अApnaFunda

ALL TIME PLASTICS LIMITED (ALLTIME)

Producer Manufacturing · Containers/Packaging · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.66 / 100
Profitability 50Balance sheet 82
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.28 / 100
Price 44Earnings 13

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹200.53 latest close · −20.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹175₹200₹225₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹175₹200₹225₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹200.53 month-end · −27.1% over 12 months

₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹200.53 month-end · −32.5% since Aug '25

₹200₹250₹300Aug '25Nov '25Feb '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250₹300Aug '25Apr '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹170.63 to ₹314.70 · 1-year volatility 47.4%

Was the rally earned?

-27%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 46 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 30.5x to 38.3x).
  • The share count rose 23%.
Net profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−18 ptsShare count changeShare price: −27%−27%Share priceNet profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29ProfitP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19P/EShare count change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−18SharesShare price: −27%−27%Share price
Net profit growth-29 ptsNet profit fell about 28%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+19 ptsThe P/E rose from 30.5x to 38.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-18 ptsShare count rose 23%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TIME TECHNOPLAST

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-46.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility47.4%annualised
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2026−45.3% 0%−20%−40%2026−45.3%
Largest drawdowns

-46.6% (2025-08 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-28: 7x the 50-day median, price -1.5% that day

2026-09-11: 6.9x the 50-day median, price +5.2% that day

2026-09-01: 12.1x the 50-day median, price +0.5% that day

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE36th
  • Op. margin65th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth27th
  • EPS growth13th
  • Debt/equity ↓63rd▲ 49 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓62nd▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓34th▼ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum22nd

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~23%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 38.3x, the price would imply about 23.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹200.53
P/E
38.3x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹1316 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹614 cr
P/S
2.1x
P/B
2.1x
ROE
5.6%
Operating Margin
14.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
70.2%
12M Momentum
-27.1%

52-week range

₹170.63₹314.70
21% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.16

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.5x
Share count, 1Y
+30.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 2checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance13%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 12.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Sep 2025, DIIs trimmed 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 40,361 to 28,843 (-29%) between Sep 2025 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '25Jun '26Change
Promoters70.1%70.2%0.0 pts
FIIs3.4%3.0%-0.4 pts
DIIs10.9%10.4%-0.6 pts
Public and others15.6%16.5%+1.0 pts

Number of shareholders

28,843shareholders-29% since Sep '25
29k33k37k40k Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 40,361
Dec '25: 31,378
Mar '26: 29,699
Jun '26: 28,843
29k33k37k40k Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 40,361
Dec '25: 31,378
Mar '26: 29,699
Jun '26: 28,843

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ALL TIME PLASTICS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +39% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.6%, 80% range −10.1% to +9.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
KAMOPAINTS · Jul 2024: −75.3% vs market
THEMISMED · Feb 2025: −54.0% vs market
OAL · Jun 2022: −49.6% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Apr 2024: −48.1% vs market
REPRO · Jun 2020: −42.9% vs market
SHIVALIK · Mar 2023: −41.8% vs market
HIKAL · Dec 2022: −41.6% vs market
PILITA · Oct 2025: −39.5% vs market
AIRAN · Sep 2025: −35.5% vs market
TAJGVK · Oct 2020: −29.0% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Jul 2024: −28.5% vs market
KOKUYOCMLN · Mar 2020: −24.4% vs market
PRECAM · Aug 2024: −24.1% vs market
LXCHEM · Aug 2025: −23.4% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Mar 2020: −23.0% vs market
DOLLAR · Aug 2023: −20.5% vs market
IKIO · Oct 2025: −18.4% vs market
UNIDT · Aug 2024: −14.5% vs market
YUKEN · Apr 2025: −13.4% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Jan 2024: −11.8% vs market
KRSNAA · Jul 2023: −11.1% vs market
ORIENTCER · Dec 2024: −9.6% vs market
SHK · Jan 2020: −9.3% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Jan 2020: −9.2% vs market
KOPRAN · Jun 2023: −7.3% vs market
MOTISONS · Sep 2025: −1.8% vs market
HARSHA · Jun 2025: −1.3% vs market
SHALBY · Nov 2021: 0% vs market
CONFIPET · May 2022: +9.5% vs market
NOVARTIND · May 2022: +10.5% vs market
SUBROS · Jun 2020: +11.0% vs market
BLISSGVS · Jul 2022: +12.2% vs market
XPROINDIA · Jun 2024: +17.4% vs market
INTLCONV · Oct 2022: +20.9% vs market
RAJRATAN · Jul 2025: +21.4% vs market
ADFFOODS · Mar 2024: +22.8% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Aug 2025: +34.6% vs market
APCOTEXIND · Apr 2020: +39.9% vs market
GAEL · Jan 2020: +54.9% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Sep 2021: +54.9% vs market
BEML · Feb 2023: +67.9% vs market
RUPA · Jun 2020: +75.2% vs market
TIRUMALCHM · Jun 2020: +77.4% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Mar 2023: +78.6% vs market
SAGCEM · Aug 2020: +85.7% vs market
NGLFINE · Sep 2025: +105.9% vs market
SHAILY · Aug 2023: +109.9% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Sep 2022: +133.1% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jul 2020: +143.6% vs market
RAMCOSYS · Jan 2020: +201.8% vs market
Similar setups −4.6%All companies −3.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.6%
All companies' median
−3.0%
Beat the market
44% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DOLLAR
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2023 47x9% −9%−20% −21%
CONFIPET
Retail Trade
May 2022 32x12% −8%−39% +10%
TTKHLTCARE
Health Technology
Jan 2020 30x15% −29%−42% −9%
PILITA
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2025 50x9% −23%−37% −40%
SHK
Process Industries
Jan 2020 18x12% −34%−35% −9%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NGLFINE
Health Technology
Sep 2025 42x10% −30%−34% +106%
SHAILY
Process Industries
Aug 2023 45x11% −13%−17% +110%
HERITGFOOD
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2020 12x14% −61%−61% −23%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ALL TIME PLASTICS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Electronic Technology
76%similar
revenuedebt/equity
Distribution Services
69%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
Process Industries
69%similar
promoter holdingROCE
Process Industries
66%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
EMSEMSLIMITED
Industrial Services
65%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Producer Manufacturing
71%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
71%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
KROSSKROSS
Producer Manufacturing
70%similar
revenuepromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

10 events since Sep '25

  1. OctPriceFell 47% from the Aug 2025 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹614 cr.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 12.1x its 50-day median on 2026-09-01; price +0.5% that day.
  4. AugDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.14x.
  5. AugSharesShare count is up 30.0% over 12 months.
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 82.9x its 50-day median on 2026-04-21; price +10.3% that day.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JanPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2026-01-23; price -10.4% that day.
Show 2 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history16 months · 2025-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1138.3x₹614 cr5.6%12.0%0.1x
2026-1037.5x₹614 cr5.5%12.0%0.1x
2026-0937.0x₹614 cr5.5%12.0%0.1x
2026-0834.6x₹610 cr5.7%12.0%0.1x
2026-0738.3x₹610 cr5.7%12.0%0.1x
2026-0640.9x₹610 cr5.7%12.0%0.1x
2026-0535.8x₹612 cr14.5%—0.9x
2026-0438.9x₹612 cr14.5%—0.9x
2026-0330.4x₹612 cr14.5%—0.9x
2026-0233.3x₹602 cr15.7%—0.9x
2026-0132.1x₹602 cr15.7%—0.9x
2025-1237.5x₹602 cr15.7%—0.9x
2025-1130.5x₹586 cr19.4%—0.9x
2025-1033.6x₹586 cr19.4%—0.9x
2025-0929.1x₹586 cr19.4%—0.9x
2025-0833.0x₹558 cr19.0%—0.9x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback