अApnaFunda

EMERALD TYRE MANUFACTURERS LTD (ETML)

Consumer Durables · Automotive Aftermarket · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.27 / 100
Profitability 39Balance sheet 14

Passes these screensValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹69.25 latest close · −24.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹60₹80Jun 24Jul 22Aug 18Sep 11Oct 14Nov 9 ₹60₹80Jun 24Sep 1Nov 9

₹69.25 month-end · −33.5% over 12 months

₹80₹100Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹80₹100Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹69.25 month-end · −61.4% since Dec '24

₹100₹150Dec '24May '25Sep '25Feb '26Jun '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150Dec '24Dec '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹58.10 to ₹131.20 · 1-year volatility 54.2%

Was the rally earned?

-34%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 19.4x to 13.1x); per-share earnings took off 1 point.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: −33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−33 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −33%−33%Share priceP/E change: −33 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−33P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −33%−33%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-33 ptsThe P/E fell from 19.4x to 13.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with MRF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-69.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility54.2%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−68.7% 0%−20%−40%−60%2026−68.7%
Largest drawdowns

-69.5% (2024-12 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

13.1xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history8th percentile
CheapestMedian 16.6xDearest

Usual range 13.4x to 23.0x since 2024-12.

Against Consumer Durables13.1x vs 25.5x
This company
13.1x
Sector median
25.5x

49% below the Consumer Durables median.

12.8x22.1x31.5x40.9xDec '24May '25Oct '25Mar '26Aug '26Nov '2612.8x22.1x31.5x40.9xDec '24Aug '25Apr '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE39th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth31st
  • EPS growth22nd
  • Debt/equity ↓12th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓19th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓82nd▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum22nd

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~11%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 14.8x, the price would imply about 11.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹69.25
P/E
13.1x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹135 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹218 cr
P/S
0.6x
P/B
1.2x
ROE
9.0%
Debt / Equity
1.2x
Promoter Holding
50.3%
12M Momentum
-33.5%

52-week range

₹58.10₹131.20
15% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
54.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.60

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
1.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.28x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 4checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance50%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 50.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion1.28xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.28x (cash from operations ₹41 cr, net profit ₹32 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Dec 2024, FIIs trimmed 8.1 pts; DIIs trimmed 4.4 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 2,113 to 1,119 (-47%) between Dec 2024 and Mar 2026.

Holdings, Mar '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '24Mar '26Change
Promoters50.3%50.3%0.0 pts
FIIs8.1%0.0%-8.1 pts
DIIs13.6%9.2%-4.4 pts
Public and others28.0%40.5%+12.5 pts

Number of shareholders

1,119shareholders-47% since Dec '24
1k1k2k2k Dec '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26
Dec '24: 2,113
Mar '25: 1,251
Sep '25: 1,149
Mar '26: 1,119
1k1k2k2k Dec '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26
Dec '24: 2,113
Mar '25: 1,251
Sep '25: 1,149
Mar '26: 1,119

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−8.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like EMERALD TYRE MANUFACTURERS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +31% vs the market, against −7% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.6%, 80% range −6.4% to +4.8%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
RKEC · Sep 2025: −68.5% vs market
AVG · Jan 2025: −56.4% vs market
LEXUS · May 2023: −54.2% vs market
DUCON · Mar 2025: −49.9% vs market
FOODSIN · Oct 2025: −46.5% vs market
CELEBRITY · Sep 2023: −37.6% vs market
BAGFILMS · Aug 2025: −35.5% vs market
SCPL · Aug 2024: −35.1% vs market
MANAKALUCO · Mar 2024: −32.5% vs market
UCAL · Jul 2021: −30.4% vs market
AUTOIND · Jan 2025: −24.5% vs market
ATL · Oct 2024: −21.4% vs market
DONEAR · Jul 2025: −20.4% vs market
MITCON · Mar 2025: −20.1% vs market
SCML · May 2025: −19.3% vs market
RICOAUTO · Dec 2023: −18.9% vs market
ISFT · Mar 2024: −18.7% vs market
KMSUGAR · Dec 2024: −16.5% vs market
BIL · Feb 2020: −15.5% vs market
AIROLAM · Oct 2024: −12.8% vs market
VIRINCHI · Aug 2024: −12.3% vs market
AMDIND · Oct 2024: −11.0% vs market
PRITIKAUTO · Jul 2025: −10.5% vs market
BALPHARMA · May 2025: −9.3% vs market
RELCHEMQ · Jun 2023: −8.9% vs market
RPPL · Jun 2023: −8.3% vs market
GEEKAYWIRE · Dec 2021: −6.0% vs market
HITECHCORP · Aug 2024: −4.4% vs market
MANOMAY · Jan 2024: −2.7% vs market
RITCO · Aug 2023: −0.9% vs market
GPTINFRA · Feb 2020: +7.1% vs market
ARCHIDPLY · Jun 2024: +7.4% vs market
HPL · Apr 2020: +13.7% vs market
INDOAMIN · May 2024: +15.7% vs market
KAMATHOTEL · May 2020: +19.6% vs market
KCPSUGIND · Nov 2021: +19.8% vs market
KHADIM · Jul 2023: +28.2% vs market
LOKESHMACH · May 2020: +31.8% vs market
GOKEX · Mar 2020: +33.4% vs market
MARALOVER · Feb 2020: +37.5% vs market
CENTEXT · Mar 2020: +38.9% vs market
BASML · May 2020: +40.4% vs market
DCI · Aug 2025: +43.3% vs market
SHIVATEX · Nov 2020: +60.8% vs market
RELIABLE · Oct 2024: +89.3% vs market
BEDMUTHA · Jun 2023: +180.9% vs market
HITECH · Sep 2020: +202.7% vs market
ASHAPURMIN · Oct 2022: +209.2% vs market
TBZ · Sep 2025: +246.8% vs market
PIGL · Jan 2024: +295.9% vs market
Similar setups −8.6%All companies −7.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−8.6%
All companies' median
−7.0%
Beat the market
40% vs 42%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GPTINFRA
Industrial Services
Feb 2020 7x12% −37%−55% +7%
AUTOIND
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2025 17x13% −30%−41% −25%
GOKEX
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2020 6x10% −65%−71% +33%
AMDIND
Process Industries
Oct 2024 21x10% −6%−31% −11%
AIROLAM
Non-Energy Minerals
Oct 2024 24x12% 0%−40% −13%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SHIVATEX
Process Industries
Nov 2020 12x— −14%−28% +61%
ASHAPURMIN
Non-Energy Minerals
Oct 2022 9x12% −17%−48% +209%
BIL
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2020 8x9% −34%−60% −16%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and P/E. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to EMERALD TYRE MANUFACTURERS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

9 events since Jun '25

  1. OctPriceFell 70% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JulPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  4. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹218 cr.
  5. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.18x).
  6. AprPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. DecSharesShare count is up 35.7% over 12 months.
  8. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 9.1 pts over 1 quarter to 12.6%.
Show 1 earlier event
  1. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.81x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history24 months · 2024-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1113.1x₹218 cr9.0%12.0%1.2x
2026-1013.7x₹218 cr9.0%12.0%1.2x
2026-0913.9x₹218 cr9.0%12.0%1.2x
2026-0815.6x₹218 cr9.0%12.0%1.2x
2026-0715.9x₹218 cr9.0%12.0%1.2x
2026-0616.6x₹218 cr9.0%12.0%1.2x
2026-0515.0x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2026-0416.6x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2026-0313.8x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2026-0217.9x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2026-0117.2x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-1219.4x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-1119.4x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-1021.6x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-0923.3x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-0826.7x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-0726.1x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-0621.5x₹199 cr9.5%14.0%0.8x
2025-0515.9x₹171 cr22.9%19.0%1.6x
2025-0413.3x₹171 cr22.9%19.0%1.6x
2025-0312.8x₹171 cr22.9%19.0%1.6x
2025-0215.0x₹171 cr22.9%19.0%1.6x
2025-0118.0x₹171 cr22.9%19.0%1.6x
2024-1222.2x₹171 cr22.9%19.0%1.6x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback