अApnaFunda

RISHABH INSTRUMENTS LIMITED (RISHABH)

Producer Manufacturing · Electrical Products · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.66 / 100
Profitability 62Growth 48Balance sheet 88
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.59 / 100
Price 45Earnings 85FII/DII 47

Passes these screensHigh Momentum

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹619.3 latest close · −4.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹700₹800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹700₹800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹619.3 month-end · +45.3% over 12 months

₹400₹600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹619.3 month-end · +18.4% over 3 years

₹200₹400₹600Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹619.3 month-end · +23.0% since Sep '23

₹200₹400₹600Sep '23May '24Dec '24Aug '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹315.00 to ₹852.00 · 1-year volatility 50.1%

Was the rally earned?

+45%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 89 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 42.4x to 29.5x), which took 44 points back.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +92 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+92 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −44 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−44 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: +45%+45%Share priceNet profit growth: +92 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+92ProfitP/E change: −44 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−44P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: +45%+45%Share price
Net profit growth+92 ptsNet profit rose about 114%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-44 ptsThe P/E fell from 42.4x to 29.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
+18%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 30 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 32.7x to 29.5x), which took 11 points back.
  • The share count rose 24%.
Net profit growth: +53 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+53 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−11 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−24 ptsShare count changeShare price: +18%+18%Share priceNet profit growth: +53 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+53ProfitP/E change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−11P/EShare count change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−24SharesShare price: +18%+18%Share price
Net profit growth+53 ptsNet profit rose about 63%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-11 ptsThe P/E fell from 32.7x to 29.5x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-24 ptsShare count rose 24%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-66.9%recovered 2026-07
1-year volatility50.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.003-year daily, correlation 0.41
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−66.3% 0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−66.3%
Largest drawdowns

-66.9% (2024-02 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-07)

-26.5% (2026-09 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-02: 6.8x the 50-day median, price +7.2% that day

2026-08-20: 11.4x the 50-day median, price -1.6% that day

2026-08-18: 5.3x the 50-day median, price -4.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

29.5xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history26th percentile
CheapestMedian 33.6xDearest

Usual range 26.9x to 54.5x since 2023-09.

Against Producer Manufacturing29.5x vs 29.6x
This company
29.5x
Sector median
29.6x

Close to the Producer Manufacturing median.

19.7x37.2x54.8x72.3xSep '23May '24Jan '25Sep '25May '26Nov '2619.7x37.2x54.8x72.3xSep '23Oct '24Nov '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE46th▲ 33 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin78th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth29th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth91st▲ 35 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓67th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓26th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓51st▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum86th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~26%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 49.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 26.3%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−0.6%/yrEPS, last 7 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+26.9 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank70thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-6%11%28% Sep 2023Nov 2026 -6%11%28% Sep 2023Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x28.0%29.1%30.3%
15x25.1%26.3%27.4%
20x21.6%22.7%23.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 26.3%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹619.30
P/E
29.5x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹2402 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹783 cr
P/S
3.1x
P/B
3.2x
ROE
10.9%
Operating Margin
17.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
69.4%
12M Momentum
45.3%

52-week range

₹315.00₹852.00
57% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
50.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.14

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
22.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.74x
Share count, 1Y
+2.6%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance19%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 19.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate28%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.74xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.74x (cash from operations ₹249 cr, net profit ₹143 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (62 vs 68). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress14% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 14% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-8 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -8 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs trimmed 5.3 pts; promoters trimmed 1.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 52,414 to 30,707 (-41%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters70.7%69.4%-1.3 pts
FIIs1.7%1.2%-0.5 pts
DIIs16.6%11.2%-5.3 pts
Public and others11.1%18.2%+7.1 pts

Number of shareholders

30,707shareholders-41% since Sep '23
31k38k45k52k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 52,414
Dec '23: 35,855
Mar '24: 35,478
Jun '24: 39,606
Sep '24: 42,223
Dec '24: 42,034
Mar '25: 41,056
Jun '25: 40,235
Sep '25: 35,765
Dec '25: 33,805
Mar '26: 32,231
Jun '26: 30,707
31k38k45k52k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 52,414
Dec '23: 35,855
Mar '24: 35,478
Jun '24: 39,606
Sep '24: 42,223
Dec '24: 42,034
Mar '25: 41,056
Jun '25: 40,235
Sep '25: 35,765
Dec '25: 33,805
Mar '26: 32,231
Jun '26: 30,707

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+3.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RISHABH INSTRUMENTS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +39% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+6.6%, 80% range −2.7% to +10.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
IFGLEXPOR · Jan 2024: −54.5% vs market
BHARATRAS · Feb 2025: −47.7% vs market
SDBL · Oct 2025: −41.0% vs market
KRBL · Feb 2023: −36.5% vs market
SHALBY · Dec 2023: −35.4% vs market
MOTISONS · Jul 2025: −34.8% vs market
CYIENT · Oct 2021: −32.4% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Apr 2021: −30.8% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Mar 2024: −27.9% vs market
GUJALKALI · May 2022: −26.1% vs market
DBCORP · Jan 2024: −24.5% vs market
GNA · Oct 2021: −24.5% vs market
CHEMFAB · Aug 2024: −21.0% vs market
ASAHISONG · May 2021: −19.6% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Jan 2023: −14.9% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Dec 2023: −14.8% vs market
ONMOBILE · Jul 2021: −11.7% vs market
GALLANTT · Aug 2025: −8.4% vs market
FIEMIND · May 2023: −6.3% vs market
BOROLTD · Feb 2022: −6.2% vs market
DATAMATICS · Sep 2025: −4.4% vs market
CONFIPET · Nov 2021: −3.3% vs market
SHREERAMA · May 2025: −1.0% vs market
SMSPHARMA · Nov 2020: +0.8% vs market
TCI · Aug 2022: +3.3% vs market
GEOJITFSL · Feb 2021: +3.7% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Jun 2025: +3.9% vs market
ADFFOODS · Jul 2025: +4.7% vs market
AVTNPL · Mar 2020: +5.8% vs market
WABAG · Apr 2025: +10.1% vs market
MANALIPETC · May 2021: +13.0% vs market
INFOBEAN · Sep 2025: +20.6% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Mar 2021: +20.7% vs market
GODFRYPHLP · Apr 2023: +27.9% vs market
ACE · Apr 2021: +33.4% vs market
INNOVACAP · Sep 2025: +35.2% vs market
AEGISLOG · May 2023: +37.3% vs market
ZENSARTECH · Jan 2024: +40.1% vs market
RAILTEL · Sep 2023: +42.0% vs market
TI · Apr 2025: +51.8% vs market
GOLDIAM · May 2021: +53.9% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Jan 2023: +65.5% vs market
BORORENEW · Aug 2021: +79.7% vs market
KPITTECH · Jul 2021: +80.8% vs market
NEULANDLAB · May 2024: +81.1% vs market
ELECON · Dec 2022: +100.2% vs market
GRWRHITECH · Feb 2024: +106.5% vs market
BALAMINES · Dec 2020: +172.7% vs market
BLISSGVS · May 2025: +217.7% vs market
HBLENGINE · Mar 2023: +220.8% vs market
Similar setups +3.5%All companies −3.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+3.5%
All companies' median
−3.1%
Beat the market
54% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GEOJITFSL
Finance
Feb 2021 28x13% +107%−12% +4%
CONFIPET
Retail Trade
Nov 2021 42x12% +165%−20% −3%
GRWRHITECH
Process Industries
Feb 2024 27x12% +210%−11% +107%
SHALBY
Health Services
Dec 2023 48x10% +101%−6% −35%
ELECON
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2022 29x17% +98%−22% +100%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ACE
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2021 31x16% +210%−16% +33%
ZENSARTECH
Technology Services
Jan 2024 39x15% +149%−9% +40%
BORORENEW
Process Industries
Aug 2021 50x10% +281%−14% +80%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RISHABH INSTRUMENTS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
73%similar
promoter holdingEPS growth
Process Industries
70%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
EMSEMSLIMITED
Industrial Services
67%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
Consumer Non-Durables
65%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Health Technology
62%similar
revenuepromoter holding
KROSSKROSS
Producer Manufacturing
73%similar
debt/equitypromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
72%similar
promoter holdingP/E
Producer Manufacturing
71%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

27 events since Dec '23

  1. NovPriceFell 26% from the Sep 2026 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 11.4x its 50-day median on 2026-08-20; price -1.6% that day.
  4. JulPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 16 months after the low.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 9% of profit).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 27.7x its 50-day median on 2026-05-19; price +13.6% that day.
  8. FebPriceVolume reached 17.7x its 50-day median on 2026-02-06; price +3.2% that day.
Show 19 earlier events
  1. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (27.1x).
  2. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. AugPriceVolume reached 224.9x its 50-day median on 2025-08-18; price +16.2% that day.
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2025-04-22; price +17.8% that day.
  7. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹710 cr.
  8. MarPriceFell 67% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  9. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  10. MarPriceVolume reached 14.6x its 50-day median on 2025-03-24; price +5.5% that day.
  11. NovPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2024-11-29; price +10.4% that day.
  12. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  13. SepSharesShare count is up 31.0% over 12 months.
  14. SepPriceVolume reached 11.6x its 50-day median on 2024-09-26; price +5.1% that day.
  15. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.4 pts over 2 quarters to 14.8%.
  16. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  17. MayPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2024-05-09; price +2.9% that day.
  18. FebPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2024-02-13; price -16.1% that day.
  19. DecPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2023-12-15; price +11.1% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history39 months · 2023-09 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1129.5x₹783 cr10.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-1029.8x₹783 cr11.0%14.0%0.1x
2026-0933.5x₹783 cr11.0%14.0%0.1x
2026-0833.3x₹775 cr11.1%14.0%0.1x
2026-0728.8x₹775 cr11.1%14.0%0.1x
2026-0627.0x₹775 cr11.1%14.0%0.1x
2026-0529.9x₹757 cr11.3%5.0%0.2x
2026-0426.6x₹757 cr11.3%5.0%0.2x
2026-0319.7x₹757 cr11.3%5.0%0.2x
2026-0228.4x₹754 cr9.2%5.0%0.2x
2026-0125.1x₹754 cr9.2%5.0%0.2x
2025-1227.1x₹754 cr9.2%5.0%0.2x
2025-1142.4x₹740 cr6.2%5.0%0.2x
2025-1040.8x₹740 cr6.2%5.0%0.2x
2025-0939.7x₹740 cr6.2%5.0%0.2x
2025-0870.9x₹719 cr3.4%5.0%0.2x
2025-0748.7x₹719 cr3.4%5.0%0.2x
2025-0650.3x₹719 cr3.4%5.0%0.2x
2025-0561.2x₹710 cr3.0%10.0%0.1x
2025-0452.8x₹710 cr3.0%10.0%0.1x
2025-0344.4x₹710 cr3.0%10.0%0.1x
2025-0245.1x₹688 cr2.9%10.0%0.1x
2025-0162.7x₹688 cr2.9%10.0%0.1x
2024-1272.3x₹688 cr2.9%10.0%0.1x
2024-1140.1x₹686 cr6.1%10.0%0.1x
2024-1038.1x₹686 cr6.1%10.0%0.1x
2024-0942.4x₹686 cr6.1%10.0%0.1x
2024-0833.6x₹689 cr7.0%10.0%0.1x
2024-0738.8x₹689 cr7.0%10.0%0.1x
2024-0640.6x₹689 cr7.0%10.0%0.1x
2024-0526.4x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2024-0429.8x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2024-0327.6x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2024-0231.0x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2024-0137.3x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2023-1236.4x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2023-1132.7x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2023-1029.7x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x
2023-0931.4x₹570 cr12.5%14.0%0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback