अApnaFunda

PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED (PTL)

Finance · Real Estate Development · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.64 / 100
Profitability 68Growth 25Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.54 / 100
Price 69Earnings 43FII/DII 49

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹39.79 latest close · −4.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹38₹40₹42Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹38₹40₹42Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹39.79 month-end · +5.8% over 12 months

₹36₹38₹40₹42Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹36₹38₹40₹42Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹39.79 month-end · +2.0% over 3 years

₹35₹40₹45Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹35₹40₹45Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹39.79 month-end · +112.9% since Jan '19

₹20₹40Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹20₹40Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹35.22 to ₹42.70 · 1-year volatility 17.1%

Was the rally earned?

+6%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 10.9x to 11.6x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+6 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +6%+6%Share priceNet profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1ProfitP/E change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+6P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +6%+6%Share price
Net profit growth-1 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change+6 ptsThe P/E rose from 10.9x to 11.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+2%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (+2%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+2 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +2%+2%Share priceNet profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1ProfitP/E change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+2P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +2%+2%Share price
Net profit growth-1 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change+2 ptsThe P/E rose from 11.3x to 11.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+79%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 6.5x to 11.6x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +79 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+79 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +79%+79%Share priceNet profit growth: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−1ProfitP/E change: +79 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+79P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +79%+79%Share price
Net profit growth-1 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change+79 ptsThe P/E rose from 6.5x to 11.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DLF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-41.8%recovered 2020-07
1-year volatility17.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.663-year daily, correlation 0.46
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−37.8% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−37.8%
Largest drawdowns

-41.8% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-07)

-31.0% (2024-02 peak to 2025-03 low, not yet recovered)

-30.9% (2021-12 peak to 2022-02 low, recovered 2023-09)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

11.6xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history89th percentile
CheapestMedian 8.8xDearest

Usual range 5.0x to 11.7x since 2019-01.

Against Finance11.6x vs 18.1x
This company
11.6x
Sector median
18.1x

36% below the Finance median.

3.8x11.2x18.6x26.0xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '263.8x11.2x18.6x26.0xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE68th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth30th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth45th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓56thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓97thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓77th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum74thflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~13%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 19.3x, the price would imply about 13.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Earnings figures have not updated recently, so the company is left out of the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹39.79
P/E
11.6x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹527 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹450 cr
P/S
1.2x
P/B
0.7x
ROE
5.9%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
69.8%
12M Momentum
5.8%

52-week range

₹35.22₹42.70
61% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
17.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.40

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.21x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 6checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance12%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 12.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion2.21xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.21x (cash from operations ₹230 cr, net profit ₹104 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (44 vs 44). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 43,291 to 47,099 (+9%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters69.8%69.8%0.0 pts
FIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.9%0.9%0.0 pts
Public and others21.9%21.9%0.0 pts

Number of shareholders

47,099shareholders+9% since Sep '23
43k46k48k50k Sep '23Mar '24Sep '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 43,291
Dec '23: 43,065
Mar '24: 48,098
Jun '24: 47,504
Sep '24: 48,935
Dec '24: 50,378
Jun '25: 50,071
Sep '25: 49,667
Jun '26: 47,099
43k46k48k50k Sep '23Jun '24Jun '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 43,291
Dec '23: 43,065
Mar '24: 48,098
Jun '24: 47,504
Sep '24: 48,935
Dec '24: 50,378
Jun '25: 50,071
Sep '25: 49,667
Jun '26: 47,099

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+1.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +31% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+3.4%, 80% range −7.8% to +11.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
STARPAPER · Jan 2024: −38.0% vs market
EXPLEOSOL · Dec 2024: −34.7% vs market
INSECTICID · Aug 2022: −33.4% vs market
SMCGLOBAL · Jun 2022: −32.1% vs market
KIRLOSENG · Feb 2021: −31.6% vs market
NILKAMAL · May 2025: −29.0% vs market
DICIND · Apr 2023: −28.5% vs market
GATEWAY · Sep 2023: −27.7% vs market
FMGOETZE · Apr 2023: −25.9% vs market
HEIDELBERG · Feb 2025: −25.5% vs market
NCLIND · Apr 2025: −21.3% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Sep 2025: −20.2% vs market
GIPCL · Apr 2020: −20.0% vs market
MMP · Mar 2020: −19.0% vs market
RAMCOIND · Oct 2023: −18.1% vs market
BLISSGVS · Jul 2023: −17.0% vs market
VARDHACRLC · Jun 2020: −16.4% vs market
VTL · Jan 2020: −15.2% vs market
IMPAL · Jun 2022: −13.0% vs market
SIYSIL · Nov 2024: −10.3% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Jul 2025: −9.0% vs market
MHHL · Mar 2021: −7.3% vs market
INDRAMEDCO · Jan 2020: −4.8% vs market
JAGRAN · Mar 2023: −4.8% vs market
BANARISUG · Nov 2024: −1.1% vs market
TCI · Jan 2024: +4.7% vs market
GNA · Mar 2025: +7.5% vs market
AMBIKCO · Sep 2025: +9.2% vs market
ALMONDZ · Mar 2020: +9.3% vs market
KRBL · Apr 2025: +10.9% vs market
DODLA · Mar 2023: +16.6% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Jul 2023: +17.7% vs market
NIITLTD · May 2020: +20.8% vs market
AVTNPL · Oct 2025: +25.3% vs market
DTIL · May 2020: +27.3% vs market
KIRLOSIND · Jan 2021: +29.5% vs market
BBL · Feb 2021: +30.4% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Jul 2023: +31.6% vs market
WINDLAS · Apr 2023: +47.2% vs market
GHCL · Aug 2021: +50.1% vs market
GULFOILLUB · Mar 2023: +56.1% vs market
GEOJITFSL · Aug 2023: +57.1% vs market
MONTECARLO · Jul 2021: +83.4% vs market
SHRIPISTON · Nov 2022: +93.0% vs market
DBCORP · Aug 2022: +97.5% vs market
UNIPARTS · Sep 2025: +113.6% vs market
COCHINSHIP · Aug 2022: +119.7% vs market
HINDCON · Mar 2021: +132.0% vs market
IRCON · Nov 2022: +147.1% vs market
THEJO · Apr 2020: +190.7% vs market
Similar setups +1.8%All companies −1.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+1.8%
All companies' median
−1.6%
Beat the market
50% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 29 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BALMLAWRIE
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2023 14x10% +36%0% +32%
NAVNETEDUL
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 16x15% +3%−7% −20%
ALMONDZ
Finance
Mar 2020 6x7% −32%−38% +9%
COCHINSHIP
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2022 9x17% +6%0% +120%
GIPCL
Utilities
Apr 2020 3x16% −15%−30% −20%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AMBIKCO
Process Industries
Sep 2025 13x11% −14%−18% +9%
VARDHACRLC
Consumer Non-Durables
Jun 2020 6x14% −18%−20% −16%
DICIND
Process Industries
Apr 2023 18x15% +15%−2% −29%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/S, 12-month momentum and ROCE. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
66%similar
market capdebt/equity
Consumer Durables
61%similar
ROCErevenue
Consumer Services
60%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Process Industries
59%similar
P/Edebt/equity
Technology Services
55%similar
P/Emarket cap
Finance
40%similar
revenueP/E
VLS FINANCEVLSFINANCE
Finance
31%similar
EPS growthmarket cap
Finance
30%similar
ROCErevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Dec '21

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (12.0x).
  3. FebPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-09; price +0.6% that day.
  4. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2025-07-01; price +3.6% that day.
  6. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (12.3x).
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 5.8x its 50-day median on 2025-05-27; price -1.4% that day.
  8. MarPriceFell 31% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  2. DecPriceVolume reached 16.6x its 50-day median on 2024-12-11; price +2.3% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 12.4x its 50-day median on 2024-07-30; price +8.9% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 8.0x its 50-day median on 2024-05-02; price +3.9% that day.
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 11.6x its 50-day median on 2024-02-05; price +6.8% that day.
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 18.5x its 50-day median on 2023-10-19; price +2.3% that day.
  9. SepPriceRegained the 2021-12 peak, 19 months after the low.
  10. SepPriceVolume reached 22.5x its 50-day median on 2023-09-18; price +15.8% that day.
  11. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  12. MayPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2023-05-05; price -3.6% that day.
  13. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (9.0x).
  14. JanPriceVolume reached 34.7x its 50-day median on 2023-01-06; price +9.2% that day.
  15. DecPriceVolume reached 10.2x its 50-day median on 2022-12-08; price +7.7% that day.
  16. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (8.7x).
  17. SepPriceVolume reached 39.5x its 50-day median on 2022-09-15; price +14.4% that day.
  18. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  19. AprPriceVolume reached 8.3x its 50-day median on 2022-04-19; price +5.6% that day.
  20. FebPriceFell 31% from the Dec 2021 peak to the Feb 2022 low.
  21. JanPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2022-01-11; price +3.4% that day.
  22. DecPriceVolume reached 16.0x its 50-day median on 2021-12-24; price +20.0% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1111.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-1011.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0911.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0811.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0711.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0612.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0511.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0411.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0310.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0210.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2026-0111.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-1210.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-1110.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-1011.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0910.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0811.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0710.8x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0612.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0511.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0410.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0310.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0210.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0110.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-1211.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-1111.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-1011.4x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0912.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0812.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0712.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0612.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0511.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0411.8x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0310.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0212.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2024-0113.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-1211.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-1111.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-1011.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-0910.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-089.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-079.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-069.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-058.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-049.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-038.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-028.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2023-018.8x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-128.8x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-118.8x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-108.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-098.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-088.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-078.4x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-068.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-058.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-049.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-039.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-028.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2022-019.4x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-128.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-116.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-106.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-096.4x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-086.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-077.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-067.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-055.8x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-044.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-035.3x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-025.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2021-016.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-126.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-115.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-105.4x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-095.4x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-086.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-075.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-064.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-054.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-044.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-033.8x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-025.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2020-015.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-125.0x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-114.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-105.1x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-094.9x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-084.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-074.6x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-065.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-055.7x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-045.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-035.5x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-025.2x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x
2019-015.4x₹450 cr5.9%14.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback