अApnaFunda

BALU FORGE INDUSTRIES LIMITED (BALUFORGE)

Producer Manufacturing · Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.94 / 100
Profitability 88Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.41 / 100
Price 86Earnings 25FII/DII 10

Passes these screensDebt-light & profitableLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹529.6 latest close · +13.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹500₹600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹500₹600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹529.6 month-end · −15.8% over 12 months

₹400₹500₹600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500₹600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹529.6 month-end · +91.5% since Apr '24

₹400₹600₹800Apr '24Oct '24Apr '25Nov '25May '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Apr '24Aug '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹341.05 to ₹667.00 · 1-year volatility 52.6%

Was the rally earned?

-16%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 10 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 30.7x to 23.3x), which took 25 points back.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+15 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: −16%−16%Share priceNet profit growth: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+15ProfitP/E change: −25 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−25P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: −16%−16%Share price
Net profit growth+15 ptsNet profit rose about 18%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-25 ptsThe P/E fell from 30.7x to 23.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ASHOK LEYLAND

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-58.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility52.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.503-year daily, correlation 0.55
Volume spikes6last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−55.6% 0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−55.6%
Largest drawdowns

-58.3% (2024-09 peak to 2026-01 low, not yet recovered)

-16.7% (2024-05 peak to 2024-06 low, recovered 2024-06)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-26: 9.4x the 50-day median, price +4.8% that day

2026-08-25: 5.2x the 50-day median, price -3.6% that day

2026-08-24: 30.3x the 50-day median, price +13.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

23.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history28th percentile
CheapestMedian 32.5xDearest

Usual range 19.9x to 67.7x since 2024-04.

Against Producer Manufacturing23.3x vs 29.6x
This company
23.3x
Sector median
29.6x

21% below the Producer Manufacturing median.

17.1x37.6x58.1x78.7xApr '24Nov '24Jun '25Jan '26Aug '26Nov '2617.1x37.6x58.1x78.7xApr '24Mar '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE79th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin97thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth63rd▼ 32 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth51st▼ 41 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓70th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓27th▼ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓62nd▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum36th▼ 15 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~26%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 49.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 26.3%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered72.4%/yrEPS, last 6 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−33.7 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank831stmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%36%72% Apr 2024Nov 2026 0%36%72% Apr 2024Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x27.9%29.1%30.2%
15x25.1%26.3%27.4%
20x21.6%22.7%23.8%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 26.3%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹529.60
P/E
23.3x
ROCE
23.0%
Market Cap
₹6435 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1176 cr
P/S
5.5x
P/B
4.0x
ROE
17.3%
Operating Margin
28.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
53.5%
12M Momentum
-15.8%

52-week range

₹341.05₹667.00
58% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
52.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.42

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
17.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.27x
low
Share count, 1Y
+9.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance11%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 10.7%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate18%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 18.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.27xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.27x (cash from operations ₹148 cr, net profit ₹556 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+5 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 5 days (140 vs 136). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress51% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 51% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-46 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -46 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, FIIs trimmed 3.7 pts; promoters trimmed 2.6 pts; DIIs trimmed 1.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 18,054 to 83,997 (+365%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters56.1%53.5%-2.6 pts
FIIs8.8%5.0%-3.7 pts
DIIs1.9%0.9%-1.0 pts
Public and others33.2%36.6%+3.4 pts

Number of shareholders

83,997shareholders+365% since Dec '23
18k40k62k84k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 18,054
Mar '24: 23,723
Jun '24: 29,419
Sep '24: 50,955
Dec '24: 66,310
Mar '25: 73,283
Jun '25: 77,243
Sep '25: 72,351
Dec '25: 70,445
Mar '26: 79,711
Jun '26: 83,997
18k40k62k84k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 18,054
Mar '24: 23,723
Jun '24: 29,419
Sep '24: 50,955
Dec '24: 66,310
Mar '25: 73,283
Jun '25: 77,243
Sep '25: 72,351
Dec '25: 70,445
Mar '26: 79,711
Jun '26: 83,997

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BALU FORGE INDUSTRIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to +37% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−4.8%, 80% range −11.9% to +8.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
IPL · Feb 2024: −64.7% vs market
AURIONPRO · Jul 2025: −48.9% vs market
BLISSGVS · Mar 2020: −45.6% vs market
OAL · Jul 2021: −42.3% vs market
KRBL · Jun 2020: −41.5% vs market
GPPL · Apr 2024: −38.0% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Mar 2021: −33.8% vs market
MIDHANI · Nov 2020: −31.9% vs market
ROTO · Dec 2024: −31.8% vs market
BHARATRAS · Sep 2022: −30.7% vs market
INTELLECT · Feb 2022: −30.5% vs market
BLS · Apr 2025: −26.6% vs market
MAYURUNIQ · Jul 2021: −24.5% vs market
MASTEK · Jun 2022: −24.5% vs market
JUSTDIAL · Nov 2020: −23.7% vs market
STERTOOLS · Feb 2020: −21.0% vs market
ELECON · Sep 2025: −19.1% vs market
TAJGVK · Jun 2025: −17.5% vs market
CONCORDBIO · Sep 2025: −17.1% vs market
ECLERX · Apr 2022: −14.4% vs market
IONEXCHANG · Mar 2024: −11.0% vs market
INDGN · Jul 2025: −10.0% vs market
KIRLOSBROS · Jul 2025: −9.9% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Dec 2023: −9.4% vs market
PIXTRANS · Mar 2025: −9.3% vs market
NINSYS · Mar 2025: −9.2% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Jul 2020: −4.0% vs market
USHAMART · Mar 2024: +2.3% vs market
GARFIBRES · Oct 2025: +3.8% vs market
VESUVIUS · Jul 2024: +5.9% vs market
RSYSTEMS · Aug 2021: +6.9% vs market
VIJAYA · Mar 2023: +9.5% vs market
ADFFOODS · Jun 2024: +10.2% vs market
TEGA · Feb 2024: +18.3% vs market
CAPLIPOINT · Oct 2025: +20.9% vs market
THEJO · Dec 2022: +28.6% vs market
KIOCL · Jan 2023: +34.0% vs market
HSCL · Aug 2025: +37.3% vs market
STYLAMIND · Oct 2025: +40.9% vs market
ZENSARTECH · Sep 2020: +51.7% vs market
HBLENGINE · Apr 2025: +55.3% vs market
ACE · Feb 2022: +59.8% vs market
NEWGEN · Sep 2020: +64.5% vs market
MARKSANS · May 2024: +67.4% vs market
SIGACHI · Jan 2023: +79.4% vs market
RHIM · Sep 2021: +88.2% vs market
GODFRYPHLP · Mar 2024: +111.4% vs market
GRSE · Mar 2024: +112.8% vs market
SBCL · Sep 2025: +113.1% vs market
SAKSOFT · Nov 2022: +156.2% vs market
Similar setups −9.3%All companies −4.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.3%
All companies' median
−4.5%
Beat the market
46% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JUSTDIAL
Technology Services
Nov 2020 15x22% +7%−11% −24%
ELECON
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 25x28% −19%−22% −19%
INTELLECT
Technology Services
Feb 2022 33x21% +51%−23% −31%
ADFFOODS
Consumer Non-Durables
Jun 2024 35x20% +29%−6% +10%
NEWGEN
Technology Services
Sep 2020 21x18% −19%−20% +65%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BLISSGVS
Health Technology
Mar 2020 8x26% −44%−45% −46%
BLS
Technology Services
Apr 2025 32x31% +1%−30% −27%
KIOCL
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2023 41x19% −15%−20% +34%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: ROCE, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BALU FORGE INDUSTRIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Durables
78%similar
P/Erevenue
Consumer Non-Durables
71%similar
revenuemarket cap
EMUDHRAEMUDHRA
Technology Services
64%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Technology Services
64%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Industrial Services
61%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
ROLEX RINGSROLEXRINGS
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
revenuepromoter holding
NRB BEARINGSNRBBEARING
Producer Manufacturing
52%similar
revenueP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

19 events since Jun '24

  1. OctValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (19.4x).
  2. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,176 cr.
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 30.3x its 50-day median on 2026-08-24; price +13.8% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. MayValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (21.0x).
  6. MaySharesShare count is up 7.8% over 12 months.
  7. MayPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2026-05-26; price +6.4% that day.
  8. JanPriceFell 58% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Jan 2026 low.
Show 11 earlier events
  1. JanPriceVolume reached 22.0x its 50-day median on 2026-01-13; price +5.3% that day.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 9.9x its 50-day median on 2025-10-10; price +4.8% that day.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2025-09-12; price +0.9% that day.
  4. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 2% to 1% of profit.
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 7.4x its 50-day median on 2025-06-13; price -11.4% that day.
  6. AprSharesShare count is up 24.1% over 12 months.
  7. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.5 pts over 1 quarter to 7.9%.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2025-03-21; price +19.8% that day.
  9. JulPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2024-07-30; price +4.8% that day.
  10. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 2% of profit).
  11. JunPriceVolume reached 5.1x its 50-day median on 2024-06-20; price +7.8% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history32 months · 2024-04 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1123.3x₹1176 cr17.3%23.0%0.1x
2026-1019.4x₹1176 cr17.3%23.0%0.1x
2026-0921.8x₹1176 cr17.3%23.0%0.1x
2026-0828.3x₹1108 cr16.8%23.0%0.1x
2026-0719.7x₹1108 cr16.8%23.0%0.1x
2026-0620.9x₹1108 cr16.8%23.0%0.1x
2026-0521.0x₹1114 cr25.1%31.0%0.0x
2026-0423.9x₹1114 cr25.1%31.0%0.0x
2026-0317.1x₹1114 cr25.1%31.0%0.0x
2026-0222.2x₹1059 cr23.9%31.0%0.0x
2026-0119.3x₹1059 cr23.9%31.0%0.0x
2025-1227.7x₹1059 cr23.9%31.0%0.0x
2025-1130.7x₹982 cr22.2%31.0%0.0x
2025-1031.5x₹982 cr22.2%31.0%0.0x
2025-0931.1x₹982 cr22.2%31.0%0.0x
2025-0832.7x₹924 cr20.0%31.0%0.0x
2025-0732.8x₹924 cr20.0%31.0%0.0x
2025-0637.8x₹924 cr20.0%31.0%0.0x
2025-0544.2x₹815 cr31.5%30.0%0.1x
2025-0432.3x₹815 cr31.5%30.0%0.1x
2025-0340.3x₹815 cr31.5%30.0%0.1x
2025-0236.9x₹706 cr25.2%30.0%0.1x
2025-0147.0x₹706 cr25.2%30.0%0.1x
2024-1261.1x₹706 cr25.2%30.0%0.1x
2024-1168.5x₹622 cr20.5%30.0%0.1x
2024-1069.0x₹622 cr20.5%30.0%0.1x
2024-0971.7x₹622 cr20.5%30.0%0.1x
2024-0878.7x₹559 cr17.3%30.0%0.1x
2024-0753.6x₹559 cr17.3%30.0%0.1x
2024-0634.0x₹559 cr17.3%30.0%0.1x
2024-0561.0x₹327 cr20.4%27.0%0.3x
2024-0459.2x₹327 cr20.4%27.0%0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback