अApnaFunda

EXICOM TELE-SYSTEMS LTD (EXICOM)

Producer Manufacturing · Electrical Products · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.7 / 100
Profitability 3Balance sheet 11
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.32 / 100
Price 37Earnings 51FII/DII 7

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹136.83 latest close · −23.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹120₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹120₹140₹160₹180Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹136.83 month-end · +22.3% over 12 months

₹100₹150Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹136.83 month-end · −28.0% since Mar '24

₹200₹400Mar '24Sep '24Apr '25Oct '25May '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400Mar '24Jul '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹75.60 to ₹189.17 · 1-year volatility 60.4%

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-84.7%not yet recovered
1-year volatility60.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.253-year daily, correlation 0.43
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−83.3% 0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−83.3%
Largest drawdowns

-84.7% (2024-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-28.2% (2024-03 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-04)

-16.1% (2024-04 peak to 2024-05 low, recovered 2024-05)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE1stflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin4thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth92nd▲ 87 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth0th
  • Debt/equity ↓8thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓36th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓21st
  • 12M momentum75th▲ 72 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

Trailing earnings per share are negative, so a P/E-based figure does not exist. See the loss-makers list on the Expectations Gap page for a revenue-based version.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹136.83
ROCE
-15.0%
Market Cap
₹1905 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1278 cr
P/S
1.5x
P/B
2.9x
ROE
-40.7%
Operating Margin
-7.0%
Debt / Equity
1.1x
Promoter Holding
65.2%
12M Momentum
22.3%

52-week range

₹75.60₹189.17
54% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
60.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.31

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
-3.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.13x
Share count, 1Y
+14.9%

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 4checks within range3 near a threshold
Other income reliance—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tax rate—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Cash conversion—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+21 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 21 days (130 vs 110). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+70 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +70 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs trimmed 9.9 pts; promoters trimmed 4.4 pts; FIIs trimmed 1.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 76,287 to 1.4 lakh (+82%) between Mar 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupMar '24Jun '26Change
Promoters69.6%65.2%-4.4 pts
FIIs1.5%0.2%-1.3 pts
DIIs10.2%0.3%-9.9 pts
Public and others18.7%34.3%+15.6 pts

Number of shareholders

1.4 lakhshareholders+82% since Mar '24
76k1.0L1.3L1.6L Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Mar '24: 76,287
Jun '24: 91,525
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.6 lakh
Mar '25: 1.6 lakh
Jun '25: 1.5 lakh
Sep '25: 1.5 lakh
Dec '25: 1.4 lakh
Mar '26: 1.4 lakh
Jun '26: 1.4 lakh
76k1.0L1.3L1.6L Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Mar '24: 76,287
Jun '24: 91,525
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.6 lakh
Mar '25: 1.6 lakh
Jun '25: 1.5 lakh
Sep '25: 1.5 lakh
Dec '25: 1.4 lakh
Mar '26: 1.4 lakh
Jun '26: 1.4 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−16.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like EXICOM TELE-SYSTEMS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −43% to +16% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −14.4%, 80% range −33.6% to −7.6%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
KAMOPAINTS · Feb 2024: −70.3% vs market
COFFEEDAY · Dec 2023: −69.9% vs market
KREBSBIO · Mar 2022: −58.4% vs market
BALAJITELE · Feb 2024: −55.2% vs market
ENIL · Mar 2024: −53.7% vs market
UFO · Mar 2024: −52.5% vs market
VIKASLIFE · Jan 2024: −50.1% vs market
MTNL · Sep 2025: −47.0% vs market
BRNL · Feb 2024: −46.7% vs market
CLEDUCATE · Jun 2025: −46.2% vs market
ALOKINDS · May 2022: −45.8% vs market
EMBDL · Nov 2024: −45.7% vs market
ONIDA · Jan 2022: −43.5% vs market
NETWORK18 · Jul 2024: −40.0% vs market
UNITECH · Jul 2020: −39.4% vs market
RTNINDIA · May 2024: −39.1% vs market
SHEMAROO · Sep 2024: −38.9% vs market
EMAMIREAL · Sep 2025: −38.4% vs market
NEXTMEDIA · Oct 2023: −38.1% vs market
ATLANTAA · Oct 2022: −37.7% vs market
SUNCLAY · Jun 2025: −34.6% vs market
DREDGECORP · Apr 2024: −27.6% vs market
BYKE · Aug 2022: −22.4% vs market
PRAENG · Feb 2025: −19.4% vs market
SPENCERS · Jul 2020: −17.8% vs market
AURUM · Aug 2024: −15.6% vs market
ITI · May 2025: −15.2% vs market
VERANDA · Apr 2025: −15.0% vs market
BOMDYEING · May 2024: −10.5% vs market
OMAXE · May 2024: −9.9% vs market
BROOKS · Sep 2024: −3.3% vs market
SHALPAINTS · Mar 2021: −3.1% vs market
JINDRILL · Nov 2020: +1.1% vs market
DCW · May 2021: +3.1% vs market
HERITGFOOD · Oct 2020: +6.9% vs market
SPLIL · Jan 2021: +12.0% vs market
ARVINDFASN · Jun 2022: +15.2% vs market
LYKALABS · Mar 2020: +16.1% vs market
INOXWIND · Oct 2021: +20.8% vs market
DWARKESH · Aug 2021: +28.6% vs market
KRITI · Jul 2023: +30.5% vs market
PRICOLLTD · May 2020: +32.5% vs market
MSTCLTD · May 2020: +35.7% vs market
THOMASCOOK · Dec 2022: +50.2% vs market
REPRO · Jul 2022: +50.8% vs market
DBREALTY · Jul 2023: +67.5% vs market
PENINLAND · Sep 2020: +80.6% vs market
RAMANEWS · May 2024: +107.8% vs market
PCJEWELLER · Mar 2024: +134.3% vs market
GANESHHOU · Apr 2021: +253.6% vs market
Similar setups −16.7%All companies −2.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−16.7%
All companies' median
−2.3%
Beat the market
36% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MSTCLTD
Retail Trade
May 2020 —-14% +14%−47% +36%
OMAXE
Finance
May 2024 —-16% +79%−22% −10%
ENIL
Consumer Services
Mar 2024 —-17% +123%−25% −54%
VERANDA
Consumer Services
Apr 2025 —0% +20%−40% −15%
PRICOLLTD
Producer Manufacturing
May 2020 —-14% −4%−36% +33%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
KAMOPAINTS
Process Industries
Feb 2024 —-7% +185%−18% −70%
SPENCERS
Retail Trade
Jul 2020 —-6% +23%−21% −18%
MTNL
Communications
Sep 2025 —-7% −17%−27% −47%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. Not used (unavailable for this company): P/E. This company is loss-making, so it was only compared with loss-making companies. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to EXICOM TELE-SYSTEMS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Process Industries
60%similar
ROCEdebt/equity
Health Technology
57%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Process Industries
56%similar
debt/equityROCE
Process Industries
54%similar
ROCEoperating margin
Process Industries
54%similar
market caprevenue
Producer Manufacturing
48%similar
volatilityROCE
Producer Manufacturing
46%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
Producer Manufacturing
40%similar
volatilitydebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

25 events since Mar '24

  1. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.2 pts over 2 quarters to 0.5%.
  2. JunSharesShare count is up 14.9% over 12 months.
  3. JunPriceVolume reached 85.1x its 50-day median on 2026-06-08; price +12.5% that day.
  4. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,030 cr.
  5. MarPriceFell 85% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPriceVolume reached 8.0x its 50-day median on 2026-03-17; price +3.5% that day.
  7. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 3.0 pts to 66.5%.
  8. DecPriceVolume reached 59.8x its 50-day median on 2025-12-16; price +7.9% that day.
Show 17 earlier events
  1. SepPriceVolume reached 36.5x its 50-day median on 2025-09-19; price +13.1% that day.
  2. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.15x).
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 18.0x its 50-day median on 2025-06-11; price +12.2% that day.
  5. MarResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  6. MarDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.06x.
  7. MarSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  8. FebPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2025-02-06; price -10.0% that day.
  9. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.3 pts over 2 quarters to 7.4%.
  10. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. NovPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2024-11-19; price -5.0% that day.
  12. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. SepPriceVolume reached 6.5x its 50-day median on 2024-09-03; price +3.3% that day.
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. MayPriceVolume reached 14.4x its 50-day median on 2024-05-30; price +16.9% that day.
  16. AprPriceRegained the 2024-03 peak, 1 month after the low.
  17. MarPriceFell 28% from the Mar 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history33 months · 2024-03 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-11—₹1278 cr-40.7%-15.0%1.1x
2026-10—₹1278 cr-40.7%-15.0%1.1x
2026-09—₹1278 cr-40.7%-15.0%1.1x
2026-08—₹1152 cr-42.1%-15.0%1.1x
2026-07—₹1152 cr-42.1%-15.0%1.1x
2026-06—₹1152 cr-42.1%-15.0%1.1x
2026-05—₹1030 cr-45.9%-6.0%1.2x
2026-04—₹1030 cr-45.9%-6.0%1.2x
2026-03—₹1030 cr-45.9%-6.0%1.2x
2026-02—₹950 cr-42.8%-6.0%1.2x
2026-01—₹950 cr-42.8%-6.0%1.2x
2025-12—₹950 cr-42.8%-6.0%1.2x
2025-11—₹821 cr-34.4%-6.0%1.2x
2025-10—₹821 cr-34.4%-6.0%1.2x
2025-09—₹821 cr-34.4%-6.0%1.2x
2025-08—₹868 cr-17.9%-6.0%1.2x
2025-07—₹868 cr-17.9%-6.0%1.2x
2025-06—₹868 cr-17.9%-6.0%1.2x
2025-05—₹903 cr-2.9%20.0%0.1x
2025-04—₹903 cr-2.9%20.0%0.1x
2025-03—₹903 cr-2.9%20.0%0.1x
2025-0250.7x₹970 cr5.1%20.0%0.1x
2025-0181.0x₹970 cr5.1%20.0%0.1x
2024-1281.8x₹970 cr5.1%20.0%0.1x
2024-1145.9x₹1007 cr10.0%20.0%0.1x
2024-1051.1x₹1007 cr10.0%20.0%0.1x
2024-0951.9x₹1007 cr10.0%20.0%0.1x
2024-0867.7x₹1020 cr8.9%20.0%0.1x
2024-0778.4x₹1020 cr8.9%20.0%0.1x
2024-0679.7x₹1020 cr8.9%20.0%0.1x
2024-05376.9x₹708 cr3.4%15.0%0.6x
2024-04360.3x₹708 cr3.4%15.0%0.6x
2024-03237.4x₹708 cr3.4%15.0%0.6x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback