अApnaFunda
Menu

LA OPALA RG LIMITED (LAOPALA)

Consumer Durables · Home Furnishings · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.60 / 100
Profitability 72Growth 8Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.22 / 100
Price 16Earnings 34FII/DII 18
Compare withASAHI INDIA GLASSTTK PRESTIGECELLO WORLD

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹152.49 latest close · −13.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹152.49 month-end · −28.7% over 12 months

₹150₹175₹200Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹175₹200Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹152.49 month-end · −58.9% over 3 years

₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹152.49 month-end · −26.3% since Jan '19

₹200₹300₹400Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹137.45 to ₹227.85 · 1-year volatility 27.9%

Was the rally earned?

-29%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 24.2x to 18.2x); per-share earnings took off 4 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −29%−29%Share priceNet profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4ProfitP/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −29%−29%Share price
Net profit growth-4 ptsNet profit fell about 5%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-24 ptsThe P/E fell from 24.2x to 18.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-59%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 33.5x to 18.2x); per-share earnings took off 18 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−18 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−40 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −59%−59%Share priceNet profit growth: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−18ProfitP/E change: −40 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−40P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −59%−59%Share price
Net profit growth-18 ptsNet profit fell about 24%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-40 ptsThe P/E fell from 33.5x to 18.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-53%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 44 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 72.2x to 18.2x), which took 97 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +44 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+44 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −97 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−97 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −53%−53%Share priceNet profit growth: +44 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+44ProfitP/E change: −97 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−97P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −53%−53%Share price
Net profit growth+44 ptsNet profit rose about 87%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-97 ptsThe P/E fell from 72.2x to 18.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ASAHI INDIA GLASS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-69.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility27.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.643-year daily, correlation 0.34
Volume spikes6last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−69.4% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−69.4%
Largest drawdowns

-69.9% (2023-07 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-43.8% (2021-12 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-06)

-39.5% (2019-01 peak to 2019-12 low, recovered 2020-02)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-13: 12.6x the 50-day median, price +2.6% that day

2026-08-13: 5.6x the 50-day median, price +2.3% that day

2026-08-06: 8.1x the 50-day median, price -1.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

18.2xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history3rd percentile
CheapestMedian 28.6xDearest

Usual range 21.0x to 60.7x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Durables18.2x vs 25.5x
This company
18.2x
Sector median
25.5x

29% below the Consumer Durables median.

13.1x39.5x65.9x92.3xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '2613.1x39.5x65.9x92.3xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE45th▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin99thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth11thflat vs a year ago
  • EPS growth18thflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓91stflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓2nd▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓70th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum27th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~9%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 16.0x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 8.5%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered6.1%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+2.5 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank484thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%15%29% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%15%29% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x9.5%10.5%11.5%
15x7.6%8.5%9.5%
20x5.1%6.0%7.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 8.5%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 18%/yr; EPS has since grown 3%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 18%/yr; EPS has since grown 2%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 28%/yr; EPS has since grown 13%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹152.49
P/E
18.2x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹1696 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹314 cr
P/S
5.4x
P/B
2.1x
ROE
11.4%
Operating Margin
36.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
66.3%
12M Momentum
-28.7%

52-week range

₹137.45₹227.85
17% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
27.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.61

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
31.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.78x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance24%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 24.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.78xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.78x (cash from operations ₹248 cr, net profit ₹317 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (35 vs 29). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+9 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +9 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 1.0 pts; DIIs trimmed 0.6 pts; promoters added 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 72,458 to 58,757 (-19%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters65.6%66.3%+0.6 pts
FIIs1.5%0.5%-1.0 pts
DIIs19.3%18.6%-0.6 pts
Public and others13.6%14.6%+1.0 pts

Number of shareholders

58,757shareholders-19% since Dec '23
59k65k71k78k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 72,458
Mar '24: 77,590
Jun '24: 68,437
Sep '24: 65,912
Dec '24: 62,289
Mar '25: 62,800
Jun '25: 61,229
Sep '25: 60,987
Dec '25: 60,050
Mar '26: 58,607
Jun '26: 58,757
 59k65k71k78k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 72,458
Mar '24: 77,590
Jun '24: 68,437
Sep '24: 65,912
Dec '24: 62,289
Mar '25: 62,800
Jun '25: 61,229
Sep '25: 60,987
Dec '25: 60,050
Mar '26: 58,607
Jun '26: 58,757

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+8.4%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LA OPALA RG LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −15% to +46% vs the market, against +1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+7.6%, 80% range −1.7% to +12.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
NDTV · Apr 2024: −49.5% vs market
SANOFI · Oct 2024: −31.4% vs market
CHEMCON · Jul 2022: −30.4% vs market
BALAMINES · Aug 2024: −29.0% vs market
DELTACORP · Apr 2025: −27.9% vs market
MANINFRA · Aug 2025: −27.8% vs market
WHIRLPOOL · May 2023: −26.9% vs market
GMDCLTD · Jan 2020: −24.4% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Oct 2020: −21.9% vs market
SANDESH · Mar 2021: −18.4% vs market
BHARATRAS · Jun 2023: −17.2% vs market
KSCL · Jun 2022: −16.5% vs market
NOCIL · Jun 2023: −14.8% vs market
VESUVIUS · Nov 2020: −14.1% vs market
INDIGOPNTS · Jun 2025: −12.8% vs market
TTKPRESTIG · Dec 2023: −7.1% vs market
VINATIORGA · Aug 2024: −5.8% vs market
MOIL · Nov 2020: −3.1% vs market
WONDERLA · May 2020: −2.6% vs market
ACI · Oct 2024: −0.2% vs market
NESCO · Dec 2021: +1.0% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Nov 2022: +1.7% vs market
STARCEMENT · Oct 2021: +2.6% vs market
AIAENG · Nov 2024: +6.3% vs market
BSE · Mar 2020: +7.0% vs market
TECHNOE · Jul 2020: +9.7% vs market
FINCABLES · Jun 2020: +11.4% vs market
GANDHITUBE · Nov 2020: +11.9% vs market
ICRA · Jun 2021: +13.4% vs market
INDNIPPON · Jan 2021: +14.8% vs market
EXCELINDUS · May 2021: +17.4% vs market
FDC · Jul 2022: +18.0% vs market
THYROCARE · Jan 2024: +21.0% vs market
DIVGIITTS · Feb 2025: +24.2% vs market
GPPL · Aug 2022: +36.4% vs market
SUPRIYA · Sep 2023: +38.1% vs market
SASKEN · Apr 2020: +42.8% vs market
RAILTEL · Jul 2022: +47.6% vs market
LMW · May 2020: +49.3% vs market
CARERATING · Sep 2022: +49.4% vs market
ALLDIGI · Mar 2020: +52.7% vs market
QUICKHEAL · Oct 2022: +56.3% vs market
HAPPYFORGE · Jun 2025: +59.7% vs market
MAHLIFE · Apr 2020: +68.4% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Jun 2021: +77.8% vs market
VIMTALABS · Jun 2024: +85.3% vs market
GEOJITFSL · May 2020: +91.3% vs market
BDL · Dec 2021: +133.7% vs market
ANUP · Nov 2022: +148.7% vs market
NEWGEN · Jan 2023: +186.1% vs market
Similar setups +8.4%All companies +0.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+8.4%
All companies' median
+0.8%
Beat the market
60% vs 51%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GPPL
Transportation		 Aug 2022 20x14% −15%−25% +36%
CARERATING
Commercial Services		 Sep 2022 20x16% −24%−30% +49%
TECHNOE
Industrial Services		 Jul 2020 11x13% −30%−42% +10%
KSCL
Process Industries		 Jun 2022 14x16% −30%−34% −17%
ADVENZYMES
Consumer Non-Durables		 Nov 2022 27x16% −13%−20% +2%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
WONDERLA
Consumer Services		 May 2020 13x10% −60%−61% −3%
MOIL
Non-Energy Minerals		 Nov 2020 20x11% −11%−25% −3%
DELTACORP
Consumer Services		 Apr 2025 16x13% −24%−37% −28%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LA OPALA RG LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

MAN INFRACONSTRUCTIONMANINFRA
Finance
63%similar
EPS growthrevenue growth
PTL ENTERPRISESPTL
Finance
61%similar
ROCErevenue
KAVERI SEED COMPANYKSCL
Process Industries
53%similar
operating marginEPS growth
MATRIMONY.COMMATRIMONY
Technology Services
51%similar
revenuemarket cap
GM BREWERIESGMBREW
Consumer Non-Durables
50%similar
market capdebt/equity
CERA SANITARYWARECERA
Consumer Durables
33%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
STUDDS ACCESSORIESSTUDDS
Consumer Durables
32%similar
market capdebt/equity
CELLO WORLDCELLO
Consumer Durables
31%similar
debt/equityROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Nov '22

  1. OctPriceFell 70% from the Jul 2023 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 12.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-13; price +2.6% that day.
  3. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (20.9x).
  4. AugPriceVolume reached 103.5x its 50-day median on 2026-08-05; price +3.0% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. AprPriceVolume reached 10.7x its 50-day median on 2026-04-08; price -0.5% that day.
  8. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  2. FebPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2026-02-27; price +1.2% that day.
  3. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (24.2x).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2025-09-09; price +5.7% that day.
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 7.3x its 50-day median on 2025-06-10; price +6.7% that day.
  6. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 28.4x its 50-day median on 2025-02-21; price +4.3% that day.
  8. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (25.3x).
  9. DecPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2024-12-10; price +8.5% that day.
  10. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  11. SepPriceVolume reached 25.9x its 50-day median on 2024-09-09; price +5.5% that day.
  12. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  13. JunPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2024-06-14; price -3.5% that day.
  14. MarPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2024-03-13; price -5.0% that day.
  15. OctPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2023-10-18; price +5.0% that day.
  16. JulPriceVolume reached 13.2x its 50-day median on 2023-07-04; price +3.6% that day.
  17. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹452 cr.
  18. JunPriceRegained the 2021-12 peak, 12 months after the low.
  19. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  20. JunPriceVolume reached 13.1x its 50-day median on 2023-06-21; price +8.0% that day.
  21. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  22. NovPriceVolume reached 6.7x its 50-day median on 2022-11-14; price +3.0% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1118.2x₹314 cr11.4%14.0%0.0x
2026-1016.8x₹314 cr11.3%14.0%0.0x
2026-0918.6x₹314 cr11.3%14.0%0.0x
2026-0820.9x₹308 cr11.2%14.0%0.0x
2026-0721.6x₹308 cr11.2%14.0%0.0x
2026-0621.1x₹308 cr11.2%14.0%0.0x
2026-0519.1x₹317 cr12.4%15.0%0.0x
2026-0419.0x₹317 cr12.4%15.0%0.0x
2026-0317.4x₹317 cr12.4%15.0%0.0x
2026-0222.1x₹324 cr12.3%15.0%0.0x
2026-0120.7x₹324 cr12.3%15.0%0.0x
2025-1221.6x₹324 cr12.3%15.0%0.0x
2025-1124.2x₹324 cr11.9%15.0%0.0x
2025-1025.3x₹324 cr11.9%15.0%0.0x
2025-0926.6x₹324 cr11.9%15.0%0.0x
2025-0827.1x₹332 cr11.8%15.0%0.0x
2025-0730.9x₹332 cr11.8%15.0%0.0x
2025-0629.2x₹332 cr11.8%15.0%0.0x
2025-0528.1x₹338 cr11.2%19.0%0.0x
2025-0425.9x₹338 cr11.2%19.0%0.0x
2025-0324.3x₹338 cr11.2%19.0%0.0x
2025-0219.0x₹354 cr13.6%19.0%0.0x
2025-0125.3x₹354 cr13.6%19.0%0.0x
2024-1229.8x₹354 cr13.6%19.0%0.0x
2024-1128.6x₹352 cr14.5%19.0%0.0x
2024-1030.2x₹352 cr14.5%19.0%0.0x
2024-0930.8x₹352 cr14.5%19.0%0.0x
2024-0828.0x₹365 cr15.0%19.0%0.0x
2024-0727.2x₹365 cr15.0%19.0%0.0x
2024-0627.2x₹365 cr15.0%19.0%0.0x
2024-0527.2x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2024-0428.6x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2024-0326.2x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2024-0229.7x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2024-0132.3x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-1232.6x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-1133.5x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-1037.2x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-0937.8x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-0838.5x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-0741.6x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-0638.0x₹452 cr15.9%22.0%0.0x
2023-0549.0x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2023-0447.5x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2023-0342.0x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2023-0244.0x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2023-0146.4x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-1247.2x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-1149.1x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-1048.2x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0941.7x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0843.9x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0736.0x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0633.3x₹323 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0557.9x₹211 cr7.5%10.0%0.0x
2022-0466.4x₹211 cr7.5%10.0%0.0x
2022-0375.6x₹211 cr7.5%10.0%0.0x
2022-0274.2x₹211 cr7.5%10.0%0.0x
2022-0185.1x₹211 cr7.5%10.0%0.0x
2021-1292.4x₹211 cr7.5%10.0%0.0x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback