अApnaFunda

SRI LOTUS DEV AND REALTY LTD (LOTUSDEV)

Finance · Real Estate Development · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.86 / 100
Profitability 71Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.54 / 100
Price 94Earnings 14

Passes these screensQuality CompounderHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitablePrice ahead of businessInstitutions in, retail out

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹224.14 latest close · +50.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹150₹200₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹150₹200₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹224.14 month-end · +33.5% over 12 months

₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹224.14 month-end · +23.8% since Aug '25

₹100₹150₹200₹250Aug '25Nov '25Feb '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200₹250Aug '25Apr '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹102.20 to ₹252.40 · 1-year volatility 45.6%

Was the rally earned?

+34%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 32.2x to 42.6x); per-share earnings added 1 point.
  • The share count rose 20%.
Net profit growth: +22 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+22 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+33 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−21 ptsShare count changeShare price: +34%+34%Share priceNet profit growth: +22 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+22ProfitP/E change: +33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+33P/EShare count change: −21 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−21SharesShare price: +34%+34%Share price
Net profit growth+22 ptsNet profit rose about 20%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+33 ptsThe P/E rose from 32.2x to 42.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-21 ptsShare count rose 20%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DLF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-51.0%recovered 2026-09
1-year volatility45.6%annualised
Volume spikes15last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2026−47.8% 0%−20%−40%2026−47.8%
Largest drawdowns

-51.0% (2025-08 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-30: 22.7x the 50-day median, price +1.4% that day

2026-09-10: 14.3x the 50-day median, price +5.0% that day

2026-08-10: 11.7x the 50-day median, price -5.0% that day

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE85th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin58th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth88th
  • EPS growth47th
  • Debt/equity ↓58th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓21stflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓21st▼ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum92nd

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~24%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 42.6x, the price would imply about 24.3%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹224.14
P/E
42.6x
ROCE
21.0%
Market Cap
₹10930 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹840 cr
P/S
13.0x
P/B
5.7x
ROE
13.4%
Operating Margin
36.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
81.9%
12M Momentum
33.5%

52-week range

₹102.20₹252.40
81% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
45.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.11

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
100.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.51x
low
Share count, 1Y
+11.4%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 5checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance16%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 16.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.51xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.51x (cash from operations ₹-300 cr, net profit ₹591 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Sep 2025, FIIs trimmed 1.3 pts; DIIs trimmed 1.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 1.0 lakh to 96,724 (-7%) between Sep 2025 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '25Jun '26Change
Promoters81.9%81.9%0.0 pts
FIIs2.5%1.2%-1.3 pts
DIIs3.0%1.7%-1.3 pts
Public and others12.5%15.2%+2.7 pts

Number of shareholders

96,724shareholders-7% since Sep '25
97k99k1.0L1.0L Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 1.0 lakh
Dec '25: 1.0 lakh
Mar '26: 1.0 lakh
Jun '26: 96,724
97k99k1.0L1.0L Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 1.0 lakh
Dec '25: 1.0 lakh
Mar '26: 1.0 lakh
Jun '26: 96,724

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−13.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SRI LOTUS DEV AND REALTY LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +14% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−8.3%, 80% range −18.4% to +0.5%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
LAOPALA · Jul 2023: −53.9% vs market
AURIONPRO · Mar 2025: −53.6% vs market
MASTEK · Mar 2022: −51.1% vs market
CONCORDBIO · Jan 2025: −48.6% vs market
NUCLEUS · Sep 2020: −46.8% vs market
POLYMED · Apr 2025: −44.9% vs market
FDC · Oct 2020: −42.1% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Apr 2021: −39.0% vs market
MCX · Oct 2020: −37.2% vs market
SAREGAMA · Mar 2025: −35.9% vs market
RHIM · Jan 2023: −33.1% vs market
WONDERLA · Feb 2024: −29.4% vs market
ZTECH · Sep 2025: −28.2% vs market
SHILPAMED · Jul 2020: −26.8% vs market
ADFFOODS · May 2021: −25.5% vs market
AIAENG · Feb 2020: −25.3% vs market
MAPMYINDIA · Jun 2024: −25.1% vs market
AFFLE · Aug 2022: −24.8% vs market
CAPLIPOINT · Mar 2025: −22.7% vs market
KSCL · Jun 2020: −22.1% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · Jan 2020: −18.9% vs market
EIHOTEL · Dec 2024: −16.9% vs market
ASTRAL · Jun 2021: −16.8% vs market
FINEORG · Jun 2022: −15.2% vs market
AJANTPHARM · Sep 2020: −13.7% vs market
EMUDHRA · Jun 2024: −12.2% vs market
ITDC · Jan 2024: −9.8% vs market
CARERATING · Jun 2025: −7.9% vs market
SUPRIYA · Nov 2024: −7.3% vs market
ELECON · Jun 2024: −3.0% vs market
NAVINFLUOR · Jun 2021: −2.7% vs market
KFINTECH · Oct 2024: +7.0% vs market
PERSISTENT · Jul 2021: +7.4% vs market
TRITURBINE · Sep 2023: +7.6% vs market
ANUP · Aug 2024: +8.7% vs market
GRINDWELL · Nov 2021: +8.9% vs market
LINDEINDIA · Apr 2022: +12.8% vs market
INGERRAND · Feb 2023: +14.1% vs market
NEWGEN · Jun 2024: +18.1% vs market
FCL · Jul 2022: +23.6% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Oct 2025: +24.5% vs market
BDL · Jul 2022: +31.8% vs market
GANESHHOU · Feb 2024: +35.8% vs market
THYROCARE · Sep 2025: +37.3% vs market
DATAPATTNS · Oct 2025: +46.4% vs market
BLS · Sep 2022: +52.3% vs market
COFORGE · Jul 2020: +68.6% vs market
RPEL · Oct 2025: +125.2% vs market
ACUTAAS · Sep 2025: +147.5% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Aug 2025: +187.5% vs market
Similar setups −13.0%All companies −4.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−13.0%
All companies' median
−4.7%
Beat the market
38% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RPEL
Process Industries
Oct 2025 89x26% +19%−7% +125%
LINDEINDIA
Process Industries
Apr 2022 60x17% +95%−10% +13%
ACUTAAS
Process Industries
Sep 2025 57x20% +51%−12% +148%
EMUDHRA
Technology Services
Jun 2024 90x18% +99%−4% −12%
NEWGEN
Technology Services
Jun 2024 54x27% +186%−5% +18%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KFINTECH
Technology Services
Oct 2024 63x30% +121%−13% +7%
TRITURBINE
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2023 72x29% +87%−2% +8%
FDC
Health Technology
Oct 2020 25x21% +92%−6% −42%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SRI LOTUS DEV AND REALTY LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

SUDEEP PHARMASUDEEPPHRM
Process Industries
71%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
Health Services
68%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Process Industries
64%similar
P/Emarket cap
Health Technology
64%similar
revenuevolatility
HAPPY FORGINGSHAPPYFORGE
Producer Manufacturing
63%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Finance
47%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
Finance
44%similar
operating marginROCE
Finance
43%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

13 events since Sep '25

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 22.7x its 50-day median on 2026-10-30; price +1.4% that day.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  3. SepPriceRegained the 2025-08 peak, 6 months after the low.
  4. AugSharesShare count is up 11.4% over 12 months.
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 46.6x its 50-day median on 2026-07-22; price +9.8% that day.
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2026-06-25; price +3.4% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 51% from the Aug 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 5 earlier events
  1. MarPriceVolume reached 13.6x its 50-day median on 2026-03-11; price +4.5% that day.
  2. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. DecPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2025-12-24; price +0.1% that day.
  4. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 6.1x its 50-day median on 2025-09-24; price +5.2% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history16 months · 2025-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1142.6x₹840 cr13.4%21.0%0.1x
2026-1046.8x₹840 cr13.4%21.0%0.1x
2026-0942.7x₹840 cr13.8%21.0%0.1x
2026-0837.2x₹769 cr12.7%21.0%0.1x
2026-0740.7x₹769 cr12.7%21.0%0.1x
2026-0630.2x₹769 cr12.7%21.0%0.1x
2026-0528.0x₹651 cr24.4%37.0%0.1x
2026-0429.0x₹651 cr24.4%37.0%0.1x
2026-0320.9x₹651 cr24.4%37.0%0.1x
2026-0230.2x₹543 cr22.4%37.0%0.1x
2026-0132.1x₹543 cr22.4%37.0%0.1x
2025-1234.1x₹543 cr22.4%37.0%0.1x
2025-1132.2x₹490 cr22.8%37.0%0.1x
2025-1034.9x₹490 cr22.8%37.0%0.1x
2025-0936.2x₹490 cr22.8%37.0%0.1x
2025-0834.7x₹550 cr24.3%37.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback