance
Dec 2022 90x-1% +101%−29% +56%
TARC
Finance
Jan 2022 229x1% +111%−19% −12%
INOXWIND
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2025 272x4% +41%−34% −39%
MAXESTATES
Finance
Jun 2025 196x3% +8%−27% −15%
SPECIALITY
Consumer Services
Feb 2023 121x8% +49%−24% −31%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DHANI
Finance
Jan 2021 3744x6% +91%−13% −71%
HINDCOPPER
Non-Energy Minerals
Jul 2021 129x6% +334%−19% −38%
PURVA
Finance
Dec 2024 129x10% +103%−31% −40%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to PVP VENTURES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
51%similar
P/EEPS growth
Health Technology
49%similar
market capEPS growth
Consumer Durables
49%similar
ROCEP/E
Health Technology
48%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Process Industries
47%similar
EPS growthP/E
LOKESH MACHINESLOKESHMACH
Technology Services
70%similar
ROCEP/E
Technology Services
17%similar
revenueEPS growth
MATRIMONY.COMMATRIMONY
Technology Services
14%similar
market cappromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Oct '23

  1. OctPriceFell 42% from the Sep 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (279.6x).
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. AugPriceRegained the 2024-03 peak, 12 months after the low.
  6. AugPriceVolume reached 26.9x its 50-day median on 2026-08-06; price +19.6% that day.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.18x).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. AprPriceVolume reached 61.5x its 50-day median on 2026-04-09; price +8.7% that day.
  2. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. FebPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2026-02-20; price +4.7% that day.
  4. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. OctPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2025-10-27; price +5.0% that day.
  6. SepPriceVolume reached 45.9x its 50-day median on 2025-09-05; price +20.0% that day.
  7. AugPriceFell 55% from the Mar 2024 peak to the Aug 2025 low.
  8. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  10. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.19x.
  11. JanPriceVolume reached 17.8x its 50-day median on 2025-01-06; price -2.0% that day.
  12. DecPriceVolume reached 20.7x its 50-day median on 2024-12-23; price +15.5% that day.
  13. AugPriceVolume reached 10.2x its 50-day median on 2024-08-07; price +20.0% that day.
  14. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  15. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.19x.
  16. JunSharesShare count is up 6.6% over 12 months.
  17. MarPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.0 pts to 61.4%.
  18. FebPriceVolume reached 20.0x its 50-day median on 2024-02-28; price +4.8% that day.
  19. JanPriceRegained the 2023-10 peak, 1 month after the low.
  20. DecPriceFell 26% from the Oct 2023 peak to the Dec 2023 low.
  21. OctPriceRegained the 2023-05 peak, 2 months after the low.
  22. OctPriceVolume reached 15.8x its 50-day median on 2023-10-12; price -5.0% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11249.1x₹118 cr2.3%6.0%1.2x
2026-10233.8x₹118 cr2.3%6.0%1.2x
2026-09279.6x₹118 cr2.3%6.0%1.2x
2026-08—₹89 cr-3.1%6.0%1.2x
2026-07—₹89 cr-3.1%6.0%1.2x
2026-06—₹89 cr-3.1%6.0%1.2x
2026-05—₹67 cr-3.1%1.0%0.1x
2026-04—₹67 cr-3.1%1.0%0.1x
2026-03—₹67 cr-3.1%1.0%0.1x
2026-02—₹55 cr-2.1%1.0%0.1x
2026-01—₹55 cr-2.1%1.0%0.1x
2025-12—₹55 cr-2.1%1.0%0.1x
2025-11—₹41 cr-2.1%1.0%0.1x
2025-10—₹41 cr-2.1%1.0%0.1x
2025-09—₹41 cr-2.1%1.0%0.1x
2025-08—₹27 cr-2.7%1.0%0.1x
2025-07—₹27 cr-2.7%1.0%0.1x
2025-06—₹27 cr-2.7%1.0%0.1x
2025-05294.9x₹12 cr0.9%-2.0%0.2x
2025-04298.8x₹12 cr0.9%-2.0%0.2x
2025-03273.1x₹12 cr0.9%-2.0%0.2x
2025-028.9x₹14 cr20.4%-2.0%0.2x
2025-0111.1x₹14 cr20.4%-2.0%0.2x
2024-1212.1x₹14 cr20.4%-2.0%0.2x
2024-119.4x₹11 cr20.1%-2.0%0.2x
2024-1010.6x₹11 cr20.1%-2.0%0.2x
2024-0910.8x₹11 cr20.1%-2.0%0.2x
2024-0812.8x₹8 cr19.5%-2.0%0.2x
2024-0710.1x₹8 cr19.5%-2.0%0.2x
2024-068.8x₹8 cr19.5%-2.0%0.2x
2024-054.2x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2024-045.3x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2024-036.5x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2024-025.3x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2024-013.4x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-122.5x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-112.4x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-102.3x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-091.8x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-081.7x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-071.7x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-061.7x₹176 cr109.0%61.0%0.8x
2023-05—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2023-04—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2023-03—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2023-02—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2023-01—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-12—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-11—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-10—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-09—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-08—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-07—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-06—₹49 cr—3.0%—
2022-05—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2022-04—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2022-03—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2022-02—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2022-01—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2021-12—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2021-11—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2021-10—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2021-09—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2021-08—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2021-07—₹18 cr-498.9%-4.0%32.1x
2021-06—————
2021-05—————
2021-04—————
2021-03—————
2021-02—————
2021-01—————
2020-12—————
2020-11—————
2020-10—————
2020-09—————
2020-08—————
2020-07—————
2020-06—————
2020-05—————
2020-04—————
2020-03—————
2020-02—————
2020-01—————
2019-12—————
2019-11—————
2019-10—₹37 cr-60.5%-9.0%2.8x
2019-09—₹37 cr-60.5%-9.0%2.8x
2019-08—₹37 cr-60.5%-9.0%2.8x
2019-07—₹37 cr-60.5%-9.0%2.8x
2019-06—₹37 cr-60.5%-9.0%2.8x
2019-05—₹58 cr-19.8%-2.0%1.6x
2019-04—₹58 cr-19.8%-2.0%1.6x
2019-03—₹58 cr-19.8%-2.0%1.6x
2019-02—₹58 cr-19.8%-2.0%1.6x
2019-01—₹58 cr-19.8%-2.0%1.6x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback