अApnaFunda

KOLTE-PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD (KOLTEPATIL)

Finance · Real Estate Development · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.29 / 100
Profitability 27Growth 28Balance sheet 31
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.65 / 100
Price 56Earnings 56FII/DII 83

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹443.7 latest close · +21.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹350₹400₹450₹500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹350₹400₹450₹500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹443.7 month-end · +17.3% over 12 months

₹300₹350₹400₹450Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹300₹350₹400₹450Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹443.7 month-end · −17.3% over 3 years

₹300₹400₹500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹300₹400₹500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹443.7 month-end · +67.6% since Jan '19

₹200₹400Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹200₹400Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹292.25 to ₹554.60 · 1-year volatility 34.7%

Was the rally earned?

+17%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 24 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 33.5x to 31.6x), which took 6 points back.
  • The share count rose 18%.
Net profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−6 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−18 ptsShare count changeShare price: +17%+17%Share priceNet profit growth: +41 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+41ProfitP/E change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−6P/EShare count change: −18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−18SharesShare price: +17%+17%Share price
Net profit growth+41 ptsNet profit rose about 46%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-6 ptsThe P/E fell from 33.5x to 31.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-18 ptsShare count rose 18%, which lowers the price.
-17%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 2 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 39.2x to 31.6x), which took 19 points back.
  • The share count rose 7%.
Net profit growth: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+9 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6 ptsShare count changeShare price: −17%−17%Share priceNet profit growth: +9 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+9ProfitP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19P/EShare count change: −6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−6SharesShare price: −17%−17%Share price
Net profit growth+9 ptsNet profit rose about 10%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-19 ptsThe P/E fell from 39.2x to 31.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-6 ptsShare count rose 7%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DLF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.3%recovered 2021-01
1-year volatility34.7%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.733-year daily, correlation 0.34
Volume spikes13last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−55.9% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−55.9%
Largest drawdowns

-59.3% (2019-01 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-01)

-55.9% (2024-01 peak to 2025-03 low, not yet recovered)

-38.5% (2022-10 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-04: 11x the 50-day median, price +5.7% that day

2026-10-23: 12.3x the 50-day median, price +6.2% that day

2026-10-13: 5.2x the 50-day median, price +0.5% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

31.6xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history62nd percentile
CheapestMedian 26.8xDearest

Usual range 16.5x to 42.3x since 2019-01.

Against Finance31.6x vs 18.1x
This company
31.6x
Sector median
18.1x

75% above the Finance median.

9.5x79.5x149.5x219.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '269.5x79.5x149.5x219.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianFinance median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Finance is valued

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE13th▼ 40 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin40th▲ 29 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth43rd▼ 34 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth68th
  • Debt/equity ↓19th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓52nd▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓31st▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum82nd▲ 5 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~35%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 97.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 35.1%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−39.9%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+65.1 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank5thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-40%-2%35% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -40%-2%35% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x36.9%38.2%39.4%
15x33.9%35.1%36.3%
20x30.1%31.3%32.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 35.1%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹443.70
P/E
31.6x
ROCE
0.0%
Market Cap
₹3931 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1573 cr
P/S
2.5x
P/B
3.3x
ROE
10.3%
Operating Margin
21.0%
Debt / Equity
1.0x
Promoter Holding
73.8%
12M Momentum
17.3%

52-week range

₹292.25₹554.60
58% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
34.7%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.52

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
9.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
5.00x
Share count, 1Y
+17.1%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 6checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance41%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 40.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate31%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 31.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion97.00xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 97.00x (cash from operations ₹388 cr, net profit ₹4 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+18 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 18 days (31 vs 13). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress2% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 2% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 8.0 pts; DIIs trimmed 0.7 pts; promoters trimmed 0.6 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters74.5%73.8%-0.6 pts
FIIs2.6%10.6%+8.0 pts
DIIs4.0%3.3%-0.7 pts
Public and others18.9%12.3%-6.7 pts

Number of shareholders

40,601shareholders-4% since Sep '23
41k45k50k55k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 42,339
Dec '23: 42,891
Mar '24: 44,476
Jun '24: 48,392
Sep '24: 54,799
Dec '24: 55,264
Mar '25: 54,497
Jun '25: 48,821
Sep '25: 45,226
Dec '25: 43,356
Mar '26: 41,772
Jun '26: 40,601
41k45k50k55k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 42,339
Dec '23: 42,891
Mar '24: 44,476
Jun '24: 48,392
Sep '24: 54,799
Dec '24: 55,264
Mar '25: 54,497
Jun '25: 48,821
Sep '25: 45,226
Dec '25: 43,356
Mar '26: 41,772
Jun '26: 40,601

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like KOLTE-PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +17% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+1.2%, 80% range −8.2% to +5.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
CAMLINFINE · May 2023: −61.0% vs market
AFSL · Aug 2024: −58.7% vs market
HIKAL · Jan 2025: −48.8% vs market
JKLAKSHMI · Oct 2025: −44.9% vs market
RAMCOCEM · May 2023: −42.8% vs market
THEINVEST · Dec 2024: −42.7% vs market
AARTIIND · Jul 2024: −40.4% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Nov 2023: −39.6% vs market
KRISHANA · Oct 2023: −36.2% vs market
GOCLCORP · Feb 2020: −35.4% vs market
APOLLOTYRE · Feb 2021: −33.7% vs market
DMCC · Mar 2025: −31.0% vs market
STARCEMENT · Oct 2025: −29.6% vs market
GUFICBIO · Feb 2025: −27.5% vs market
APLLTD · Feb 2024: −24.0% vs market
SHREEKARNI · Apr 2025: −23.9% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jul 2020: −20.6% vs market
SHK · Mar 2024: −17.1% vs market
VTL · Oct 2021: −16.7% vs market
HCG · Feb 2023: −13.3% vs market
GANECOS · Jun 2023: −11.5% vs market
GESHIP · May 2021: −10.6% vs market
BANARISUG · Aug 2022: −10.1% vs market
JUBLPHARMA · Dec 2024: −8.0% vs market
BALRAMCHIN · Jul 2025: −5.2% vs market
ASTERDM · Apr 2023: −4.6% vs market
MMFL · May 2022: −3.7% vs market
KCP · Jan 2024: −1.2% vs market
NAVNETEDUL · Oct 2022: −1.1% vs market
TATACHEM · Jul 2022: +1.5% vs market
LIBERTSHOE · Jun 2024: +3.8% vs market
DCMSHRIRAM · Mar 2025: +6.3% vs market
GREENPLY · Feb 2024: +8.1% vs market
BIOCON · Aug 2025: +9.8% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Jun 2025: +11.8% vs market
JSWENERGY · Mar 2020: +14.4% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Nov 2024: +15.4% vs market
SHILPAMED · Apr 2025: +17.8% vs market
BIRLACORPN · May 2020: +39.0% vs market
SANGHIIND · Dec 2022: +42.3% vs market
SUDARSCHEM · May 2024: +42.9% vs market
FACT · Jan 2020: +45.7% vs market
STAR · Mar 2020: +45.8% vs market
PRIVISCL · Dec 2024: +50.8% vs market
KITEX · Aug 2024: +57.8% vs market
BRIGADE · Jun 2023: +60.0% vs market
HSCL · May 2022: +74.7% vs market
MBAPL · Apr 2025: +85.8% vs market
ORCHPHARMA · Dec 2023: +115.7% vs market
STEELXIND · Jan 2021: +256.1% vs market
Similar setups −4.9%All companies −6.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.9%
All companies' median
−6.1%
Beat the market
42% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 38 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GUFICBIO
Health Technology
Feb 2025 39x— +5%−32% −28%
HUHTAMAKI
Process Industries
Jul 2020 21x— +8%−18% −21%
STEELXIND
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2021 18x— +81%−9% +256%
BANARISUG
Process Industries
Aug 2022 43x7% +54%−7% −10%
MMFL
Producer Manufacturing
May 2022 42x8% +68%−14% −4%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
JUBLPHARMA
Health Technology
Dec 2024 30x7% +103%−13% −8%
STAR
Health Technology
Mar 2020 8x2% −32%−40% +46%
ORCHPHARMA
Health Technology
Dec 2023 63x5% +96%−3% +116%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to KOLTE-PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
58%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Retail Trade
58%similar
volatilityrevenue
Process Industries
58%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
TRIDENTTRIDENT
Process Industries
55%similar
promoter holdingrevenue growth
Process Industries
54%similar
ROCErevenue
Finance
45%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
TARCTARC
Finance
45%similar
market capoperating margin
Finance
41%similar
market caprevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '24

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 31.3x its 50-day median on 2026-10-09; price +1.1% that day.
  2. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  3. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  4. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  5. AugPriceVolume reached 266.4x its 50-day median on 2026-08-11; price +11.8% that day.
  6. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  7. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.98x).
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunSharesShare count is up 17.1% over 12 months.
  2. AprPriceVolume reached 64.8x its 50-day median on 2026-04-17; price +5.5% that day.
  3. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  4. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  5. FebPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-09; price -1.5% that day.
  6. DecPromoterPromoter holding rose 4.4 pts to 73.8%.
  7. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.6 pts over 2 quarters to 12.6%.
  8. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (38.4x).
  9. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  10. JulPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2025-07-01; price +6.0% that day.
  11. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  12. AprResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  13. MarResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  14. MarPriceFell 56% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  15. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (174.1x).
  16. MarPriceVolume reached 18.9x its 50-day median on 2025-03-13; price +2.3% that day.
  17. OctPriceVolume reached 41.5x its 50-day median on 2024-10-17; price +4.3% that day.
  18. AugPriceVolume reached 8.6x its 50-day median on 2024-08-21; price +9.2% that day.
  19. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 5.0 pts to 69.5%.
  20. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  21. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 4.2 pts over 2 quarters to 10.8%.
  22. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1131.6x₹1573 cr10.3%0.0%1.0x
2026-1031.6x₹1573 cr10.4%0.0%1.0x
2026-0930.3x₹1573 cr10.4%0.0%1.0x
2026-08—₹735 cr-3.2%0.0%1.0x
2026-07—₹735 cr-3.2%0.0%1.0x
2026-06—₹735 cr-3.2%0.0%1.0x
2026-0561.1x₹1205 cr5.1%11.0%1.4x
2026-0463.9x₹1205 cr5.1%11.0%1.4x
2026-0349.3x₹1205 cr5.1%11.0%1.4x
2026-0240.2x₹1290 cr7.7%11.0%1.4x
2026-0142.3x₹1290 cr7.7%11.0%1.4x
2025-1245.3x₹1290 cr7.7%11.0%1.4x
2025-1133.5x₹1459 cr10.2%11.0%1.4x
2025-1037.8x₹1459 cr10.2%11.0%1.4x
2025-0938.4x₹1459 cr10.2%11.0%1.4x
2025-0833.4x₹1718 cr13.0%11.0%1.4x
2025-0729.6x₹1718 cr13.0%11.0%1.4x
2025-0633.1x₹1718 cr13.0%11.0%1.4x
2025-05219.5x₹1525 cr2.1%2.0%1.5x
2025-04181.2x₹1525 cr2.1%2.0%1.5x
2025-03174.1x₹1525 cr2.1%2.0%1.5x
2025-02—₹1251 cr-9.7%2.0%1.5x
2025-01—₹1251 cr-9.7%2.0%1.5x
2024-12—₹1251 cr-9.7%2.0%1.5x
2024-11—₹1141 cr-14.5%2.0%1.5x
2024-10—₹1141 cr-14.5%2.0%1.5x
2024-09—₹1141 cr-14.5%2.0%1.5x
2024-08—₹1371 cr-8.9%2.0%1.5x
2024-07—₹1371 cr-8.9%2.0%1.5x
2024-06—₹1371 cr-8.9%2.0%1.5x
2024-0532.3x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2024-0439.0x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2024-0333.8x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2024-0234.2x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2024-0137.3x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-1235.7x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-1139.2x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-1035.0x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-0934.3x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-0833.0x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-0731.7x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-0624.7x₹1488 cr13.0%14.0%0.6x
2023-0531.2x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2023-0424.1x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2023-0323.9x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2023-0225.8x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2023-0127.0x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-1226.7x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-1129.2x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-1033.2x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-0932.9x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-0829.6x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-0725.6x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-0620.8x₹1117 cr8.9%13.0%0.6x
2022-05—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2022-04—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2022-03—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2022-02—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2022-01—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-12—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-11—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-10—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-09—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-08—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-07—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-06—₹692 cr-0.6%4.0%0.8x
2021-0523.6x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2021-0422.2x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2021-0323.7x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2021-0225.4x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2021-0125.2x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-1225.5x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-1122.2x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-1017.7x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-0916.6x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-0818.3x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-0714.4x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-0616.6x₹1130 cr11.0%16.0%0.8x
2020-0515.6x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2020-0417.0x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2020-0312.1x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2020-0221.3x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2020-0126.7x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-1225.1x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-1123.8x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-1025.2x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-0926.8x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-0822.6x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-0721.4x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-0622.1x₹866 cr11.8%14.0%1.0x
2019-0514.6x₹1403 cr15.7%16.0%0.7x
2019-0414.4x₹1403 cr15.7%16.0%0.7x
2019-0315.7x₹1403 cr15.7%16.0%0.7x
2019-0214.8x₹1403 cr15.7%16.0%0.7x
2019-0116.5x₹1403 cr15.7%16.0%0.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback