RHETAN TMT LIMITED (RHETAN): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share Price

₹13.40

P/E

78.8x

ROCE

11.0%

Market Cap

₹1068 cr

Revenue (TTM)

₹23 cr

P/S

45.5x

P/B

9.8x

ROE

12.4%

Operating Margin

-16.3%

Debt / Equity

0.4x

Promoter Holding

62.1%

12M Momentum

-42.5%

52-week range

₹12.76₹34.87

3% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

62.3%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

0.32

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

12.5x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

1.18x

Share count, 1Y

unchanged

Was the rally earned?

-43%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

Per-share earnings added 68 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 333.0x to 78.8x), which took 111 points back.
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+68 ptsNet profit rose about 143%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-111 ptsThe P/E fell from 333.0x to 78.8x, which lowers the price.

Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JSW STEEL

What is the price implying?

~46%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 208.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 45.7%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered22.4%/yrEPS, last 6 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg

Gap+23.3 ptsimplied minus delivered

Rank93rdmost demanding of 843

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return	11%	12%	13%
12x	47.7%	49.0%	50.3%
15x	44.4%	45.7%	47.0%
20x	40.3%	41.6%	42.9%

Required return 12.0% Years 10 Exit P/E 15x Implied: 45.7%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

What changed?

Oct '26Fell 60% from the Aug 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
Sep '26Slipped to the bottom quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the top quartile).
Aug '26Volume reached 7.6x its 50-day median on 2026-08-13; price -19.7% that day.
Jun '26Moved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
May '26Volume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2026-05-15; price +0.9% that day.
Feb '26Volume reached 12.2x its 50-day median on 2026-02-13; price -0.1% that day.
Dec '25Moved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
Nov '25Volume reached 32.7x its 50-day median on 2025-11-11; price -4.0% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Are profits backed by cash?

1 of 5 checks are within range, 3 near a threshold, 1 beyond a threshold.
Tap a check to see how it is measured.

Other income reliance78%Beyond threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 78.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate5%Near threshold

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 5.3%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.18xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.18x (cash from operations ₹20 cr, net profit ₹17 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress38% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 38% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Since Jun 2025, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
The number of shareholders fell from 94,091 to 76,501 (-19%) between Jun 2025 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '25Jun '26Change

Promoters62.1%62.1%0.0 pts

FIIs0.0%0.3%+0.3 pts

DIIs———

Public and others37.9%37.5%-0.4 pts

Number of shareholders

76,501shareholders-19% since Jun '25

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-60.3%not yet recovered

1-year volatility62.3%annualised

Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Monthly share price

Last 90 trading days

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-60.3% (2026-08 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

-18.0% (2026-04 peak to 2026-05 low, recovered 2026-05)

-16.3% (2026-06 peak to 2026-06 low, recovered 2026-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-28: 7.1x the 50-day median, price +4.9% that day

2026-09-09: 5.5x the 50-day median, price -5.0% that day

2026-08-13: 7.6x the 50-day median, price -19.7% that day

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Nov '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Oct '26

Lower rank Higher rank

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Company	Sector	Similarity	Closest on
SAHASRA ELECTRONIC SOLU (SAHASRA)	Electronic Technology	66%	market cap, P/E
PROZONE REALTY (PROZONER)	Finance	50%	operating margin, revenue
YUKEN INDIA (YUKEN)	Producer Manufacturing	49%	P/E, debt/equity
FAIRCHEM ORGANICS (FAIRCHEMOR)	Process Industries	48%	promoter holding, debt/equity
MAMATA MACHINERY (MAMATA)	Producer Manufacturing	47%	operating margin, promoter holding
ARFIN INDIA (ARFIN)	Non-Energy Minerals	50%	P/E, market cap
DECCAN CEMENTS (DECCANCE)	Non-Energy Minerals	40%	P/E, market cap
SHIV AUM STEELS (SHIVAUM)	Non-Energy Minerals	37%	P/E, operating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What happened next to similar setups

−14.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RHETAN TMT LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −36% to −2% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −13.9%, 80% range −20.5% to −10.3%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median

−14.9%

All companies' median

−1.0%

Beat the market

24% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
JUBLINGREA Process Industries	Apr 2022	148x	8%	+23%	−38%	−15%
HINDOILEXP Energy Minerals	Oct 2022	92x	6%	−18%	−41%	+8%
MEDICAMEQ Health Technology	Jan 2023	60x	12%	−11%	−40%	−47%
MTARTECH Electronic Technology	Jul 2022	64x	16%	−12%	−49%	+47%
SUNTECK Finance	Nov 2020	62x	5%	−19%	−30%	−3%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
PARAS Electronic Technology	Oct 2022	91x	12%	−32%	−42%	−1%
TECHLABS Distribution Services	Sep 2025	75x	27%	−40%	−69%	−77%
MAANALU Non-Energy Minerals	Sep 2025	786x	—	−36%	−56%	−9%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/E and revenue growth. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RHETAN TMT LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-10-30. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 97,430 company-months from 2000 companies; financial: 5,632 company-months from 106 companies. 2240 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Monthly history (14 months)

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-10	78.8x	₹23 cr	12.4%	11.0%	0.4x
2026-09	103.0x	₹23 cr	12.4%	11.0%	0.4x
2026-08	136.5x	₹24 cr	10.1%	11.0%	0.4x
2026-07	219.1x	₹24 cr	10.1%	11.0%	0.4x
2026-06	188.0x	₹24 cr	10.1%	11.0%	0.4x
2026-05	250.3x	₹22 cr	9.7%	4.0%	0.2x
2026-04	247.0x	₹22 cr	9.7%	4.0%	0.2x
2026-03	201.9x	₹22 cr	9.7%	4.0%	0.2x
2026-02	325.1x	₹23 cr	6.8%	4.0%	0.2x
2026-01	324.8x	₹23 cr	6.8%	4.0%	0.2x
2025-12	304.0x	₹23 cr	6.8%	4.0%	0.2x
2025-11	323.0x	₹23 cr	5.9%	4.0%	0.2x
2025-10	333.0x	₹23 cr	5.9%	4.0%	0.2x
2025-09	307.6x	₹23 cr	5.9%	4.0%	0.2x

Methodology and data notes