अApnaFunda

OM FREIGHT FORWARDERS LTD (OMFREIGHT)

Transportation · Air Freight/Couriers · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.54 / 100
Profitability 35Balance sheet 74

Passes these screensHigh Momentum

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹115 latest close · +11.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹100₹120Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹100₹120Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹115 month-end · +20.7% over 12 months

₹60₹80₹100₹120Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80₹100₹120Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹115 month-end · +26.7% since Oct '25

₹60₹80₹100₹120Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80₹100₹120Oct '25May '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹58.95 to ₹127.99 · 1-year volatility 44.5%

Was the rally earned?

+21%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 18 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 18.6x to 19.0x).
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+24 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+3 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: +21%+21%Share priceNet profit growth: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+24ProfitP/E change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+3P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: +21%+21%Share price
Net profit growth+24 ptsNet profit rose about 24%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+3 ptsThe P/E rose from 18.6x to 19.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DELHIVERY

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-41.5%recovered 2026-07
1-year volatility44.5%annualised

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2026−37.2% 0%−20%−40%2026−37.2%
Largest drawdowns

-41.5% (2025-11 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-07)

-23.8% (2026-07 peak to 2026-09 low, recovered 2026-10)

Where does it rank among Transportation peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Transportation peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE42nd▼ 31 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin27th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth74th
  • EPS growth59th
  • Debt/equity ↓69th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓29th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓46th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum85th

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Transportation sector page Watch it move against Transportation in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~16%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 20.4x, the price would imply about 15.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Transportation The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹115.00
P/E
19.0x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹386 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹576 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
1.9x
ROE
9.7%
Operating Margin
5.8%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
74.8%
12M Momentum
20.7%

52-week range

₹58.95₹127.99
81% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
44.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.69

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
10.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.33x
Share count, 1Y
+6.3%

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 5checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance24%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 24.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.33xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.33x (cash from operations ₹64 cr, net profit ₹48 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 4 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

+4.4%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like OM FREIGHT FORWARDERS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +47% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +8.6%, 80% range +4.1% to +17.6%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
ELIN · Oct 2025: −63.5% vs market
UDS · Nov 2024: −57.6% vs market
SCHAND · Aug 2023: −45.9% vs market
RGL · Feb 2020: −42.9% vs market
BANSWRAS · Apr 2023: −36.3% vs market
MAHEPC · Sep 2025: −36.1% vs market
MIRZAINT · Feb 2020: −31.2% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Apr 2022: −27.3% vs market
GROBTEA · Oct 2025: −26.2% vs market
WCIL · Oct 2025: −25.1% vs market
DHARMAJ · Jul 2025: −23.9% vs market
GHCLTEXTIL · Jan 2025: −23.2% vs market
NRAIL · Sep 2022: −20.2% vs market
AARVI · Aug 2020: −18.6% vs market
ASPINWALL · Jun 2025: −18.0% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · Dec 2022: −14.8% vs market
RUCHIRA · Jul 2022: −11.6% vs market
INSECTICID · Aug 2024: −10.0% vs market
FIEMIND · Feb 2020: −8.8% vs market
ALLCARGO · Jan 2020: −2.8% vs market
RAMAPHO · Jun 2025: −0.1% vs market
SHREYANIND · Apr 2023: +3.6% vs market
MMP · Sep 2023: +3.8% vs market
HGS · Feb 2020: +4.0% vs market
SURYAROSNI · Mar 2023: +4.0% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jul 2023: +4.9% vs market
TNPETRO · Aug 2025: +6.0% vs market
SPAL · Nov 2023: +10.4% vs market
MODISONLTD · Jul 2024: +10.6% vs market
TIMETECHNO · Aug 2022: +13.1% vs market
SUNFLAG · Apr 2022: +24.7% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Nov 2024: +28.3% vs market
SALZERELEC · Feb 2024: +30.9% vs market
PASUPTAC · Oct 2025: +32.4% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Dec 2023: +35.9% vs market
BBL · Nov 2022: +38.4% vs market
ADSL · Sep 2021: +40.7% vs market
FILATEX · Oct 2025: +48.8% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Nov 2022: +50.0% vs market
DBCORP · Jun 2023: +53.2% vs market
GENUSPAPER · May 2021: +55.9% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Jun 2022: +63.0% vs market
BHAGERIA · Oct 2025: +71.1% vs market
TALBROAUTO · May 2023: +76.7% vs market
MARINE · Feb 2023: +94.2% vs market
TDPOWERSYS · Aug 2021: +98.1% vs market
PRECAM · Nov 2020: +102.7% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · Jan 2020: +126.9% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Jun 2022: +150.3% vs market
GALLANTT · Aug 2023: +175.1% vs market
Similar setups +4.4%All companies −4.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+4.4%
All companies' median
−4.2%
Beat the market
58% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MMP
Non-Energy Minerals
Sep 2023 30x10% +51%−1% +4%
PASUPTAC
Process Industries
Oct 2025 19x12% +17%−6% +32%
UDS
Commercial Services
Nov 2024 35x13% +62%−2% −58%
ADSL
Technology Services
Sep 2021 19x5% +229%−1% +41%
GALLANTT
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2023 16x10% +47%0% +175%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
INSECTICID
Process Industries
Aug 2024 29x13% +102%−2% −10%
ARTEMISMED
Health Services
Jun 2022 17x10% +28%−15% +150%
MODISONLTD
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2024 24x12% +74%−2% +11%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: debt/equity, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to OM FREIGHT FORWARDERS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What changed?

6 events since Dec '25

  1. OctSharesShare count is up 6.2% over 12 months.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Transportation on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  3. JulPriceRegained the 2025-11 peak, 4 months after the low.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Transportation on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. MarPriceFell 42% from the Nov 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Transportation on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history14 months · 2025-10 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1119.0x₹576 cr9.7%10.0%0.2x
2026-1018.6x₹576 cr9.7%10.0%0.2x
2026-0915.6x₹576 cr9.7%10.0%0.2x
2026-0818.3x₹477 cr7.7%10.0%0.2x
2026-0718.3x₹477 cr7.7%10.0%0.2x
2026-0619.5x₹477 cr7.7%10.0%0.2x
2026-0514.3x₹451 cr11.0%17.0%0.2x
2026-0413.9x₹451 cr11.0%17.0%0.2x
2026-0310.1x₹451 cr11.0%17.0%0.2x
2026-0215.8x₹448 cr9.3%17.0%0.2x
2026-0118.2x₹448 cr9.3%17.0%0.2x
2025-1218.9x₹448 cr9.3%17.0%0.2x
2025-1118.6x₹464 cr9.4%17.0%0.2x
2025-1017.7x₹464 cr9.4%17.0%0.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback