अApnaFunda

LLOYDS METALS AND ENERGY LIMIT (LLOYDSME)

Non-Energy Minerals · Steel · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.67 / 100
Profitability 95Growth 100Balance sheet 8
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.46 / 100
Price 33Earnings 62FII/DII 42

Passes these screensQuality CompounderHigh MomentumLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,807 latest close · +1.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,800₹2,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,800₹2,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,807 month-end · +48.1% over 12 months

₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,500₹2,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,807 month-end · +244.3% over 3 years

₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹1,807 month-end · +187.3% since Jul '23

₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Jul '23Mar '24Nov '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Jul '23Mar '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹1042.90 to ₹2125.00 · 1-year volatility 36.5%

Was the rally earned?

+48%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 132 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 41.6x to 21.0x), which took 84 points back.
  • The share count rose 8%.
Net profit growth: +141 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+141 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −84 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−84 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−9 ptsShare count changeShare price: +48%+48%Share priceNet profit growth: +141 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+141ProfitP/E change: −84 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−84P/EShare count change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−9SharesShare price: +48%+48%Share price
Net profit growth+141 ptsNet profit rose about 216%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-84 ptsThe P/E fell from 41.6x to 21.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-9 ptsShare count rose 8%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-33.0%recovered 2025-06
1-year volatility36.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.043-year daily, correlation 0.55
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%−30%202420252026−30.5% 0%−10%−20%−30%202420252026−30.5%
Largest drawdowns

-33.0% (2025-01 peak to 2025-03 low, recovered 2025-06)

-32.4% (2025-06 peak to 2026-02 low, recovered 2026-04)

-22.8% (2023-08 peak to 2023-10 low, recovered 2024-04)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

21.0xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history3rd percentile
CheapestMedian 36.7xDearest

Usual range 26.1x to 46.0x since 2023-07.

Against Non-Energy Minerals21.0x vs 21.8x
This company
21.0x
Sector median
21.8x

Close to the Non-Energy Minerals median.

19.1x31.6x44.1x56.6xJul '23Mar '24Nov '24Jul '25Mar '26Nov '2619.1x31.6x44.1x56.6xJul '23Sep '24Nov '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE93rd▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin96thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth100th▲ 71 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth98th▲ 34 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓7th▼ 60 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓79th▲ 54 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓54th▲ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum90th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~33%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 81.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 32.5%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered43.3%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−10.8 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank711thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-11%21%53% Jun 2020Nov 2026 -11%21%53% Jun 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x34.2%35.4%36.7%
15x31.3%32.5%33.7%
20x27.6%28.8%29.9%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 32.5%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1807.00
P/E
21.0x
ROCE
27.0%
Market Cap
₹1.02L cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹22083 cr
P/S
4.6x
P/B
7.3x
ROE
34.9%
Operating Margin
38.0%
Debt / Equity
1.5x
Promoter Holding
61.6%
12M Momentum
48.1%

52-week range

₹1042.90₹2125.00
71% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
36.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.95

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
9.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.89x
Share count, 1Y
+7.7%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 27.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.89xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.89x (cash from operations ₹5,829 cr, net profit ₹6,527 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+28 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 28 days (32 vs 4). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress106% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 106% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+373 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +373 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 4.1 pts; DIIs added 2.2 pts; FIIs added 1.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 31,607 to 1.3 lakh (+301%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters65.7%61.6%-4.1 pts
FIIs0.3%1.9%+1.5 pts
DIIs0.0%2.2%+2.2 pts
Public and others33.9%34.3%+0.4 pts

Number of shareholders

1.3 lakhshareholders+301% since Dec '23
32k63k95k1.3L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 31,607
Mar '24: 33,891
Jun '24: 37,806
Sep '24: 62,762
Dec '24: 1.1 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.2 lakh
Sep '25: 1.2 lakh
Dec '25: 1.1 lakh
Mar '26: 1.2 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh
32k63k95k1.3L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 31,607
Mar '24: 33,891
Jun '24: 37,806
Sep '24: 62,762
Dec '24: 1.1 lakh
Mar '25: 1.2 lakh
Jun '25: 1.2 lakh
Sep '25: 1.2 lakh
Dec '25: 1.1 lakh
Mar '26: 1.2 lakh
Jun '26: 1.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−10.5%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LLOYDS METALS AND ENERGY LIMIT today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +16% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −7.9%, 80% range −16.2% to −0.5%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
MBAPL · May 2023: −48.1% vs market
APLLTD · Nov 2020: −42.7% vs market
AUROPHARMA · Dec 2020: −41.0% vs market
MASTEK · Feb 2022: −40.7% vs market
LUXIND · May 2021: −40.2% vs market
EPIGRAL · Sep 2022: −39.7% vs market
GREENPANEL · May 2022: −39.1% vs market
INDUSTOWER · Sep 2021: −36.2% vs market
MANINFRA · Feb 2024: −28.1% vs market
HGINFRA · Oct 2021: −25.8% vs market
ROLEXRINGS · Feb 2023: −25.4% vs market
JKCEMENT · Aug 2021: −22.5% vs market
GSPL · May 2020: −22.1% vs market
SANDUMA · Oct 2025: −21.2% vs market
JSWSTEEL · Jul 2021: −20.6% vs market
GENUSPOWER · Jun 2025: −19.8% vs market
LAURUSLABS · Aug 2021: −18.9% vs market
PNCINFRA · Mar 2021: −18.7% vs market
HAL · Jul 2020: −18.3% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · Aug 2023: −16.6% vs market
PREMIERENE · Oct 2025: −15.3% vs market
ERIS · Jun 2025: −15.0% vs market
BHARTIHEXA · Sep 2025: −14.7% vs market
ADANIPOWER · Apr 2024: −14.5% vs market
KPIGREEN · Dec 2024: −12.4% vs market
SRF · Jan 2022: −8.7% vs market
SARDAEN · Sep 2025: −8.3% vs market
LODHA · Aug 2025: −6.7% vs market
VBL · Jun 2020: −1.6% vs market
BHARATFORG · Jan 2020: −0.1% vs market
RELIANCE · Mar 2020: 0% vs market
SHAREINDIA · May 2022: +0.3% vs market
MOTILALOFS · Nov 2024: +0.5% vs market
TORNTPOWER · Apr 2024: +0.9% vs market
ADANIPORTS · Oct 2024: +2.8% vs market
RKFORGE · Mar 2024: +8.0% vs market
ANGELONE · May 2025: +8.7% vs market
BRIGADE · Mar 2020: +18.8% vs market
UNOMINDA · Mar 2020: +25.4% vs market
INDIGO · Sep 2024: +26.6% vs market
TIINDIA · Jul 2022: +28.9% vs market
MANORAMA · Oct 2025: +36.5% vs market
MOLDTKPAC · Jan 2022: +36.7% vs market
SOLARINDS · Aug 2023: +50.6% vs market
CGPOWER · Sep 2022: +61.7% vs market
DEEPAKNTR · Jan 2021: +68.8% vs market
GRANULES · Jan 2020: +93.9% vs market
CHOICEIN · Jul 2024: +102.7% vs market
ADANIENSOL · Jun 2020: +149.1% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · Mar 2020: +163.3% vs market
Similar setups −10.5%All companies −2.6%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−10.5%
All companies' median
−2.6%
Beat the market
40% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 35 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TORNTPOWER
Utilities
Apr 2024 34x18% +172%−6% +1%
LAURUSLABS
Health Technology
Aug 2021 36x40% +194%−6% −19%
DEEPAKNTR
Process Industries
Jan 2021 22x38% +153%−8% +69%
GSPL
Industrial Services
May 2020 11x25% +4%−24% −22%
INDUSTOWER
Communications
Sep 2021 21x19% +76%−4% −36%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MOTILALOFS
Finance
Nov 2024 20x21% +206%−11% +1%
PNCINFRA
Industrial Services
Mar 2021 12x21% +174%−9% −19%
ANGELONE
Finance
May 2025 20x39% +23%−12% +9%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, P/S and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LLOYDS METALS AND ENERGY LIMIT. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Electronic Technology
78%similar
volatilitymarket cap
Finance
64%similar
operating margindebt/equity
BAJAJ AUTOBAJAJ-AUTO
Consumer Durables
58%similar
ROCErevenue
Finance
53%similar
operating marginrevenue
Transportation
52%similar
revenueoperating margin
Non-Energy Minerals
45%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
NMDCNMDC
Non-Energy Minerals
42%similar
operating marginROCE
Non-Energy Minerals
33%similar
ROCErevenue growth

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

22 events since Oct '23

  1. JunPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.1 pts to 61.6% (largest drop since 2024-12).
  2. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (26.8x).
  3. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.49x).
  4. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 4% to 2% of profit.
  5. JunSharesShare count is up 7.7% over 12 months.
  6. AprPriceRegained the 2025-06 peak, 2 months after the low.
  7. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. FebPriceFell 32% from the Jun 2025 peak to the Feb 2026 low.
Show 14 earlier events
  1. FebPriceVolume reached 16.3x its 50-day median on 2026-02-04; price +10.0% that day.
  2. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹8,903 cr.
  3. DecPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2025-12-16; price +1.7% that day.
  4. JunPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 3 months after the low.
  5. MarPriceFell 33% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  6. JanPriceVolume reached 7.4x its 50-day median on 2025-01-03; price +7.5% that day.
  7. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 2.2 pts to 63.5%.
  8. NovPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2024-11-29; price +7.3% that day.
  9. JulPriceVolume reached 14.6x its 50-day median on 2024-07-04; price +4.9% that day.
  10. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  11. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 4% of profit).
  12. AprPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2024-04-10; price +5.7% that day.
  13. MarPriceVolume reached 11.0x its 50-day median on 2024-03-15; price +0.3% that day.
  14. OctPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2023-10-04; price +0.1% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history41 months · 2023-07 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1121.0x₹22083 cr34.9%27.0%1.5x
2026-1021.2x₹22083 cr35.5%27.0%1.5x
2026-0921.9x₹22083 cr35.5%27.0%1.5x
2026-0826.6x₹17113 cr27.6%27.0%1.5x
2026-0730.3x₹17113 cr27.6%27.0%1.5x
2026-0626.8x₹17113 cr27.6%27.0%1.5x
2026-0539.0x₹12286 cr38.7%37.0%0.2x
2026-0438.2x₹12286 cr38.7%37.0%0.2x
2026-0327.5x₹12286 cr38.7%37.0%0.2x
2026-0235.8x₹8903 cr27.9%37.0%0.2x
2026-0132.1x₹8903 cr27.9%37.0%0.2x
2025-1238.4x₹8903 cr27.9%37.0%0.2x
2025-1141.6x₹6688 cr23.7%37.0%0.2x
2025-1044.5x₹6688 cr23.7%37.0%0.2x
2025-0941.8x₹6688 cr23.7%37.0%0.2x
2025-0845.9x₹6721 cr22.4%37.0%0.2x
2025-0753.6x₹6721 cr22.4%37.0%0.2x
2025-0656.6x₹6721 cr22.4%37.0%0.2x
2025-0546.9x₹7082 cr54.2%78.0%0.0x
2025-0440.5x₹7082 cr54.2%78.0%0.0x
2025-0343.3x₹7082 cr54.2%78.0%0.0x
2025-0235.4x₹7319 cr52.2%78.0%0.0x
2025-0143.0x₹7319 cr52.2%78.0%0.0x
2024-1242.7x₹7319 cr52.2%78.0%0.0x
2024-1137.6x₹6974 cr49.7%78.0%0.0x
2024-1035.2x₹6974 cr49.7%78.0%0.0x
2024-0934.3x₹6974 cr49.7%78.0%0.0x
2024-0831.5x₹6523 cr44.2%78.0%0.0x
2024-0729.7x₹6523 cr44.2%78.0%0.0x
2024-0629.8x₹6523 cr44.2%78.0%0.0x
2024-05—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2024-04—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2024-03—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2024-02—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2024-01—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2023-12—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2023-11—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2023-10—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2023-09—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2023-08—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x
2023-07—₹3353 cr-18.9%81.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback