अApnaFunda

MUKKA PROTEINS LIMITED (MUKKA)

Consumer Non-Durables · Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.23 / 100
Profitability 40Balance sheet 7
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.57 / 100
Price 88Earnings 69FII/DII 14

Passes these screensValue Pick

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹27.81 latest close · +16.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹25₹30Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹25₹30Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹27.81 month-end · +10.0% over 12 months

₹20₹25Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹20₹25Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹27.81 month-end · −23.8% since Mar '24

₹20₹30₹40₹50Mar '24Sep '24Apr '25Oct '25May '26Nov '26 ₹20₹30₹40₹50Mar '24Jul '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹18.27 to ₹33.29 · 1-year volatility 41.6%

Was the rally earned?

+10%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 49 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 17.4x to 12.0x), which took 39 points back.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +55 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+55 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−39 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: +10%+10%Share priceNet profit growth: +55 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+55ProfitP/E change: −39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−39P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: +10%+10%Share price
Net profit growth+55 ptsNet profit rose about 68%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-39 ptsThe P/E fell from 17.4x to 12.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with HATSUN AGRO PRODUCTS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-65.9%not yet recovered
1-year volatility41.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.923-year daily, correlation 0.29
Volume spikes10last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−63.4% 0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−63.4%
Largest drawdowns

-65.9% (2024-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-26.4% (2024-03 peak to 2024-06 low, recovered 2024-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-15: 7.6x the 50-day median, price -2.4% that day

2026-09-11: 6.4x the 50-day median, price +5.2% that day

2026-09-09: 6.4x the 50-day median, price -2.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

12.0xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history9th percentile
CheapestMedian 16.0xDearest

Usual range 12.4x to 19.3x since 2024-03.

Against Consumer Non-Durables12.0x vs 26.8x
This company
12.0x
Sector median
26.8x

55% below the Consumer Non-Durables median.

10.6x23.5x36.5x49.5xMar '24Oct '24May '25Dec '25Jul '26Nov '2610.6x23.5x36.5x49.5xMar '24Feb '25Jan '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE45th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin34thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth98th▲ 96 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth88th▲ 77 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓6th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓24th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓84thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum77th▲ 64 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~14%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 17.6x, the price would imply about 13.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹27.81
P/E
12.0x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹834 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1770 cr
P/S
0.5x
P/B
1.7x
ROE
13.9%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Debt / Equity
1.6x
Promoter Holding
73.3%
12M Momentum
10.0%

52-week range

₹18.27₹33.29
64% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
41.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.16

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance31%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 31.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate24%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-2.08xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -2.08x (cash from operations ₹-373 cr, net profit ₹179 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-15 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 15 days (46 vs 61). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress16% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 16% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+31 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +31 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 4.7 pts; DIIs trimmed 2.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 1.2 lakh to 1.3 lakh (+10%) between Mar 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupMar '24Jun '26Change
Promoters73.3%73.3%0.0 pts
FIIs6.5%1.7%-4.7 pts
DIIs2.0%0.0%-2.0 pts
Public and others18.2%24.9%+6.7 pts

Number of shareholders

1.3 lakhshareholders+10% since Mar '24
1.1L1.2L1.4L1.5L Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Mar '24: 1.2 lakh
Jun '24: 1.1 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.5 lakh
Mar '25: 1.5 lakh
Jun '25: 1.5 lakh
Sep '25: 1.4 lakh
Dec '25: 1.4 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh
1.1L1.2L1.4L1.5L Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Mar '24: 1.2 lakh
Jun '24: 1.1 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.5 lakh
Mar '25: 1.5 lakh
Jun '25: 1.5 lakh
Sep '25: 1.4 lakh
Dec '25: 1.4 lakh
Mar '26: 1.3 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+15.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MUKKA PROTEINS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +72% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+18.6%, 80% range −1.9% to +30.8%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
FOODSIN · Sep 2023: −52.7% vs market
TNPL · Feb 2020: −41.1% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · May 2025: −38.8% vs market
LAGNAM · Jul 2024: −38.4% vs market
RBS · Oct 2025: −37.6% vs market
RITCO · Dec 2024: −33.9% vs market
EMAMIPAP · Oct 2022: −31.6% vs market
PARACABLES · Mar 2020: −31.4% vs market
IVP · Apr 2023: −30.9% vs market
EUROBOND · Oct 2025: −29.6% vs market
BSL · Nov 2024: −29.5% vs market
UTTAMSUGAR · May 2025: −24.7% vs market
DOLLEX · Jun 2025: −24.4% vs market
DONEAR · Mar 2025: −22.0% vs market
RGL · Mar 2020: −20.0% vs market
JAYSREETEA · Jun 2021: −16.9% vs market
PARADEEP · Jun 2023: −9.8% vs market
NITINSPIN · Jul 2024: −8.2% vs market
SALSTEEL · Sep 2022: −7.3% vs market
SMCGLOBAL · Jun 2024: −5.4% vs market
SANDHAR · Jun 2024: −4.2% vs market
RANEHOLDIN · Sep 2025: −3.5% vs market
VISHNU · Feb 2020: +6.3% vs market
NECLIFE · Apr 2020: +10.0% vs market
MUKANDLTD · Dec 2022: +13.9% vs market
SPIC · Apr 2020: +16.1% vs market
RAIN · Feb 2020: +17.8% vs market
UGARSUGAR · Aug 2020: +19.6% vs market
JBMA · Jan 2020: +24.9% vs market
MANOMAY · Oct 2025: +25.8% vs market
SUMIT · Jun 2024: +33.3% vs market
ASHAPURMIN · Jul 2023: +40.7% vs market
JKTYRE · May 2020: +42.9% vs market
NFL · Apr 2020: +43.4% vs market
UNITEDPOLY · Mar 2025: +56.5% vs market
TBZ · Oct 2023: +61.4% vs market
GOODLUCK · Jan 2023: +69.1% vs market
MWL · Oct 2025: +72.9% vs market
PGIL · May 2023: +77.6% vs market
PITTIENG · May 2023: +77.6% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Feb 2023: +82.5% vs market
FILATEX · May 2020: +93.2% vs market
LUMAXIND · Apr 2025: +102.6% vs market
AVADHSUGAR · Apr 2021: +113.9% vs market
KAPSTON · Jun 2025: +131.2% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Jan 2025: +134.0% vs market
DHAMPURSUG · Mar 2021: +136.9% vs market
ELECTCAST · May 2023: +139.5% vs market
PENIND · Aug 2022: +153.7% vs market
GOKEX · Apr 2021: +255.3% vs market
Similar setups +15.0%All companies −3.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 8 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+15.0%
All companies' median
−3.6%
Beat the market
56% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MUKANDLTD
Non-Energy Minerals
Dec 2022 11x8% +8%−12% +14%
GOODLUCK
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2023 16x16% +29%−16% +69%
EMAMIPAP
Process Industries
Oct 2022 9x17% +17%−7% −32%
NITINSPIN
Process Industries
Jul 2024 18x12% +84%−3% −8%
PARADEEP
Process Industries
Jun 2023 17x11% +60%−8% −10%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NFL
Process Industries
Apr 2020 4x11% −29%−38% +43%
UGARSUGAR
Process Industries
Aug 2020 12x11% +17%−12% +20%
JAYSREETEA
Process Industries
Jun 2021 16x7% +139%−3% −17%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: interest cover, P/S and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MUKKA PROTEINS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
73%similar
debt/equityvolatility
Electronic Technology
68%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
Non-Energy Minerals
65%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
Process Industries
64%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Producer Manufacturing
63%similar
ROCEoperating margin
Consumer Non-Durables
54%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Consumer Non-Durables
53%similar
operating marginvolatility
Consumer Non-Durables
53%similar
volatilitymarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

29 events since Jun '24

  1. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,770 cr.
  2. SepValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (11.2x).
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 27.5x its 50-day median on 2026-09-04; price +9.1% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2026-06-16; price +4.3% that day.
  8. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,452 cr.
Show 21 earlier events
  1. MarPriceFell 66% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  2. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (12.4x).
  3. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. FebPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2026-02-12; price +3.6% that day.
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. DecPriceVolume reached 78.7x its 50-day median on 2025-12-04; price +0.9% that day.
  7. SepPriceVolume reached 12.6x its 50-day median on 2025-09-10; price +3.7% that day.
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.03x).
  10. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  11. MarSharesShare count is up 36.4% over 12 months.
  12. FebPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2025-02-01; price +2.1% that day.
  13. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.7 pts over 2 quarters to 4.8%.
  14. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. OctPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2024-10-21; price +9.6% that day.
  16. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  17. JulPriceRegained the 2024-03 peak, 1 month after the low.
  18. JulPriceVolume reached 85.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-16; price +15.0% that day.
  19. JunPriceFell 26% from the Mar 2024 peak to the Jun 2024 low.
  20. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  21. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.92x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history33 months · 2024-03 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1112.0x₹1770 cr13.9%12.0%1.6x
2026-1010.5x₹1770 cr13.9%12.0%1.6x
2026-0911.2x₹1770 cr13.9%12.0%1.6x
2026-0814.3x₹1451 cr10.7%12.0%1.6x
2026-0713.0x₹1451 cr10.7%12.0%1.6x
2026-0613.8x₹1451 cr10.7%12.0%1.6x
2026-0515.3x₹1452 cr10.6%12.0%1.0x
2026-0416.1x₹1452 cr10.6%12.0%1.0x
2026-0312.4x₹1452 cr10.6%12.0%1.0x
2026-0214.4x₹1101 cr10.6%12.0%1.0x
2026-0114.7x₹1101 cr10.6%12.0%1.0x
2025-1215.2x₹1101 cr10.6%12.0%1.0x
2025-1117.4x₹1005 cr9.3%12.0%1.0x
2025-1017.4x₹1005 cr9.3%12.0%1.0x
2025-0918.0x₹1005 cr9.3%12.0%1.0x
2025-0817.3x₹1006 cr10.0%12.0%1.0x
2025-0718.5x₹1006 cr10.0%12.0%1.0x
2025-0619.4x₹1006 cr10.0%12.0%1.0x
2025-0515.5x₹881 cr14.7%19.0%0.9x
2025-0416.0x₹881 cr14.7%19.0%0.9x
2025-0316.3x₹881 cr14.7%19.0%0.9x
2025-0221.4x₹1095 cr11.1%19.0%0.9x
2025-0122.9x₹1095 cr11.1%19.0%0.9x
2024-1225.8x₹1095 cr11.1%19.0%0.9x
2024-1114.6x₹1278 cr17.7%19.0%0.9x
2024-1015.5x₹1278 cr17.7%19.0%0.9x
2024-0914.5x₹1278 cr17.7%19.0%0.9x
2024-0816.4x₹1380 cr17.5%19.0%0.9x
2024-0718.2x₹1380 cr17.5%19.0%0.9x
2024-0612.5x₹1380 cr17.5%19.0%0.9x
2024-0516.7x₹1177 cr30.4%24.0%1.8x
2024-0418.3x₹1177 cr30.4%24.0%1.8x
2024-0318.3x₹1177 cr30.4%24.0%1.8x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback