अApnaFunda

PREMIER POLYFILM LTD (PREMIERPOL)

Non-Energy Minerals · Forest Products · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.82 / 100
Profitability 83Growth 76Balance sheet 85
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.69 / 100
Price 95Earnings 56FII/DII 57

Passes these screensQuality CompounderHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitable

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹91.18 latest close · +33.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹60₹80₹100₹120Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹60₹80₹100₹120Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹91.18 month-end · +98.9% over 12 months

₹40₹60₹80Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60₹80Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹91.18 month-end · +202.4% over 3 years

₹40₹60₹80Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹40₹60₹80Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹91.18 month-end · +1760.8% since Jan '19

₹0₹50₹100Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹50₹100Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹38.00 to ₹120.00 · 1-year volatility 63.5%

Was the rally earned?

+99%share price, 1 yearEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings added 42 points and the multiple added 57 points (P/E 18.4x to 27.3x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +42 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+42 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+57 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +99%+99%Share priceNet profit growth: +42 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+42ProfitP/E change: +57 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+57P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +99%+99%Share price
Net profit growth+42 ptsNet profit rose about 34%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+57 ptsThe P/E rose from 18.4x to 27.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+202%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 200 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 26.9x to 27.3x).
  • The share count fell 2%.
Net profit growth: +196 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+196 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+3 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4 ptsShare count changeShare price: +202%+202%Share priceNet profit growth: +196 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+196ProfitP/E change: +3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+3P/EShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4SharesShare price: +202%+202%Share price
Net profit growth+196 ptsNet profit rose about 192%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+3 ptsThe P/E rose from 26.9x to 27.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+4 ptsShare count fell 2%, which lifts the price.
+599%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 440 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 16.3x to 27.3x).
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +454 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+454 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +159 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+159 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−14 ptsShare count changeShare price: +599%+599%Share priceNet profit growth: +454 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+454ProfitP/E change: +159 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+159P/EShare count change: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−14SharesShare price: +599%+599%Share price
Net profit growth+454 ptsNet profit rose about 337%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+159 ptsThe P/E rose from 16.3x to 27.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-14 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with STYLAM INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-55.0%recovered 2026-08
1-year volatility63.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.603-year daily, correlation 0.20
Volume spikes13last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−53.5% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−53.5%
Largest drawdowns

-55.0% (2025-01 peak to 2025-11 low, recovered 2026-08)

-54.9% (2019-01 peak to 2019-12 low, recovered 2020-12)

-45.4% (2022-04 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-12: 27.8x the 50-day median, price +11.7% that day

2026-10-05: 17.6x the 50-day median, price +12.0% that day

2026-09-24: 23.2x the 50-day median, price +3.9% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

27.3xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history86th percentile
CheapestMedian 19.1xDearest

Usual range 9.4x to 29.1x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals27.3x vs 21.8x
This company
27.3x
Sector median
21.8x

25% above the Non-Energy Minerals median.

7.1x17.7x28.3x38.9xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '267.1x17.7x28.3x38.9xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE96thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin70th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth72nd▲ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth72nd▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓73rdflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓39th▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓41st▼ 32 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum97th▲ 70 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~25%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 47.2x, the price would imply about 25.2%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹91.18
P/E
27.3x
ROCE
29.0%
Market Cap
₹955 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹322 cr
P/S
3.0x
P/B
6.5x
ROE
23.6%
Operating Margin
15.4%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
71.1%
12M Momentum
98.9%

52-week range

₹38.00₹120.00
65% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
63.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.54

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
61.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.84x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance0%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 0.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.2%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.84xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.84x (cash from operations ₹66 cr, net profit ₹79 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (51 vs 50). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+19 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +19 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 3.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 12,359 to 23,612 (+91%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters67.5%71.1%+3.6 pts
FIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
DIIs1.4%1.0%-0.4 pts
Public and others31.1%27.6%-3.6 pts

Number of shareholders

23,612shareholders+91% since Sep '23
12k16k20k24k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 12,359
Dec '23: 13,624
Mar '24: 11,862
Jun '24: 13,276
Sep '24: 16,090
Dec '24: 23,700
Mar '25: 23,972
Jun '25: 24,136
Sep '25: 24,178
Dec '25: 23,563
Mar '26: 24,052
Jun '26: 23,612
12k16k20k24k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 12,359
Dec '23: 13,624
Mar '24: 11,862
Jun '24: 13,276
Sep '24: 16,090
Dec '24: 23,700
Mar '25: 23,972
Jun '25: 24,136
Sep '25: 24,178
Dec '25: 23,563
Mar '26: 24,052
Jun '26: 23,612

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like PREMIER POLYFILM LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +20% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−3.1%, 80% range −10.5% to +2.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
INDOTECH · Mar 2025: −49.4% vs market
NUCLEUS · Jan 2024: −46.4% vs market
NAHARPOLY · Apr 2022: −45.2% vs market
AESTHETIK · Aug 2025: −44.7% vs market
ARIHANTCAP · Jul 2022: −43.5% vs market
MOLDTECH · Jun 2023: −42.0% vs market
SHYAMCENT · May 2022: −36.0% vs market
SAKSOFT · Jul 2023: −34.8% vs market
KOTHARIPET · Jan 2022: −34.8% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Sep 2022: −34.4% vs market
GLOBUSSPR · Apr 2022: −32.7% vs market
RADHIKAJWE · Jul 2025: −31.9% vs market
PLATIND · Mar 2025: −28.5% vs market
DATAMATICS · Dec 2023: −25.0% vs market
INTERARCH · Aug 2025: −23.8% vs market
CYBERTECH · Jul 2021: −23.7% vs market
IONEXCHANG · Aug 2023: −22.3% vs market
VILAS · Sep 2025: −21.7% vs market
NDRAUTO · Jul 2025: −21.4% vs market
KIRLOSBROS · Feb 2025: −16.0% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Oct 2025: −14.5% vs market
OAL · Jan 2021: −11.4% vs market
BETA · Jun 2022: −8.4% vs market
RAILTEL · May 2024: −8.4% vs market
GOLDIAM · Jan 2022: −7.6% vs market
INFOBEAN · Oct 2025: −6.2% vs market
DYNPRO · Apr 2021: −2.5% vs market
MARKSANS · Aug 2020: −2.4% vs market
INDRAMEDCO · Mar 2025: −0.9% vs market
MPSLTD · Sep 2023: −0.1% vs market
EXPLEOSOL · Feb 2022: +0.7% vs market
INNOVANA · Jun 2023: +3.6% vs market
ACE · Sep 2021: +6.2% vs market
VIDHIING · Aug 2021: +7.2% vs market
DYCL · Sep 2025: +12.3% vs market
ICEMAKE · Jul 2023: +19.3% vs market
TI · Sep 2025: +19.9% vs market
THEJO · Aug 2021: +20.4% vs market
KINGFA · Feb 2025: +28.8% vs market
GRSE · Sep 2023: +41.1% vs market
MONARCH · Jan 2023: +46.3% vs market
MANALIPETC · Mar 2021: +48.0% vs market
NEULANDLAB · Jun 2023: +80.5% vs market
RSYSTEMS · Nov 2020: +88.8% vs market
AURIONPRO · Jun 2023: +90.9% vs market
SBCL · Jul 2022: +119.1% vs market
MASTEK · Mar 2021: +120.4% vs market
BALAMINES · Oct 2020: +157.1% vs market
OBSCP · Oct 2025: +177.3% vs market
FCL · Oct 2021: +196.8% vs market
Similar setups −6.9%All companies −3.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−6.9%
All companies' median
−3.8%
Beat the market
40% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NDRAUTO
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2025 44x23% +94%−16% −21%
INDOTECH
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2025 35x34% +127%−38% −49%
INDRAMEDCO
Health Services
Mar 2025 23x38% +125%−32% −1%
FCL
Process Industries
Oct 2021 31x28% +291%−15% +197%
SAKSOFT
Technology Services
Jul 2023 40x28% +221%−7% −35%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VILAS
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 36x22% +27%−19% −22%
THEJO
Distribution Services
Aug 2021 37x28% +269%−6% +20%
MARKSANS
Health Technology
Aug 2020 16x25% +234%−17% −2%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/E, 12-month momentum and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to PREMIER POLYFILM LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
72%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Technology Services
71%similar
ROCEvolatility
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
revenueROCE
Health Technology
58%similar
EPS growthpromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
market caprevenue
Non-Energy Minerals
44%similar
EPS growthrevenue growth
Non-Energy Minerals
39%similar
debt/equityrevenue growth
Non-Energy Minerals
38%similar
market capEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 27.8x its 50-day median on 2026-10-12; price +11.7% that day.
  2. AugPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 9 months after the low.
  3. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (29.8x).
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 31.3x its 50-day median on 2026-07-16; price +16.3% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  6. JanPriceVolume reached 30.5x its 50-day median on 2026-01-14; price +2.2% that day.
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. NovPriceFell 55% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Nov 2025 low.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. NovPriceVolume reached 28.3x its 50-day median on 2025-11-21; price +10.0% that day.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 11.2x its 50-day median on 2025-08-25; price +2.4% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2025-05-19; price -8.6% that day.
  5. FebPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2025-02-25; price +7.7% that day.
  6. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.09x.
  7. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (29.8x).
  9. OctPriceVolume reached 148.2x its 50-day median on 2024-10-15; price +19.9% that day.
  10. SepPriceVolume reached 32.1x its 50-day median on 2024-09-12; price +20.0% that day.
  11. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹259 cr.
  12. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.09x.
  14. JunPriceVolume reached 26.1x its 50-day median on 2024-06-13; price +12.9% that day.
  15. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  16. FebPriceVolume reached 72.7x its 50-day median on 2024-02-20; price -2.6% that day.
  17. OctPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 7 months after the low.
  18. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (30.4x).
  19. OctPriceVolume reached 149.0x its 50-day median on 2023-10-26; price +19.9% that day.
  20. JulPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2023-07-03; price -0.2% that day.
  21. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹252 cr.
  22. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1127.3x₹322 cr23.6%29.0%0.1x
2026-1027.2x₹322 cr23.6%29.0%0.1x
2026-0927.8x₹322 cr23.6%29.0%0.1x
2026-0829.8x₹299 cr21.5%29.0%0.1x
2026-0723.0x₹299 cr21.5%29.0%0.1x
2026-0622.3x₹299 cr21.5%29.0%0.1x
2026-0519.8x₹290 cr24.5%30.0%0.2x
2026-0419.6x₹290 cr24.5%30.0%0.2x
2026-0322.8x₹290 cr24.5%30.0%0.2x
2026-0220.9x₹273 cr22.3%30.0%0.2x
2026-0119.8x₹273 cr22.3%30.0%0.2x
2025-1216.6x₹273 cr22.3%30.0%0.2x
2025-1118.4x₹270 cr22.1%30.0%0.2x
2025-1017.5x₹270 cr22.1%30.0%0.2x
2025-0918.5x₹270 cr22.1%30.0%0.2x
2025-0819.4x₹267 cr22.0%30.0%0.2x
2025-0720.5x₹267 cr22.0%30.0%0.2x
2025-0620.6x₹267 cr22.0%30.0%0.2x
2025-0520.3x₹265 cr28.5%29.0%0.1x
2025-0422.3x₹265 cr28.5%29.0%0.1x
2025-0324.1x₹265 cr28.5%29.0%0.1x
2025-0227.5x₹264 cr26.0%29.0%0.1x
2025-0126.3x₹264 cr26.0%29.0%0.1x
2024-1231.3x₹264 cr26.0%29.0%0.1x
2024-1128.9x₹261 cr22.8%29.0%0.1x
2024-1029.8x₹261 cr22.8%29.0%0.1x
2024-0922.3x₹261 cr22.8%29.0%0.1x
2024-0823.0x₹259 cr22.1%29.0%0.1x
2024-0724.0x₹259 cr22.1%29.0%0.1x
2024-0621.0x₹259 cr22.1%29.0%0.1x
2024-0535.2x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2024-0435.3x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2024-0335.0x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2024-0238.9x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2024-0129.5x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-1229.3x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-1126.9x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-1030.4x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-0918.3x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-0819.5x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-0719.1x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-0618.6x₹252 cr16.2%20.0%0.3x
2023-0519.2x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2023-0417.8x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2023-0315.9x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2023-0218.3x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2023-0121.0x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-1220.9x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-1119.8x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-1018.7x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-0919.7x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-0820.6x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-0720.8x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-0617.6x₹212 cr15.9%21.0%0.4x
2022-0522.2x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2022-0426.4x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2022-0319.1x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2022-0218.3x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2022-0120.9x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-1223.2x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-1116.3x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-1016.6x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-0917.0x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-0818.9x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-0723.8x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-0616.2x₹151 cr14.5%18.0%0.3x
2021-0516.4x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2021-0413.3x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2021-0312.0x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2021-0212.8x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2021-0114.0x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-1214.9x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-1111.2x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-107.5x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-098.1x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-089.4x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-077.1x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-068.6x₹147 cr12.8%16.0%0.6x
2020-0511.4x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2020-049.3x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2020-039.1x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2020-0210.3x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2020-0110.2x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-128.3x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-118.7x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-109.1x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-099.4x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-089.7x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-079.7x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-0610.9x₹150 cr10.7%13.0%0.7x
2019-0510.2x₹126 cr12.8%15.0%0.8x
2019-0411.3x₹126 cr12.8%15.0%0.8x
2019-0310.3x₹126 cr12.8%15.0%0.8x
2019-0210.7x₹126 cr12.8%15.0%0.8x
2019-0110.9x₹126 cr12.8%15.0%0.8x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback