अApnaFunda

EICHER MOTORS LTD (EICHERMOT)

Consumer Durables · Motor Vehicles · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.84 / 100
Profitability 90Growth 61Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.55 / 100
Price 55Earnings 57FII/DII 54

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹7,629 latest close · +3.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹7,000₹7,500₹8,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹7,000₹7,500₹8,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹7,629 month-end · +8.2% over 12 months

₹6,500₹7,000₹7,500₹8,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹6,500₹7,000₹7,500₹8,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹7,629 month-end · +95.8% over 3 years

₹4,000₹6,000₹8,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹4,000₹6,000₹8,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹7,629 month-end · +301.4% since Jan '19

₹2,500₹5,000₹7,500Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹2,500₹5,000₹7,500Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹6442.00 to ₹8230.00 · 1-year volatility 27.6%

Was the rally earned?

+8%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 18 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 40.0x to 36.3x), which took 10 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+19 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−10 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +8%+8%Share priceNet profit growth: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+19ProfitP/E change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−10P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +8%+8%Share price
Net profit growth+19 ptsNet profit rose about 19%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-10 ptsThe P/E fell from 40.0x to 36.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+96%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 97 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 36.6x to 36.3x), which took 1 point back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +98 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+98 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−1 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +96%+96%Share priceNet profit growth: +98 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+98ProfitP/E change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−1P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +96%+96%Share price
Net profit growth+98 ptsNet profit rose about 98%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-1 ptsThe P/E fell from 36.6x to 36.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+222%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 276 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 48.1x to 36.3x), which took 54 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +276 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+276 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −54 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−54 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +222%+222%Share priceNet profit growth: +276 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+276ProfitP/E change: −54 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−54P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +222%+222%Share price
Net profit growth+276 ptsNet profit rose about 329%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-54 ptsThe P/E fell from 48.1x to 36.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-45.5%recovered 2020-11
1-year volatility27.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.933-year daily, correlation 0.62
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2020202120222023202420252026−45.5% 0%−20%−40%2020202220242026−45.5%
Largest drawdowns

-45.5% (2019-11 peak to 2020-04 low, recovered 2020-11)

-33.7% (2019-01 peak to 2019-08 low, recovered 2019-11)

-25.9% (2022-10 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-11)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

36.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history53rd percentile
CheapestMedian 36.0xDearest

Usual range 26.8x to 53.8x since 2019-01.

Against Consumer Durables36.3x vs 25.5x
This company
36.3x
Sector median
25.5x

42% above the Consumer Durables median.

13.1x29.7x46.2x62.8xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '2613.1x29.7x46.2x62.8xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE88th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin92nd▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth67th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth49th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓88thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓87th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓32nd▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum73rd▼ 17 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~26%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 55.5x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 25.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered13.6%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+12.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank272ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%15%30% Jan 2019Nov 2026 0%15%30% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x27.4%28.5%29.7%
15x24.8%25.9%27.1%
20x21.5%22.6%23.7%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 25.9%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 21%/yr; EPS has since grown 14%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 23%/yr; EPS has since grown 20%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 23%/yr; EPS has since grown 33%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹7629.00
P/E
36.3x
ROCE
31.0%
Market Cap
₹2.09L cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹24998 cr
P/S
8.4x
P/B
8.3x
ROE
23.0%
Operating Margin
24.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
49.0%
12M Momentum
8.2%

52-week range

₹6442.00₹8230.00
66% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
27.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.04

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
96.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.88x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance30%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 30.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate23%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 22.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.88xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.88x (cash from operations ₹12,509 cr, net profit ₹14,250 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-3 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 3 days (6 vs 9). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress19% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 19% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-9 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -9 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, DIIs added 5.5 pts; FIIs trimmed 3.4 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters49.1%49.0%-0.1 pts
FIIs28.9%25.5%-3.4 pts
DIIs10.5%16.0%+5.5 pts
Public and others11.4%9.4%-2.0 pts

Number of shareholders

2.8 lakhshareholders+1% since Sep '23
2.5L2.6L2.7L2.8L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.8 lakh
Dec '23: 2.5 lakh
Mar '24: 2.6 lakh
Jun '24: 2.6 lakh
Sep '24: 2.5 lakh
Dec '24: 2.5 lakh
Mar '25: 2.5 lakh
Jun '25: 2.5 lakh
Sep '25: 2.5 lakh
Dec '25: 2.6 lakh
Mar '26: 2.8 lakh
Jun '26: 2.8 lakh
2.5L2.6L2.7L2.8L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.8 lakh
Dec '23: 2.5 lakh
Mar '24: 2.6 lakh
Jun '24: 2.6 lakh
Sep '24: 2.5 lakh
Dec '24: 2.5 lakh
Mar '25: 2.5 lakh
Jun '25: 2.5 lakh
Sep '25: 2.5 lakh
Dec '25: 2.6 lakh
Mar '26: 2.8 lakh
Jun '26: 2.8 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like EICHER MOTORS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +6% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −6.2%, 80% range −16.5% to −2.7%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%
SIEMENS · Jun 2024: −45.7% vs market
MPHASIS · Mar 2022: −44.8% vs market
HINDUNILVR · Jun 2023: −37.0% vs market
COFORGE · Nov 2021: −32.0% vs market
IGL · Nov 2020: −30.9% vs market
ITC · Mar 2020: −29.2% vs market
DABUR · Oct 2020: −28.3% vs market
EMAMILTD · Jun 2021: −25.0% vs market
UBL · Mar 2020: −24.8% vs market
GRINDWELL · Jul 2023: −24.3% vs market
BALKRISIND · Oct 2021: −23.1% vs market
VINATIORGA · Aug 2022: −23.0% vs market
PIIND · Apr 2025: −21.3% vs market
AIAENG · Aug 2023: −21.1% vs market
CIPLA · Apr 2025: −20.8% vs market
CRISIL · Nov 2024: −20.6% vs market
HONAUT · Jan 2021: −19.3% vs market
SUMICHEM · Sep 2025: −19.2% vs market
ZYDUSLIFE · Jul 2024: −17.4% vs market
MANKIND · Feb 2025: −16.9% vs market
BRITANNIA · Feb 2020: −16.8% vs market
CUMMINSIND · Jun 2024: −16.1% vs market
ABBOTINDIA · May 2025: −13.7% vs market
ASIANPAINT · Feb 2022: −10.0% vs market
LTTS · Jan 2024: −9.7% vs market
UNITDSPR · Sep 2024: −9.7% vs market
HAL · Apr 2025: −9.4% vs market
BAJAJ-AUTO · Apr 2020: −8.5% vs market
3MINDIA · Jul 2023: −7.9% vs market
VOLTAS · Jan 2021: −4.2% vs market
SCHAEFFLER · Aug 2025: −3.6% vs market
PIDILITIND · Sep 2025: −0.8% vs market
TECHM · Mar 2020: −0.3% vs market
AJANTPHARM · Feb 2025: +2.0% vs market
ERIS · Jul 2020: +2.7% vs market
HCLTECH · Apr 2020: +3.5% vs market
CGPOWER · Sep 2024: +5.8% vs market
TCS · Feb 2020: +6.3% vs market
PERSISTENT · Oct 2025: +8.0% vs market
HAVELLS · Apr 2020: +10.0% vs market
INFY · Dec 2020: +11.4% vs market
MARICO · Sep 2025: +12.1% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Mar 2023: +13.3% vs market
ATUL · Jul 2020: +14.3% vs market
BOSCHLTD · Sep 2025: +22.8% vs market
POLYCAB · Aug 2025: +23.7% vs market
LALPATHLAB · Sep 2025: +26.7% vs market
BEL · Mar 2024: +44.3% vs market
DIVISLAB · Jan 2020: +45.0% vs market
INOXINDIA · Oct 2025: +65.6% vs market
Similar setups −9.7%All companies −3.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.7%
All companies' median
−3.5%
Beat the market
34% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BAJAJ-AUTO
Consumer Durables
Apr 2020 15x30% −12%−20% −9%
MANKIND
Health Technology
Feb 2025 43x26% +7%−24% −17%
CUMMINSIND
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2024 64x35% +104%−3% −16%
INFY
Technology Services
Dec 2020 31x32% +72%0% +11%
TCS
Technology Services
Feb 2020 24x47% +1%−12% +6%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
IGL
Utilities
Nov 2020 28x31% +20%−5% −31%
BEL
Electronic Technology
Mar 2024 49x30% +107%−6% +44%
SCHAEFFLER
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2025 62x25% −2%−10% −4%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to EICHER MOTORS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Electronic Technology
87%similar
revenuemarket cap
CUMMINS INDIACUMMINSIND
Producer Manufacturing
79%similar
EPS growthmarket cap
Health Technology
76%similar
volatilityrevenue
Finance
70%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
Health Technology
70%similar
operating marginP/E
HERO MOTOCORPHEROMOTOCO
Consumer Durables
60%similar
volatilityEPS growth
BAJAJ AUTOBAJAJ-AUTO
Consumer Durables
51%similar
EPS growthmarket cap
Consumer Durables
49%similar
market caprevenue growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '20

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JunPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2026-06-30; price -4.7% that day.
  3. FebPriceVolume reached 5.9x its 50-day median on 2026-02-11; price +6.5% that day.
  4. JanPriceVolume reached 7.3x its 50-day median on 2025-01-02; price +8.7% that day.
  5. NovPriceVolume reached 6.1x its 50-day median on 2024-11-14; price +6.4% that day.
  6. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹16,536 cr.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2024-03-20; price +4.2% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JanPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. DecPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2023-12-04; price +7.4% that day.
  3. NovPriceRegained the 2022-10 peak, 8 months after the low.
  4. NovPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JulPriceVolume reached 8.4x its 50-day median on 2023-07-04; price -6.3% that day.
  7. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹14,442 cr.
  8. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (59.9x).
  9. MayPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2023-05-12; price +6.5% that day.
  10. MarPriceFell 26% from the Oct 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  11. AugValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (54.8x).
  12. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  13. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  14. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (53.4x).
  15. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (52.6x).
  16. AugPriceVolume reached 7.8x its 50-day median on 2021-08-13; price -2.7% that day.
  17. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (40.0x).
  18. JanValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (41.0x).
  19. NovPriceRegained the 2019-11 peak, 7 months after the low.
  20. NovPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2020-11-13; price +7.0% that day.
  21. AugPriceVolume reached 46.1x its 50-day median on 2020-08-24; price +0.3% that day.
  22. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1136.3x₹24998 cr23.0%31.0%0.0x
2026-1034.3x₹24998 cr23.0%31.0%0.0x
2026-0934.0x₹24998 cr23.0%31.0%0.0x
2026-0839.6x₹23408 cr22.0%31.0%0.0x
2026-0739.0x₹23408 cr22.0%31.0%0.0x
2026-0635.2x₹23408 cr22.0%31.0%0.0x
2026-0536.7x₹22569 cr25.2%30.0%0.0x
2026-0436.4x₹22569 cr25.2%30.0%0.0x
2026-0333.7x₹22569 cr25.2%30.0%0.0x
2026-0243.0x₹21428 cr24.0%30.0%0.0x
2026-0138.2x₹21428 cr24.0%30.0%0.0x
2025-1239.3x₹21428 cr24.0%30.0%0.0x
2025-1140.0x₹19519 cr22.7%30.0%0.0x
2025-1039.7x₹19519 cr22.7%30.0%0.0x
2025-0939.7x₹19519 cr22.7%30.0%0.0x
2025-0835.3x₹18870 cr22.2%30.0%0.0x
2025-0731.7x₹18870 cr22.2%30.0%0.0x
2025-0632.7x₹18870 cr22.2%30.0%0.0x
2025-0532.9x₹17885 cr24.6%31.0%0.0x
2025-0434.3x₹17885 cr24.6%31.0%0.0x
2025-0333.0x₹17885 cr24.6%31.0%0.0x
2025-0230.6x₹17091 cr23.6%31.0%0.0x
2025-0133.3x₹17091 cr23.6%31.0%0.0x
2024-1230.9x₹17091 cr23.6%31.0%0.0x
2024-1131.6x₹16943 cr23.2%31.0%0.0x
2024-1032.0x₹16943 cr23.2%31.0%0.0x
2024-0932.9x₹16943 cr23.2%31.0%0.0x
2024-0833.9x₹16536 cr22.2%31.0%0.0x
2024-0733.9x₹16536 cr22.2%31.0%0.0x
2024-0632.0x₹16536 cr22.2%31.0%0.0x
2024-0544.4x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2024-0443.1x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2024-0337.7x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2024-0235.6x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2024-0136.0x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-1238.9x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-1136.6x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-1030.9x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-0932.4x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-0831.3x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-0731.6x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-0633.6x₹14442 cr19.4%27.0%0.0x
2023-0559.9x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2023-0453.8x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2023-0348.1x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2023-0250.7x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2023-0153.2x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-1252.6x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-1156.8x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-1062.8x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-0959.9x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-0854.8x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-0750.4x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-0645.6x₹10298 cr13.3%18.0%0.0x
2022-0556.4x₹8720 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0453.4x₹8720 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0349.9x₹8720 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0252.6x₹8720 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2022-0153.7x₹8720 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x
2021-1252.6x₹8720 cr11.8%17.0%0.0x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback