अApnaFunda

INOX INDIA LIMITED (INOXINDIA)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.95 / 100
Profitability 89Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.54 / 100
Price 55Earnings 29FII/DII 78

Passes these screensQuality CompounderHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitablePrice ahead of business

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,899.6 latest close · +1.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,800₹2,000₹2,200Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,800₹2,000₹2,200Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,899.6 month-end · +62.4% over 12 months

₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,899.6 month-end · +115.2% since Dec '23

₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Dec '23Jul '24Feb '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Dec '23Jun '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹1068.20 to ₹2339.50 · 1-year volatility 43.3%

Was the rally earned?

+62%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 45.3x to 67.6x); per-share earnings added 11 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+11 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +52 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+52 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +62%+62%Share priceNet profit growth: +11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+11ProfitP/E change: +52 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+52P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +62%+62%Share price
Net profit growth+11 ptsNet profit rose about 9%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+52 ptsThe P/E rose from 45.3x to 67.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-39.0%recovered 2026-04
1-year volatility43.3%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.883-year daily, correlation 0.46
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%20252026−38.1% 0%−20%−40%20252026−38.1%
Largest drawdowns

-39.0% (2024-07 peak to 2025-02 low, recovered 2026-04)

-19.7% (2026-09 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-16.1% (2024-04 peak to 2024-06 low, recovered 2024-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-27: 21.4x the 50-day median, price +13.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

67.7xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history81st percentile
CheapestMedian 53.5xDearest

Usual range 43.0x to 72.4x since 2023-12.

Against Producer Manufacturing67.7x vs 29.6x
This company
67.7x
Sector median
29.6x

129% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

25.3x43.3x61.3x79.3xDec '23Jul '24Feb '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '2625.3x43.3x61.3x79.3xDec '23Dec '24Dec '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE91st▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin87th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth63rd▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth48th▼ 25 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓73rd▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓19th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓14th▼ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum90th▲ 19 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~33%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 89.4x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 33.4%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered11.9%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+21.5 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank125thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%18%35% Dec 2023Nov 2026 0%18%35% Dec 2023Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x35.2%36.4%37.6%
15x32.2%33.4%34.6%
20x28.6%29.7%30.9%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 33.4%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1899.60
P/E
67.6x
ROCE
33.0%
Market Cap
₹17243 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1619 cr
P/S
10.7x
P/B
15.4x
ROE
22.8%
Operating Margin
20.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
74.9%
12M Momentum
62.4%

52-week range

₹1068.20₹2339.50
65% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.88

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
31.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.53x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance12%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 12.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate24%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.53xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.53x (cash from operations ₹361 cr, net profit ₹680 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+9 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 9 days (72 vs 63). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-10 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -10 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs added 2.2 pts; DIIs added 1.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 2.4 lakh to 1.5 lakh (-38%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters75.0%74.9%-0.1 pts
FIIs4.7%6.9%+2.2 pts
DIIs6.5%7.7%+1.2 pts
Public and others13.9%10.6%-3.3 pts

Number of shareholders

1.5 lakhshareholders-38% since Dec '23
1.4L1.7L2.1L2.4L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 2.4 lakh
Mar '24: 1.9 lakh
Jun '24: 1.8 lakh
Sep '24: 1.8 lakh
Dec '24: 1.7 lakh
Mar '25: 1.8 lakh
Jun '25: 1.7 lakh
Sep '25: 1.7 lakh
Dec '25: 1.5 lakh
Mar '26: 1.4 lakh
Jun '26: 1.5 lakh
1.4L1.7L2.1L2.4L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 2.4 lakh
Mar '24: 1.9 lakh
Jun '24: 1.8 lakh
Sep '24: 1.8 lakh
Dec '24: 1.7 lakh
Mar '25: 1.8 lakh
Jun '25: 1.7 lakh
Sep '25: 1.7 lakh
Dec '25: 1.5 lakh
Mar '26: 1.4 lakh
Jun '26: 1.5 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−10.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like INOX INDIA LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +10% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −9.1%, 80% range −17.3% to −3.8%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
VAIBHAVGBL · Apr 2021: −54.6% vs market
POLYMED · Feb 2025: −47.7% vs market
MIDHANI · Jul 2020: −39.4% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Nov 2020: −34.2% vs market
COCHINSHIP · Oct 2025: −34.2% vs market
LTTS · Nov 2021: −33.9% vs market
RHIM · Jan 2023: −33.1% vs market
CRISIL · Jun 2025: −32.7% vs market
FINEORG · Aug 2022: −29.1% vs market
THYROCARE · Nov 2020: −28.7% vs market
ITDC · Jun 2024: −28.3% vs market
HAPPSTMNDS · Sep 2021: −28.2% vs market
SUZLON · Sep 2024: −25.5% vs market
ACE · Apr 2024: −24.3% vs market
ASTRAZEN · Aug 2025: −23.7% vs market
DHANUKA · Jul 2020: −23.5% vs market
CERA · Jun 2023: −22.6% vs market
SONACOMS · Jun 2022: −22.4% vs market
KPRMILL · Jan 2022: −20.6% vs market
SUMICHEM · Aug 2025: −15.1% vs market
HONAUT · Jun 2020: −14.8% vs market
BIKAJI · Feb 2025: −14.8% vs market
RAILTEL · Jan 2024: −14.0% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Jan 2025: −11.5% vs market
TASTYBITE · Mar 2020: −11.5% vs market
PERSISTENT · May 2025: −9.9% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Aug 2022: −6.8% vs market
DOMS · Dec 2024: −5.5% vs market
ELECON · Apr 2024: −5.5% vs market
ASTRAL · Aug 2021: −4.3% vs market
EMUDHRA · Apr 2024: +0.6% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Sep 2021: +0.7% vs market
TRITURBINE · Jul 2023: +0.8% vs market
AMRUTANJAN · Jul 2020: +1.3% vs market
KPITTECH · Jun 2023: +2.4% vs market
KFINTECH · Aug 2024: +6.6% vs market
GRINDWELL · Nov 2021: +8.9% vs market
INGERRAND · May 2023: +10.5% vs market
RELAXO · Jun 2020: +11.3% vs market
CUMMINSIND · Sep 2024: +11.8% vs market
BALKRISIND · Apr 2020: +18.5% vs market
METROPOLIS · Apr 2020: +18.7% vs market
DATAPATTNS · Feb 2023: +27.4% vs market
NEWGEN · May 2024: +28.8% vs market
LLOYDSME · Aug 2025: +29.3% vs market
GARFIBRES · Mar 2020: +32.9% vs market
COFORGE · May 2020: +39.6% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · Oct 2020: +90.2% vs market
RPEL · Sep 2025: +179.8% vs market
ATGL · Dec 2020: +239.6% vs market
Similar setups −10.7%All companies −1.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−10.7%
All companies' median
−1.6%
Beat the market
40% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VAIBHAVGBL
Consumer Durables
Apr 2021 71x30% +334%−11% −55%
FINEORG
Process Industries
Aug 2022 73x39% +117%−8% −29%
KFINTECH
Technology Services
Aug 2024 72x30% +132%−10% +7%
METROPOLIS
Health Services
Apr 2020 53x43% +33%−37% +19%
THYROCARE
Health Services
Nov 2020 66x35% +100%−9% −29%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KPITTECH
Technology Services
Jun 2023 78x30% +111%−6% +2%
INGERRAND
Producer Manufacturing
May 2023 79x30% +75%−5% +11%
NEWGEN
Technology Services
May 2024 72x24% +187%−11% +29%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and revenue growth. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to INOX INDIA LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
62%similar
volatilityROCE
Electronic Technology
60%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
Health Services
60%similar
revenuevolatility
SUDEEP PHARMASUDEEPPHRM
Process Industries
59%similar
P/Emarket cap
Finance
58%similar
debt/equityvolatility
Producer Manufacturing
63%similar
P/Epromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
60%similar
debt/equityROCE
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
debt/equityROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

18 events since Feb '24

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (75.1x).
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 21.4x its 50-day median on 2026-08-27; price +13.0% that day.
  4. AprPriceRegained the 2024-07 peak, 14 months after the low.
  5. AprPriceVolume reached 25.3x its 50-day median on 2026-04-13; price +8.2% that day.
  6. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2026-03-27; price -3.2% that day.
  8. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (41.9x).
Show 10 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. NovPriceVolume reached 13.4x its 50-day median on 2025-11-19; price -4.1% that day.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2025-09-15; price +4.4% that day.
  4. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 51% to 8% of profit.
  5. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. FebPriceFell 39% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Feb 2025 low.
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 129.0x its 50-day median on 2025-02-27; price +4.0% that day.
  8. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,171 cr.
  9. NovPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2024-11-08; price +4.6% that day.
  10. FebPriceVolume reached 9.7x its 50-day median on 2024-02-15; price +10.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history36 months · 2023-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1167.6x₹1619 cr22.8%33.0%0.1x
2026-1066.2x₹1619 cr22.8%33.0%0.1x
2026-0973.1x₹1619 cr22.8%33.0%0.1x
2026-0875.1x₹1588 cr23.1%33.0%0.1x
2026-0767.2x₹1588 cr23.1%33.0%0.1x
2026-0668.9x₹1588 cr23.1%33.0%0.1x
2026-0554.6x₹1496 cr28.5%38.0%0.0x
2026-0453.3x₹1496 cr28.5%38.0%0.0x
2026-0343.0x₹1496 cr28.5%38.0%0.0x
2026-0242.9x₹1401 cr28.1%38.0%0.0x
2026-0141.2x₹1401 cr28.1%38.0%0.0x
2025-1241.9x₹1401 cr28.1%38.0%0.0x
2025-1145.3x₹1350 cr26.8%38.0%0.0x
2025-1046.0x₹1350 cr26.8%38.0%0.0x
2025-0945.6x₹1350 cr26.8%38.0%0.0x
2025-0844.9x₹1306 cr25.9%38.0%0.0x
2025-0747.0x₹1306 cr25.9%38.0%0.0x
2025-0649.4x₹1306 cr25.9%38.0%0.0x
2025-0553.0x₹1214 cr31.4%43.0%0.0x
2025-0443.9x₹1214 cr31.4%43.0%0.0x
2025-0344.4x₹1214 cr31.4%43.0%0.0x
2025-0244.7x₹1171 cr30.0%43.0%0.0x
2025-0142.7x₹1171 cr30.0%43.0%0.0x
2024-1251.6x₹1171 cr30.0%43.0%0.0x
2024-1153.8x₹1122 cr29.6%43.0%0.0x
2024-1053.9x₹1122 cr29.6%43.0%0.0x
2024-0955.3x₹1122 cr29.6%43.0%0.0x
2024-0854.5x₹1134 cr30.2%43.0%0.0x
2024-0759.9x₹1134 cr30.2%43.0%0.0x
2024-0660.9x₹1134 cr30.2%43.0%0.0x
2024-0573.9x₹966 cr28.2%37.0%0.0x
2024-0479.3x₹966 cr28.2%37.0%0.0x
2024-0371.7x₹966 cr28.2%37.0%0.0x
2024-0269.8x₹966 cr28.2%37.0%0.0x
2024-0153.7x₹966 cr28.2%37.0%0.0x
2023-1251.8x₹966 cr28.2%37.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback