अApnaFunda

AEROFLEX ENTERPRISES LIMITED (AEROENTER)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.72 / 100
Profitability 38Growth 79Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.62 / 100
Price 60Earnings 50FII/DII 76

Passes these screensValue PickLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹124.01 latest close · −5.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹120₹140Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹120₹140Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹124.01 month-end · +43.3% over 12 months

₹75₹100₹125Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹75₹100₹125Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹124.01 month-end · +5.7% over 3 years

₹75₹100₹125Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹75₹100₹125Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹124.01 month-end · +76.4% since Nov '22

₹50₹100Nov '22Sep '23Jun '24Apr '25Jan '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100Nov '22Nov '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹62.20 to ₹159.60 · 1-year volatility 57.4%

Was the rally earned?

+43%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 133 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 19.5x to 9.3x), which took 89 points back.
  • The share count fell 25%.
Net profit growth: +98 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+98 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −89 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−89 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+34 ptsShare count changeShare price: +43%+43%Share priceNet profit growth: +98 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+98ProfitP/E change: −89 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−89P/EShare count change: +34 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+34SharesShare price: +43%+43%Share price
Net profit growth+98 ptsNet profit rose about 126%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-89 ptsThe P/E fell from 19.5x to 9.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+34 ptsShare count fell 25%, which lifts the price.
+6%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 130 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 31.0x to 9.3x), which took 124 points back.
  • The share count rose 10%.
Net profit growth: +139 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+139 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −124 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−124 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−9 ptsShare count changeShare price: +6%+6%Share priceNet profit growth: +139 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+139ProfitP/E change: −124 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−124P/EShare count change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−9SharesShare price: +6%+6%Share price
Net profit growth+139 ptsNet profit rose about 286%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-124 ptsThe P/E fell from 31.0x to 9.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-9 ptsShare count rose 10%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-56.1%recovered 2026-09
1-year volatility57.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.363-year daily, correlation 0.53
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−55.1% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−55.1%
Largest drawdowns

-56.1% (2024-10 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-09)

-39.5% (2023-08 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-10)

-32.3% (2023-01 peak to 2023-04 low, recovered 2023-06)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-12: 7.6x the 50-day median, price +10.8% that day

2026-09-07: 5.2x the 50-day median, price +9.1% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.3xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history16th percentile
CheapestMedian 20.7xDearest

Usual range 7.1x to 27.5x since 2022-11.

Against Producer Manufacturing9.3x vs 29.6x
This company
9.3x
Sector median
29.6x

69% below the Producer Manufacturing median.

3.9x17.3x30.7x44.0xNov '22Sep '23Jul '24May '25Mar '26Nov '263.9x17.3x30.7x44.0xNov '22Mar '24Jul '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE41stflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin35th▼ 29 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth76th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth96th▲ 89 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓78thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓32nd▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓95th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum84th▲ 51 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~12%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 15.5x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 12.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered37.1%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−25.2 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank802ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%22%44% Nov 2022Nov 2026 0%22%44% Nov 2022Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x13.4%14.4%15.5%
15x11.0%12.0%13.0%
20x7.9%8.8%9.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 12.0%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹124.01
P/E
9.3x
ROCE
13.0%
Market Cap
₹1399 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹752 cr
P/S
1.9x
P/B
1.7x
ROE
18.2%
Operating Margin
9.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
52.3%
12M Momentum
43.3%

52-week range

₹62.20₹159.60
63% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
57.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.55

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
49.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.43x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance67%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 67.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.43xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.43x (cash from operations ₹-191 cr, net profit ₹440 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+4 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 4 days (112 vs 108). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress7% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 7% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+20 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +20 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters added 0.7 pts; FIIs added 0.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 24,970 to 36,992 (+48%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters51.6%52.3%+0.7 pts
FIIs0.8%1.3%+0.5 pts
DIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
Public and others47.7%46.4%-1.3 pts

Number of shareholders

36,992shareholders+48% since Dec '23
25k31k37k43k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 24,970
Mar '24: 28,519
Jun '24: 33,216
Sep '24: 42,081
Dec '24: 43,125
Mar '25: 43,045
Jun '25: 42,832
Sep '25: 39,451
Dec '25: 37,000
Mar '26: 35,374
Jun '26: 36,992
25k31k37k43k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 24,970
Mar '24: 28,519
Jun '24: 33,216
Sep '24: 42,081
Dec '24: 43,125
Mar '25: 43,045
Jun '25: 42,832
Sep '25: 39,451
Dec '25: 37,000
Mar '26: 35,374
Jun '26: 36,992

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−5.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AEROFLEX ENTERPRISES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +41% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.9%, 80% range −9.5% to +6.7%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
EMKAYTOOLS · Jun 2024: −74.6% vs market
FROG · Dec 2024: −50.2% vs market
VASCONEQ · Jan 2024: −46.5% vs market
ALMONDZ · Oct 2024: −40.5% vs market
EKC · Dec 2024: −40.4% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Aug 2022: −40.0% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jul 2021: −36.8% vs market
MOREPENLAB · May 2025: −34.8% vs market
ORBTEXP · Jun 2023: −30.2% vs market
KITEX · Jun 2022: −29.6% vs market
GUJALKALI · Aug 2022: −28.3% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Oct 2022: −25.8% vs market
ADSL · Jun 2022: −24.2% vs market
NATIONALUM · Dec 2021: −23.2% vs market
ANDHRAPAP · Mar 2023: −21.0% vs market
GNFC · May 2022: −19.8% vs market
WINDLAS · Feb 2025: −16.2% vs market
CLSEL · Jul 2025: −15.1% vs market
ASAHISONG · Nov 2020: −15.0% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Sep 2024: −14.0% vs market
KIRIINDUS · Feb 2020: −12.9% vs market
CHEMFAB · Oct 2022: −12.1% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Dec 2021: −8.9% vs market
SESHAPAPER · Feb 2023: −8.4% vs market
MINDTECK · Jun 2024: −6.2% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Jun 2024: −4.8% vs market
MONTECARLO · Oct 2022: −2.4% vs market
KSL · Jun 2024: −2.0% vs market
MODISONLTD · Aug 2024: +1.1% vs market
CYBERTECH · Sep 2024: +1.3% vs market
CHEMBOND · Aug 2023: +4.2% vs market
NIITLTD · Jul 2021: +5.0% vs market
JGCHEM · Mar 2025: +5.8% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · May 2024: +8.8% vs market
JINDRILL · Jun 2023: +26.0% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Aug 2025: +39.2% vs market
RADHIKAJWE · Apr 2024: +39.8% vs market
IZMO · Dec 2024: +41.0% vs market
TIIL · Jun 2022: +48.8% vs market
DBCORP · Jun 2023: +53.2% vs market
ANTELOPUS · Jun 2023: +61.2% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Oct 2021: +77.8% vs market
DEEPINDS · Nov 2022: +78.6% vs market
DATAMATICS · Mar 2021: +110.2% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Sep 2023: +117.1% vs market
GOLDIAM · Mar 2020: +117.2% vs market
MANALIPETC · Jan 2021: +146.6% vs market
GRWRHITECH · May 2024: +147.7% vs market
BLISSGVS · Jun 2025: +241.0% vs market
AURIONPRO · Oct 2022: +281.5% vs market
Similar setups −5.5%All companies −4.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−5.5%
All companies' median
−4.6%
Beat the market
44% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NIITLTD
Commercial Services
Jul 2021 14x8% +235%−3% +5%
NAHARPOLY
Process Industries
Dec 2021 11x14% +193%−5% −9%
GUJALKALI
Process Industries
Aug 2022 11x13% +96%−14% −28%
ADSL
Technology Services
Jun 2022 11x9% +97%−26% −24%
IZMO
Technology Services
Dec 2024 15x10% +118%−14% +41%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DEEPINDS
Industrial Services
Nov 2022 12x8% +84%−15% +79%
JINDRILL
Industrial Services
Jun 2023 10x10% +88%−9% +26%
SHREEPUSHK
Process Industries
Aug 2025 17x12% +22%−22% +39%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AEROFLEX ENTERPRISES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Technology Services
64%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
Technology Services
64%similar
volatilityEPS growth
Process Industries
57%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Industrial Services
57%similar
market capoperating margin
Technology Services
51%similar
ROCEvolatility
Producer Manufacturing
52%similar
revenuevolatility
Producer Manufacturing
50%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
46%similar
revenue growthrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 7.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-12; price +10.8% that day.
  2. SepPriceRegained the 2024-10 peak, 6 months after the low.
  3. SepPriceFell 27% from the Sep 2026 peak to the Sep 2026 low.
  4. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2026-09-07; price +9.1% that day.
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 23.5x its 50-day median on 2026-06-18; price +7.6% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 56% from the Oct 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. JanPriceVolume reached 14.1x its 50-day median on 2026-01-22; price +10.5% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 66.4x its 50-day median on 2025-06-19; price +8.7% that day.
  7. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹533 cr.
  8. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.10x.
  9. JanPriceVolume reached 8.9x its 50-day median on 2025-01-17; price +8.8% that day.
  10. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  11. OctPriceRegained the 2023-08 peak, 7 months after the low.
  12. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. SepPriceVolume reached 13.2x its 50-day median on 2024-09-06; price -0.6% that day.
  14. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹500 cr.
  15. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  16. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.10x.
  17. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 5% to 1% of profit.
  18. MayPriceVolume reached 6.7x its 50-day median on 2024-05-10; price +3.5% that day.
  19. MarPriceFell 40% from the Aug 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  20. JanPriceVolume reached 9.4x its 50-day median on 2024-01-04; price +13.5% that day.
  21. JulPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2023-07-06; price +1.9% that day.
  22. JunPriceRegained the 2023-01 peak, 2 months after the low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history49 months · 2022-11 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.3x₹752 cr18.2%13.0%0.0x
2026-109.4x₹752 cr18.2%13.0%0.0x
2026-099.3x₹752 cr18.2%13.0%0.0x
2026-0824.4x₹697 cr8.9%13.0%0.0x
2026-0721.0x₹697 cr8.9%13.0%0.0x
2026-0624.9x₹697 cr8.9%13.0%0.0x
2026-0521.2x₹658 cr9.6%14.0%0.0x
2026-0420.6x₹658 cr9.6%14.0%0.0x
2026-0314.3x₹658 cr9.6%14.0%0.0x
2026-0218.0x₹624 cr9.2%14.0%0.0x
2026-0118.3x₹624 cr9.2%14.0%0.0x
2025-1219.6x₹624 cr9.2%14.0%0.0x
2025-1119.5x₹590 cr9.5%14.0%0.0x
2025-1019.6x₹590 cr9.5%14.0%0.0x
2025-0919.9x₹590 cr9.5%14.0%0.0x
2025-0818.5x₹579 cr10.0%14.0%0.0x
2025-0721.8x₹579 cr10.0%14.0%0.0x
2025-0622.1x₹579 cr10.0%14.0%0.0x
2025-0520.6x₹533 cr10.1%14.0%0.1x
2025-0418.8x₹533 cr10.1%14.0%0.1x
2025-0319.0x₹533 cr10.1%14.0%0.1x
2025-0220.7x₹494 cr9.2%14.0%0.1x
2025-0128.4x₹494 cr9.2%14.0%0.1x
2024-1225.8x₹494 cr9.2%14.0%0.1x
2024-116.4x₹493 cr29.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-106.8x₹493 cr29.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-097.2x₹493 cr29.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-085.2x₹500 cr36.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-074.6x₹500 cr36.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-063.9x₹500 cr36.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-0523.8x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2024-0426.1x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2024-0323.0x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2024-0227.3x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2024-0130.9x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-1230.4x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-1131.0x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-1024.5x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-0927.2x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-0831.8x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-0726.4x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-0621.2x₹466 cr14.8%17.0%0.4x
2023-0524.3x₹347 cr16.6%20.0%0.4x
2023-0418.0x₹347 cr16.6%20.0%0.4x
2023-0319.0x₹347 cr16.6%20.0%0.4x
2023-0220.7x₹347 cr16.6%20.0%0.4x
2023-0125.4x₹347 cr16.6%20.0%0.4x
2022-1221.5x₹347 cr16.6%20.0%0.4x
2022-1122.4x₹347 cr16.6%20.0%0.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback