अApnaFunda

EMKAY TOOLS LIMITED (ETL)

Producer Manufacturing

Quality #2Profitability #6
Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.100 / 100
Profitability 100Balance sheet 100

Passes these screens: Quality Compounder · Debt-light & profitable

Share Price
₹1080.00
P/E
19.6x
ROCE
70.0%
Market Cap
₹1152 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹144 cr
P/S
8.0x
P/B
8.2x
ROE
41.9%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
75.0%
12M Momentum
23.1%

52-week range

₹719.00₹1297.00
62% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.39

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Was the rally earned?

+23%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 31 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 21.0x to 19.6x), which took 8 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
1 year Net profit growth: +32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+32 ptsP/E change: -8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.-8 ptsShare count change: -1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price. +23% 1 year Net profit growth: +32 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+32 ptsP/E change: -8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.Share count change: -1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price. +23%
Net profit growth+32 ptsNet profit rose about 33%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-8 ptsThe P/E fell from 21.0x to 19.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

What is the price implying?

~15%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 19.6x, the price would imply about 14.9%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

What changed?

  1. Sep '26Regained the 2025-07 peak, 8 months after the low.
  2. Sep '26Volume reached 17.2x its 50-day median on 2026-09-25; price +5.1% that day.
  3. Jun '26Started paying a dividend (payout 5% of profit).
  4. Jan '26Fell 29% from the Jul 2025 peak to the Jan 2026 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 1 checks are within range.
Tap a check to see how it is measured.

Other income reliance3%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 2.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-28.6%recovered 2026-09
1-year volatility47.6%annualised
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Monthly share price

₹820₹955₹1,090₹1,225 Jul '25Oct '25Jan '26Apr '26Jul '26Oct '26
2025-07: ₹1050.95
2025-08: ₹983.65
2025-09: ₹912.25
2025-10: ₹877.35
2025-11: ₹877.45
2025-12: ₹842.55
2026-01: ₹819.70
2026-02: ₹902.40
2026-03: ₹877.45
2026-04: ₹957.25
2026-05: ₹1044.50
2026-06: ₹1008.10
2026-07: ₹1002.10
2026-08: ₹1106.80
2026-09: ₹1225.00
2026-10: ₹1080.00
₹820₹955₹1,090₹1,225 Jul '25Dec '25May '26Oct '26
2025-07: ₹1050.95
2025-08: ₹983.65
2025-09: ₹912.25
2025-10: ₹877.35
2025-11: ₹877.45
2025-12: ₹842.55
2026-01: ₹819.70
2026-02: ₹902.40
2026-03: ₹877.45
2026-04: ₹957.25
2026-05: ₹1044.50
2026-06: ₹1008.10
2026-07: ₹1002.10
2026-08: ₹1106.80
2026-09: ₹1225.00
2026-10: ₹1080.00

Last 90 trading days

₹917₹1,020₹1,122₹1,225 May 21Jun 19Jul 20Aug 21Sep 23Oct 30
2026-05-21: ₹942.25
2026-05-26: ₹927.30
2026-05-29: ₹1044.50
2026-06-02: ₹1007.60
2026-06-04: ₹927.35
2026-06-08: ₹1022.05
2026-06-11: ₹922.35
2026-06-15: ₹1017.05
2026-06-17: ₹1027.05
2026-06-19: ₹967.20
2026-06-23: ₹957.25
2026-06-25: ₹997.10
2026-06-30: ₹1008.10
2026-07-02: ₹1037.00
2026-07-06: ₹1056.95
2026-07-09: ₹1086.85
2026-07-13: ₹984.65
2026-07-15: ₹967.25
2026-07-20: ₹1051.95
2026-07-22: ₹980.15
2026-07-24: ₹967.20
2026-07-28: ₹967.40
2026-07-31: ₹1002.10
2026-08-05: ₹967.20
2026-08-10: ₹1037.00
2026-08-12: ₹1027.05
2026-08-17: ₹979.10
2026-08-21: ₹1051.95
2026-08-25: ₹1074.90
2026-08-27: ₹1060.75
2026-08-31: ₹1106.80
2026-09-02: ₹1096.85
2026-09-04: ₹1044.00
2026-09-08: ₹1037.00
2026-09-10: ₹1037.00
2026-09-21: ₹1069.60
2026-09-23: ₹1118.00
2026-09-25: ₹1203.00
2026-09-29: ₹1210.00
2026-10-01: ₹1177.50
2026-10-06: ₹1125.00
2026-10-12: ₹1154.45
2026-10-21: ₹1187.50
2026-10-26: ₹1070.00
2026-10-29: ₹1100.00
2026-10-30: ₹1080.00
₹917₹1,020₹1,122₹1,225 May 21Jul 9Aug 31Oct 30
2026-05-21: ₹942.25
2026-05-26: ₹927.30
2026-05-29: ₹1044.50
2026-06-02: ₹1007.60
2026-06-04: ₹927.35
2026-06-08: ₹1022.05
2026-06-11: ₹922.35
2026-06-15: ₹1017.05
2026-06-17: ₹1027.05
2026-06-19: ₹967.20
2026-06-23: ₹957.25
2026-06-25: ₹997.10
2026-06-30: ₹1008.10
2026-07-02: ₹1037.00
2026-07-06: ₹1056.95
2026-07-09: ₹1086.85
2026-07-13: ₹984.65
2026-07-15: ₹967.25
2026-07-20: ₹1051.95
2026-07-22: ₹980.15
2026-07-24: ₹967.20
2026-07-28: ₹967.40
2026-07-31: ₹1002.10
2026-08-05: ₹967.20
2026-08-10: ₹1037.00
2026-08-12: ₹1027.05
2026-08-17: ₹979.10
2026-08-21: ₹1051.95
2026-08-25: ₹1074.90
2026-08-27: ₹1060.75
2026-08-31: ₹1106.80
2026-09-02: ₹1096.85
2026-09-04: ₹1044.00
2026-09-08: ₹1037.00
2026-09-10: ₹1037.00
2026-09-21: ₹1069.60
2026-09-23: ₹1118.00
2026-09-25: ₹1203.00
2026-09-29: ₹1210.00
2026-10-01: ₹1177.50
2026-10-06: ₹1125.00
2026-10-12: ₹1154.45
2026-10-21: ₹1187.50
2026-10-26: ₹1070.00
2026-10-29: ₹1100.00
2026-10-30: ₹1080.00

Drawdown from peak

0% -14% -28% Jul '25Mar '26Oct '26 0% -14% -28% Jul '25Mar '26Oct '26
Largest drawdowns

-28.6% (2025-07 peak to 2026-01 low, recovered 2026-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-25: 17.2x the 50-day median, price +5.1% that day

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Nov '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Oct '26
Lower rank Higher rank

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

CompanySectorSimilarityClosest on
GLOBAL EDUCATION (GLOBAL)Commercial Services59%debt/equity, revenue
SAFE ENTERPRISES RETAIL (SAFEENTP)Miscellaneous48%debt/equity, market cap
CANARA ROBECO ASSET MANAGEMENT (CRAMC)Finance41%P/E, promoter holding
SHRI AHIMSA NATURALS (SHRIAHIMSA)Consumer Non-Durables37%revenue, market cap
GRAUER & WEIL (INDIA) (GRAUWEIL)Process Industries31%volatility, P/E
EURO PRATIK SALES (EUROPRATIK)Producer Manufacturing60%P/E, ROCE
DANISH POWER (DANISH)Producer Manufacturing51%debt/equity, promoter holding
INDOSOLAR (WAAREEINDO)Producer Manufacturing41%ROCE, promoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What happened next to similar setups

−14.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like EMKAY TOOLS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +2% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −10.7%, 80% range −20.7% to −8.2%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
BASILIC · May 2025: −49.6% vs market
FCL · Feb 2024: −44.4% vs market
SASKEN · Aug 2021: −43.2% vs market
TANLA · Oct 2021: −41.4% vs market
ACE · Dec 2024: −40.5% vs market
VOLTAMP · Aug 2024: −40.0% vs market
SHREDIGCEM · Jul 2021: −39.7% vs market
ACCELYA · Feb 2020: −37.2% vs market
LIKHITHA · Mar 2023: −33.6% vs market
MOLDTECH · Mar 2020: −33.0% vs market
IEX · Mar 2025: −32.9% vs market
DENTALKART · Apr 2025: −31.8% vs market
GMBREW · Oct 2025: −30.4% vs market
CASTROLIND · Jun 2020: −30.3% vs market
BDL · Jul 2020: −30.3% vs market
MPSLTD · Jun 2025: −29.4% vs market
ZTECH · Sep 2025: −28.1% vs market
RHIM · Feb 2020: −25.0% vs market
GILLETTE · Sep 2025: −24.9% vs market
KSCL · Jun 2020: −22.1% vs market
GANDHITUBE · Oct 2023: −21.9% vs market
SUNTV · May 2020: −19.2% vs market
OFSS · May 2020: −17.5% vs market
SIRCA · Sep 2020: −16.5% vs market
SWARAJENG · Jul 2025: −15.5% vs market
VSTTILLERS · Sep 2023: −13.0% vs market
ESABINDIA · Jul 2020: −12.9% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · Aug 2025: −12.6% vs market
CAPLIPOINT · Apr 2020: −12.1% vs market
INGERRAND · Aug 2023: −11.0% vs market
VIMTALABS · Jan 2025: −9.5% vs market
ANUP · Sep 2020: −8.7% vs market
RPGLIFE · Jun 2025: −7.7% vs market
ALIVUS · Mar 2025: −7.6% vs market
PRIMESECU · Jul 2025: −7.6% vs market
DOLATALGO · Mar 2021: −1.7% vs market
SJS · Dec 2022: −1.2% vs market
MONARCH · Jul 2025: +2.7% vs market
FOSECOIND · May 2025: +5.6% vs market
SIGMA · Aug 2025: +11.8% vs market
WEALTH · Jun 2022: +15.0% vs market
EXPLEOSOL · Sep 2020: +16.7% vs market
PGHL · Feb 2020: +17.7% vs market
SUPRIYA · Sep 2025: +29.8% vs market
TIPSMUSIC · May 2023: +53.2% vs market
THYROCARE · Jun 2020: +58.0% vs market
STEELCAS · Oct 2025: +70.2% vs market
LTTS · Dec 2020: +77.4% vs market
KSOLVES · Jan 2023: +104.5% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Jun 2025: +147.6% vs market
Similar setups −14.3%All companies −3.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−14.3%
All companies' median
−3.6%
Beat the market
26% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ACCELYA
Technology Services
Feb 2020 13x86% +13%−13% −37%
ANUP
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2020 15x— +38%−3% −9%
KSOLVES
Technology Services
Jan 2023 32x140% +29%−9% +105%
RPGLIFE
Health Technology
Jun 2025 22x— +51%−12% −8%
FOSECOIND
Process Industries
May 2025 40x— +27%−10% +6%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GMBREW
Consumer Non-Durables
Oct 2025 22x— +54%−3% −30%
PGHL
Health Technology
Feb 2020 8x78% +33%−15% +18%
TIPSMUSIC
Consumer Services
May 2023 38x86% +19%0% +53%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to EMKAY TOOLS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-10-30. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 97,430 company-months from 2000 companies; financial: 5,632 company-months from 106 companies. 2240 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.
Monthly history (16 months)
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1019.6x₹144 cr41.9%70.0%0.0x
2026-0922.3x₹144 cr42.1%70.0%0.0x
2026-0820.1x₹144 cr42.1%70.0%0.0x
2026-0718.2x₹144 cr42.1%70.0%0.0x
2026-0618.3x₹144 cr42.1%70.0%0.0x
2026-0525.1x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2026-0423.0x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2026-0321.0x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2026-0221.6x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2026-0119.7x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2025-1220.2x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2025-1121.0x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2025-1021.0x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2025-0921.9x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2025-0823.6x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x
2025-0725.2x₹117 cr53.0%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback