अApnaFunda

ELLENBARRIE INDUSTRIAL GASES L (ELLEN)

Process Industries · Industrial Specialties · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.80 / 100
Profitability 81Balance sheet 79
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.57 / 100
Price 60Earnings 50FII/DII 61

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹288.65 latest close · +10.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹250₹300₹350Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹250₹300₹350Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹288.65 month-end · −26.5% over 12 months

₹200₹300₹400Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300₹400Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹288.65 month-end · −50.0% since Jul '25

₹200₹400₹600Jul '25Oct '25Jan '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹175.00 to ₹472.00 · 1-year volatility 53.8%

Was the rally earned?

-27%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 24 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 60.9x to 33.7x), which took 51 points back.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+29 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−51 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5 ptsShare count changeShare price: −26%−26%Share priceNet profit growth: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+29ProfitP/E change: −51 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−51P/EShare count change: −5 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−5SharesShare price: −26%−26%Share price
Net profit growth+29 ptsNet profit rose about 40%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-51 ptsThe P/E fell from 60.9x to 33.7x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-5 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with ASIAN PAINTS INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-70.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility53.8%annualised
Volume spikes9last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2026−68.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2026−68.1%
Largest drawdowns

-70.6% (2025-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-29: 14.9x the 50-day median, price +2.9% that day

2026-09-16: 6.1x the 50-day median, price +5.5% that day

2026-09-10: 8.6x the 50-day median, price +5.2% that day

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE62nd▼ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin99thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth51st
  • EPS growth69th
  • Debt/equity ↓67th▲ 24 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓75th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓23rd▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum23rd

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~30%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 67.1x, the price would imply about 30.1%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹288.65
P/E
33.7x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹4074 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹356 cr
P/S
11.4x
P/B
4.2x
ROE
12.4%
Operating Margin
38.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
77.2%
12M Momentum
-26.5%

52-week range

₹175.00₹472.00
38% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
53.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.71

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
27.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.78x
Share count, 1Y
+7.7%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 5checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance40%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 39.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 24.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.78xNear threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.78x (cash from operations ₹181 cr, net profit ₹232 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress17% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 17% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Dec 2016, promoters added 47.5 pts; DIIs added 11.6 pts; FIIs added 1.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 327 to 54,735 (+16639%) between Dec 2016 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '16Jun '26Change
Promoters29.6%77.2%+47.5 pts
FIIs0.0%1.1%+1.1 pts
DIIs0.0%11.6%+11.6 pts
Public and others70.1%10.2%-59.9 pts

Number of shareholders

54,735shareholders+16639% since Dec '16
32770k1.4L2.1L Dec '16Jun '25Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Dec '16: 327
Jun '25: 2.1 lakh
Sep '25: 55,926
Dec '25: 53,001
Mar '26: 52,776
Jun '26: 54,735
32770k1.4L2.1L Dec '16Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Dec '16: 327
Jun '25: 2.1 lakh
Sep '25: 55,926
Dec '25: 53,001
Mar '26: 52,776
Jun '26: 54,735

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−15.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ELLENBARRIE INDUSTRIAL GASES L today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −27% to +27% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −12.4%, 80% range −19.7% to −1.4%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
NDTV · Jan 2024: −51.5% vs market
SULA · Feb 2024: −49.7% vs market
ASTEC · Mar 2023: −48.1% vs market
MEDICAMEQ · Jan 2023: −47.0% vs market
DIVGIITTS · Mar 2024: −44.2% vs market
SHIVALIK · Apr 2023: −41.3% vs market
SUBEXLTD · Dec 2021: −39.6% vs market
TAJGVK · Sep 2020: −38.2% vs market
MATRIMONY · Sep 2021: −36.5% vs market
ROTO · Jul 2025: −28.0% vs market
MIDHANI · Jan 2021: −27.8% vs market
STERTOOLS · Jan 2020: −27.8% vs market
NINSYS · Jan 2025: −27.5% vs market
JAICORPLTD · Jul 2021: −26.3% vs market
SUNTECK · Mar 2020: −25.7% vs market
PARKHOTELS · Jul 2025: −25.1% vs market
POLYMED · Oct 2025: −23.4% vs market
WENDT · Aug 2025: −22.7% vs market
ELDEHSG · Jun 2024: −22.2% vs market
JUSTDIAL · Feb 2022: −21.7% vs market
RESPONIND · Aug 2024: −21.2% vs market
ZEEL · Jan 2022: −21.2% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Aug 2025: −21.1% vs market
XCHANGING · Jun 2024: −19.6% vs market
RAILTEL · Mar 2025: −16.4% vs market
JUBLINGREA · Apr 2022: −15.1% vs market
FELIX · Aug 2025: −7.5% vs market
SEAMECLTD · Dec 2022: −7.2% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Aug 2023: −3.9% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · Dec 2021: −2.9% vs market
KIOCL · Aug 2022: −1.7% vs market
LATENTVIEW · Mar 2023: +6.4% vs market
ZOTA · May 2023: +13.1% vs market
ICRA · Jun 2021: +13.4% vs market
GREAVESCOT · May 2021: +13.9% vs market
ADFFOODS · Nov 2023: +20.4% vs market
VIJAYA · Apr 2023: +25.4% vs market
LAOPALA · Apr 2022: +27.5% vs market
SHILPAMED · Jan 2020: +33.3% vs market
APCOTEXIND · Aug 2020: +37.9% vs market
MPSLTD · Jul 2020: +38.2% vs market
SIRCA · Feb 2022: +41.5% vs market
MTARTECH · Jul 2022: +46.9% vs market
APTECHT · Aug 2020: +55.4% vs market
PARAS · Jun 2023: +56.8% vs market
SHALBY · Jun 2020: +59.9% vs market
ITDC · Mar 2020: +65.0% vs market
DATAPATTNS · Mar 2025: +84.6% vs market
BORORENEW · Jun 2021: +124.8% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Jan 2025: +170.6% vs market
Similar setups −15.8%All companies −3.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−15.8%
All companies' median
−3.4%
Beat the market
38% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
HINDCOPPER
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2025 57x18% −17%−40% +171%
SEAMECLTD
Industrial Services
Dec 2022 27x10% −21%−36% −7%
ADFFOODS
Consumer Non-Durables
Nov 2023 42x17% +29%−17% +20%
MATRIMONY
Technology Services
Sep 2021 55x19% +46%−18% −37%
ITDC
Consumer Services
Mar 2020 28x11% −54%−69% +65%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JUSTDIAL
Technology Services
Feb 2022 22x12% +4%−33% −22%
KIOCL
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2022 40x19% −17%−32% −2%
FELIX
Industrial Services
Aug 2025 29x14% −31%−44% −8%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ELLENBARRIE INDUSTRIAL GASES L. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

MIDWESTMIDWESTLTD
Miscellaneous
79%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
Industrial Services
66%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Finance
60%similar
revenueoperating margin
Consumer Services
53%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Electronic Technology
53%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Process Industries
52%similar
volatilityP/E
Process Industries
45%similar
market capvolatility
SUDEEP PHARMASUDEEPPHRM
Process Industries
40%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

11 events since Sep '25

  1. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.5 pts over 2 quarters to 12.7%.
  2. SepPriceVolume reached 14.9x its 50-day median on 2026-09-29; price +2.9% that day.
  3. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.19x.
  4. JulSharesShare count is up 7.7% over 12 months.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 8.2x its 50-day median on 2026-04-08; price +0.6% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 71% from the Jul 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 18.0x its 50-day median on 2026-03-17; price +8.3% that day.
Show 3 earlier events
  1. DecPriceVolume reached 14.1x its 50-day median on 2025-12-10; price -1.4% that day.
  2. SepPromoterPromoter holding rose 47.5 pts to 77.2%.
  3. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 12.6 pts over 1 quarter to 12.6%.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history17 months · 2025-07 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1133.7x₹356 cr12.4%14.0%0.2x
2026-1036.0x₹356 cr12.4%14.0%0.2x
2026-0941.7x₹356 cr12.4%14.0%0.2x
2026-0843.5x₹341 cr10.7%14.0%0.2x
2026-0735.6x₹341 cr10.7%14.0%0.2x
2026-0635.7x₹341 cr10.7%14.0%0.2x
2026-0536.3x₹336 cr20.3%18.0%0.5x
2026-0437.4x₹336 cr20.3%18.0%0.5x
2026-0327.5x₹336 cr20.3%18.0%0.5x
2026-0233.7x₹323 cr18.9%18.0%0.5x
2026-0139.9x₹323 cr18.9%18.0%0.5x
2025-1250.0x₹323 cr18.9%18.0%0.5x
2025-1160.9x₹329 cr17.4%18.0%0.5x
2025-1071.8x₹329 cr17.4%18.0%0.5x
2025-0972.8x₹329 cr17.4%18.0%0.5x
2025-0881.4x₹312 cr16.8%18.0%0.5x
2025-0790.8x₹312 cr16.8%18.0%0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback