अApnaFunda

VSTTILLERS TRACTORS LTD (VSTTILLERS)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.64 / 100
Profitability 53Growth 39Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.32 / 100
Price 33Earnings 49FII/DII 15

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹3,939.8 latest close · −13.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹4,000₹4,250₹4,500₹4,750Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹4,000₹4,250₹4,500₹4,750Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹3,939.8 month-end · −29.7% over 12 months

₹4,000₹5,000₹6,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹4,000₹5,000₹6,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹3,939.8 month-end · −4.3% over 3 years

₹3,000₹4,000₹5,000₹6,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹3,000₹4,000₹5,000₹6,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹3,939.8 month-end · +38.6% since Jun '23

₹4,000₹6,000Jun '23Feb '24Oct '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹4,000₹6,000Jun '23Mar '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹3808.80 to ₹6374.00 · 1-year volatility 30.0%

Was the rally earned?

-30%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 42.2x to 31.3x); per-share earnings took off 4 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −30%−30%Share priceNet profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4ProfitP/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −30%−30%Share price
Net profit growth-4 ptsNet profit fell about 4%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-25 ptsThe P/E fell from 42.2x to 31.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-4%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (-4%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +17 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+17 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −4%−4%Share priceNet profit growth: +17 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+17ProfitP/E change: −20 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−20P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −4%−4%Share price
Net profit growth+17 ptsNet profit rose about 18%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-20 ptsThe P/E fell from 38.5x to 31.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-61.8%recovered 2020-08
1-year volatility30.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.793-year daily, correlation 0.48
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−61.8% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−61.8%
Largest drawdowns

-61.8% (2019-01 peak to 2020-04 low, recovered 2020-08)

-39.9% (2025-01 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-08)

-38.5% (2025-12 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-01: 6.9x the 50-day median, price -1.1% that day

2026-08-14: 5.2x the 50-day median, price -2.0% that day

2026-08-13: 7.3x the 50-day median, price +3.6% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

31.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history31st percentile
CheapestMedian 34.2xDearest

Usual range 29.9x to 44.9x since 2023-06.

Against Producer Manufacturing31.3x vs 29.6x
This company
31.3x
Sector median
29.6x

6% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

24.7x35.5x46.3x57.0xJun '23Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26Nov '2624.7x35.5x46.3x57.0xJun '23Aug '24Oct '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE46th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin59thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth56th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth31st▼ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓94thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓73rd▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓47th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum19th▼ 63 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~20%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 32.9x, the price would imply about 20.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹3939.80
P/E
31.3x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹3409 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1270 cr
P/S
2.7x
P/B
3.1x
ROE
10.0%
Operating Margin
13.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
55.5%
12M Momentum
-29.7%

52-week range

₹3808.80₹6374.00
5% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
30.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.83

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
75.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.81x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 4.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.81xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.81x (cash from operations ₹258 cr, net profit ₹319 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 4 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 4: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (51 vs 58). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress8% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 8% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-12 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -12 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 2.7 pts; FIIs trimmed 0.9 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters55.6%55.5%0.0 pts
FIIs2.1%1.2%-0.9 pts
DIIs17.2%20.0%+2.7 pts
Public and others25.1%23.3%-1.8 pts

Number of shareholders

24,293shareholders-5% since Sep '23
20k22k25k27k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 25,456
Dec '23: 26,121
Mar '24: 26,855
Jun '24: 25,190
Sep '24: 24,066
Dec '24: 23,321
Mar '25: 24,104
Jun '25: 20,243
Sep '25: 21,237
Dec '25: 22,694
Mar '26: 24,076
Jun '26: 24,293
20k22k25k27k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 25,456
Dec '23: 26,121
Mar '24: 26,855
Jun '24: 25,190
Sep '24: 24,066
Dec '24: 23,321
Mar '25: 24,104
Jun '25: 20,243
Sep '25: 21,237
Dec '25: 22,694
Mar '26: 24,076
Jun '26: 24,293

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like VSTTILLERS TRACTORS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +13% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−1.7%, 80% range −14.5% to +3.2%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
HPAL · Jul 2024: −49.8% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Aug 2025: −44.5% vs market
DIVGIITTS · Mar 2024: −44.2% vs market
ATUL · May 2023: −41.9% vs market
TTKPRESTIG · May 2023: −31.3% vs market
TCIEXP · Sep 2025: −29.4% vs market
DIAMONDYD · Apr 2020: −28.6% vs market
SREEL · Feb 2020: −27.1% vs market
CERA · Apr 2024: −26.7% vs market
RALLIS · Mar 2021: −23.8% vs market
LXCHEM · Jun 2024: −22.9% vs market
STARCEMENT · Jun 2020: −21.9% vs market
NATCOPHARM · Mar 2022: −21.5% vs market
WHIRLPOOL · May 2022: −20.4% vs market
BAJAJCON · Jan 2024: −20.1% vs market
AVANTIFEED · Jul 2022: −19.3% vs market
INDIGOPNTS · Apr 2025: −17.3% vs market
BOROSCI · Aug 2025: −17.0% vs market
HONDAPOWER · Oct 2020: −16.5% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Jun 2024: −14.9% vs market
VESUVIUS · Nov 2020: −14.1% vs market
KANSAINER · Apr 2024: −9.5% vs market
FINCABLES · Feb 2024: −7.5% vs market
NOCIL · Apr 2022: −4.9% vs market
KAJARIACER · Feb 2025: −4.9% vs market
GPPL · Jan 2022: −3.1% vs market
WONDERLA · May 2020: −2.6% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · Jan 2020: +1.5% vs market
INDNIPPON · Jun 2021: +1.7% vs market
IMPAL · Jun 2021: +2.4% vs market
ESCORTS · Feb 2024: +4.7% vs market
SIRCA · May 2024: +6.0% vs market
INTELLECT · Aug 2024: +6.7% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Dec 2022: +7.7% vs market
TECHNOE · Jul 2020: +9.7% vs market
SUNDROP · Mar 2022: +10.1% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Aug 2025: +12.7% vs market
ICRA · Jun 2021: +13.4% vs market
EXCELINDUS · Jun 2021: +13.7% vs market
FDC · Jul 2022: +18.0% vs market
VOLTAMP · Dec 2020: +18.2% vs market
ZFCVINDIA · Jan 2025: +28.1% vs market
TEAMLEASE · May 2020: +34.1% vs market
SAREGAMA · Mar 2024: +42.2% vs market
KSB · Aug 2020: +42.8% vs market
NUCLEUS · Apr 2020: +49.2% vs market
LMW · May 2020: +49.3% vs market
BOROLTD · Feb 2023: +49.4% vs market
PRAJIND · Mar 2020: +96.9% vs market
ACUTAAS · Feb 2024: +102.8% vs market
Similar setups −4.0%All companies −2.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.0%
All companies' median
−2.3%
Beat the market
46% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NOCIL
Process Industries
Apr 2022 43x9% +23%−28% −5%
RALLIS
Process Industries
Mar 2021 22x16% +44%−23% −24%
ACUTAAS
Process Industries
Feb 2024 49x21% +23%−19% +103%
AVANTIFEED
Process Industries
Jul 2022 27x15% −31%−32% −19%
HONDAPOWER
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2020 15x16% −14%−27% −17%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VESUVIUS
Non-Energy Minerals
Nov 2020 23x16% −12%−18% −14%
LMW
Producer Manufacturing
May 2020 15x18% −54%−56% +49%
INDIGOPNTS
Process Industries
Apr 2025 34x23% −29%−42% −17%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to VSTTILLERS TRACTORS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

INDIGO PAINTSINDIGOPNTS
Process Industries
69%similar
EPS growthpromoter holding
Consumer Durables
65%similar
operating marginvolatility
Non-Energy Minerals
64%similar
EPS growthROCE
Distribution Services
59%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
FDCFDC
Health Technology
58%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Producer Manufacturing
61%similar
revenue growthpromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
55%similar
P/Edebt/equity
Producer Manufacturing
52%similar
operating margindebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Mar '24

  1. OctPriceFell 38% from the Dec 2025 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2026-10-01; price -1.1% that day.
  3. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. AugPriceVolume reached 8.0x its 50-day median on 2026-08-06; price +1.4% that day.
  6. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. FebPriceVolume reached 5.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-17; price +9.1% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. NovPriceVolume reached 14.1x its 50-day median on 2025-11-06; price -3.8% that day.
  4. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  6. AugPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 5 months after the low.
  7. AugPriceVolume reached 20.7x its 50-day median on 2025-08-11; price +7.9% that day.
  8. JulValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (42.5x).
  9. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  10. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  11. AprPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2025-04-01; price -4.5% that day.
  12. MarPriceFell 40% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  13. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. FebPriceVolume reached 12.7x its 50-day median on 2025-02-10; price -7.2% that day.
  15. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.2 pts over 2 quarters to 22.0%.
  16. DecPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  17. NovPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2024-11-04; price -1.2% that day.
  18. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  19. SepPriceVolume reached 7.8x its 50-day median on 2024-09-23; price +4.3% that day.
  20. JunPriceRegained the 2023-11 peak, 3 months after the low.
  21. JunPriceVolume reached 11.5x its 50-day median on 2024-06-11; price +4.9% that day.
  22. MarPriceFell 26% from the Nov 2023 peak to the Mar 2024 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history42 months · 2023-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1131.3x₹1270 cr10.0%14.0%0.0x
2026-1030.6x₹1270 cr9.9%14.0%0.0x
2026-0934.9x₹1270 cr9.9%14.0%0.0x
2026-0836.0x₹1239 cr9.5%14.0%0.0x
2026-0736.8x₹1239 cr9.5%14.0%0.0x
2026-0637.2x₹1239 cr9.5%14.0%0.0x
2026-0532.0x₹1212 cr12.3%12.0%0.0x
2026-0436.3x₹1212 cr12.3%12.0%0.0x
2026-0333.5x₹1212 cr12.3%12.0%0.0x
2026-0252.6x₹1117 cr9.4%12.0%0.0x
2026-0150.3x₹1117 cr9.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-1257.0x₹1117 cr9.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-1142.2x₹1085 cr11.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-1045.1x₹1085 cr11.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-0938.0x₹1085 cr11.4%12.0%0.0x
2025-0849.2x₹994 cr9.2%12.0%0.0x
2025-0742.5x₹994 cr9.2%12.0%0.0x
2025-0634.1x₹994 cr9.2%12.0%0.0x
2025-0532.1x₹966 cr11.1%18.0%0.0x
2025-0429.9x₹966 cr11.1%18.0%0.0x
2025-0332.5x₹966 cr11.1%18.0%0.0x
2025-0224.7x₹917 cr12.9%18.0%0.0x
2025-0133.7x₹917 cr12.9%18.0%0.0x
2024-1238.2x₹917 cr12.9%18.0%0.0x
2024-1137.5x₹913 cr11.9%18.0%0.0x
2024-1034.9x₹913 cr11.9%18.0%0.0x
2024-0936.1x₹913 cr11.9%18.0%0.0x
2024-0830.5x₹968 cr13.1%18.0%0.0x
2024-0730.3x₹968 cr13.1%18.0%0.0x
2024-0629.8x₹968 cr13.1%18.0%0.0x
2024-0530.7x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2024-0434.3x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2024-0330.3x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2024-0230.7x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2024-0131.2x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2023-1235.3x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2023-1138.5x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2023-1033.1x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2023-0934.2x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2023-0834.6x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2023-0729.0x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x
2023-0626.6x₹1006 cr11.2%—0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback