अApnaFunda

RAYMOND REALTY LIMITED (RAYMONDREL)

Finance · Real Estate Development · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.49 / 100
Profitability 58Balance sheet 41
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.44 / 100
Price 42Earnings 89FII/DII 0

Passes these screensQuality Compounder

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹552.1 latest close · −18.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹500₹600₹700Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹500₹600₹700Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹552.1 month-end · +9.7% over 12 months

₹400₹500₹600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500₹600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹552.1 month-end · −19.9% since Jul '25

₹400₹500₹600₹700Jul '25Oct '25Jan '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500₹600₹700Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹349.00 to ₹741.95 · 1-year volatility 59.1%

Was the rally earned?

+10%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 3.8x to 12.2x); per-share earnings took off 111 points.
  • The share count rose 3250%.
Net profit growth: +257 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+257 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +121 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+121 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −368 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−368 ptsShare count changeShare price: +10%+10%Share priceNet profit growth: +257 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+257ProfitP/E change: +121 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+121P/EShare count change: −368 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−368SharesShare price: +10%+10%Share price
Net profit growth+257 ptsNet profit rose about 1060%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+121 ptsThe P/E rose from 3.8x to 12.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-368 ptsShare count rose 3250%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with DLF

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-63.1%not yet recovered
1-year volatility59.1%annualised
Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2026−62.2% 0%−20%−40%−60%2026−62.2%
Largest drawdowns

-63.1% (2025-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-06: 7.1x the 50-day median, price +2.3% that day

2026-10-05: 5.3x the 50-day median, price +6.7% that day

2026-09-25: 23.4x the 50-day median, price +0.4% that day

Where does it rank among Finance peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Finance peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE89th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin27th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth95th
  • Debt/equity ↓24th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓54th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓74th
  • 12M momentum81st

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Finance sector page Watch it move against Finance in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~10%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 12.2x, the price would imply about 9.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Finance The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹552.10
P/E
12.2x
ROCE
30.0%
Market Cap
₹3674 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3139 cr
P/S
1.2x
P/B
2.3x
ROE
19.2%
Operating Margin
12.0%
Debt / Equity
0.6x
Promoter Holding
50.9%
12M Momentum
9.7%

52-week range

₹349.00₹741.95
52% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
59.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.34

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-2.00x
low
Share count, 1Y
+200.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 5checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance12%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 12.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate14%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 13.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-4.92xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -4.92x (cash from operations ₹-1,373 cr, net profit ₹279 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 3 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 3: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress6% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 6% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Jun 2025, FIIs trimmed 9.7 pts; DIIs trimmed 3.4 pts; promoters added 2.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 2.6 lakh to 2.1 lakh (-20%) between Jun 2025 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '25Jun '26Change
Promoters48.9%50.9%+2.1 pts
FIIs15.5%5.8%-9.7 pts
DIIs6.3%2.9%-3.4 pts
Public and others29.2%40.3%+11.1 pts

Number of shareholders

2.1 lakhshareholders-20% since Jun '25
2.1L2.3L2.4L2.6L Jun '25Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Jun '25: 2.6 lakh
Sep '25: 2.3 lakh
Dec '25: 2.2 lakh
Mar '26: 2.1 lakh
Jun '26: 2.1 lakh
2.1L2.3L2.4L2.6L Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '25: 2.6 lakh
Sep '25: 2.3 lakh
Dec '25: 2.2 lakh
Mar '26: 2.1 lakh
Jun '26: 2.1 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−8.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RAYMOND REALTY LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +50% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−3.6%, 80% range −13.8% to +19.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
AVPINFRA · Aug 2025: −69.7% vs market
SAHAJSOLAR · Oct 2025: −63.4% vs market
BASILIC · Oct 2025: −52.0% vs market
WSI · Aug 2024: −46.9% vs market
RUSHIL · Aug 2025: −44.2% vs market
KHAICHEM · Jun 2022: −43.3% vs market
KUANTUM · Jul 2023: −41.8% vs market
ORIANA · Jul 2025: −41.1% vs market
SHAKTIPUMP · Nov 2021: −37.0% vs market
ASHAPURMIN · Jun 2021: −34.8% vs market
INDORAMA · Jun 2022: −34.6% vs market
HGINFRA · Jan 2020: −31.8% vs market
ASALCBR · Jul 2025: −29.9% vs market
EUROBOND · Oct 2025: −29.6% vs market
CGRAPHICS · Jun 2025: −28.2% vs market
TIRUMALCHM · Jul 2022: −22.2% vs market
DONEAR · Mar 2025: −22.0% vs market
SKIPPER · Mar 2025: −21.4% vs market
KOPRAN · Aug 2021: −20.4% vs market
PNCINFRA · Feb 2021: −18.1% vs market
ROHLTD · Aug 2023: −17.8% vs market
TEMBO · Oct 2025: −16.3% vs market
SOLEX · Jun 2025: −16.0% vs market
GPIL · Apr 2022: −13.6% vs market
SIYSIL · Jul 2022: −9.6% vs market
FACT · May 2021: −7.6% vs market
VADILALIND · Jul 2023: +6.5% vs market
JKIL · Dec 2023: +12.4% vs market
ESTER · Aug 2021: +13.9% vs market
KAMDHENU · May 2021: +16.6% vs market
ARIHANTCAP · Jun 2024: +16.9% vs market
SALZERELEC · Mar 2021: +21.8% vs market
MARATHON · Jun 2023: +23.7% vs market
SANDUMA · Aug 2025: +30.7% vs market
RADHIKAJWE · Jun 2024: +34.6% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Apr 2021: +37.3% vs market
ROSSELLIND · May 2022: +47.2% vs market
STLTECH · May 2020: +50.5% vs market
CEMPRO · Nov 2024: +54.7% vs market
IIFLCAPS · Jul 2024: +58.9% vs market
GTPL · Jun 2020: +67.0% vs market
POKARNA · May 2020: +77.8% vs market
SARDAEN · Jul 2022: +84.4% vs market
PGIL · Aug 2025: +85.4% vs market
GRAVITA · Jul 2022: +101.8% vs market
UTSSAV · Aug 2025: +111.9% vs market
FORCEMOT · Oct 2024: +118.9% vs market
REFEX · Apr 2024: +141.1% vs market
DPABHUSHAN · Feb 2021: +158.2% vs market
SKYGOLD · Oct 2025: +162.3% vs market
Similar setups −8.6%All companies −5.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 6 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−8.6%
All companies' median
−5.0%
Beat the market
48% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 29 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
GTPL
Communications
Jun 2020 9x27% +17%−26% +67%
REFEX
Energy Minerals
Apr 2024 16x— +156%−7% +141%
WSI
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2024 16x25% +46%−14% −47%
CEMPRO
Industrial Services
Nov 2024 28x27% +94%−19% +55%
AVPINFRA
Industrial Services
Aug 2025 14x25% +3%−32% −70%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ROSSELLIND
Electronic Technology
May 2022 19x— +37%−24% +47%
ASHAPURMIN
Non-Energy Minerals
Jun 2021 15x16% +251%−9% −35%
DPABHUSHAN
Miscellaneous
Feb 2021 14x— +91%−6% +158%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, ROCE and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RAYMOND REALTY LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Non-Energy Minerals
74%similar
market capoperating margin
Industrial Services
66%similar
debt/equityP/E
Utilities
57%similar
operating marginROCE
Technology Services
56%similar
ROCEoperating margin
Energy Minerals
56%similar
operating marginP/E
Finance
24%similar
market capP/E
Finance
16%similar
volatilityrevenue
Finance
12%similar
P/Evolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

15 events since Sep '25

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2026-10-06; price +2.3% that day.
  2. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.2 pts over 2 quarters to 8.8%.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 49.0x its 50-day median on 2026-09-24; price +5.5% that day.
  4. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.65x.
  5. JulSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Finance on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.65x).
  8. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 4% of profit).
Show 7 earlier events
  1. MayPriceVolume reached 88.5x its 50-day median on 2026-05-07; price +11.5% that day.
  2. MarPriceFell 63% from the Jul 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  3. MarPriceVolume reached 17.8x its 50-day median on 2026-03-18; price +10.8% that day.
  4. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 6.2 pts over 1 quarter to 15.7%.
  5. DecPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  6. OctPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2025-10-28; price -4.9% that day.
  7. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Finance on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history17 months · 2025-07 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1112.2x₹3139 cr19.2%30.0%0.6x
2026-1011.3x₹3139 cr19.2%30.0%0.6x
2026-0914.8x₹3139 cr19.2%30.0%0.6x
2026-0811.6x₹2992 cr19.4%30.0%0.6x
2026-0714.1x₹2992 cr19.4%30.0%0.6x
2026-0613.5x₹2992 cr19.4%30.0%0.6x
2026-05—₹1952 cr302.1%16.0%9.7x
2026-04—₹1952 cr302.1%16.0%9.7x
2026-03—₹1952 cr302.1%16.0%9.7x
2026-02—₹1286 cr168.8%16.0%9.7x
2026-01—₹1286 cr168.8%16.0%9.7x
2025-12—₹1286 cr168.8%16.0%9.7x
2025-11—₹815 cr54.2%16.0%9.7x
2025-10—₹815 cr54.2%16.0%9.7x
2025-09—₹815 cr54.2%16.0%9.7x
2025-08—₹565 cr35.4%16.0%9.7x
2025-07—₹565 cr35.4%16.0%9.7x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback