अApnaFunda

RPG LIFE SCIENCES LIMITED (RPGLIFE)

Health Technology · Pharmaceuticals: Major · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.88 / 100
Profitability 75Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.74 / 100
Price 62FII/DII 87

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitable

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹2,596 latest close · +7.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹2,500₹2,750₹3,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹2,500₹2,750₹3,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹2,596 month-end · +14.0% over 12 months

₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹2,596 month-end · +4.6% since Jun '25

₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Jun '25Sep '25Jan '26Apr '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹2,500₹3,000Jun '25Mar '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹1733.00 to ₹3127.80 · 1-year volatility 43.6%

Was the rally earned?

+14%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 20.6x to 35.9x); per-share earnings took off 46 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −46 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−46 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +60 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+60 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +14%+14%Share priceNet profit growth: −46 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−46ProfitP/E change: +60 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+60P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +14%+14%Share price
Net profit growth-46 ptsNet profit fell about 35%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+60 ptsThe P/E rose from 20.6x to 35.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-55.6%recovered 2020-08
1-year volatility43.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.043-year daily, correlation 0.36
Volume spikes13last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−51.1% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−51.1%
Largest drawdowns

-55.6% (2020-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-08)

-42.3% (2019-04 peak to 2019-08 low, recovered 2019-11)

-38.3% (2024-10 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-30: 8.7x the 50-day median, price -14.3% that day

2026-10-29: 8.6x the 50-day median, price +5.6% that day

2026-09-29: 6.8x the 50-day median, price +4.5% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Where does it rank among Health Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Health Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE83rd
  • Op. margin67th
  • Revenue growth53rd
  • EPS growth18th
  • Debt/equity ↓80th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓73rd▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓53rd▼ 24 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum57th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Health Technology sector page Watch it move against Health Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~21%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 35.9x, the price would imply about 20.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Health Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹2596.00
P/E
35.9x
ROCE
26.0%
Market Cap
₹4293 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹735 cr
P/S
5.8x
P/B
7.1x
ROE
19.7%
Operating Margin
22.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
73.0%
12M Momentum
14.0%

52-week range

₹1733.00₹3127.80
62% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.05

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
100.0x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 2checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance18%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 18.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 6.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 21,866 to 23,886 (+9%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters72.8%73.0%+0.1 pts
FIIs0.6%0.9%+0.4 pts
DIIs1.8%8.7%+6.9 pts
Public and others24.9%17.4%-7.4 pts

Number of shareholders

23,886shareholders+9% since Dec '23
22k23k25k27k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 21,866
Mar '24: 22,137
Jun '24: 22,232
Sep '24: 23,481
Dec '24: 24,891
Mar '25: 24,867
Jun '25: 25,832
Sep '25: 26,657
Dec '25: 25,905
Mar '26: 25,282
Jun '26: 23,886
22k23k25k27k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 21,866
Mar '24: 22,137
Jun '24: 22,232
Sep '24: 23,481
Dec '24: 24,891
Mar '25: 24,867
Jun '25: 25,832
Sep '25: 26,657
Dec '25: 25,905
Mar '26: 25,282
Jun '26: 23,886

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−12.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RPG LIFE SCIENCES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −31% to +19% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−6.4%, 80% range −13.6% to +3.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
VEEDOL · Jun 2021: −58.5% vs market
GODFRYPHLP · Apr 2020: −46.4% vs market
OAL · Jul 2021: −42.3% vs market
NUCLEUS · Oct 2020: −40.3% vs market
NINSYS · Feb 2025: −39.9% vs market
BDL · Aug 2020: −37.7% vs market
INTELLECT · Sep 2025: −37.4% vs market
SAREGAMA · Feb 2025: −36.4% vs market
CONCORDBIO · Nov 2024: −35.9% vs market
EMAMILTD · Apr 2025: −33.3% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Jul 2024: −33.0% vs market
CARERATING · Oct 2021: −31.2% vs market
ACUTAAS · Jun 2023: −30.7% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Mar 2021: −30.5% vs market
ELECON · Dec 2024: −28.1% vs market
SUPREMEIND · May 2024: −25.3% vs market
VESUVIUS · Aug 2025: −24.7% vs market
SUMICHEM · Jun 2025: −20.7% vs market
KSB · Apr 2024: −20.1% vs market
CERA · Jul 2023: −20.0% vs market
BLS · Nov 2024: −18.3% vs market
EIHOTEL · Sep 2025: −16.8% vs market
FINEORG · Jul 2025: −13.8% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · Aug 2025: −12.8% vs market
NEWGEN · Jul 2024: −12.4% vs market
ENGINERSIN · May 2024: −12.1% vs market
JUSTDIAL · Jan 2020: −10.2% vs market
KENNAMET · Oct 2022: −8.9% vs market
MPSLTD · Oct 2024: −1.3% vs market
GARFIBRES · Aug 2025: −1.3% vs market
INDGN · Aug 2025: +4.7% vs market
LAOPALA · May 2020: +5.1% vs market
RHIM · Aug 2022: +11.0% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Jan 2022: +11.1% vs market
DHANUKA · Feb 2020: +13.7% vs market
SASKEN · Oct 2020: +17.2% vs market
FINPIPE · Apr 2020: +17.8% vs market
AJANTPHARM · Jul 2025: +19.5% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Feb 2021: +19.8% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Aug 2020: +20.3% vs market
AMRUTANJAN · Sep 2020: +20.7% vs market
CAPLIPOINT · Feb 2024: +28.1% vs market
TRITURBINE · Dec 2022: +28.3% vs market
RATEGAIN · Sep 2025: +31.3% vs market
THYROCARE · Jan 2020: +36.1% vs market
FCL · May 2022: +48.7% vs market
GRINDWELL · Sep 2021: +49.9% vs market
INGERRAND · Nov 2021: +70.0% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Jul 2025: +110.5% vs market
AEROFLEX · Jun 2025: +121.2% vs market
Similar setups −12.2%All companies −5.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−12.2%
All companies' median
−5.8%
Beat the market
40% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BLS
Technology Services
Nov 2024 45x31% +47%−15% −18%
VESUVIUS
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2025 40x25% −7%−19% −25%
JYOTHYLAB
Consumer Non-Durables
Jul 2024 52x27% +69%−4% −33%
LAOPALA
Consumer Durables
May 2020 22x21% −26%−34% +5%
DHANUKA
Process Industries
Feb 2020 20x23% +16%−14% +14%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TRITURBINE
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2022 31x21% +37%−15% +28%
SUMICHEM
Process Industries
Jun 2025 52x25% +10%−14% −21%
ADVENZYMES
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2020 17x22% +35%−17% +20%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, P/S and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RPG LIFE SCIENCES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
66%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Finance
64%similar
revenuevolatility
Producer Manufacturing
60%similar
ROCErevenue
MPSMPSLTD
Consumer Services
59%similar
revenuemarket cap
Commercial Services
59%similar
volatilityoperating margin
Health Technology
60%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Health Technology
44%similar
revenueROCE
Health Technology
39%similar
ROCEpromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Dec '20

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 8.7x its 50-day median on 2026-10-30; price -14.3% that day.
  2. JulPriceRegained the 2024-10 peak, 4 months after the low.
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 21.0x its 50-day median on 2026-07-10; price +7.5% that day.
  4. AprPriceVolume reached 207.5x its 50-day median on 2026-04-30; price +13.0% that day.
  5. MarPriceFell 38% from the Oct 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. JanPriceVolume reached 33.9x its 50-day median on 2026-01-28; price -6.7% that day.
  7. OctPriceVolume reached 30.6x its 50-day median on 2025-10-20; price +5.4% that day.
  8. JulPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2025-07-28; price -9.9% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. AprPriceVolume reached 32.5x its 50-day median on 2025-04-29; price +2.8% that day.
  2. JanPriceVolume reached 24.8x its 50-day median on 2025-01-27; price +9.0% that day.
  3. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.7 pts over 2 quarters to 6.8%.
  4. OctPriceVolume reached 10.1x its 50-day median on 2024-10-07; price +1.8% that day.
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 33.5x its 50-day median on 2024-07-22; price +3.0% that day.
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2024-06-10; price +4.2% that day.
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 11.9x its 50-day median on 2024-03-06; price +3.2% that day.
  8. JulPriceRegained the 2022-11 peak, 4 months after the low.
  9. JulPriceVolume reached 8.4x its 50-day median on 2023-07-13; price +3.4% that day.
  10. JunPriceVolume reached 39.9x its 50-day median on 2023-06-09; price +11.4% that day.
  11. MarPriceFell 34% from the Nov 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  12. NovPriceVolume reached 11.7x its 50-day median on 2022-11-11; price +10.3% that day.
  13. AugPriceRegained the 2021-11 peak, 3 months after the low.
  14. AugPriceVolume reached 60.1x its 50-day median on 2022-08-03; price +10.2% that day.
  15. MayPriceFell 36% from the Nov 2021 peak to the May 2022 low.
  16. AprPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2022-04-29; price +0.3% that day.
  17. MarPriceVolume reached 23.1x its 50-day median on 2022-03-21; price -2.1% that day.
  18. NovPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2021-11-01; price +13.9% that day.
  19. SepPriceVolume reached 31.9x its 50-day median on 2021-09-01; price +13.7% that day.
  20. AprPriceVolume reached 48.7x its 50-day median on 2021-04-20; price +19.6% that day.
  21. JanPriceVolume reached 19.4x its 50-day median on 2021-01-20; price +9.9% that day.
  22. DecPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2020-12-28; price +1.7% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history18 months · 2025-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1135.9x₹735 cr19.7%26.0%0.0x
2026-1035.7x₹735 cr19.8%26.0%0.0x
2026-0942.0x₹735 cr19.8%26.0%0.0x
2026-0837.8x₹708 cr19.0%26.0%0.0x
2026-0739.8x₹708 cr19.0%26.0%0.0x
2026-0632.9x₹708 cr19.0%26.0%0.0x
2026-0518.2x₹674 cr38.1%—0.0x
2026-0418.7x₹674 cr38.1%—0.0x
2026-0315.2x₹674 cr38.1%—0.0x
2026-0214.4x₹667 cr40.6%—0.0x
2026-0115.4x₹667 cr40.6%—0.0x
2025-1217.8x₹667 cr40.6%—0.0x
2025-1120.6x₹653 cr34.5%—0.0x
2025-1021.7x₹653 cr34.5%—0.0x
2025-0920.2x₹653 cr34.5%—0.0x
2025-0820.9x₹653 cr34.5%—0.0x
2025-0721.7x₹653 cr34.5%—0.0x
2025-0622.4x₹653 cr34.5%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback