अApnaFunda

SUNDROP BRANDS LIMITED (SUNDROP)

Consumer Non-Durables · Food: Specialty/Candy · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.60 / 100
Profitability 13Growth 67Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.65 / 100
Price 57Earnings 75FII/DII 64

Passes these screensBusiness ahead of price

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹639.55 latest close · +0.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹650₹700₹750Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹650₹700₹750Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹639.55 month-end · −14.9% over 12 months

₹600₹700Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹600₹700Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹639.55 month-end · −21.0% over 3 years

₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹639.55 month-end · +14.1% since Jan '19

₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹556.00 to ₹795.00 · 1-year volatility 30.1%

Was the rally earned?

-21%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 16 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 130.7x to 86.2x), which took 37 points back.
  • The share count rose 56%.
Net profit growth: +56 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+56 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−37 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−39 ptsShare count changeShare price: −21%−21%Share priceNet profit growth: +56 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+56ProfitP/E change: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−37P/EShare count change: −39 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−39SharesShare price: −21%−21%Share price
Net profit growth+56 ptsNet profit rose about 86%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-37 ptsThe P/E fell from 130.7x to 86.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-39 ptsShare count rose 56%, which lowers the price.
-31%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 46 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 71.9x to 86.2x).
  • The share count rose 56%.
Net profit growth: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−9 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+15 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−37 ptsShare count changeShare price: −31%−31%Share priceNet profit growth: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−9ProfitP/E change: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+15P/EShare count change: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−37SharesShare price: −31%−31%Share price
Net profit growth-9 ptsNet profit fell about 10%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+15 ptsThe P/E rose from 71.9x to 86.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-37 ptsShare count rose 56%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-50.6%recovered 2020-08
1-year volatility30.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.413-year daily, correlation 0.14
Volume spikes8last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−46.2% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−46.2%
Largest drawdowns

-50.6% (2020-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-08)

-48.4% (2021-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-23.3% (2019-01 peak to 2019-09 low, recovered 2019-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-16: 9.2x the 50-day median, price -5.0% that day

2026-10-09: 13x the 50-day median, price -8.3% that day

2026-09-22: 19.2x the 50-day median, price +4.9% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

86.2xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history66th percentile
CheapestMedian 75.4xDearest

Usual range 41.3x to 304.0x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Non-Durables86.2x vs 26.8x
This company
86.2x
Sector median
26.8x

222% above the Consumer Non-Durables median.

14.2x186.5x358.8x531.1xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '2614.2x186.5x358.8x531.1xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE10thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin16th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth92nd▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth1st▼ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓92ndflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓76th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓11th
  • 12M momentum50th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~32%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 86.2x, the price would imply about 32.1%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹639.55
P/E
86.2x
ROCE
2.0%
Market Cap
₹2410 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1605 cr
P/S
1.5x
P/B
1.6x
ROE
1.9%
Operating Margin
6.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
43.9%
12M Momentum
-14.9%

52-week range

₹556.00₹795.00
35% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
30.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.40

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
20.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.08x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance8%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 7.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate28%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (25 vs 32). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+12 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +12 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 7.9 pts; FIIs trimmed 7.7 pts; DIIs trimmed 5.5 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters51.8%43.9%-7.9 pts
FIIs7.9%0.2%-7.7 pts
DIIs11.3%5.8%-5.5 pts
Public and others28.6%50.1%+21.5 pts

Number of shareholders

14,778shareholders+5% since Dec '23
14k15k16k17k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 14,141
Mar '24: 14,970
Jun '24: 16,777
Sep '24: 16,287
Dec '24: 15,960
Mar '25: 15,869
Jun '25: 15,441
Sep '25: 15,274
Dec '25: 15,076
Mar '26: 14,925
Jun '26: 14,778
14k15k16k17k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 14,141
Mar '24: 14,970
Jun '24: 16,777
Sep '24: 16,287
Dec '24: 15,960
Mar '25: 15,869
Jun '25: 15,441
Sep '25: 15,274
Dec '25: 15,076
Mar '26: 14,925
Jun '26: 14,778

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+5.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SUNDROP BRANDS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −18% to +31% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+10.9%, 80% range −2.8% to +14.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
RAMASTEEL · Oct 2025: −61.3% vs market
ANIKINDS · Aug 2025: −54.0% vs market
EUREKAFORB · Oct 2025: −40.7% vs market
DIAMONDYD · Jun 2020: −32.2% vs market
KANSAINER · Mar 2023: −31.6% vs market
WHIRLPOOL · Oct 2024: −31.4% vs market
LXCHEM · Oct 2024: −30.0% vs market
HATHWAY · Sep 2023: −29.2% vs market
DREDGECORP · May 2021: −28.3% vs market
ACC · Apr 2024: −26.6% vs market
BEML · Apr 2022: −25.7% vs market
PATANJALI · Jun 2025: −25.4% vs market
ORIENTELEC · May 2025: −18.8% vs market
UNICHEMLAB · Jul 2021: −17.2% vs market
SHALBY · Jan 2020: −15.5% vs market
SEAMECLTD · May 2024: −13.0% vs market
NOCIL · Mar 2022: −12.6% vs market
KINGFA · Jan 2020: −9.4% vs market
SOTL · May 2021: −9.3% vs market
BOROSCI · Jul 2025: −8.8% vs market
PILITA · Jul 2023: −7.4% vs market
ATULAUTO · Sep 2025: −6.1% vs market
JTEKTINDIA · Sep 2021: −2.6% vs market
YATRA · May 2025: −1.8% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Oct 2025: +2.2% vs market
SREEL · Aug 2022: +8.3% vs market
VOLTAS · Apr 2025: +8.5% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Jun 2022: +8.5% vs market
ASHIANA · Aug 2023: +8.9% vs market
ZYDUSWELL · Dec 2024: +9.2% vs market
SUBROS · Jul 2023: +12.0% vs market
ENTERO · Mar 2025: +12.8% vs market
TASTYBITE · Oct 2025: +14.7% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Jul 2020: +19.8% vs market
STYRENIX · Dec 2020: +22.0% vs market
KRISHIVAL · Jan 2025: +25.3% vs market
PRAJIND · Feb 2020: +26.8% vs market
SASKEN · Oct 2025: +31.9% vs market
LMW · Dec 2021: +36.5% vs market
LOTUSEYE · Feb 2021: +41.2% vs market
APOLLOPIPE · Aug 2025: +43.7% vs market
URJA · Jul 2020: +52.9% vs market
NAZARA · Sep 2025: +53.4% vs market
GREAVESCOT · Dec 2023: +55.3% vs market
ZOTA · Dec 2020: +64.1% vs market
ABREL · May 2023: +76.1% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Jan 2022: +77.0% vs market
VESUVIUS · Jun 2022: +94.1% vs market
GABRIEL · Sep 2024: +148.3% vs market
RAMCOSYS · Jan 2020: +201.8% vs market
Similar setups +5.2%All companies −5.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+5.2%
All companies' median
−5.7%
Beat the market
52% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NAZARA
Technology Services
Sep 2025 70x3% +3%−29% +53%
UNICHEMLAB
Health Technology
Jul 2021 68x2% +42%−9% −17%
DIAMONDYD
Consumer Non-Durables
Jun 2020 30x7% −26%−37% −32%
SUBROS
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2023 58x9% +24%−9% +12%
KINGFA
Process Industries
Jan 2020 41x9% −10%−13% −9%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TTKHLTCARE
Health Technology
Jul 2020 48x8% −17%−26% +20%
LMW
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2021 205x5% +86%−12% +37%
EUREKAFORB
Consumer Durables
Oct 2025 63x5% −1%−13% −41%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SUNDROP BRANDS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
56%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
ETHOSETHOSLTD
Retail Trade
50%similar
revenueP/E
Producer Manufacturing
48%similar
operating marginmarket cap
SOBHASOBHA
Finance
41%similar
operating marginvolatility
Producer Manufacturing
41%similar
volatilityEPS growth
Consumer Non-Durables
43%similar
revenuemarket cap
Consumer Non-Durables
38%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
Consumer Non-Durables
29%similar
P/EEPS growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since May '23

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2026-10-09; price -8.3% that day.
  2. SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 5.0 pts to 43.9%.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 19.2x its 50-day median on 2026-09-22; price +4.9% that day.
  4. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2026-05-11; price +4.9% that day.
  6. MarPromoterPromoter holding rose 5.0 pts to 38.9%.
  7. MarPriceFell 48% from the Jul 2021 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. FebPriceVolume reached 12.9x its 50-day median on 2026-02-13; price +2.1% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,090 cr.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 21.4x its 50-day median on 2025-08-13; price +8.9% that day.
  3. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 17.9 pts to 33.9%.
  4. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  5. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.5 pts over 1 quarter to 5.7%.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 70% to 0% of profit.
  8. JunSharesShare count is up 58.3% over 12 months.
  9. MarPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  10. MarPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2025-03-20; price -0.9% that day.
  11. OctPriceVolume reached 17.7x its 50-day median on 2024-10-11; price +7.8% that day.
  12. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 10.5 pts over 1 quarter to 8.6%.
  13. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  14. JulPriceVolume reached 16.3x its 50-day median on 2024-07-02; price +7.8% that day.
  15. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (168.1x).
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  17. JunPriceVolume reached 56.7x its 50-day median on 2024-06-19; price +9.9% that day.
  18. FebPriceVolume reached 92.7x its 50-day median on 2024-02-22; price +15.0% that day.
  19. DecPriceVolume reached 29.0x its 50-day median on 2023-12-01; price +8.4% that day.
  20. SepPriceVolume reached 17.0x its 50-day median on 2023-09-04; price +11.2% that day.
  21. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (138.4x).
  22. MayPriceVolume reached 33.6x its 50-day median on 2023-05-25; price +2.8% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1186.2x₹1605 cr1.9%2.0%0.0x
2026-1082.3x₹1605 cr1.9%2.0%0.0x
2026-09100.4x₹1605 cr1.9%2.0%0.0x
2026-08123.6x₹1549 cr1.4%2.0%0.0x
2026-07124.6x₹1549 cr1.4%2.0%0.0x
2026-06119.5x₹1549 cr1.4%2.0%0.0x
2026-05—₹1466 cr-7.2%0.0%0.0x
2026-04—₹1466 cr-7.2%0.0%0.0x
2026-03—₹1466 cr-7.2%0.0%0.0x
2026-02—₹1267 cr-7.5%0.0%0.0x
2026-01—₹1267 cr-7.5%0.0%0.0x
2025-12—₹1267 cr-7.5%0.0%0.0x
2025-11—₹1090 cr-7.4%0.0%0.0x
2025-10—₹1090 cr-7.4%0.0%0.0x
2025-09—₹1090 cr-7.4%0.0%0.0x
2025-08—₹899 cr-7.6%0.0%0.0x
2025-07—₹899 cr-7.6%0.0%0.0x
2025-06—₹899 cr-7.6%0.0%0.0x
2025-05394.2x₹773 cr1.0%3.0%0.1x
2025-04334.4x₹773 cr1.0%3.0%0.1x
2025-03326.7x₹773 cr1.0%3.0%0.1x
2025-02462.4x₹758 cr0.8%3.0%0.1x
2025-01458.1x₹758 cr0.8%3.0%0.1x
2024-12531.1x₹758 cr0.8%3.0%0.1x
2024-11376.8x₹753 cr1.2%3.0%0.1x
2024-10376.2x₹753 cr1.2%3.0%0.1x
2024-09344.9x₹753 cr1.2%3.0%0.1x
2024-08195.9x₹759 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2024-07213.5x₹759 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2024-06168.1x₹759 cr2.2%3.0%0.1x
2024-05109.0x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2024-04122.1x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2024-03110.2x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2024-02162.7x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2024-01136.0x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-12140.7x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-11130.7x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-10124.6x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-09130.6x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-08131.9x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-07138.7x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-06138.4x₹850 cr3.1%5.0%0.1x
2023-0575.1x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2023-0475.4x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2023-0382.6x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2023-0281.8x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2023-0185.8x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-1279.0x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-1176.8x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-1073.5x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-0971.7x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-0873.1x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-0774.3x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-0679.5x₹917 cr5.6%7.0%0.1x
2022-0564.6x₹893 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2022-0470.8x₹893 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2022-0365.4x₹893 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2022-0268.0x₹893 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2022-0174.2x₹893 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x
2021-1277.2x₹893 cr7.1%10.0%0.0x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback