अApnaFunda

JSW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (JSWINFRA)

Industrial Services · Engineering & Construction · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.55 / 100
Profitability 67Growth 64Balance sheet 34
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.53 / 100
Price 64Earnings 41

Passes these screensHigh Momentum

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹339.25 latest close · +4.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹320₹340₹360Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹320₹340₹360Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹339.25 month-end · +25.5% over 12 months

₹250₹300₹350Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹250₹300₹350Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹339.25 month-end · +61.2% over 3 years

₹200₹250₹300₹350Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250₹300₹350Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹339.25 month-end · +100.1% since Oct '23

₹200₹300Oct '23May '24Jan '25Aug '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Oct '23May '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹233.42 to ₹375.50 · 1-year volatility 33.7%

Was the rally earned?

+26%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 35.6x to 49.1x); per-share earnings took off 11 points.
  • The share count rose 6%.
Net profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: +26%+26%Share priceNet profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4ProfitP/E change: +36 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+36P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: +26%+26%Share price
Net profit growth-4 ptsNet profit fell about 4%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+36 ptsThe P/E rose from 35.6x to 49.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 6%, which lowers the price.
+61%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 71 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 53.0x to 49.1x), which took 10 points back.
  • The share count rose 19%.
Net profit growth: +94 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+94 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−10 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −22 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−22 ptsShare count changeShare price: +61%+61%Share priceNet profit growth: +94 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+94ProfitP/E change: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−10P/EShare count change: −22 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−22SharesShare price: +61%+61%Share price
Net profit growth+94 ptsNet profit rose about 107%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-10 ptsThe P/E fell from 53.0x to 49.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-22 ptsShare count rose 19%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LARSEN AND TOUBRO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-36.9%recovered 2026-09
1-year volatility33.7%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.843-year daily, correlation 0.52
Volume spikes3last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%−30%202420252026−35.9% 0%−10%−20%−30%202420252026−35.9%
Largest drawdowns

-36.9% (2024-07 peak to 2025-02 low, recovered 2026-09)

-17.9% (2024-02 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-22: 6.5x the 50-day median, price +5.1% that day

2026-09-18: 9.7x the 50-day median, price +6.6% that day

2026-07-13: 6.1x the 50-day median, price +6.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

49.1xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history58th percentile
CheapestMedian 46.5xDearest

Usual range 35.5x to 62.2x since 2023-10.

Against Industrial Services49.1x vs 14.0x
This company
49.1x
Sector median
14.0x

250% above the Industrial Services median.

13.3x32.6x52.0x71.3xOct '23Jun '24Feb '25Oct '25Jun '26Nov '2613.3x32.6x52.0x71.3xOct '23Nov '24Dec '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Industrial Services is valued

Where does it rank among Industrial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Industrial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE43rd▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin92ndflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth58th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth33rd▼ 47 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓31st▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓58thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓10th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum88th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Industrial Services sector page Watch it move against Industrial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~30%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 70.1x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 30.2%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered22.7%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+7.5 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank378thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-3%19%41% Jun 2022Nov 2026 -3%19%41% Jun 2022Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x31.9%33.1%34.2%
15x29.0%30.2%31.4%
20x25.5%26.6%27.7%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 30.2%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Industrial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹339.25
P/E
49.1x
ROCE
14.0%
Market Cap
₹79070 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5583 cr
P/S
14.2x
P/B
7.3x
ROE
14.8%
Operating Margin
47.0%
Debt / Equity
0.6x
Promoter Holding
73.9%
12M Momentum
25.5%

52-week range

₹233.42₹375.50
74% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
33.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.82

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
5.3x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.40x
Share count, 1Y
+0.5%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 6checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance13%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 12.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate18%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 18.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.40xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.40x (cash from operations ₹5,925 cr, net profit ₹4,229 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (72 vs 66). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress30% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 30% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 11.7 pts; FIIs added 7.6 pts; DIIs added 5.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 2.1 lakh to 4.3 lakh (+108%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters85.6%73.9%-11.7 pts
FIIs3.6%11.2%+7.6 pts
DIIs4.1%9.2%+5.1 pts
Public and others3.4%5.4%+2.0 pts

Number of shareholders

4.3 lakhshareholders+108% since Sep '23
2.1L2.9L3.8L4.6L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.1 lakh
Dec '23: 3.0 lakh
Mar '24: 3.7 lakh
Jun '24: 3.9 lakh
Sep '24: 4.3 lakh
Dec '24: 4.4 lakh
Mar '25: 4.4 lakh
Jun '25: 4.4 lakh
Sep '25: 4.4 lakh
Dec '25: 4.6 lakh
Mar '26: 4.6 lakh
Jun '26: 4.3 lakh
2.1L2.9L3.8L4.6L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 2.1 lakh
Dec '23: 3.0 lakh
Mar '24: 3.7 lakh
Jun '24: 3.9 lakh
Sep '24: 4.3 lakh
Dec '24: 4.4 lakh
Mar '25: 4.4 lakh
Jun '25: 4.4 lakh
Sep '25: 4.4 lakh
Dec '25: 4.6 lakh
Mar '26: 4.6 lakh
Jun '26: 4.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−15.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like JSW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −25% to −6% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −13.6%, 80% range −20.3% to −10.3%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−80%−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
ASIANTILES · Sep 2020: −61.9% vs market
ANURAS · May 2023: −54.4% vs market
PVRINOX · Feb 2020: −46.5% vs market
UNITDSPR · Apr 2020: −39.4% vs market
DALBHARAT · Aug 2021: −34.8% vs market
TORNTPHARM · Sep 2020: −32.7% vs market
JKCEMENT · Mar 2021: −32.1% vs market
RELIANCE · Sep 2020: −31.1% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · Feb 2020: −30.2% vs market
LEMONTREE · Oct 2025: −30.1% vs market
SHREECEM · Jun 2020: −27.0% vs market
ERIS · Sep 2025: −25.3% vs market
CIPLA · Oct 2020: −24.9% vs market
ZYDUSLIFE · Oct 2020: −24.6% vs market
SYNGENE · Sep 2023: −23.0% vs market
GODREJCP · May 2020: −22.4% vs market
FORTIS · Oct 2025: −20.6% vs market
TEGA · Aug 2025: −20.3% vs market
RADICO · Jul 2023: −19.5% vs market
UNOMINDA · Dec 2021: −17.9% vs market
VIJAYA · Nov 2024: −17.6% vs market
INDHOTEL · May 2025: −16.9% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Aug 2022: −16.8% vs market
MEDANTA · Jan 2024: −16.3% vs market
GODREJPROP · Feb 2024: −15.8% vs market
NH · Sep 2020: −14.3% vs market
ADANIPORTS · Feb 2021: −12.8% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Sep 2023: −12.8% vs market
RAINBOW · Aug 2025: −12.6% vs market
CHALET · Jun 2025: −11.7% vs market
APOLLOHOSP · Apr 2023: −10.8% vs market
METROBRAND · Apr 2025: −10.4% vs market
LODHA · Jun 2024: −9.8% vs market
MANKIND · Jul 2025: −8.7% vs market
RAMCOCEM · Feb 2020: −7.6% vs market
BHARTIHEXA · Oct 2025: −7.1% vs market
CHOICEIN · Sep 2025: −5.9% vs market
SUNPHARMA · Mar 2020: −5.6% vs market
ULTRACEMCO · May 2020: −1.4% vs market
AARTIIND · May 2020: −1.3% vs market
BIOCON · Feb 2020: −0.1% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · Aug 2022: +1.7% vs market
TITAN · Jul 2022: +11.3% vs market
KIMS · Feb 2025: +21.1% vs market
MAXHEALTH · Mar 2023: +25.1% vs market
SOLARINDS · May 2022: +31.2% vs market
SRF · Nov 2020: +38.5% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Aug 2025: +51.1% vs market
VBL · Aug 2022: +58.9% vs market
NAVINFLUOR · Sep 2025: +77.4% vs market
Similar setups −15.0%All companies −1.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−15.0%
All companies' median
−1.4%
Beat the market
18% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TORNTPHARM
Health Technology
Sep 2020 46x15% +68%−7% −33%
INDHOTEL
Consumer Services
May 2025 61x15% +38%−14% −17%
ADANIPORTS
Transportation
Feb 2021 37x12% +98%−4% −13%
VBL
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2022 97x17% +83%−1% +59%
MEDANTA
Health Services
Jan 2024 94x17% +159%0% −16%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BHARTIHEXA
Communications
Oct 2025 68x17% +32%−6% −7%
AARTIIND
Process Industries
May 2020 34x18% +5%−14% −1%
PHOENIXLTD
Finance
Feb 2020 31x11% +37%−8% −30%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to JSW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Technology
78%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Transportation
70%similar
ROCEoperating margin
Health Technology
70%similar
EPS growthROCE
ADANI POWERADANIPOWER
Utilities
66%similar
operating marginvolatility
Finance
66%similar
market capoperating margin
Industrial Services
38%similar
ROCEEPS growth
Industrial Services
28%similar
debt/equityrevenue
SEAMECSEAMECLTD
Industrial Services
25%similar
operating marginpromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

24 events since Feb '24

  1. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 9.7 pts to 73.9%.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. SepPriceRegained the 2024-07 peak, 19 months after the low.
  4. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 11.1 pts over 2 quarters to 20.4%.
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 9.7x its 50-day median on 2026-09-18; price +6.6% that day.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 18.8x its 50-day median on 2026-06-24; price +7.4% that day.
  8. JanPriceVolume reached 10.9x its 50-day median on 2026-01-19; price +5.8% that day.
Show 16 earlier events
  1. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  2. OctValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (38.1x).
  3. SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.0 pts to 83.6%.
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 10.9x its 50-day median on 2025-09-19; price +2.5% that day.
  6. MayPriceVolume reached 26.3x its 50-day median on 2025-05-16; price -3.0% that day.
  7. FebPriceFell 37% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Feb 2025 low.
  8. FebPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2025-02-21; price +8.8% that day.
  9. OctSharesShare count is up 13.9% over 12 months.
  10. OctPriceVolume reached 8.0x its 50-day median on 2024-10-29; price +10.0% that day.
  11. SepPriceVolume reached 7.8x its 50-day median on 2024-09-11; price +4.7% that day.
  12. AugPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.59x).
  14. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 10% of profit).
  15. JunPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2024-06-21; price +2.3% that day.
  16. FebPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2024-02-23; price +7.8% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history38 months · 2023-10 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1149.1x₹5583 cr14.8%14.0%0.6x
2026-1045.7x₹5583 cr14.4%14.0%0.6x
2026-0951.6x₹5583 cr14.4%14.0%0.6x
2026-0846.9x₹5362 cr14.7%14.0%0.6x
2026-0743.1x₹5362 cr14.7%14.0%0.6x
2026-0644.4x₹5362 cr14.7%14.0%0.6x
2026-0535.8x₹5123 cr17.5%14.0%0.5x
2026-0435.4x₹5123 cr17.5%14.0%0.5x
2026-0331.3x₹5123 cr17.5%14.0%0.5x
2026-0233.7x₹4955 cr17.2%14.0%0.5x
2026-0134.2x₹4955 cr17.2%14.0%0.5x
2025-1237.7x₹4955 cr17.2%14.0%0.5x
2025-1135.6x₹4690 cr17.2%14.0%0.5x
2025-1038.1x₹4690 cr17.2%14.0%0.5x
2025-0941.5x₹4690 cr17.2%14.0%0.5x
2025-0841.3x₹4476 cr16.3%14.0%0.5x
2025-0742.6x₹4476 cr16.3%14.0%0.5x
2025-0643.7x₹4476 cr16.3%14.0%0.5x
2025-0546.2x₹4289 cr17.2%16.0%0.6x
2025-0446.6x₹4289 cr17.2%16.0%0.6x
2025-0350.8x₹4289 cr17.2%16.0%0.6x
2025-0243.0x₹4047 cr16.2%16.0%0.6x
2025-0146.5x₹4047 cr16.2%16.0%0.6x
2024-1253.7x₹4047 cr16.2%16.0%0.6x
2024-1158.1x₹3894 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x
2024-1058.8x₹3894 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x
2024-0964.4x₹3894 cr14.6%16.0%0.6x
2024-0859.0x₹3763 cr15.0%16.0%0.6x
2024-0761.6x₹3763 cr15.0%16.0%0.6x
2024-0659.7x₹3763 cr15.0%16.0%0.6x
2024-0571.3x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x
2024-0463.0x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x
2024-0361.8x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x
2024-0264.6x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x
2024-0154.2x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x
2023-1252.5x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x
2023-1153.0x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x
2023-1042.7x₹3195 cr19.4%17.0%1.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback