अApnaFunda

BAYER CROPSCIENCE LIMITED (BAYERCROP)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Agricultural · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.61 / 100
Profitability 82Growth 40Balance sheet 62
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.46 / 100
Price 22Earnings 43FII/DII 72

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹3,483.7 latest close · −15.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹3,500₹4,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹3,500₹4,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹3,483.7 month-end · −25.2% over 12 months

₹3,500₹4,000₹4,500Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹3,500₹4,000₹4,500Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹3,483.7 month-end · −35.2% over 3 years

₹4,000₹6,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹4,000₹6,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹3,483.7 month-end · −20.4% since Jan '19

₹4,000₹6,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹4,000₹6,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹3226.10 to ₹5063.00 · 1-year volatility 21.7%

Was the rally earned?

-25%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 332.0x to 248.3x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25 ptsP/E changeShare price: −25%−25%Share priceP/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25P/EShare price: −25%−25%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-25 ptsThe P/E fell from 332.0x to 248.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-35%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 383.0x to 248.3x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: −35 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−35 ptsP/E changeShare price: −35%−35%Share priceP/E change: −35 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−35P/EShare price: −35%−35%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-35 ptsThe P/E fell from 383.0x to 248.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-24%share price, 5 yearsMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 328.2x to 248.3x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
P/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24 ptsP/E changeShare price: −24%−24%Share priceP/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24P/EShare price: −24%−24%Share price
Net profit growth0 ptsNet profit was little changed.
P/E change-24 ptsThe P/E fell from 328.2x to 248.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAV

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-53.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility21.7%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.603-year daily, correlation 0.38
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−53.2% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−53.2%
Largest drawdowns

-53.3% (2024-07 peak to 2026-11 low, not yet recovered)

-37.5% (2020-09 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-06)

-32.4% (2019-04 peak to 2019-08 low, recovered 2020-02)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-29: 7.6x the 50-day median, price -1.9% that day

2026-07-21: 11.4x the 50-day median, price +2.1% that day

2026-07-08: 10.1x the 50-day median, price +1.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

248.3xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history7th percentile
CheapestMedian 349.9xDearest

Usual range 261.1x to 417.7x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries248.3x vs 18.1x
This company
248.3x
Sector median
18.1x

1273% above the Process Industries median.

6.8x169.8x332.8x495.8xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '266.8x169.8x332.8x495.8xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE82ndflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth27th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth39th▼ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓53rdflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓40th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓2ndflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum26th▼ 30 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~48%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 248.3x, the price would imply about 47.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Earnings figures have not updated recently, so the company is left out of the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹3483.70
P/E
248.3x
ROCE
20.0%
Market Cap
₹15655 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹727 cr
P/S
21.5x
P/B
46.9x
ROE
18.9%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
71.4%
12M Momentum
-25.2%

52-week range

₹3226.10₹5063.00
14% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
21.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.48

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
10.7x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 3checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance97%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 96.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (108 vs 108). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Payable days0 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by 0 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs trimmed 1.6 pts; FIIs added 0.7 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 45,329 to 58,884 (+30%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters71.4%71.4%0.0 pts
FIIs3.3%4.0%+0.7 pts
DIIs13.2%11.6%-1.6 pts
Public and others12.1%13.0%+0.9 pts

Number of shareholders

58,884shareholders+30% since Sep '23
45k50k54k59k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 45,329
Dec '23: 46,907
Mar '24: 45,852
Jun '24: 46,201
Sep '24: 51,289
Dec '24: 54,289
Mar '25: 54,216
Jun '25: 55,753
Sep '25: 58,109
Dec '25: 58,571
Mar '26: 55,795
Jun '26: 58,884
45k50k54k59k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 45,329
Dec '23: 46,907
Mar '24: 45,852
Jun '24: 46,201
Sep '24: 51,289
Dec '24: 54,289
Mar '25: 54,216
Jun '25: 55,753
Sep '25: 58,109
Dec '25: 58,571
Mar '26: 55,795
Jun '26: 58,884

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−8.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BAYER CROPSCIENCE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +7% vs the market, against 0% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−8.2%, 80% range −16.9% to +0.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
ALKYLAMINE · Jun 2023: −46.5% vs market
EIHOTEL · Feb 2020: −46.1% vs market
MANYAVAR · Sep 2024: −44.6% vs market
AMRUTANJAN · Jan 2023: −42.2% vs market
TASTYBITE · Jul 2021: −40.4% vs market
GOCOLORS · Dec 2023: −35.7% vs market
CROMPTON · Jul 2022: −35.0% vs market
SYMPHONY · May 2020: −31.5% vs market
SFL · Jan 2023: −31.0% vs market
DABUR · Jul 2023: −25.1% vs market
SHREECEM · Apr 2021: −24.9% vs market
KANSAINER · Jan 2021: −24.0% vs market
PIDILITIND · Jul 2023: −17.4% vs market
JUBLFOOD · Jun 2021: −16.9% vs market
HAPPSTMNDS · Jul 2022: −16.7% vs market
3MINDIA · Dec 2021: −16.5% vs market
RELAXO · Jul 2022: −16.1% vs market
AARTIIND · May 2021: −16.1% vs market
BATAINDIA · Nov 2020: −15.4% vs market
SONACOMS · Jun 2023: −15.2% vs market
UBL · Jun 2020: −14.7% vs market
MTARTECH · Jan 2023: −13.1% vs market
METROBRAND · Jun 2025: −12.8% vs market
UNITDSPR · Jan 2022: −10.7% vs market
DMART · Apr 2022: −9.8% vs market
GODREJCP · Feb 2021: −6.8% vs market
GODREJPROP · May 2021: −5.4% vs market
BERGEPAINT · Jul 2022: −4.8% vs market
LALPATHLAB · Dec 2023: −1.0% vs market
TATACONSUM · Jun 2024: −0.7% vs market
ASTRAL · Sep 2025: −0.3% vs market
LINDEINDIA · Sep 2025: +0.7% vs market
ASIANPAINT · Sep 2025: +1.7% vs market
HONAUT · Jun 2022: +2.7% vs market
AETHER · Nov 2024: +2.7% vs market
HAVELLS · Jun 2020: +3.5% vs market
MAPMYINDIA · Feb 2023: +5.4% vs market
ATGL · Jun 2025: +8.0% vs market
ASTRAZEN · Jun 2022: +14.1% vs market
ABB · Jul 2020: +21.2% vs market
TORNTPHARM · Feb 2023: +22.3% vs market
SYNGENE · Sep 2022: +23.6% vs market
SOLARINDS · Sep 2020: +25.1% vs market
METROPOLIS · Jun 2025: +26.4% vs market
POLYMED · Jun 2022: +27.5% vs market
TITAN · Jul 2021: +27.5% vs market
EMAMILTD · Feb 2020: +30.3% vs market
RADICO · Feb 2024: +37.7% vs market
VBL · Jun 2021: +62.4% vs market
ANURAS · Jan 2025: +69.6% vs market
Similar setups −8.3%All companies −0.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−8.3%
All companies' median
−0.1%
Beat the market
38% vs 50%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RELAXO
Consumer Non-Durables
Jul 2022 105x18% −15%−32% −16%
GOCOLORS
Consumer Non-Durables
Dec 2023 106x23% +5%−11% −36%
JUBLFOOD
Consumer Services
Jun 2021 176x16% +78%−6% −17%
LALPATHLAB
Health Services
Dec 2023 90x18% +14%−6% −1%
TASTYBITE
Consumer Non-Durables
Jul 2021 120x18% +56%−10% −40%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SYMPHONY
Producer Manufacturing
May 2020 68x22% −41%−41% −32%
SOLARINDS
Process Industries
Sep 2020 35x19% −7%−20% +25%
ASTRAL
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 76x20% −31%−32% 0%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and interest cover. Not used (unavailable for this company): operating margin. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BAYER CROPSCIENCE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Non-Durables
61%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
Health Technology
53%similar
market cappromoter holding
SYMPHONYSYMPHONY
Producer Manufacturing
53%similar
debt/equityROCE
Health Technology
50%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
METRO BRANDSMETROBRAND
Retail Trade
44%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
LINDE INDIALINDEINDIA
Process Industries
43%similar
EPS growthP/E
Process Industries
37%similar
market capROCE
Process Industries
36%similar
revenue growthEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Nov '21

  1. NovPriceFell 53% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Nov 2026 low.
  2. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (283.0x).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 11.4x its 50-day median on 2026-07-21; price +2.1% that day.
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 10.6x its 50-day median on 2026-06-09; price -0.3% that day.
  5. MarPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2026-03-20; price +5.6% that day.
  6. NovPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2025-11-27; price -0.3% that day.
  7. SepPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2025-09-19; price +2.9% that day.
  8. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (448.6x).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. MayPriceVolume reached 61.4x its 50-day median on 2025-05-27; price +10.6% that day.
  3. MarPriceVolume reached 21.5x its 50-day median on 2025-03-28; price +4.3% that day.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2024-07-11; price -0.0% that day.
  5. JunPriceRegained the 2020-09 peak, 15 months after the low.
  6. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (478.4x).
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. JunPriceVolume reached 14.2x its 50-day median on 2024-06-21; price +4.9% that day.
  9. FebPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2024-02-02; price -4.6% that day.
  10. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (395.7x).
  11. NovPriceVolume reached 16.6x its 50-day median on 2023-11-03; price +5.9% that day.
  12. SepPriceVolume reached 23.6x its 50-day median on 2023-09-05; price +8.5% that day.
  13. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  14. JunPriceVolume reached 20.2x its 50-day median on 2023-06-13; price -0.1% that day.
  15. MarPriceFell 38% from the Sep 2020 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  16. JanPriceVolume reached 12.6x its 50-day median on 2023-01-12; price -0.8% that day.
  17. NovPriceVolume reached 13.9x its 50-day median on 2022-11-29; price -0.4% that day.
  18. AugPriceVolume reached 15.1x its 50-day median on 2022-08-05; price +3.7% that day.
  19. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  20. MayPriceVolume reached 15.7x its 50-day median on 2022-05-25; price +5.1% that day.
  21. FebPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2022-02-10; price -1.1% that day.
  22. NovPriceVolume reached 12.9x its 50-day median on 2021-11-02; price -7.4% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11248.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-10232.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-09258.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-08283.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-07301.8x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-06295.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-05321.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-04339.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-03331.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-02333.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2026-01318.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-12324.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-11332.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-10348.2x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-09342.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-08372.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-07450.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-06448.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-05404.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-04334.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-03349.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-02337.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2025-01364.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-12395.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-11405.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-10472.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-09457.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-08448.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-07495.8x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-06478.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-05358.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-04392.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-03374.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-02404.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2024-01427.8x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-12395.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-11383.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-10350.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-09380.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-08343.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-07317.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-06312.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-05301.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-04295.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-03290.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-02305.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2023-01317.2x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-12351.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-11330.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-10333.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-09348.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-08388.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-07376.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-06356.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-05384.8x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-04331.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-03354.2x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-02314.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2022-01367.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-12353.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-11328.2x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-10355.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-09377.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-08395.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-07411.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-06412.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-05377.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-04381.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-03380.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-02366.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2021-01383.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-12387.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-11359.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-10388.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-09419.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-08414.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-07395.8x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-06423.2x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-05383.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-04306.5x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-03246.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-02312.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2020-01294.4x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-12253.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-11264.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-10256.2x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-09238.9x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-08223.3x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-07218.7x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-06247.6x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-05273.2x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-04293.1x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-03313.8x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-02309.8x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x
2019-01312.0x₹727 cr18.9%20.0%0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback