अApnaFunda

JIO FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED (JIOFIN)

Finance · Financial Conglomerates · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.78 / 100
Profitability 53Growth 100Balance sheet 80
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.34 / 100
Price 40Earnings 48FII/DII 12

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹230 latest close · −3.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹220₹240₹260Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹220₹240₹260Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹230 month-end · −24.9% over 12 months

₹200₹250₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹230 month-end · +0.3% over 3 years

₹200₹300Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹230 month-end · −1.5% since Aug '23

₹200₹300Aug '23Apr '24Dec '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Aug '23Apr '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹202.51 to ₹316.85 · 1-year volatility 29.0%

Was the rally earned?

-25%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 20 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 120.1x to 71.9x), which took 45 points back.
  • The share count rose 4%.
Net profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−45 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: −25%−25%Share priceNet profit growth: +23 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+23ProfitP/E change: −45 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−45P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: −25%−25%Share price
Net profit growth+23 ptsNet profit rose about 30%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-45 ptsThe P/E fell from 120.1x to 71.9x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 4%, which lowers the price.
+0%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (+0%).
  • The share count rose 330050%.
Net profit growth: +423 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+423 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +389 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+389 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −811 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−811 ptsShare count changeShare price: 0%0%Share priceNet profit growth: +423 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+423ProfitP/E change: +389 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+389P/EShare count change: −811 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−811SharesShare price: 0%0%Share price
Net profit growth+423 ptsNet profit growth over the period.
P/E change+389 ptsThe P/E rose from 1.5x to 71.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-811 ptsShare count rose 330050%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BAJAJ HOLDINGS & INVESTMENT LI

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-48.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility29.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.103-year daily, correlation 0.61
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202420252026−47.3% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−47.3%
Largest drawdowns

-48.2% (2024-04 peak to 2025-03 low, not yet recovered)

-19.0% (2023-09 peak to 2023-10 low, recovered 2024-01)

-15.2% (2023-08 peak to 2023-08 low, recovered 2023-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-07-17: 8.5x the 50-day median, price +3.1% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

71.9xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history10th percentile
CheapestMedian 109.2xDearest

Usual range 81.3x to 130.3x since 2023-08.

Against Finance71.9x vs 18.1x
This company
71.9x
Sector median
18.1x

297% above the Finance median.

17.2x58.6x100.1x141.6xAug '23Apr '24Dec '24Aug '25Apr '26Nov '2617.2x58.6x100.1x141.6xAug '23Sep '24Oct '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE23rd▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin83rdflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth91st▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth70th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓48th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓73rd▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓8thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum32nd▼ 37 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~31%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 71.9x, the price would imply about 30.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹230.00
P/E
71.9x
ROCE
2.0%
Market Cap
₹1.52L cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹4905 cr
P/S
31.0x
P/B
1.1x
ROE
1.6%
Operating Margin
70.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
49.1%
12M Momentum
-24.9%

52-week range

₹202.51₹316.85
24% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
29.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.16

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance13%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 12.8%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate20%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 20.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-5.48xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -5.48x (cash from operations ₹-26,206 cr, net profit ₹4,779 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 4 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+3 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 3 days (6 vs 3). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress32% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 32% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 10.3 pts; promoters added 2.4 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 39.8 lakh to 49.7 lakh (+25%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters46.8%49.1%+2.4 pts
FIIs21.6%11.3%-10.3 pts
DIIs13.6%13.3%-0.4 pts
Public and others17.9%26.1%+8.3 pts

Number of shareholders

49.7 lakhshareholders+25% since Sep '23
39.8L44.1L48.3L52.6L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 39.8 lakh
Dec '23: 40.8 lakh
Mar '24: 44.0 lakh
Jun '24: 48.0 lakh
Sep '24: 48.6 lakh
Dec '24: 49.8 lakh
Mar '25: 52.6 lakh
Jun '25: 51.2 lakh
Sep '25: 50.7 lakh
Dec '25: 49.6 lakh
Mar '26: 49.4 lakh
Jun '26: 49.7 lakh
39.8L44.1L48.3L52.6L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 39.8 lakh
Dec '23: 40.8 lakh
Mar '24: 44.0 lakh
Jun '24: 48.0 lakh
Sep '24: 48.6 lakh
Dec '24: 49.8 lakh
Mar '25: 52.6 lakh
Jun '25: 51.2 lakh
Sep '25: 50.7 lakh
Dec '25: 49.6 lakh
Mar '26: 49.4 lakh
Jun '26: 49.7 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like JIO FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +26% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+2.3%, 80% range −4.7% to +12.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
DELTACORP · Apr 2023: −59.6% vs market
TEJASNET · Jul 2024: −50.0% vs market
EIHOTEL · Feb 2020: −46.1% vs market
VIPIND · May 2023: −44.1% vs market
MAHLIFE · May 2024: −37.8% vs market
SJVN · Aug 2025: −35.8% vs market
JUNIPER · Apr 2025: −33.6% vs market
ZYDUSWELL · Feb 2021: −31.0% vs market
ITI · May 2021: −30.8% vs market
IMAGICAA · Jun 2025: −29.6% vs market
JUBLINGREA · May 2022: −29.0% vs market
SUNTECK · Aug 2024: −27.6% vs market
GREAVESCOT · Aug 2023: −24.2% vs market
DRREDDY · Mar 2021: −23.0% vs market
BATAINDIA · Oct 2022: −22.0% vs market
SHREECEM · Jul 2023: −22.0% vs market
PILANIINVS · Jul 2021: −21.7% vs market
ADANIPORTS · May 2021: −11.0% vs market
MAHSCOOTER · Jul 2020: −10.3% vs market
NAUKRI · Sep 2025: −7.4% vs market
JSWINFRA · May 2025: −7.4% vs market
SYNGENE · Jun 2021: −4.9% vs market
FORTIS · May 2021: −3.2% vs market
NAZARA · Jan 2024: −2.1% vs market
TATACONSUM · Sep 2021: −1.7% vs market
DLF · Jun 2024: −0.5% vs market
BIOCON · Jan 2020: +6.1% vs market
NYKAA · Mar 2024: +6.7% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · May 2020: +8.7% vs market
ULTRACEMCO · Apr 2020: +11.2% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · May 2025: +12.7% vs market
ABB · Jun 2025: +15.4% vs market
SUNPHARMA · May 2021: +19.2% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Oct 2025: +19.9% vs market
TRENT · May 2021: +22.1% vs market
AZAD · Jun 2025: +23.2% vs market
MAXESTATES · Sep 2025: +25.5% vs market
INDHOTEL · Oct 2023: +26.7% vs market
JSWHL · Aug 2020: +29.6% vs market
POLICYBZR · Jul 2024: +32.4% vs market
GODREJPROP · Apr 2023: +36.2% vs market
ANURAS · Apr 2022: +38.1% vs market
MAXHEALTH · Aug 2022: +38.7% vs market
LODHA · Dec 2022: +47.8% vs market
TATAINVEST · Nov 2021: +53.6% vs market
RADICO · Jul 2024: +68.5% vs market
AETHER · Jun 2025: +78.1% vs market
OLECTRA · Oct 2022: +84.9% vs market
MCX · Feb 2025: +107.4% vs market
CARTRADE · Aug 2024: +206.6% vs market
Similar setups −1.1%All companies −3.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.1%
All companies' median
−3.4%
Beat the market
48% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GODREJPROP
Finance
Apr 2023 104x5% −16%−19% +36%
MAHLIFE
Finance
May 2024 111x2% +28%−14% −38%
ZYDUSWELL
Consumer Non-Durables
Feb 2021 78x6% +30%−11% −31%
INDHOTEL
Consumer Services
Oct 2023 54x13% +15%−11% +27%
DLF
Finance
Jun 2024 75x6% +68%−13% −1%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SUNTECK
Finance
Aug 2024 118x5% +58%−10% −28%
PHOENIXLTD
Finance
May 2025 53x12% −1%−25% +13%
MAXHEALTH
Health Services
Aug 2022 62x12% +1%−12% +39%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to JIO FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

BIOCONBIOCON
Health Technology
49%similar
ROCEvolatility
Retail Trade
49%similar
market capP/E
Technology Services
49%similar
ROCEmarket cap
ITC HOTELSITCHOTELS
Consumer Services
48%similar
revenuevolatility
Producer Manufacturing
48%similar
revenueP/E
PHOENIX MILLSPHOENIXLTD
Finance
56%similar
revenueoperating margin
Finance
36%similar
P/Emarket cap
Finance
35%similar
operating marginrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

14 events since Feb '24

  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.0 pts to 49.1%.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  3. SepValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (67.8x).
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2026-07-17; price +3.1% that day.
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
Show 6 earlier events
  1. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 20% of profit).
  2. MarPriceFell 48% from the Apr 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  3. MarPriceVolume reached 8.4x its 50-day median on 2025-03-27; price +1.4% that day.
  4. AugSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  5. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.3 pts over 2 quarters to 31.9%.
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 13.3x its 50-day median on 2024-02-23; price +10.3% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history40 months · 2023-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1171.9x₹4905 cr1.6%2.0%0.2x
2026-1063.9x₹4905 cr1.5%2.0%0.2x
2026-0967.8x₹4905 cr1.5%2.0%0.2x
2026-0898.5x₹3513 cr1.2%2.0%0.2x
2026-07104.7x₹3513 cr1.2%2.0%0.2x
2026-0696.5x₹3513 cr1.2%2.0%0.2x
2026-0594.8x₹2987 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2026-0497.8x₹2987 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2026-0388.9x₹2987 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2026-0299.8x₹2524 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2026-0199.4x₹2524 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-12115.2x₹2524 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-11120.1x₹2237 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-10120.3x₹2237 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-09115.0x₹2237 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-08123.2x₹2043 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-07130.1x₹2043 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-06129.2x₹2043 cr1.3%1.0%0.0x
2025-05113.8x₹1968 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2025-04103.3x₹1968 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2025-0390.3x₹1968 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2025-0282.4x₹1944 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2025-0195.9x₹1944 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2024-12118.5x₹1944 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2024-11131.9x₹1858 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2024-10129.4x₹1858 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2024-09140.8x₹1858 cr1.1%2.0%0.0x
2024-08127.2x₹1855 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2024-07129.8x₹1855 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2024-06141.6x₹1855 cr1.2%2.0%0.0x
2024-05—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2024-04—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2024-03—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2024-02—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2024-01—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2023-12—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2023-11—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2023-10—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2023-09—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x
2023-08—₹45 cr0.0%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback