अApnaFunda

CAMPUS ACTIVEWEAR LIMITED (CAMPUS)

Consumer Non-Durables · Apparel/Footwear · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.46 / 100
Profitability 82Growth 25Balance sheet 31
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.35 / 100
Price 37Earnings 45FII/DII 24

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹198.13 latest close · −15.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹180₹200₹220₹240Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹180₹200₹220₹240Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹198.13 month-end · −28.2% over 12 months

₹200₹250Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹198.13 month-end · −28.0% over 3 years

₹200₹250₹300₹350Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250₹300₹350Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹198.13 month-end · −46.2% since May '22

₹200₹400₹600May '22Apr '23Mar '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600May '22Aug '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹182.15 to ₹286.55 · 1-year volatility 27.3%

Was the rally earned?

-28%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 67.1x to 48.2x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).0 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −28%−28%Share priceNet profit growth: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).0ProfitP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −28%−28%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-28 ptsThe P/E fell from 67.1x to 48.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-28%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 66.9x to 48.2x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).0 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −28%−28%Share priceNet profit growth: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).0ProfitP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −28%−28%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-28 ptsThe P/E fell from 66.9x to 48.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PAGE INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-70.8%not yet recovered
1-year volatility27.3%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.693-year daily, correlation 0.29
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−70.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−70.1%
Largest drawdowns

-70.8% (2022-10 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-18.3% (2022-05 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2022-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-06: 13.5x the 50-day median, price -3.3% that day

2026-07-20: 22.3x the 50-day median, price -4.6% that day

2026-07-17: 248.2x the 50-day median, price +4.1% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

48.2xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history4th percentile
CheapestMedian 67.7xDearest

Usual range 54.5x to 106.0x since 2022-05.

Against Consumer Non-Durables48.2x vs 26.8x
This company
48.2x
Sector median
26.8x

80% above the Consumer Non-Durables median.

24.1x155.5x286.9x418.2xMay '22Apr '23Mar '24Feb '25Jan '26Nov '2624.1x155.5x286.9x418.2xMay '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE90thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin74thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth26th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth36th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓26th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓48thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓27th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum25th▼ 39 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~39%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 125.0x, the price would imply about 38.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Earnings figures have not updated recently, so the company is left out of the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹198.13
P/E
48.2x
ROCE
32.0%
Market Cap
₹6052 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1259 cr
P/S
4.8x
P/B
14.2x
ROE
29.4%
Operating Margin
18.0%
Debt / Equity
0.7x
Promoter Holding
72.1%
12M Momentum
-28.2%

52-week range

₹182.15₹286.55
15% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
27.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.64

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
9.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.22x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance1%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 1.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate32%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 32.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.22xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.22x (cash from operations ₹241 cr, net profit ₹197 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (41 vs 41). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 6.6 pts; FIIs trimmed 3.2 pts; promoters trimmed 1.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 2.7 lakh to 1.8 lakh (-33%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters73.9%72.1%-1.8 pts
FIIs9.3%6.0%-3.2 pts
DIIs4.8%11.4%+6.6 pts
Public and others12.1%10.5%-1.6 pts

Number of shareholders

1.8 lakhshareholders-33% since Sep '23
1.8L2.1L2.5L2.8L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.7 lakh
Dec '23: 2.7 lakh
Mar '24: 2.8 lakh
Jun '24: 2.5 lakh
Sep '24: 2.1 lakh
Dec '24: 2.1 lakh
Mar '25: 2.1 lakh
Jun '25: 2.0 lakh
Sep '25: 2.0 lakh
Dec '25: 1.9 lakh
Mar '26: 1.8 lakh
Jun '26: 1.8 lakh
1.8L2.1L2.5L2.8L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.7 lakh
Dec '23: 2.7 lakh
Mar '24: 2.8 lakh
Jun '24: 2.5 lakh
Sep '24: 2.1 lakh
Dec '24: 2.1 lakh
Mar '25: 2.1 lakh
Jun '25: 2.0 lakh
Sep '25: 2.0 lakh
Dec '25: 1.9 lakh
Mar '26: 1.8 lakh
Jun '26: 1.8 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−12.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CAMPUS ACTIVEWEAR LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −26% to +23% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −10.9%, 80% range −16.8% to −0.1%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
GOCOLORS · Jul 2025: −62.3% vs market
HLEGLAS · May 2023: −53.2% vs market
TARSONS · Nov 2024: −48.3% vs market
RAJRATAN · Oct 2023: −46.7% vs market
APOLLOPIPE · Apr 2024: −40.5% vs market
BHARATRAS · Mar 2023: −37.1% vs market
HAPPSTMNDS · Dec 2023: −30.3% vs market
ORIENTELEC · Sep 2022: −29.9% vs market
TASTYBITE · Oct 2021: −29.5% vs market
CROMPTON · Jun 2022: −29.1% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Oct 2020: −27.8% vs market
LAURUSLABS · Oct 2022: −27.5% vs market
KKCL · May 2020: −26.6% vs market
BLUEDART · Jun 2023: −24.9% vs market
SFL · Dec 2022: −24.8% vs market
SBCL · Nov 2024: −24.0% vs market
GODREJAGRO · Aug 2021: −23.0% vs market
BATAINDIA · Sep 2020: −17.6% vs market
GUFICBIO · Nov 2024: −17.3% vs market
COROMANDEL · Feb 2021: −16.4% vs market
GARFIBRES · Jun 2023: −15.5% vs market
SYMPHONY · Sep 2022: −14.4% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · Oct 2024: −13.3% vs market
BLUESTARCO · Sep 2020: −13.3% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Jul 2024: −12.9% vs market
ACCELYA · Sep 2021: −11.3% vs market
CCL · Jan 2020: −11.2% vs market
GALAXYSURF · May 2021: −9.7% vs market
VIJAYA · Sep 2022: −6.6% vs market
TATATECH · Jul 2025: +1.0% vs market
BERGEPAINT · Aug 2024: +1.2% vs market
METROPOLIS · May 2023: +2.1% vs market
LALPATHLAB · Feb 2024: +2.4% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jul 2024: +9.8% vs market
UNITDSPR · Jan 2021: +10.1% vs market
BRITANNIA · Dec 2024: +20.0% vs market
MARICO · Aug 2024: +21.6% vs market
PAGEIND · Jun 2024: +23.8% vs market
LUXIND · Apr 2020: +26.9% vs market
GREENLAM · Jun 2021: +28.7% vs market
NELCO · Jun 2024: +29.1% vs market
SUNDRMFAST · Dec 2020: +30.0% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Apr 2020: +33.2% vs market
VIPIND · May 2021: +45.9% vs market
KIMS · Aug 2022: +51.6% vs market
MATRIMONY · May 2020: +57.1% vs market
MOLDTKPAC · Oct 2020: +59.8% vs market
KOVAI · Aug 2022: +63.4% vs market
NH · Jun 2024: +76.4% vs market
SOLARINDS · Apr 2021: +82.6% vs market
Similar setups −12.1%All companies −1.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−12.1%
All companies' median
−1.2%
Beat the market
42% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SOLARINDS
Process Industries
Apr 2021 41x19% +38%−13% +83%
VIPIND
Consumer Durables
May 2021 47x29% +69%−11% +46%
TARSONS
Process Industries
Nov 2024 52x— −7%−24% −48%
BLUEDART
Transportation
Jun 2023 46x26% −7%−23% −25%
LAURUSLABS
Health Technology
Oct 2022 30x26% −12%−26% −28%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CROMPTON
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2022 37x21% −22%−31% −29%
APOLLOPIPE
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2024 124x31% +10%−16% −41%
KOVAI
Health Services
Aug 2022 28x24% −15%−20% +63%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, interest cover and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CAMPUS ACTIVEWEAR LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Technology
67%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
Process Industries
61%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
SYMPHONYSYMPHONY
Producer Manufacturing
57%similar
revenuerevenue growth
Health Technology
55%similar
ROCErevenue
Process Industries
55%similar
EPS growthrevenue
Consumer Non-Durables
40%similar
operating marginrevenue growth
BATA INDIABATAINDIA
Consumer Non-Durables
38%similar
revenue growthP/E
Consumer Non-Durables
36%similar
P/Evolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

28 events since Jun '22

  1. OctPriceFell 71% from the Oct 2022 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 248.2x its 50-day median on 2026-07-17; price +4.1% that day.
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 28.9x its 50-day median on 2026-05-26; price +6.1% that day.
  5. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (53.2x).
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 19.8x its 50-day median on 2026-02-02; price +6.7% that day.
  7. NovPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2025-11-12; price +0.3% that day.
  8. JulPriceVolume reached 41.6x its 50-day median on 2025-07-10; price +6.2% that day.
Show 20 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (63.4x).
  3. FebPriceVolume reached 18.9x its 50-day median on 2025-02-01; price +7.1% that day.
  4. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.5 pts over 2 quarters to 17.5%.
  5. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  6. DecPriceVolume reached 15.6x its 50-day median on 2024-12-30; price +1.1% that day.
  7. OctPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. SepPriceVolume reached 21.0x its 50-day median on 2024-09-13; price +2.8% that day.
  9. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. MayPriceVolume reached 52.5x its 50-day median on 2024-05-29; price +18.3% that day.
  11. AprPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  12. FebPriceVolume reached 42.4x its 50-day median on 2024-02-21; price +2.8% that day.
  13. NovPriceVolume reached 14.9x its 50-day median on 2023-11-10; price -2.0% that day.
  14. AugPriceVolume reached 28.0x its 50-day median on 2023-08-02; price -4.3% that day.
  15. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  16. MayPriceVolume reached 10.2x its 50-day median on 2023-05-31; price -8.3% that day.
  17. MarPriceVolume reached 96.2x its 50-day median on 2023-03-24; price -8.6% that day.
  18. NovPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2022-11-15; price -5.7% that day.
  19. AugPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2022-08-19; price +6.8% that day.
  20. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history55 months · 2022-05 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1148.2x₹1259 cr29.4%32.0%0.7x
2026-1046.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0950.8x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0855.0x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0754.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0657.2x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0561.6x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0460.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0353.2x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0263.2x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2026-0161.6x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-1263.7x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-1167.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-1068.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0965.6x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0864.3x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0765.0x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0668.0x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0571.0x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0459.0x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0356.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0263.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2025-0166.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-1278.5x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-1169.3x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-1071.8x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0982.7x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0867.7x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0776.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0671.0x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0567.5x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0460.2x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0352.2x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0259.3x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2024-0167.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-1268.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-1166.9x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-1064.7x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0970.2x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0873.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0773.5x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0675.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0574.0x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0486.7x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0381.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0298.4x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2023-0195.3x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2022-12100.6x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2022-11109.6x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2022-10140.6x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2022-09139.1x₹1259 cr29.5%32.0%0.7x
2022-08141.1x₹1196 cr25.1%32.0%0.7x
2022-07125.8x₹1196 cr25.1%32.0%0.7x
2022-0693.1x₹1196 cr25.1%32.0%0.7x
2022-05418.2x₹711 cr8.6%17.0%0.6x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback