अApnaFunda

KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC COLTD (KIRLPNU)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.92 / 100
Profitability 79Growth 97Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.61 / 100
Price 24Earnings 78FII/DII 80

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitableBusiness ahead of priceConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹630.3 latest close · −31.0% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹630.3 month-end · +16.0% over 12 months

₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹630.3 month-end · +121.7% over 3 years

₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹630.3 month-end · +112.7% since Apr '23

₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Apr '23Jan '24Sep '24Jun '25Feb '26Nov '26 ₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Apr '23Feb '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹495.00 to ₹1098.60 · 1-year volatility 39.8%

Was the rally earned?

+16%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 47 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 41.4x to 31.1x), which took 31 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +48 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+48 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−31 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +16%+16%Share priceNet profit growth: +48 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+48ProfitP/E change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−31P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +16%+16%Share price
Net profit growth+48 ptsNet profit rose about 56%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-31 ptsThe P/E fell from 41.4x to 31.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+122%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 299 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 99.4x to 31.1x), which took 177 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +300 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+300 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −177 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−177 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +122%+122%Share priceNet profit growth: +300 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+300ProfitP/E change: −177 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−177P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +122%+122%Share price
Net profit growth+300 ptsNet profit rose about 612%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-177 ptsThe P/E fell from 99.4x to 31.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-48.8%not yet recovered
1-year volatility39.8%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.973-year daily, correlation 0.43
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202420252026−48.5% 0%−20%−40%202420252026−48.5%
Largest drawdowns

-48.8% (2026-06 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-44.6% (2024-11 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2026-06)

-21.0% (2023-07 peak to 2023-11 low, recovered 2024-02)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-06: 6.3x the 50-day median, price +7.6% that day

2026-10-28: 7.6x the 50-day median, price +1.3% that day

2026-10-27: 28.7x the 50-day median, price -9.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

31.1xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history5th percentile
CheapestMedian 104.5xDearest

Usual range 36.4x to 234.5x since 2023-04.

Against Producer Manufacturing31.1x vs 29.6x
This company
31.1x
Sector median
29.6x

5% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

25.3x120.0x214.6x309.3xApr '23Jan '24Oct '24Jul '25Apr '26Nov '2625.3x120.0x214.6x309.3xApr '23Jul '24Oct '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE88th
  • Op. margin70th▲ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth67th▼ 33 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth79th▼ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓93rd▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓59th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓48th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum69th▲ 53 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~30%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 73.5x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 29.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered12.0%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+17.8 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank181stmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-16%17%49% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -16%17%49% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x31.4%32.6%33.7%
15x28.7%29.9%31.0%
20x25.3%26.4%27.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 29.9%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹630.30
P/E
31.1x
ROCE
30.0%
Market Cap
₹8199 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1808 cr
P/S
4.5x
P/B
6.6x
ROE
21.1%
Operating Margin
15.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
38.8%
12M Momentum
16.0%

52-week range

₹495.00₹1098.60
22% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
39.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.82

Balance sheet & cash

Debt service
no meaningful debt
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.29x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance9%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 8.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.00xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.00x (cash from operations ₹501 cr, net profit ₹502 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+22 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 22 days (107 vs 85). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-21 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -21 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 9.2 pts; DIIs trimmed 5.8 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 27,000 to 64,033 (+137%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters39.0%38.8%-0.2 pts
FIIs1.1%10.4%+9.3 pts
DIIs31.8%26.0%-5.8 pts
Public and others28.1%24.8%-3.3 pts

Number of shareholders

64,033shareholders+137% since Sep '23
27k42k56k71k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 27,000
Dec '23: 27,794
Mar '24: 29,075
Jun '24: 34,675
Sep '24: 34,294
Dec '24: 48,946
Mar '25: 48,538
Jun '25: 65,393
Sep '25: 70,990
Dec '25: 65,430
Mar '26: 61,484
Jun '26: 64,033
27k42k56k71k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 27,000
Dec '23: 27,794
Mar '24: 29,075
Jun '24: 34,675
Sep '24: 34,294
Dec '24: 48,946
Mar '25: 48,538
Jun '25: 65,393
Sep '25: 70,990
Dec '25: 65,430
Mar '26: 61,484
Jun '26: 64,033

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−7.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC COLTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +14% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−3.2%, 80% range −14.7% to +4.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
VEEDOL · Jul 2021: −69.7% vs market
LUXIND · Dec 2021: −57.1% vs market
BAJAJCON · Jun 2021: −51.6% vs market
NEWGEN · Sep 2021: −39.1% vs market
FINEORG · Mar 2023: −36.9% vs market
INTELLECT · Oct 2021: −36.5% vs market
ADVENZYMES · Jun 2021: −35.8% vs market
AVANTIFEED · Sep 2020: −33.8% vs market
BSOFT · Feb 2022: −31.8% vs market
RALLIS · Dec 2020: −27.8% vs market
SAKSOFT · Jan 2024: −26.7% vs market
FDC · Jan 2021: −26.5% vs market
RHIM · May 2023: −24.8% vs market
NUCLEUS · Jan 2021: −21.8% vs market
JYOTHYLAB · Jun 2024: −21.5% vs market
ADFFOODS · Jun 2021: −20.2% vs market
DHANUKA · Dec 2020: −19.6% vs market
RATNAMANI · Dec 2023: −19.6% vs market
CERA · Dec 2023: −17.8% vs market
SHANTIGEAR · Jan 2024: −15.5% vs market
TANLA · Jun 2022: −15.2% vs market
WENDT · Oct 2023: −12.8% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Jan 2024: −11.1% vs market
COFORGE · Jan 2022: −8.4% vs market
PRINCEPIPE · Jan 2022: −7.6% vs market
ECLERX · Jan 2022: −6.7% vs market
KEI · Jul 2024: −5.7% vs market
KSB · Jan 2025: −5.0% vs market
ACE · Aug 2025: −2.1% vs market
IONEXCHANG · Dec 2023: −0.6% vs market
BLS · Jun 2024: +3.1% vs market
EIHOTEL · Sep 2024: +3.1% vs market
GARFIBRES · Oct 2025: +3.8% vs market
FCL · Apr 2023: +6.9% vs market
VESUVIUS · Jan 2025: +9.0% vs market
RSYSTEMS · Feb 2022: +11.8% vs market
JUSTDIAL · Feb 2020: +12.6% vs market
INOXINDIA · Jan 2025: +14.8% vs market
INGERRAND · Nov 2023: +18.5% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Feb 2021: +19.8% vs market
BEL · Jan 2020: +20.6% vs market
ELECON · Sep 2023: +24.7% vs market
PRAJIND · Dec 2023: +25.6% vs market
GRINDWELL · Jul 2021: +30.4% vs market
CUMMINSIND · Jan 2025: +33.1% vs market
TRITURBINE · Oct 2023: +38.3% vs market
VOLTAMP · Oct 2023: +73.3% vs market
POLYCAB · Sep 2020: +78.1% vs market
KFINTECH · Jun 2024: +88.5% vs market
AEROFLEX · May 2025: +136.7% vs market
Similar setups −7.2%All companies −4.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−7.2%
All companies' median
−4.0%
Beat the market
40% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 29 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NEWGEN
Technology Services
Sep 2021 32x28% +169%−21% −39%
JYOTHYLAB
Consumer Non-Durables
Jun 2024 43x27% +100%−21% −22%
DHANUKA
Process Industries
Dec 2020 26x26% +90%−13% −20%
NUCLEUS
Technology Services
Jan 2021 18x21% +84%−24% −22%
CERA
Consumer Durables
Dec 2023 44x26% +51%−18% −18%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VEEDOL
Process Industries
Jul 2021 39x26% +268%−11% −70%
AVANTIFEED
Process Industries
Sep 2020 20x32% +35%−33% −34%
BLS
Technology Services
Jun 2024 46x31% +69%−17% +3%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/E, P/S and size. Not used (unavailable for this company): interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC COLTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Finance
57%similar
ROCErevenue
Non-Energy Minerals
56%similar
market capP/E
Industrial Services
55%similar
revenue growthoperating margin
Health Technology
53%similar
promoter holdingP/E
Technology Services
52%similar
ROCErevenue
Producer Manufacturing
67%similar
P/EROCE
Producer Manufacturing
63%similar
operating marginP/E
Producer Manufacturing
58%similar
debt/equityROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

26 events since Aug '23

  1. OctPriceFell 49% from the Jun 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 28.7x its 50-day median on 2026-10-27; price -9.8% that day.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  4. JulValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (37.6x).
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 7.0x its 50-day median on 2026-07-21; price -6.1% that day.
  6. JunPriceRegained the 2024-11 peak, 15 months after the low.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. AprPriceVolume reached 35.4x its 50-day median on 2026-04-27; price +8.3% that day.
Show 18 earlier events
  1. MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,667 cr.
  2. JanPriceVolume reached 5.3x its 50-day median on 2026-01-06; price +0.5% that day.
  3. OctPriceVolume reached 10.9x its 50-day median on 2025-10-28; price -0.6% that day.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2025-07-22; price -11.2% that day.
  5. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,640 cr.
  6. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (43.6x).
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. AprPriceVolume reached 19.6x its 50-day median on 2025-04-24; price -3.9% that day.
  9. MarPriceFell 45% from the Nov 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  10. JanPriceVolume reached 7.6x its 50-day median on 2025-01-28; price -13.6% that day.
  11. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.5 pts over 2 quarters to 37.4%.
  12. OctPriceVolume reached 17.8x its 50-day median on 2024-10-28; price +5.2% that day.
  13. SepPriceVolume reached 10.2x its 50-day median on 2024-09-20; price -0.8% that day.
  14. AprPriceVolume reached 53.6x its 50-day median on 2024-04-26; price +17.6% that day.
  15. FebPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  16. FebPriceVolume reached 6.3x its 50-day median on 2024-02-16; price +7.7% that day.
  17. OctPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2023-10-19; price -4.8% that day.
  18. AugPriceVolume reached 12.0x its 50-day median on 2023-08-31; price +0.6% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history44 months · 2023-04 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1131.1x₹1808 cr21.1%30.0%0.0x
2026-1026.6x₹1808 cr21.1%30.0%0.0x
2026-0933.4x₹1808 cr21.1%30.0%0.0x
2026-0836.2x₹1787 cr20.4%30.0%0.0x
2026-0737.6x₹1787 cr20.4%30.0%0.0x
2026-0649.5x₹1787 cr20.4%30.0%0.0x
2026-0553.0x₹1667 cr17.4%—0.0x
2026-0450.6x₹1667 cr17.4%—0.0x
2026-0335.0x₹1667 cr17.4%—0.0x
2026-0240.3x₹1603 cr17.0%—0.0x
2026-0139.6x₹1603 cr17.0%—0.0x
2025-1236.8x₹1603 cr17.0%—0.0x
2025-1141.4x₹1492 cr15.4%—0.0x
2025-1042.6x₹1492 cr15.4%—0.0x
2025-0945.8x₹1492 cr15.4%—0.0x
2025-0837.5x₹1640 cr19.3%—0.0x
2025-0740.5x₹1640 cr19.3%—0.0x
2025-0643.6x₹1640 cr19.3%—0.0x
2025-05219.2x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2025-04197.8x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2025-03206.7x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2025-02174.7x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2025-01198.1x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-12268.7x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-11309.3x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-10290.6x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-09231.9x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-08227.2x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-07237.1x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-06235.7x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-05214.2x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-04182.9x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-03123.8x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-02122.9x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2024-01118.1x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-12105.3x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-1199.4x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-1097.3x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-09115.5x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-08112.6x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-07113.3x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-06114.1x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-0598.7x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x
2023-04103.6x₹509 cr11.2%15.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback