अApnaFunda

RACL GEARTECH LIMITED (RACLGEAR)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.52 / 100
Profitability 76Balance sheet 28
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.80 / 100
Price 77Earnings 87FII/DII 77

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,461.9 latest close · +6.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600₹1,800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600₹1,800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,461.9 month-end · +37.6% over 12 months

₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,461.9 month-end · +58.5% since Nov '24

₹1,000₹1,500Nov '24Apr '25Sep '25Jan '26Jun '26Nov '26 ₹1,000₹1,500Nov '24Nov '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹921.80 to ₹1927.70 · 1-year volatility 52.1%

Was the rally earned?

+38%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 61 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 42.2x to 34.7x), which took 23 points back.
  • The share count rose 7%.
Net profit growth: +68 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+68 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −23 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−23 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7 ptsShare count changeShare price: +38%+38%Share priceNet profit growth: +68 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+68ProfitP/E change: −23 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−23P/EShare count change: −7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−7SharesShare price: +38%+38%Share price
Net profit growth+68 ptsNet profit rose about 78%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-23 ptsThe P/E fell from 42.2x to 34.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-7 ptsShare count rose 7%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-28.7%not yet recovered
1-year volatility52.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.793-year daily, correlation 0.31
Volume spikes6last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%−30%20252026−28.7% 0%−10%−20%−30%2026−28.7%
Largest drawdowns

-28.7% (2026-09 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-27.9% (2026-02 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-09)

-27.6% (2024-11 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-16: 8.9x the 50-day median, price +5.5% that day

2026-09-15: 7.8x the 50-day median, price -0.1% that day

2026-09-11: 42.6x the 50-day median, price +10.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

34.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history52nd percentile
CheapestMedian 34.7xDearest

Usual range 29.9x to 42.4x since 2024-11.

Against Producer Manufacturing34.8x vs 29.6x
This company
34.8x
Sector median
29.6x

18% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

25.2x32.7x40.2x47.8xNov '24Apr '25Sep '25Feb '26Jul '26Nov '2625.2x32.7x40.2x47.8xNov '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE58th▲ 26 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin94th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth77th▲ 62 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth83rd▲ 59 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓22nd▲ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓10th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓40thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum82ndflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~26%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 49.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 26.1%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered16.2%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+9.9 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank327thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%14%27% Jun 2024Nov 2026 0%14%27% Jun 2024Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x27.7%28.9%30.0%
15x24.9%26.1%27.2%
20x21.4%22.5%23.6%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 26.1%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1461.90
P/E
34.7x
ROCE
17.0%
Market Cap
₹1723 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹522 cr
P/S
3.3x
P/B
4.9x
ROE
14.1%
Operating Margin
24.1%
Debt / Equity
0.7x
Promoter Holding
42.7%
12M Momentum
37.6%

52-week range

₹921.80₹1927.70
54% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
52.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.87

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.63x
Share count, 1Y
+9.1%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance20%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 20.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.7%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.63xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.63x (cash from operations ₹183 cr, net profit ₹112 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (109 vs 103). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+2 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +2 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 10.6 pts; FIIs added 9.3 pts; DIIs added 3.2 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '24Jun '26Change
Promoters53.3%42.7%-10.6 pts
FIIs0.0%9.3%+9.3 pts
DIIs0.0%3.2%+3.2 pts
Public and others46.7%44.8%-1.9 pts

Number of shareholders

16,693shareholders+1% since Jun '24
15k16k17k18k Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '24: 16,592
Sep '24: 16,535
Dec '24: 15,979
Mar '25: 15,076
Jun '25: 15,263
Sep '25: 17,185
Dec '25: 17,202
Mar '26: 17,568
Jun '26: 16,693
15k16k17k18k Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '24: 16,592
Sep '24: 16,535
Dec '24: 15,979
Mar '25: 15,076
Jun '25: 15,263
Sep '25: 17,185
Dec '25: 17,202
Mar '26: 17,568
Jun '26: 16,693

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−8.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RACL GEARTECH LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −40% to +19% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−4.0%, 80% range −16.0% to +2.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SOLARA · Jun 2021: −79.1% vs market
LOKESHMACH · Jun 2024: −59.8% vs market
EKC · Mar 2022: −58.1% vs market
HIKAL · Jul 2021: −56.3% vs market
MOTISONS · Jan 2025: −54.4% vs market
KOLTEPATIL · Nov 2023: −46.7% vs market
HIGREEN · Aug 2025: −44.6% vs market
ARIHANTSUP · Feb 2025: −43.1% vs market
KHAICHEM · May 2022: −42.8% vs market
DYNPRO · Oct 2021: −42.6% vs market
CAMLINFINE · Jun 2021: −42.3% vs market
ROHLTD · Oct 2025: −40.6% vs market
SOUTHWEST · Mar 2022: −40.5% vs market
PARACABLES · Jan 2024: −36.8% vs market
HPL · Jun 2025: −36.7% vs market
JINDWORLD · Apr 2023: −36.0% vs market
AARON · Sep 2025: −33.9% vs market
ONEPOINT · Aug 2024: −33.5% vs market
SMSPHARMA · Sep 2024: −24.1% vs market
GREENLAM · Nov 2023: −24.1% vs market
CARYSIL · Feb 2022: −23.4% vs market
CANTABIL · Jan 2023: −18.5% vs market
AJMERA · Jun 2021: −15.2% vs market
RAMASTEEL · Apr 2023: −14.7% vs market
HFCL · Feb 2022: −11.4% vs market
RKFORGE · Jan 2024: −5.0% vs market
BHAGCHEM · Apr 2023: −3.1% vs market
NACLIND · Apr 2022: −2.7% vs market
HLEGLAS · Sep 2025: −2.7% vs market
VRLLOG · Aug 2022: −1.2% vs market
SIGNPOST · Sep 2025: −0.9% vs market
THEMISMED · Sep 2021: +1.0% vs market
HINDWAREAP · Dec 2021: +1.3% vs market
BFUTILITIE · Apr 2020: +2.3% vs market
FSL · Feb 2021: +6.2% vs market
JASH · Jun 2021: +13.8% vs market
KDDL · Feb 2024: +18.0% vs market
TI · Nov 2023: +19.1% vs market
KRISHANA · Aug 2022: +20.3% vs market
SAKAR · Oct 2022: +20.8% vs market
SALASAR · Jun 2023: +21.9% vs market
BETA · Jul 2025: +21.9% vs market
XPROINDIA · Oct 2022: +26.3% vs market
VADILALIND · Mar 2023: +33.1% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Feb 2024: +42.0% vs market
MARINE · Feb 2024: +46.2% vs market
RAJRATAN · Mar 2022: +51.7% vs market
GRAVITA · Apr 2022: +66.0% vs market
MANINFRA · Jul 2021: +81.9% vs market
PGEL · Nov 2022: +113.2% vs market
Similar setups −8.2%All companies −4.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−8.2%
All companies' median
−4.2%
Beat the market
38% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VADILALIND
Consumer Non-Durables
Mar 2023 35x19% +56%−26% +33%
KDDL
Consumer Durables
Feb 2024 61x18% +144%−13% +18%
HIKAL
Health Technology
Jul 2021 50x16% +244%−4% −56%
ARTEMISMED
Health Services
Feb 2024 59x11% +161%−11% +42%
SIGNPOST
Commercial Services
Sep 2025 37x15% +2%−33% −1%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SALASAR
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2023 41x14% +81%−9% +22%
TI
Consumer Non-Durables
Nov 2023 33x15% +143%−5% +19%
ONEPOINT
Commercial Services
Aug 2024 65x22% +128%−8% −34%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RACL GEARTECH LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Technology
61%similar
debt/equityrevenue
CARYSILCARYSIL
Consumer Durables
61%similar
promoter holdingROCE
Finance
59%similar
market capP/E
HUBTOWNHUBTOWN
Finance
55%similar
volatilityrevenue
Utilities
55%similar
revenueoperating margin
POKARNAPOKARNA
Producer Manufacturing
54%similar
revenuevolatility
Producer Manufacturing
49%similar
operating margindebt/equity
Producer Manufacturing
49%similar
P/Edebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

26 events since Mar '25

  1. OctPriceFell 29% from the Sep 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepPriceRegained the 2026-02 peak, 6 months after the low.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 42.6x its 50-day median on 2026-09-11; price +10.6% that day.
  4. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.67x.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.67x).
  7. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 4% of profit).
  8. JunSharesShare count is up 9.1% over 12 months.
Show 18 earlier events
  1. JunPriceVolume reached 7.8x its 50-day median on 2026-06-29; price +2.8% that day.
  2. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹446 cr.
  3. MarPriceFell 28% from the Feb 2026 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  4. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. FebPriceVolume reached 187.8x its 50-day median on 2026-02-17; price +13.2% that day.
  6. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 98.0x its 50-day median on 2025-10-01; price +13.8% that day.
  9. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 8.6 pts to 42.7%.
  10. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 11.6 pts over 2 quarters to 11.6%.
  11. SepPriceVolume reached 196.2x its 50-day median on 2025-09-26; price +13.1% that day.
  12. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.0 pts to 51.3%.
  13. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 4% to 0% of profit.
  15. MayPriceRegained the 2024-11 peak, 2 months after the low.
  16. MayPriceVolume reached 78.2x its 50-day median on 2025-05-14; price +1.1% that day.
  17. MarPriceFell 28% from the Nov 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  18. MarPriceVolume reached 9.5x its 50-day median on 2025-03-21; price +1.1% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history25 months · 2024-11 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1134.7x₹522 cr14.1%17.0%0.7x
2026-1032.5x₹522 cr14.1%17.0%0.7x
2026-0937.9x₹522 cr14.1%17.0%0.7x
2026-0837.0x₹490 cr13.9%17.0%0.7x
2026-0730.4x₹490 cr13.9%17.0%0.7x
2026-0633.8x₹490 cr13.9%17.0%0.7x
2026-0535.6x₹446 cr19.1%12.0%1.4x
2026-0434.3x₹446 cr19.1%12.0%1.4x
2026-0332.5x₹446 cr19.1%12.0%1.4x
2026-0247.8x₹421 cr14.8%12.0%1.4x
2026-0134.5x₹421 cr14.8%12.0%1.4x
2025-1238.6x₹421 cr14.8%12.0%1.4x
2025-1142.2x₹407 cr12.3%12.0%1.4x
2025-1045.7x₹407 cr12.3%12.0%1.4x
2025-0942.5x₹407 cr12.3%12.0%1.4x
2025-0840.8x₹415 cr10.5%12.0%1.4x
2025-0742.2x₹415 cr10.5%12.0%1.4x
2025-0640.9x₹415 cr10.5%12.0%1.4x
2025-0539.7x₹434 cr12.5%18.0%1.4x
2025-0433.3x₹434 cr12.5%18.0%1.4x
2025-0331.5x₹434 cr12.5%18.0%1.4x
2025-0225.2x₹435 cr15.2%18.0%1.4x
2025-0129.5x₹435 cr15.2%18.0%1.4x
2024-1230.3x₹435 cr15.2%18.0%1.4x
2024-1128.6x₹430 cr17.0%18.0%1.4x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback