अApnaFunda

VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED (VAIBHAVGBL)

Consumer Durables · Other Consumer Specialties · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.63 / 100
Profitability 54Growth 64Balance sheet 72
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.38 / 100
Price 3Earnings 79FII/DII 33

Passes these screensCash RichValue PickDebt-light & profitableBusiness ahead of priceConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹165.62 latest close · −29.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹150₹200₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹150₹200₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹165.62 month-end · −30.9% over 12 months

₹150₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹165.62 month-end · −61.3% over 3 years

₹200₹400Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹165.62 month-end · +24.6% since Jan '19

₹250₹500₹750Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹250₹500₹750Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹154.49 to ₹282.75 · 1-year volatility 43.0%

Was the rally earned?

-31%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 46 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 24.4x to 9.7x), which took 77 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +47 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+47 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −77 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−77 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −31%−31%Share priceNet profit growth: +47 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+47ProfitP/E change: −77 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−77P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −31%−31%Share price
Net profit growth+47 ptsNet profit rose about 74%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-77 ptsThe P/E fell from 24.4x to 9.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-61%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 64 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 67.3x to 9.7x), which took 125 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+65 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −125 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−125 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −61%−61%Share priceNet profit growth: +65 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+65ProfitP/E change: −125 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−125P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −61%−61%Share price
Net profit growth+65 ptsNet profit rose about 172%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-125 ptsThe P/E fell from 67.3x to 9.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-66%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 1 point, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 29.4x to 9.7x), which took 67 points back.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+3 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −67 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−67 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −66%−66%Share priceNet profit growth: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+3ProfitP/E change: −67 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−67P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −66%−66%Share price
Net profit growth+3 ptsNet profit rose about 5%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-67 ptsThe P/E fell from 29.4x to 9.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with TITAN COMPANY

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-84.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility43.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.143-year daily, correlation 0.46
Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−84.3% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−84.3%
Largest drawdowns

-84.4% (2021-05 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-48.1% (2020-02 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-06)

-21.6% (2021-03 peak to 2021-03 low, recovered 2021-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-29: 22.6x the 50-day median, price -15.7% that day

2026-10-16: 6.6x the 50-day median, price +3.9% that day

2026-10-08: 5.2x the 50-day median, price -0.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.7xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history2nd percentile
CheapestMedian 24.4xDearest

Usual range 17.4x to 64.1x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Durables9.7x vs 25.5x
This company
9.7x
Sector median
25.5x

62% below the Consumer Durables median.

9.2x32.2x55.1x78.1xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '269.2x32.2x55.1x78.1xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE52ndflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin56th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth35th▼ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth87th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓58th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓28thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓93rd▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum24th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~8%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 15.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 7.8%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered7.4%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+0.4 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank516thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%19%38% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%19%38% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x8.7%9.7%10.7%
15x6.9%7.8%8.8%
20x4.4%5.4%6.3%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 7.8%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 23%/yr; EPS has since grown 8%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 32%/yr; EPS has since grown 5%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 25%/yr; EPS has since grown −0%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹165.62
P/E
9.7x
ROCE
16.0%
Market Cap
₹2778 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3795 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
1.7x
ROE
17.4%
Operating Margin
11.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
57.3%
12M Momentum
-30.9%

52-week range

₹154.49₹282.75
9% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.11

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
20.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.38x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance11%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 11.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate20%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 20.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.38xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.38x (cash from operations ₹752 cr, net profit ₹546 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (34 vs 35). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress4% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 4% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+1 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +1 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 6.0 pts; DIIs trimmed 3.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1.2 lakh to 1.3 lakh (+8%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters57.1%57.3%+0.2 pts
FIIs22.7%16.7%-6.0 pts
DIIs5.7%2.2%-3.5 pts
Public and others14.4%23.8%+9.3 pts

Number of shareholders

1.3 lakhshareholders+8% since Sep '23
1.2L1.3L1.4L1.4L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.2 lakh
Dec '23: 1.2 lakh
Mar '24: 1.2 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.4 lakh
Jun '25: 1.4 lakh
Sep '25: 1.4 lakh
Dec '25: 1.4 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh
1.2L1.3L1.4L1.4L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.2 lakh
Dec '23: 1.2 lakh
Mar '24: 1.2 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.4 lakh
Mar '25: 1.4 lakh
Jun '25: 1.4 lakh
Sep '25: 1.4 lakh
Dec '25: 1.4 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+3.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −16% to +31% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+4.6%, 80% range −3.8% to +8.8%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
JAGRAN · Jan 2020: −49.4% vs market
POLYPLEX · Dec 2022: −48.0% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Mar 2023: −42.5% vs market
PARAGMILK · May 2021: −38.8% vs market
KOPRAN · Feb 2025: −33.6% vs market
BIRLANU · Apr 2023: −32.8% vs market
ASAHISONG · Feb 2022: −30.8% vs market
GHCL · Apr 2023: −28.3% vs market
DALMIASUG · Dec 2023: −25.1% vs market
GUJALKALI · Jun 2023: −22.5% vs market
GAEL · Aug 2024: −21.6% vs market
IOLCP · Mar 2024: −18.4% vs market
UDS · Sep 2025: −16.5% vs market
GTPL · Jul 2023: −15.1% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Dec 2024: −15.0% vs market
LINC · Apr 2025: −11.6% vs market
APEX · May 2021: −9.8% vs market
KCP · Jul 2022: −8.5% vs market
MONTECARLO · Nov 2023: −7.2% vs market
WELENT · Aug 2020: −6.3% vs market
CHAMBLFERT · Dec 2022: −5.2% vs market
INSECTICID · Dec 2024: +0.8% vs market
PYRAMID · Aug 2024: +1.2% vs market
TIIL · Feb 2020: +2.6% vs market
NRBBEARING · Oct 2024: +3.5% vs market
BODALCHEM · Jun 2020: +3.9% vs market
EVERESTIND · Apr 2020: +5.6% vs market
JKPAPER · Apr 2025: +7.3% vs market
VINDHYATEL · Jun 2020: +8.7% vs market
ISGEC · May 2022: +10.2% vs market
KSL · Apr 2025: +14.0% vs market
TIMETECHNO · Nov 2020: +14.8% vs market
JKIL · Jun 2020: +20.9% vs market
DCMSHRIRAM · Mar 2024: +21.9% vs market
SUNFLAG · Nov 2021: +22.0% vs market
PCBL · Feb 2022: +25.1% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Apr 2024: +28.3% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Jun 2020: +31.9% vs market
SPAL · Dec 2022: +46.8% vs market
KIRLOSBROS · Mar 2022: +52.6% vs market
BLISSGVS · Jul 2024: +53.5% vs market
TCI · Jul 2020: +55.3% vs market
FIEMIND · Feb 2021: +56.3% vs market
ORIENTCEM · Dec 2022: +60.7% vs market
LGBBROSLTD · May 2021: +72.3% vs market
KRBL · Mar 2022: +80.6% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Mar 2020: +81.0% vs market
GRWRHITECH · Apr 2023: +119.5% vs market
GNA · Jul 2020: +141.6% vs market
KIRLOSENG · Apr 2022: +145.7% vs market
Similar setups +3.7%All companies −0.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+3.7%
All companies' median
−0.9%
Beat the market
58% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GTPL
Communications
Jul 2023 13x15% −16%−26% −15%
BIRLANU
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2023 10x21% −30%−32% −33%
BALMLAWRIE
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2024 13x16% −3%−32% −15%
GAEL
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2024 19x16% +9%−31% −22%
EVERESTIND
Distribution Services
Apr 2020 5x18% −57%−60% +6%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DALMIASUG
Process Industries
Dec 2023 13x12% +8%−14% −25%
POLYPLEX
Process Industries
Dec 2022 9x20% −15%−43% −48%
INSECTICID
Process Industries
Dec 2024 15x13% −1%−33% +1%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to VAIBHAV GLOBAL LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Non-Durables
63%similar
operating marginrevenue growth
Energy Minerals
63%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Process Industries
61%similar
revenuerevenue growth
Consumer Services
61%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Process Industries
61%similar
ROCErevenue growth
Consumer Durables
57%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Consumer Durables
51%similar
ROCEEPS growth
Consumer Durables
51%similar
P/Evolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. NovPriceFell 84% from the May 2021 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 22.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-29; price -15.7% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2026-07-08; price +2.4% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. AprPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.0x).
  8. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. FebPriceVolume reached 27.6x its 50-day median on 2026-02-09; price +14.1% that day.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 129.7x its 50-day median on 2025-10-30; price +6.4% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 12.8x its 50-day median on 2025-09-16; price +4.9% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.2 pts over 2 quarters to 19.1%.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JanPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. DecPriceVolume reached 16.9x its 50-day median on 2024-12-19; price -5.6% that day.
  10. NovPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  12. AugPriceVolume reached 20.9x its 50-day median on 2024-08-20; price +12.5% that day.
  13. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  14. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.1 pts over 2 quarters to 25.2%.
  15. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  16. AprPriceVolume reached 10.6x its 50-day median on 2024-04-29; price +6.0% that day.
  17. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (78.1x).
  18. JanPriceVolume reached 25.3x its 50-day median on 2024-01-03; price +6.2% that day.
  19. DecPriceVolume reached 15.3x its 50-day median on 2023-12-13; price +2.7% that day.
  20. JulPriceVolume reached 42.7x its 50-day median on 2023-07-18; price +4.9% that day.
  21. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (48.4x).
  22. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.7x₹3795 cr17.4%16.0%0.3x
2026-109.2x₹3795 cr17.3%16.0%0.3x
2026-0912.0x₹3795 cr17.3%16.0%0.3x
2026-0813.7x₹3692 cr16.2%16.0%0.3x
2026-0716.7x₹3692 cr16.2%16.0%0.3x
2026-0614.4x₹3692 cr16.2%16.0%0.3x
2026-0517.8x₹3607 cr15.6%14.0%0.2x
2026-0417.3x₹3607 cr15.6%14.0%0.2x
2026-0314.0x₹3607 cr15.6%14.0%0.2x
2026-0220.5x₹3518 cr13.6%14.0%0.2x
2026-0120.3x₹3518 cr13.6%14.0%0.2x
2025-1221.2x₹3518 cr13.6%14.0%0.2x
2025-1124.4x₹3437 cr12.1%14.0%0.2x
2025-1027.4x₹3437 cr12.1%14.0%0.2x
2025-0922.9x₹3437 cr12.1%14.0%0.2x
2025-0822.1x₹3379 cr11.3%14.0%0.2x
2025-0724.7x₹3379 cr11.3%14.0%0.2x
2025-0625.9x₹3379 cr11.3%14.0%0.2x
2025-0530.0x₹3318 cr11.1%14.0%0.2x
2025-0425.9x₹3318 cr11.1%14.0%0.2x
2025-0325.9x₹3318 cr11.1%14.0%0.2x
2025-0230.1x₹3229 cr9.8%14.0%0.2x
2025-0136.5x₹3229 cr9.8%14.0%0.2x
2024-1237.0x₹3229 cr9.8%14.0%0.2x
2024-1137.1x₹3138 cr9.9%14.0%0.2x
2024-1038.9x₹3138 cr9.9%14.0%0.2x
2024-0940.9x₹3138 cr9.9%14.0%0.2x
2024-0841.1x₹3041 cr10.1%14.0%0.2x
2024-0744.2x₹3041 cr10.1%14.0%0.2x
2024-0640.0x₹3041 cr10.1%14.0%0.2x
2024-0553.2x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2024-0465.3x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2024-0357.3x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2024-0266.4x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2024-0178.1x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-1262.4x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-1167.3x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-1065.8x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-0969.2x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-0869.5x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-0754.3x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-0648.4x₹2691 cr8.7%11.0%0.2x
2023-0520.8x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2023-0421.7x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2023-0318.8x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2023-0222.4x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2023-0121.0x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-1221.4x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-1123.3x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-1024.3x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-0924.3x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-0824.0x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-0720.6x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-0620.7x₹2752 cr21.0%21.0%0.1x
2022-0520.1x₹2540 cr28.2%36.0%0.1x
2022-0428.0x₹2540 cr28.2%36.0%0.1x
2022-0322.4x₹2540 cr28.2%36.0%0.1x
2022-0224.6x₹2540 cr28.2%36.0%0.1x
2022-0127.7x₹2540 cr28.2%36.0%0.1x
2021-1235.2x₹2540 cr28.2%36.0%0.1x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback