अApnaFunda
Menu

KSB LIMITED (KSB)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.69 / 100
Profitability 53Growth 54Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.27 / 100
Price 13Earnings 26FII/DII 43
Compare withWELSPUN CORPVOLTASTHERMAX

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹636.15 latest close · −32.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹700₹800₹900Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹700₹800₹900Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹636.15 month-end · −17.2% over 12 months

₹800₹1,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹800₹1,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹636.15 month-end · −7.1% over 3 years

₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹636.15 month-end · +353.9% since Jan '19

₹0₹500₹1,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹500₹1,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹626.00 to ₹1028.30 · 1-year volatility 33.1%

Was the rally earned?

-17%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 52.0x to 45.1x); per-share earnings took off 4 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−13 ptsP/E changeShare price: −17%−17%Share priceNet profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4ProfitP/E change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−13P/EShare price: −17%−17%Share price
Net profit growth-4 ptsNet profit fell about 4%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-13 ptsThe P/E fell from 52.0x to 45.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-7%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 29 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 65.2x to 45.1x), which took 36 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+28 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−36 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −7%−7%Share priceNet profit growth: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+28ProfitP/E change: −36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−36P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −7%−7%Share price
Net profit growth+28 ptsNet profit rose about 34%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-36 ptsThe P/E fell from 65.2x to 45.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+156%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 160 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 46.1x to 45.1x), which took 4 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +159 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+159 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−4 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +156%+156%Share priceNet profit growth: +159 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+159ProfitP/E change: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−4P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +156%+156%Share price
Net profit growth+159 ptsNet profit rose about 161%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-4 ptsThe P/E fell from 46.1x to 45.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-48.6%recovered 2021-03
1-year volatility33.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.713-year daily, correlation 0.44
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−46.6% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−46.6%
Largest drawdowns

-48.6% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-03)

-40.5% (2024-07 peak to 2025-02 low, not yet recovered)

-29.0% (2021-11 peak to 2022-02 low, recovered 2022-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-30: 45.3x the 50-day median, price +3.8% that day

2026-09-29: 6.6x the 50-day median, price +2.9% that day

2026-08-05: 6.9x the 50-day median, price -7.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

45.1xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history51st percentile
CheapestMedian 45.1xDearest

Usual range 22.0x to 65.7x since 2019-01.

Against Producer Manufacturing45.1x vs 29.6x
This company
45.1x
Sector median
29.6x

52% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

10.6x33.4x56.3x79.1xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '2610.6x33.4x56.3x79.1xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE84th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin53rd▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth26th▼ 29 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth32nd▼ 37 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓91st▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓24th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓28thflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum34th▼ 27 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~25%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 48.8x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 24.6%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered19.9%/yrEPS, last 9 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+4.6 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank432ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%18%36% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%18%36% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x26.0%27.2%28.3%
15x23.5%24.6%25.7%
20x20.2%21.3%22.3%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 24.6%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹636.15
P/E
45.1x
Market Cap
₹11074 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2726 cr
P/S
4.1x
P/B
6.5x
ROE
14.5%
Operating Margin
12.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
69.8%
12M Momentum
-17.2%

52-week range

₹626.00₹1028.30
3% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
33.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.75

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
83.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.58x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

3 of 5checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance13%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 13.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.58xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.58x (cash from operations ₹422 cr, net profit ₹726 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress22% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 22% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 3.1 pts; DIIs added 0.9 pts; FIIs added 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 39,873 to 51,832 (+30%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters66.7%69.8%+3.1 pts
FIIs3.5%4.1%+0.6 pts
DIIs10.9%11.8%+0.9 pts
Public and others18.9%14.3%-4.6 pts

Number of shareholders

51,832shareholders+30% since Sep '23
40k50k60k70k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 39,873
Dec '23: 45,747
Mar '24: 47,455
Jun '24: 55,288
Sep '24: 70,326
Dec '24: 54,962
Mar '25: 56,172
Jun '25: 54,840
Sep '25: 53,916
Dec '25: 50,203
Mar '26: 51,144
Jun '26: 51,832
 40k50k60k70k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 39,873
Dec '23: 45,747
Mar '24: 47,455
Jun '24: 55,288
Sep '24: 70,326
Dec '24: 54,962
Mar '25: 56,172
Jun '25: 54,840
Sep '25: 53,916
Dec '25: 50,203
Mar '26: 51,144
Jun '26: 51,832

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+0.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like KSB LIMITED today on valuation, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −20% to +23% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+4.1%, 80% range −8.4% to +10.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
TCIEXP · Jun 2023: −47.0% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · May 2025: −42.0% vs market
KANSAINER · May 2021: −35.2% vs market
TTKPRESTIG · Apr 2023: −35.0% vs market
INDIGOPNTS · Jun 2023: −34.4% vs market
SUMICHEM · Apr 2023: −32.6% vs market
WHIRLPOOL · Jul 2022: −28.3% vs market
PGHL · Aug 2023: −27.3% vs market
WONDERLA · Mar 2020: −23.4% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Mar 2025: −21.4% vs market
VSTIND · Oct 2025: −21.4% vs market
CASTROLIND · Jan 2020: −20.3% vs market
HONAUT · Mar 2025: −19.7% vs market
DEEPAKNTR · May 2025: −18.8% vs market
SWARAJENG · Dec 2020: −16.2% vs market
CERA · May 2025: −14.4% vs market
VESUVIUS · Sep 2020: −14.4% vs market
3MINDIA · Feb 2024: −14.3% vs market
ATUL · Dec 2021: −11.9% vs market
BOSCHLTD · May 2020: −9.9% vs market
JUSTDIAL · Mar 2023: −9.2% vs market
VGUARD · Jun 2020: −4.5% vs market
ACE · Oct 2025: −4.5% vs market
ENDURANCE · Sep 2022: −3.7% vs market
CRISIL · Apr 2024: +0.6% vs market
TIMKEN · Aug 2025: +1.3% vs market
TECHNOE · Jun 2020: +6.1% vs market
INTELLECT · Jan 2025: +6.2% vs market
SCHAEFFLER · Aug 2024: +6.4% vs market
RHIM · Mar 2020: +7.1% vs market
EMAMILTD · Jun 2023: +10.8% vs market
ESCORTS · Jan 2024: +12.3% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Mar 2025: +12.3% vs market
KENNAMET · Aug 2020: +17.0% vs market
ZFCVINDIA · Feb 2025: +17.4% vs market
GILLETTE · Jan 2024: +20.9% vs market
VSTTILLERS · Jun 2025: +22.8% vs market
SIEMENS · Aug 2020: +23.0% vs market
BSE · Jun 2020: +23.6% vs market
TRITURBINE · Jul 2021: +29.9% vs market
BASF · Jan 2020: +32.6% vs market
CUMMINSIND · Jul 2021: +33.8% vs market
GLAXO · Mar 2024: +42.8% vs market
ACUTAAS · Nov 2023: +48.9% vs market
BDL · Oct 2023: +59.9% vs market
GRINDWELL · Aug 2020: +60.6% vs market
LMW · Mar 2020: +64.2% vs market
KAJARIACER · Aug 2020: +69.2% vs market
INGERRAND · Aug 2021: +103.7% vs market
KIOCL · May 2020: +111.3% vs market
Similar setups +0.9%All companies −3.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+0.9%
All companies' median
−3.2%
Beat the market
52% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BASF
Process Industries		 Jan 2020 42x25% −27%−33% +33%
ESCORTS
Producer Manufacturing		 Jan 2024 62x11% +43%−13% +12%
TCIEXP
Transportation		 Jun 2023 43x— −1%−20% −47%
SUMICHEM
Process Industries		 Apr 2023 47x33% −6%−24% −33%
SCHAEFFLER
Producer Manufacturing		 Aug 2024 69x27% +29%−18% +6%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
LMW
Producer Manufacturing		 Mar 2020 13x18% −62%−63% +64%
SUPREMEIND
Producer Manufacturing		 Mar 2025 43x29% −19%−45% +12%
INDIGOPNTS
Process Industries		 Jun 2023 52x— +2%−16% −34%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and revenue growth. Not used (unavailable for this company): ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to KSB LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

EUREKA FORBESEUREKAFORB
Consumer Durables
73%similar
revenuedebt/equity
HONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIAHONAUT
Electronic Technology
69%similar
P/EEPS growth
KINGFA SCIENCE & TECH (I)KINGFA
Process Industries
62%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
AKUMS DRUGS AND PHARMAAKUMS
Health Technology
59%similar
market capvolatility
BIKAJI FOODS INTBIKAJI
Consumer Non-Durables
57%similar
market capP/E
ZF COMMERCIAL VEHICLE CONTROLZFCVINDIA
Producer Manufacturing
65%similar
operating margindebt/equity
ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTSACE
Producer Manufacturing
63%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
TRIVENI TURBINETRITURBINE
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
operating marginP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Feb '23

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 45.3x its 50-day median on 2026-09-30; price +3.8% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. AprPriceVolume reached 8.8x its 50-day median on 2026-04-15; price +3.7% that day.
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 257.7x its 50-day median on 2026-02-26; price +9.2% that day.
  8. NovPriceVolume reached 46.6x its 50-day median on 2025-11-28; price +3.5% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 144.0x its 50-day median on 2025-08-26; price +4.2% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. FebPriceFell 40% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Feb 2025 low.
  5. FebPriceVolume reached 122.2x its 50-day median on 2025-02-28; price +1.4% that day.
  6. OctPriceVolume reached 11.3x its 50-day median on 2024-10-29; price -4.8% that day.
  7. SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 3.1 pts to 69.8%.
  8. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  9. JulPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  10. JulPriceVolume reached 16.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-15; price +6.8% that day.
  11. JunPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2024-06-24; price -0.1% that day.
  12. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹2,247 cr.
  13. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. MarPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2024-03-15; price +4.2% that day.
  15. OctPriceVolume reached 5.9x its 50-day median on 2023-10-19; price +5.0% that day.
  16. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (53.2x).
  17. AugPriceVolume reached 99.8x its 50-day median on 2023-08-03; price +18.1% that day.
  18. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  19. MayPriceVolume reached 6.1x its 50-day median on 2023-05-10; price -3.4% that day.
  20. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,822 cr.
  21. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  22. FebPriceVolume reached 45.9x its 50-day median on 2023-02-24; price +1.8% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1145.1x₹2726 cr14.5%—0.0x
2026-1046.1x₹2726 cr14.5%—0.0x
2026-0960.7x₹2726 cr14.5%—0.0x
2026-0854.3x₹2702 cr15.4%25.0%0.0x
2026-0757.6x₹2702 cr15.4%25.0%0.0x
2026-0664.5x₹2702 cr15.4%25.0%0.0x
2026-0550.8x₹2696 cr16.1%25.0%0.0x
2026-0463.0x₹2696 cr16.1%25.0%0.0x
2026-0351.3x₹2696 cr16.1%25.0%0.0x
2026-0251.0x₹2638 cr17.7%24.0%0.0x
2026-0146.9x₹2638 cr17.7%24.0%0.0x
2025-1250.0x₹2638 cr17.7%24.0%0.0x
2025-1152.0x₹2604 cr17.3%24.0%0.0x
2025-1053.6x₹2604 cr17.3%24.0%0.0x
2025-0955.7x₹2604 cr17.3%24.0%0.0x
2025-0856.5x₹2583 cr17.2%24.0%0.0x
2025-0757.4x₹2583 cr17.2%24.0%0.0x
2025-0656.0x₹2583 cr17.2%24.0%0.0x
2025-0559.5x₹2532 cr16.7%24.0%0.0x
2025-0451.5x₹2532 cr16.7%24.0%0.0x
2025-0350.2x₹2532 cr16.7%24.0%0.0x
2025-0246.8x₹2409 cr17.7%23.0%0.0x
2025-0153.3x₹2409 cr17.7%23.0%0.0x
2024-1258.3x₹2409 cr17.7%23.0%0.0x
2024-1166.5x₹2357 cr16.7%23.0%0.0x
2024-1064.0x₹2357 cr16.7%23.0%0.0x
2024-0971.9x₹2357 cr16.7%23.0%0.0x
2024-0876.0x₹2302 cr16.4%23.0%0.0x
2024-0778.8x₹2302 cr16.4%23.0%0.0x
2024-0676.9x₹2302 cr16.4%23.0%0.0x
2024-0579.1x₹2247 cr16.1%23.0%0.0x
2024-0475.2x₹2247 cr16.1%23.0%0.0x
2024-0364.3x₹2247 cr16.1%23.0%0.0x
2024-0269.7x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2024-0169.5x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-1266.0x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-1165.2x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-1058.3x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0956.9x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0853.2x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0743.3x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0641.1x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0540.1x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0442.9x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0339.9x₹1822 cr16.0%23.0%0.0x
2023-0244.6x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2023-0142.3x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-1245.0x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-1147.1x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-1048.5x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0946.5x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0844.6x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0734.4x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0634.5x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0531.5x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0431.1x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0330.7x₹1497 cr14.7%21.0%0.0x
2022-0240.7x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2022-0145.6x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-1245.3x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-1146.1x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-1049.2x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0945.3x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0844.2x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0743.0x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0637.5x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0536.2x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0432.8x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0333.3x₹1208 cr10.5%18.0%0.1x
2021-0225.1x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2021-0121.8x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-1222.3x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-1119.7x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-1015.6x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0916.5x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0818.1x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0717.5x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0616.1x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0516.0x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0417.0x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0314.7x₹1294 cr12.2%16.0%0.1x
2020-0232.3x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2020-0135.9x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-1232.8x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-1132.7x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-1033.8x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0933.7x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0829.7x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0729.7x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0634.8x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0533.0x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0432.4x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0333.4x₹1093 cr9.5%15.0%0.1x
2019-0231.9x₹946 cr10.0%16.0%0.0x
2019-0134.4x₹946 cr10.0%16.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback