AEGIS VOPAK TERMINALS LIMITED (AEGISVOPAK): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

3M1YAll

₹255.11 latest close · −0.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹255.11 month-end · −2.1% over 12 months

₹255.11 month-end · +4.0% since Jun '25

52-week range ₹158.00 to ₹320.95 · 1-year volatility 48.1%

Was the rally earned?

-2%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat

The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (-2%).
The share count rose 9%.

Net profit growth+48 ptsNet profit rose about 63%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-42 ptsThe P/E fell from 141.6x to 92.4x, which lowers the price.

Share count change-8 ptsShare count rose 9%, which lowers the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-44.9%recovered 2026-07

1-year volatility48.1%annualised

Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-44.9% (2025-07 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-07)

-30.6% (2026-09 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-17: 5.2x the 50-day median, price +4.6% that day

2026-07-14: 5.1x the 50-day median, price -7.5% that day

2026-07-13: 8.6x the 50-day median, price +7.1% that day

Where does it rank among Transportation peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Transportation peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

ROCE31st▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
Op. margin100thflat vs a year ago
Revenue growth86th
EPS growth80th
Debt/equity ↓38th▲ 33 pts vs a year ago
Cash cycle ↓49th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
P/E ↓11th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
12M momentum63rd

Rank history

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26

Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Transportation sector page Watch it move against Transportation in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~48%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 235.0x, the price would imply about 47.5%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Transportation The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov: ₹255.11
P/E: 92.4x
ROCE: 8.0%
Market Cap: ₹28259 cr
Revenue (TTM): ₹948 cr
P/S: 29.8x
P/B: 6.6x
ROE: 7.1%
Operating Margin: 77.0%
Debt / Equity: 0.9x
Promoter Holding: 86.9%
12M Momentum: -2.1%

52-week range

₹158.00₹320.95

60% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

48.1%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

0.75

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

4.4x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

2.47x

Share count, 1Y

+12.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 5checks within range1 near a threshold

Other income reliance7%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 7.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate16%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 16.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.47xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.47x (cash from operations ₹1,615 cr, net profit ₹654 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress3% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 3% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Since Jun 2025, FIIs trimmed 0.5 pts.
The number of shareholders fell from 57,139 to 50,411 (-12%) between Jun 2025 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '25Jun '26Change

Promoters86.9%86.9%0.0 pts

FIIs5.9%5.3%-0.5 pts

DIIs5.3%5.3%0.0 pts

Public and others1.9%2.4%+0.5 pts

Number of shareholders

50,411shareholders-12% since Jun '25

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−13.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like AEGIS VOPAK TERMINALS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +5% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −10.2%, 80% range −19.4% to −3.2%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median

−13.1%

All companies' median

−2.9%

Beat the market

32% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
GODREJPROP Finance	Jul 2024	123x	6%	+85%	−5%	−31%
PHOENIXLTD Finance	Mar 2023	98x	5%	+18%	−16%	+44%
DEVYANI Consumer Services	Aug 2022	142x	16%	+47%	−13%	−3%
ITI Electronic Technology	Mar 2020	61x	7%	−35%	−40%	+2%
HINDOILEXP Energy Minerals	May 2023	120x	6%	+2%	−15%	−27%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
LODHA Finance	Jul 2022	46x	10%	+34%	−23%	+16%
CHALET Consumer Services	Jun 2025	141x	11%	+15%	−9%	−12%
IMAGICAA Consumer Services	Sep 2024	391x	3%	+56%	−19%	−29%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to AEGIS VOPAK TERMINALS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

AETHER INDUSTRIESAETHER

Process Industries

48%similar

P/Emarket cap

ACME SOLAR HOLDINGSACMESOLAR

Utilities

46%similar

market capoperating margin

UNIMECH AEROSPACE AND MFGUNIMECH

Electronic Technology

44%similar

promoter holdingP/E

YASHO INDUSTRIESYASHO

Consumer Non-Durables

39%similar

revenueROCE

SMS PHARMACEUTICALSSMSPHARMA

Health Technology

35%similar

revenuevolatility

DREDGING CORPORATION OF INDIADREDGECORP

Transportation

28%similar

debt/equityP/E

SHREEJI SHIPPING GLOBAL LIMITESHREEJISPG

Transportation

23%similar

P/Epromoter holding

SINDHU TRADE LINKSSINDHUTRAD

Transportation

23%similar

promoter holdingvolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

11 events since Dec '25

2026
OctPriceFell 31% from the Sep 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
JulPriceRegained the 2025-07 peak, 4 months after the low.
JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.87x.
JulPriceVolume reached 19.2x its 50-day median on 2026-07-06; price +8.8% that day.
JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.87x).
JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 71% of profit).
JunSharesShare count is up 12.0% over 12 months.
MayPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2026-05-07; price +7.5% that day.

Show 3 earlier events

2026
MarPriceFell 45% from the Jul 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
JanPriceVolume reached 21.5x its 50-day median on 2026-01-27; price +9.5% that day.
2025
DecPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2025-12-01; price +4.8% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history18 months · 2025-06 to 2026-11

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-11	92.4x	₹948 cr	7.1%	8.0%	0.9x
2026-10	80.1x	₹948 cr	7.2%	8.0%	0.9x
2026-09	107.5x	₹948 cr	7.2%	8.0%	0.9x
2026-08	96.0x	₹922 cr	7.4%	8.0%	0.9x
2026-07	103.6x	₹922 cr	7.4%	8.0%	0.9x
2026-06	83.8x	₹922 cr	7.4%	8.0%	0.9x
2026-05	70.8x	₹878 cr	22.9%	9.0%	3.0x
2026-04	68.5x	₹878 cr	22.9%	9.0%	3.0x
2026-03	58.4x	₹878 cr	22.9%	9.0%	3.0x
2026-02	94.6x	₹801 cr	19.4%	9.0%	3.0x
2026-01	94.1x	₹801 cr	19.4%	9.0%	3.0x
2025-12	103.5x	₹801 cr	19.4%	9.0%	3.0x
2025-11	141.6x	₹718 cr	14.0%	9.0%	3.0x
2025-10	151.6x	₹718 cr	14.0%	9.0%	3.0x
2025-09	141.6x	₹718 cr	14.0%	9.0%	3.0x
2025-08	168.6x	₹664 cr	10.3%	9.0%	3.0x
2025-07	163.1x	₹664 cr	10.3%	9.0%	3.0x
2025-06	166.9x	₹664 cr	10.3%	9.0%	3.0x

Methodology and data notes