अApnaFunda

CONCORD BIOTECH LIMITED (CONCORDBIO)

Health Technology · Pharmaceuticals: Other · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.72 / 100
Profitability 78Growth 38Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.26 / 100
Price 23Earnings 30FII/DII 24

Passes these screensCash RichDebt-light & profitable

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹596.8 latest close · −6.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹700₹800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹700₹800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹596.8 month-end · −15.8% over 12 months

₹500₹600₹700Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹500₹600₹700Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹596.8 month-end · −10.7% over 3 years

₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹596.8 month-end · +22.5% since Aug '23

₹600₹800₹1,000Aug '23Apr '24Dec '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Aug '23Apr '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹493.50 to ₹807.50 · 1-year volatility 43.5%

Was the rally earned?

-16%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 24 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 20.8x to 22.7x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−24 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+8 ptsP/E changeShare price: −16%−16%Share priceNet profit growth: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−24ProfitP/E change: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+8P/EShare price: −16%−16%Share price
Net profit growth-24 ptsNet profit fell about 23%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+8 ptsThe P/E rose from 20.8x to 22.7x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-11%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 13 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 29.1x to 22.7x), which took 24 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24 ptsP/E changeShare price: −11%−11%Share priceNet profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13ProfitP/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24P/EShare price: −11%−11%Share price
Net profit growth+13 ptsNet profit rose about 15%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-24 ptsThe P/E fell from 29.1x to 22.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with CIPLA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-61.0%not yet recovered
1-year volatility43.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.943-year daily, correlation 0.32
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−61.0% 0%−20%−40%−60%202420252026−61.0%
Largest drawdowns

-61.0% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-16.3% (2024-04 peak to 2024-05 low, recovered 2024-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-21: 5.2x the 50-day median, price +5.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

22.7xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history25th percentile
CheapestMedian 26.0xDearest

Usual range 19.6x to 34.0x since 2023-08.

Against Health Technology22.7x vs 37.0x
This company
22.7x
Sector median
37.0x

39% below the Health Technology median.

17.1x25.4x33.7x42.1xAug '23Apr '24Dec '24Aug '25Apr '26Nov '2617.1x25.4x33.7x42.1xAug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Technology median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Health Technology is valued

Where does it rank among Health Technology peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Health Technology peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE62nd▼ 29 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin93rd▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth10th▼ 60 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth23rd▼ 35 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓97thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓4th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓73rd▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum21st▼ 6 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Health Technology sector page Watch it move against Health Technology in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~15%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 22.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 14.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered12.8%/yrEPS, last 7 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+2.1 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank493rdmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%13%26% Aug 2023Nov 2026 0%13%26% Aug 2023Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x16.2%17.2%18.3%
15x13.9%14.9%15.9%
20x10.9%11.9%12.9%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 14.9%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Health Technology The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹596.80
P/E
22.7x
ROCE
17.0%
Market Cap
₹6241 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1108 cr
P/S
5.6x
P/B
3.1x
ROE
13.6%
Operating Margin
32.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
44.1%
12M Momentum
-15.8%

52-week range

₹493.50₹807.50
33% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.09

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.83x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance14%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 14.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.83xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.83x (cash from operations ₹777 cr, net profit ₹939 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+34 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 34 days (159 vs 125). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress10% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 10% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+1 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +1 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 1.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 1.0 lakh to 83,325 (-17%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters44.1%44.1%0.0 pts
FIIs7.3%7.5%+0.2 pts
DIIs8.1%9.4%+1.3 pts
Public and others40.5%39.0%-1.5 pts

Number of shareholders

83,325shareholders-17% since Sep '23
81k87k94k1.0L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.0 lakh
Dec '23: 87,486
Mar '24: 83,296
Jun '24: 80,737
Sep '24: 84,298
Dec '24: 82,004
Mar '25: 81,219
Jun '25: 82,045
Sep '25: 82,650
Dec '25: 81,815
Mar '26: 82,249
Jun '26: 83,325
81k87k94k1.0L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.0 lakh
Dec '23: 87,486
Mar '24: 83,296
Jun '24: 80,737
Sep '24: 84,298
Dec '24: 82,004
Mar '25: 81,219
Jun '25: 82,045
Sep '25: 82,650
Dec '25: 81,815
Mar '26: 82,249
Jun '26: 83,325

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−3.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CONCORD BIOTECH LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −26% to +44% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+0.1%, 80% range −9.7% to +7.7%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
NDTV · Feb 2024: −52.0% vs market
FMGOETZE · Apr 2020: −50.0% vs market
CHEMCON · Oct 2022: −42.8% vs market
MANINFRA · Jun 2025: −42.6% vs market
ADOR · Mar 2024: −41.1% vs market
INDNIPPON · Sep 2020: −37.6% vs market
NUCLEUS · Jun 2025: −36.8% vs market
LAOPALA · Jul 2025: −36.6% vs market
INTELLECT · Aug 2025: −35.3% vs market
HONDAPOWER · Aug 2025: −32.9% vs market
SANOFI · Oct 2024: −31.4% vs market
JUSTDIAL · Jan 2022: −29.9% vs market
CARERATING · Apr 2021: −25.7% vs market
BALAMINES · Jul 2024: −24.9% vs market
MOIL · Oct 2020: −23.9% vs market
TECHNOE · Apr 2021: −20.5% vs market
FINCABLES · Mar 2021: −19.8% vs market
GLAND · Apr 2024: −19.5% vs market
RITES · Aug 2025: −16.9% vs market
SUMICHEM · Dec 2024: −16.2% vs market
ZEEL · Oct 2022: −10.0% vs market
EIMCOELECO · Aug 2025: −9.2% vs market
ACI · Jan 2025: −8.9% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Jun 2020: −7.1% vs market
KSCL · Jan 2020: −3.8% vs market
CONTROLPR · Apr 2020: −2.7% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Jan 2023: −2.5% vs market
NESCO · Apr 2022: −2.4% vs market
ENGINERSIN · Jun 2025: −0.3% vs market
GPPL · Feb 2020: +1.4% vs market
THYROCARE · Mar 2024: +11.2% vs market
DELTACORP · May 2021: +18.9% vs market
GREAVESCOT · Mar 2021: +21.1% vs market
QUICKHEAL · May 2020: +27.6% vs market
TRITURBINE · Jul 2021: +29.9% vs market
VOLTAMP · Dec 2021: +34.2% vs market
SASKEN · May 2020: +35.9% vs market
CUMMINSIND · Nov 2021: +47.3% vs market
NINSYS · May 2025: +47.3% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Jul 2020: +48.1% vs market
BDL · Sep 2023: +55.0% vs market
GMDCLTD · Oct 2024: +56.4% vs market
NOCIL · Jun 2020: +59.8% vs market
FCL · Oct 2025: +71.4% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Jun 2023: +87.4% vs market
SUPRIYA · May 2024: +87.7% vs market
GOLDIAM · Dec 2023: +92.5% vs market
ANUP · Jul 2022: +110.3% vs market
VIMTALABS · Oct 2024: +154.4% vs market
BLS · Jun 2021: +197.7% vs market
Similar setups −3.2%All companies −3.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−3.2%
All companies' median
−3.3%
Beat the market
42% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
RITES
Commercial Services
Aug 2025 31x22% −25%−35% −17%
KSCL
Process Industries
Jan 2020 14x20% −21%−21% −4%
QUICKHEAL
Technology Services
May 2020 8x18% −46%−47% +28%
LAOPALA
Consumer Durables
Jul 2025 31x15% −14%−28% −37%
NOCIL
Process Industries
Jun 2020 11x13% −29%−33% +60%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TECHNOE
Industrial Services
Apr 2021 18x13% +45%−9% −21%
GLAND
Health Technology
Apr 2024 36x15% +26%−20% −20%
MANINFRA
Finance
Jun 2025 24x24% −8%−29% −43%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and drawdown from 12-month high. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CONCORD BIOTECH LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Non-Durables
69%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
INDIGO PAINTSINDIGOPNTS
Process Industries
66%similar
EPS growthrevenue growth
Technology Services
65%similar
market capROCE
Technology Services
65%similar
debt/equityoperating margin
Process Industries
63%similar
debt/equityrevenue
NATCO PHARMANATCOPHARM
Health Technology
53%similar
ROCErevenue growth
Health Technology
50%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Health Technology
49%similar
ROCEmarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

17 events since Dec '23

  1. SepPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2026-09-21; price +5.7% that day.
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Health Technology on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  3. JunPriceVolume reached 28.8x its 50-day median on 2026-06-03; price +3.0% that day.
  4. MarPriceFell 61% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  5. FebPriceVolume reached 175.1x its 50-day median on 2026-02-25; price +14.4% that day.
  6. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Health Technology on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2025-10-24; price -2.5% that day.
Show 9 earlier events
  1. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (23.7x).
  2. MayPriceVolume reached 19.2x its 50-day median on 2025-05-08; price +9.1% that day.
  3. MarPriceVolume reached 16.7x its 50-day median on 2025-03-04; price +14.6% that day.
  4. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.1 pts over 2 quarters to 18.0%.
  5. DecPriceVolume reached 19.1x its 50-day median on 2024-12-31; price +0.8% that day.
  6. SepPriceVolume reached 43.3x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price +15.6% that day.
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 67.8x its 50-day median on 2024-05-28; price -3.1% that day.
  8. FebPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2024-02-09; price -1.2% that day.
  9. DecPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2023-12-22; price +10.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history40 months · 2023-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1122.7x₹1108 cr13.6%17.0%0.0x
2026-1023.7x₹1108 cr13.5%17.0%0.0x
2026-0926.1x₹1108 cr13.5%17.0%0.0x
2026-0829.0x₹1055 cr12.8%17.0%0.0x
2026-0728.5x₹1055 cr12.8%17.0%0.0x
2026-0625.7x₹1055 cr12.8%17.0%0.0x
2026-0517.6x₹1159 cr17.2%28.0%0.0x
2026-0419.1x₹1159 cr17.2%28.0%0.0x
2026-0317.0x₹1159 cr17.2%28.0%0.0x
2026-0219.7x₹1125 cr17.8%28.0%0.0x
2026-0119.0x₹1125 cr17.8%28.0%0.0x
2025-1221.7x₹1125 cr17.8%28.0%0.0x
2025-1120.8x₹1188 cr19.6%28.0%0.0x
2025-1021.2x₹1188 cr19.6%28.0%0.0x
2025-0924.2x₹1188 cr19.6%28.0%0.0x
2025-0823.7x₹1200 cr20.5%28.0%0.0x
2025-0724.9x₹1200 cr20.5%28.0%0.0x
2025-0625.9x₹1200 cr20.5%28.0%0.0x
2025-0528.0x₹1089 cr21.4%28.0%0.0x
2025-0424.3x₹1089 cr21.4%28.0%0.0x
2025-0326.9x₹1089 cr21.4%28.0%0.0x
2025-0223.9x₹1086 cr21.6%28.0%0.0x
2025-0134.4x₹1086 cr21.6%28.0%0.0x
2024-1235.3x₹1086 cr21.6%28.0%0.0x
2024-1135.5x₹1038 cr20.6%28.0%0.0x
2024-1030.6x₹1038 cr20.6%28.0%0.0x
2024-0934.0x₹1038 cr20.6%28.0%0.0x
2024-0828.3x₹1017 cr20.2%28.0%0.0x
2024-0727.9x₹1017 cr20.2%28.0%0.0x
2024-0626.3x₹1017 cr20.2%28.0%0.0x
2024-0531.9x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2024-0436.3x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2024-0333.1x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2024-0231.7x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2024-0131.7x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2023-1232.1x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2023-1129.1x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2023-1025.0x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2023-0923.6x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x
2023-0821.2x₹853 cr18.6%26.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback