अApnaFunda
Menu

TTK PRESTIGE LTD (TTKPRESTIG)

Consumer Durables · Home Furnishings · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.56 / 100
Profitability 46Growth 21Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.68 / 100
Price 66Earnings 73FII/DII 67
Compare withASAHI INDIA GLASSCELLO WORLDCERA SANITARYWARE

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹604.5 latest close · −3.2% over the last 90 sessions

₹500₹600₹700Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹500₹600₹700Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹604.5 month-end · −6.1% over 12 months

₹500₹600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹500₹600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹604.5 month-end · −21.6% over 3 years

₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹604.5 month-end · −5.5% since Jan '19

₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹423.00 to ₹742.90 · 1-year volatility 36.6%

Was the rally earned?

-6%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 67 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 90.7x to 42.8x), which took 73 points back.
  • The share count rose 5%.
Net profit growth: +71 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+71 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −73 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−73 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −6%−6%Share priceNet profit growth: +71 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+71ProfitP/E change: −73 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−73P/EShare count change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−4SharesShare price: −6%−6%Share price
Net profit growth+71 ptsNet profit rose about 108%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-73 ptsThe P/E fell from 90.7x to 42.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-4 ptsShare count rose 5%, which lowers the price.
-22%share price, 3 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 23 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 42.1x to 42.8x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−24 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+2 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −22%−22%Share priceNet profit growth: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−24ProfitP/E change: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+2P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −22%−22%Share price
Net profit growth-24 ptsNet profit fell about 24%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+2 ptsThe P/E rose from 42.1x to 42.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-39%share price, 5 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings took off 15 points and the multiple took off 24 points (P/E 58.4x to 42.8x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−16 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −39%−39%Share priceNet profit growth: −16 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−16ProfitP/E change: −24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−24P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −39%−39%Share price
Net profit growth-16 ptsNet profit fell about 18%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-24 ptsThe P/E fell from 58.4x to 42.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ASAHI INDIA GLASS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-63.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility36.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.373-year daily, correlation 0.21
Volume spikes6last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−62.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−62.5%
Largest drawdowns

-63.4% (2021-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-47.8% (2019-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-03)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-09: 11.3x the 50-day median, price +1.2% that day

2026-11-08: 6.8x the 50-day median, price -1.8% that day

2026-11-06: 178.1x the 50-day median, price +10.5% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

42.8xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history45th percentile
CheapestMedian 43.6xDearest

Usual range 35.8x to 72.9x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Durables42.8x vs 25.5x
This company
42.8x
Sector median
25.5x

68% above the Consumer Durables median.

13.1x40.2x67.3x94.3xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '2613.1x40.2x67.3x94.3xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE39thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin53rd▲ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth50th▲ 23 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth88th▲ 81 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓75thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓40th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓23rd▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum59th▲ 29 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~21%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 38.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 21.2%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−5.1%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+26.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank76thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-5%13%31% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -5%13%31% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x22.6%23.7%24.8%
15x20.2%21.2%22.3%
20x17.0%18.1%19.1%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 21.2%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 26%/yr; EPS has since grown −5%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 24%/yr; EPS has since grown −3%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 29%/yr; EPS has since grown −8%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹604.50
P/E
42.8x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹8280 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3178 cr
P/S
2.6x
P/B
4.2x
ROE
9.8%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
70.5%
12M Momentum
-6.1%

52-week range

₹423.00₹742.90
57% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
36.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.33

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
18.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.34x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance18%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 17.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.34xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.34x (cash from operations ₹656 cr, net profit ₹490 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-5 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 5 days (35 vs 40). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress4% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 4% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+6 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +6 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs added 1.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 96,651 to 85,265 (-12%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters70.4%70.5%+0.1 pts
FIIs6.7%7.8%+1.1 pts
DIIs14.6%14.7%+0.1 pts
Public and others8.2%6.9%-1.3 pts

Number of shareholders

85,265shareholders-12% since Dec '23
81k86k92k97k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 96,651
Mar '24: 94,370
Jun '24: 93,211
Sep '24: 93,002
Dec '24: 87,425
Mar '25: 89,157
Jun '25: 89,741
Sep '25: 85,489
Dec '25: 81,424
Mar '26: 89,284
Jun '26: 85,265
 81k86k92k97k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 96,651
Mar '24: 94,370
Jun '24: 93,211
Sep '24: 93,002
Dec '24: 87,425
Mar '25: 89,157
Jun '25: 89,741
Sep '25: 85,489
Dec '25: 81,424
Mar '26: 89,284
Jun '26: 85,265

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like TTK PRESTIGE LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +17% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.8%, 80% range −7.3% to +5.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
PRINCEPIPE · Dec 2023: −50.8% vs market
KANSAINER · Jul 2023: −37.9% vs market
CROMPTON · Nov 2024: −37.6% vs market
DIAMONDYD · Feb 2020: −35.1% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Jul 2024: −34.7% vs market
FINPIPE · Jun 2024: −34.4% vs market
WHIRLPOOL · Oct 2024: −31.4% vs market
GALAXYSURF · Jul 2025: −30.8% vs market
ROUTE · May 2023: −28.4% vs market
KINGFA · Feb 2020: −28.1% vs market
APLLTD · Mar 2025: −26.7% vs market
KAJARIACER · Jun 2023: −23.6% vs market
HARSHA · Feb 2025: −20.8% vs market
SUNDROP · Mar 2021: −18.5% vs market
GRAPHITE · Sep 2023: −17.3% vs market
SHALBY · Apr 2021: −17.2% vs market
BOROLTD · Sep 2025: −15.7% vs market
GODREJAGRO · May 2020: −15.5% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Apr 2020: −15.0% vs market
FDC · Mar 2024: −10.5% vs market
BOROSCI · Jul 2025: −8.8% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Feb 2021: −8.5% vs market
ESCORTS · Apr 2025: −6.8% vs market
ATUL · Jul 2025: −3.5% vs market
STARCEMENT · May 2025: −1.9% vs market
RADICO · Sep 2022: −0.7% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Sep 2022: 0% vs market
JAMNAAUTO · Feb 2022: +0.3% vs market
FORTIS · Jun 2023: +3.0% vs market
ENDURANCE · Mar 2024: +4.0% vs market
CERA · Aug 2021: +4.8% vs market
BLISSGVS · Feb 2023: +6.3% vs market
BSOFT · Jul 2023: +7.2% vs market
VGUARD · Jul 2023: +9.9% vs market
THERMAX · Jan 2024: +12.3% vs market
AEGISLOG · Jan 2020: +15.5% vs market
MINDACORP · May 2025: +16.8% vs market
KSB · Mar 2020: +17.3% vs market
IPCALAB · Dec 2023: +29.5% vs market
ZENSARTECH · May 2024: +29.9% vs market
SUNDRMFAST · Jul 2022: +33.2% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · May 2023: +33.3% vs market
THYROCARE · Aug 2024: +59.2% vs market
APCOTEXIND · Aug 2021: +60.8% vs market
RATNAMANI · Nov 2022: +68.6% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Oct 2020: +96.0% vs market
ACE · Sep 2022: +115.6% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Oct 2021: +134.7% vs market
GABRIEL · Sep 2024: +148.3% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Mar 2021: +286.0% vs market
Similar setups −1.3%All companies −3.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.3%
All companies' median
−3.1%
Beat the market
48% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SUNDROP
Consumer Non-Durables		 Mar 2021 60x10% +118%−7% −19%
KSB
Producer Manufacturing		 Mar 2020 15x16% −38%−43% +17%
KANSAINER
Process Industries		 Jul 2023 57x14% +26%−2% −38%
ENDURANCE
Producer Manufacturing		 Mar 2024 54x14% +47%−15% +4%
CENTURYPLY
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2020 26x14% +6%−10% +96%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NAVNETEDUL
Producer Manufacturing		 Sep 2022 40x6% +19%−11% 0%
RATNAMANI
Non-Energy Minerals		 Nov 2022 42x20% +32%−9% +69%
CERA
Consumer Durables		 Aug 2021 57x15% +81%−7% +5%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to TTK PRESTIGE LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

GALAXY SURFACTANTSGALAXYSURF
Consumer Non-Durables
67%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
RELAXO FOOTWEARSRELAXO
Consumer Non-Durables
66%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
PRINCE PIPES AND FITTINGSPRINCEPIPE
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
debt/equityEPS growth
AKUMS DRUGS AND PHARMAAKUMS
Health Technology
63%similar
P/Emarket cap
ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERINGISGEC
Industrial Services
63%similar
revenue growthmarket cap
JTEKT INDIAJTEKTINDIA
Consumer Durables
70%similar
operating marginvolatility
NILKAMALNILKAMAL
Consumer Durables
64%similar
revenueoperating margin
EUREKA FORBESEUREKAFORB
Consumer Durables
61%similar
operating marginmarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since May '23

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 178.1x its 50-day median on 2026-11-06; price +10.5% that day.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 169.3x its 50-day median on 2026-07-28; price +7.2% that day.
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 172.3x its 50-day median on 2026-05-12; price +2.0% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 63% from the Dec 2021 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPriceVolume reached 361.4x its 50-day median on 2026-03-12; price +8.0% that day.
  2. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,820 cr.
  3. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  4. OctPriceVolume reached 148.3x its 50-day median on 2025-10-28; price +10.7% that day.
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2025-07-28; price +1.0% that day.
  6. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (76.4x).
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. MayPriceVolume reached 14.5x its 50-day median on 2025-05-29; price +0.2% that day.
  9. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. FebPriceVolume reached 19.7x its 50-day median on 2025-02-19; price +2.3% that day.
  11. DecPriceVolume reached 10.2x its 50-day median on 2024-12-03; price +3.6% that day.
  12. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. JulValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (58.5x).
  14. JulPriceVolume reached 7.5x its 50-day median on 2024-07-01; price +4.9% that day.
  15. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  16. AprPriceVolume reached 15.0x its 50-day median on 2024-04-19; price +1.3% that day.
  17. MarPriceVolume reached 9.3x its 50-day median on 2024-03-27; price -1.7% that day.
  18. DecPriceVolume reached 14.1x its 50-day median on 2023-12-18; price -0.4% that day.
  19. JulPriceVolume reached 14.5x its 50-day median on 2023-07-13; price +1.1% that day.
  20. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  21. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  22. MayPriceVolume reached 12.2x its 50-day median on 2023-05-25; price -3.4% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1142.8x₹3178 cr9.8%12.0%0.1x
2026-1036.2x₹3178 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2026-0936.6x₹3178 cr9.6%12.0%0.1x
2026-0849.8x₹2973 cr7.9%12.0%0.1x
2026-0754.7x₹2973 cr7.9%12.0%0.1x
2026-0652.6x₹2973 cr7.9%12.0%0.1x
2026-0589.0x₹2894 cr4.2%12.0%0.1x
2026-0483.3x₹2894 cr4.2%12.0%0.1x
2026-0370.7x₹2894 cr4.2%12.0%0.1x
2026-0265.9x₹2820 cr5.5%12.0%0.1x
2026-0174.4x₹2820 cr5.5%12.0%0.1x
2025-1277.8x₹2820 cr5.5%12.0%0.1x
2025-1190.7x₹2736 cr4.9%12.0%0.1x
2025-1094.3x₹2736 cr4.9%12.0%0.1x
2025-0989.5x₹2736 cr4.9%12.0%0.1x
2025-0880.4x₹2715 cr5.7%12.0%0.1x
2025-0777.1x₹2715 cr5.7%12.0%0.1x
2025-0676.4x₹2715 cr5.7%12.0%0.1x
2025-0540.4x₹2688 cr9.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0439.4x₹2688 cr9.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0338.6x₹2688 cr9.9%14.0%0.1x
2025-0240.0x₹2699 cr10.2%14.0%0.1x
2025-0147.3x₹2699 cr10.2%14.0%0.1x
2024-1251.9x₹2699 cr10.2%14.0%0.1x
2024-1152.6x₹2678 cr10.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-1053.9x₹2678 cr10.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-0954.6x₹2678 cr10.5%14.0%0.1x
2024-0856.9x₹2678 cr10.8%14.0%0.1x
2024-0758.5x₹2678 cr10.8%14.0%0.1x
2024-0647.7x₹2678 cr10.8%14.0%0.1x
2024-0537.0x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2024-0438.3x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2024-0336.6x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2024-0240.8x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2024-0142.9x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-1240.4x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-1142.1x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-1043.7x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-0942.7x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-0842.8x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-0743.0x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-0640.9x₹2777 cr13.0%18.0%0.1x
2023-0531.3x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2023-0433.3x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2023-0331.8x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2023-0234.4x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2023-0135.6x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-1236.5x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-1140.2x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-1042.4x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-0943.6x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-0843.7x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-0740.4x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-0637.8x₹2722 cr17.6%24.0%0.1x
2022-0548.7x₹2194 cr15.7%21.0%0.1x
2022-0449.7x₹2194 cr15.7%21.0%0.1x
2022-0348.4x₹2194 cr15.7%21.0%0.1x
2022-0246.3x₹2194 cr15.7%21.0%0.1x
2022-0156.1x₹2194 cr15.7%21.0%0.1x
2021-1257.8x₹2194 cr15.7%21.0%0.1x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback