अApnaFunda

GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED (GODREJPROP)

Finance · Real Estate Development · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.47 / 100
Profitability 28Growth 79Balance sheet 35
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.32 / 100
Price 27Earnings 63FII/DII 5

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,814.6 latest close · −9.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,500₹1,750₹2,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,500₹1,750₹2,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,814.6 month-end · −14.2% over 12 months

₹1,600₹1,800₹2,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,600₹1,800₹2,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,814.6 month-end · −3.3% over 3 years

₹2,000₹3,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹2,000₹3,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹1,814.6 month-end · +144.6% since Jan '19

₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹1434.00 to ₹2327.40 · 1-year volatility 36.8%

Was the rally earned?

-14%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 6 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 42.2x to 34.2x), which took 20 points back.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+8 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −14%−14%Share priceNet profit growth: +8 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+8ProfitP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −14%−14%Share price
Net profit growth+8 ptsNet profit rose about 9%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-20 ptsThe P/E fell from 42.2x to 34.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
-3%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (-3%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +93 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+93 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −97 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−97 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −3%−3%Share priceNet profit growth: +93 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+93ProfitP/E change: −97 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−97P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −3%−3%Share price
Net profit growth+93 ptsNet profit rose about 158%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-97 ptsThe P/E fell from 91.3x to 34.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DLF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.5%recovered 2024-04
1-year volatility36.8%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.373-year daily, correlation 0.65
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−58.8% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−58.8%
Largest drawdowns

-59.5% (2021-10 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-04)

-56.5% (2024-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-52.1% (2020-02 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

34.1xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history11th percentile
CheapestMedian 86.3xDearest

Usual range 34.2x to 130.7x since 2019-01.

Against Finance34.1x vs 18.1x
This company
34.1x
Sector median
18.1x

89% above the Finance median.

9.5x80.1x150.6x221.2xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '269.5x80.1x150.6x221.2xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE48th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin7thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth49th▼ 42 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth52nd▼ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓21stflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓47th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓29thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum53rd▲ 19 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~28%annual earnings growth implied by the priceIn line with delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 54.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 27.5%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered27.4%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+0.2 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank524thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-15%19%52% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -15%19%52% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x29.2%30.4%31.6%
15x26.4%27.5%28.7%
20x22.8%23.9%25.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 27.5%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 39%/yr; EPS has since grown 28%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 42%/yr; EPS has since grown 33%/yr (6.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1814.60
P/E
34.2x
ROCE
8.0%
Market Cap
₹54660 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5202 cr
P/S
10.5x
P/B
2.9x
ROE
8.4%
Operating Margin
-58.0%
Debt / Equity
0.8x
Promoter Holding
51.7%
12M Momentum
-14.2%

52-week range

₹1434.00₹2327.40
43% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
36.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.42

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
16.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-1.24x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 6checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance138%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 138.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate28%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 28.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-1.24xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -1.24x (cash from operations ₹-4,938 cr, net profit ₹3,977 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (39 vs 37). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress10% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 10% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 6.8 pts; DIIs added 4.4 pts; FIIs trimmed 3.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1.5 lakh to 1.9 lakh (+24%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters58.5%51.7%-6.8 pts
FIIs29.3%25.3%-3.9 pts
DIIs4.6%9.0%+4.4 pts
Public and others7.7%14.0%+6.4 pts

Number of shareholders

1.9 lakhshareholders+24% since Sep '23
1.3L1.5L1.7L1.9L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.5 lakh
Dec '23: 1.4 lakh
Mar '24: 1.3 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.5 lakh
Mar '25: 1.6 lakh
Jun '25: 1.7 lakh
Sep '25: 1.9 lakh
Dec '25: 1.8 lakh
Mar '26: 1.9 lakh
Jun '26: 1.9 lakh
1.3L1.5L1.7L1.9L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 1.5 lakh
Dec '23: 1.4 lakh
Mar '24: 1.3 lakh
Jun '24: 1.3 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.5 lakh
Mar '25: 1.6 lakh
Jun '25: 1.7 lakh
Sep '25: 1.9 lakh
Dec '25: 1.8 lakh
Mar '26: 1.9 lakh
Jun '26: 1.9 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +17% vs the market, against +2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −7.7%, 80% range −12.4% to −2.1%), but the matches cluster in only 5 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
ASIANTILES · Dec 2020: −56.5% vs market
SHILPAMED · Oct 2021: −48.0% vs market
EIHOTEL · Feb 2020: −46.1% vs market
AARTIIND · Mar 2022: −43.0% vs market
IMAGICAA · Feb 2025: −41.3% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · May 2023: −37.9% vs market
CROMPTON · Sep 2022: −35.2% vs market
RAMCOCEM · Apr 2021: −34.8% vs market
HESTERBIO · Jul 2022: −32.9% vs market
JUBLFOOD · Mar 2023: −31.4% vs market
DALBHARAT · Jul 2021: −30.5% vs market
BIOCON · Jul 2022: −27.0% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Jun 2021: −24.8% vs market
TORNTPHARM · Jan 2021: −24.7% vs market
SAPPHIRE · Jun 2023: −22.2% vs market
MOTILALOFS · Sep 2020: −19.3% vs market
INDHOTEL · Mar 2020: −17.8% vs market
NHPC · Apr 2024: −12.2% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · Jul 2020: −10.7% vs market
UPL · Apr 2020: −9.6% vs market
ASTERDM · Apr 2020: −9.3% vs market
ADANIPORTS · Jun 2022: −8.4% vs market
METROBRAND · Jun 2024: −8.3% vs market
BALKRISIND · Jun 2023: −7.0% vs market
GODREJCP · Jan 2020: −7.0% vs market
DLF · Aug 2024: −5.2% vs market
SYNGENE · Jan 2023: −4.0% vs market
APOLLOHOSP · Oct 2022: −2.8% vs market
LODHA · Jul 2024: −0.1% vs market
UNOMINDA · Jan 2023: +1.7% vs market
JKCEMENT · Nov 2022: +3.5% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Dec 2021: +4.6% vs market
ANURAS · Jul 2022: +6.7% vs market
FORTIS · Mar 2023: +8.8% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · Oct 2022: +12.1% vs market
JSWENERGY · Nov 2022: +15.9% vs market
TATACHEM · Feb 2022: +17.0% vs market
SUNPHARMA · Feb 2020: +17.1% vs market
ZYDUSLIFE · Feb 2020: +22.9% vs market
ULTRACEMCO · Aug 2020: +26.0% vs market
IPCALAB · Dec 2023: +29.5% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Apr 2022: +35.8% vs market
BHARATFORG · May 2023: +36.8% vs market
VBL · Apr 2021: +38.2% vs market
CCL · Jun 2022: +44.3% vs market
MAXHEALTH · Aug 2024: +45.2% vs market
RADICO · May 2024: +52.9% vs market
CIPLA · Jan 2020: +55.2% vs market
ERIS · Jun 2024: +61.1% vs market
SRF · Feb 2021: +82.6% vs market
Similar setups −6.1%All companies +1.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.1%
All companies' median
+1.6%
Beat the market
42% vs 52%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
OBEROIRLTY
Finance
Oct 2022 32x12% +2%−14% +12%
PHOENIXLTD
Finance
Jul 2020 28x9% −4%−34% −11%
BIOCON
Health Technology
Jul 2022 57x9% −21%−25% −27%
ADANIPORTS
Transportation
Jun 2022 29x11% −5%−26% −8%
AARTIIND
Process Industries
Mar 2022 64x13% +45%−17% −43%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SRF
Process Industries
Feb 2021 31x14% +40%−10% +83%
RAMCOCEM
Non-Energy Minerals
Apr 2021 38x12% +78%−9% −35%
BALKRISIND
Consumer Durables
Jun 2023 43x14% +10%−4% −7%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and revenue growth. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
63%similar
EPS growthvolatility
SWAN CORPSWANCORP
Utilities
59%similar
P/Evolatility
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Retail Trade
58%similar
P/Edebt/equity
Non-Energy Minerals
56%similar
revenuevolatility
SOBHASOBHA
Finance
59%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Finance
47%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
Finance
41%similar
revenue growthP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Nov '22

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 4.5 pts to 51.7% (largest rise in the history since 2019-01).
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.6 pts over 1 quarter to 34.4%.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 16% of profit).
  7. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  8. MarPriceFell 56% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JanPriceVolume reached 12.1x its 50-day median on 2026-01-27; price -1.5% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  3. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.73x).
  4. JunSharesShare count is up 8.6% over 12 months.
  5. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 12.0 pts to 46.5%.
  6. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.8 pts over 1 quarter to 40.3%.
  7. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹3,588 cr.
  8. SepValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (78.5x).
  9. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. JulPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-31; price +1.2% that day.
  11. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹3,036 cr.
  12. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  13. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.07x).
  14. MayPriceVolume reached 9.6x its 50-day median on 2024-05-06; price +10.6% that day.
  15. AprPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 13 months after the low.
  16. JanPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2024-01-04; price +8.0% that day.
  17. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  18. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (76.3x).
  19. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  20. AprPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2023-04-10; price +9.2% that day.
  21. MarPriceFell 60% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  22. NovPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2022-11-10; price +5.6% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1134.2x₹5202 cr8.4%8.0%0.8x
2026-1029.5x₹5202 cr8.3%8.0%0.8x
2026-0930.7x₹5202 cr8.3%8.0%0.8x
2026-0832.8x₹5131 cr9.6%8.0%0.8x
2026-0734.3x₹5131 cr9.6%8.0%0.8x
2026-0630.4x₹5131 cr9.6%8.0%0.8x
2026-0533.6x₹3795 cr9.1%7.0%0.7x
2026-0434.9x₹3795 cr9.1%7.0%0.7x
2026-0328.0x₹3795 cr9.1%7.0%0.7x
2026-0233.6x₹4266 cr8.9%7.0%0.7x
2026-0130.6x₹4266 cr8.9%7.0%0.7x
2025-1239.0x₹4266 cr8.9%7.0%0.7x
2025-1142.2x₹4619 cr8.5%7.0%0.7x
2025-1045.7x₹4619 cr8.5%7.0%0.7x
2025-0939.3x₹4619 cr8.5%7.0%0.7x
2025-0839.9x₹4923 cr8.0%7.0%0.7x
2025-0743.1x₹4923 cr8.0%7.0%0.7x
2025-0648.0x₹4923 cr8.0%7.0%0.7x
2025-0542.2x₹4227 cr14.9%6.0%1.1x
2025-0440.7x₹4227 cr14.9%6.0%1.1x
2025-0340.1x₹4227 cr14.9%6.0%1.1x
2025-0238.8x₹3588 cr14.0%6.0%1.1x
2025-0146.6x₹3588 cr14.0%6.0%1.1x
2024-1255.8x₹3588 cr14.0%6.0%1.1x
2024-1168.9x₹2838 cr11.3%6.0%1.1x
2024-1071.4x₹2838 cr11.3%6.0%1.1x
2024-0978.5x₹2838 cr11.3%6.0%1.1x
2024-08111.6x₹3036 cr7.5%6.0%1.1x
2024-07123.4x₹3036 cr7.5%6.0%1.1x
2024-06123.0x₹3036 cr7.5%6.0%1.1x
2024-05135.2x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2024-04128.8x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2024-03111.9x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2024-02116.7x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2024-01115.7x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-1298.0x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-1191.3x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-1080.8x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-0975.6x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-0880.1x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-0784.7x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-0676.3x₹2252 cr6.7%6.0%0.7x
2023-05109.6x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2023-04103.7x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2023-0381.3x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2023-0286.8x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2023-0193.2x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-1296.6x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-11102.9x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-1099.6x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-0994.2x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-08111.0x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-07118.9x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-0693.3x₹1825 cr4.0%5.0%0.6x
2022-05—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2022-04—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2022-03—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2022-02—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2022-01—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-12—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-11—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-10—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-09—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-08—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-07—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-06—₹765 cr-2.3%1.0%0.5x
2021-05127.7x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2021-04127.5x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2021-03131.1x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2021-02143.6x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2021-01117.2x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-12133.5x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-11108.6x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-1096.4x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-0980.2x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-0885.1x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-0786.4x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-0680.8x₹2441 cr5.7%9.0%0.8x
2020-0562.4x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2020-0461.4x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2020-0354.6x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2020-0290.9x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2020-0197.9x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-1289.5x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-1182.3x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-1090.3x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-0994.1x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-0881.6x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-0786.3x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-0690.8x₹2817 cr10.2%10.0%1.4x
2019-05221.2x₹1604 cr7.2%1.0%3.1x
2019-04207.0x₹1604 cr7.2%1.0%3.1x
2019-03202.8x₹1604 cr7.2%1.0%3.1x
2019-02176.9x₹1604 cr7.2%1.0%3.1x
2019-01185.0x₹1604 cr7.2%1.0%3.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback