अApnaFunda

ROTO PUMPS LTD (ROTO)

Producer Manufacturing · Industrial Machinery · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.61 / 100
Profitability 69Growth 32Balance sheet 83
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.38 / 100
Price 62Earnings 26FII/DII 25

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹65.15 latest close · −8.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹55₹60₹65₹70Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹55₹60₹65₹70Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹65.15 month-end · +5.0% over 12 months

₹50₹60₹70Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹50₹60₹70Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹65.15 month-end · −1.3% over 3 years

₹60₹80₹100₹120Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80₹100₹120Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹65.15 month-end · +85.1% since Apr '22

₹50₹75₹100Apr '22Mar '23Feb '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹50₹75₹100Apr '22Aug '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹47.50 to ₹80.77 · 1-year volatility 43.8%

Was the rally earned?

+5%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (+5%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −22 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−22 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+28 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +5%+5%Share priceNet profit growth: −22 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−22ProfitP/E change: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+28P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +5%+5%Share price
Net profit growth-22 ptsNet profit fell about 19%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+28 ptsThe P/E rose from 33.9x to 44.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-1%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (-1%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−17 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+16 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −1%−1%Share priceNet profit growth: −17 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−17ProfitP/E change: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+16P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −1%−1%Share price
Net profit growth-17 ptsNet profit fell about 16%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+16 ptsThe P/E rose from 37.7x to 44.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WELSPUN CORP

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility43.8%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.153-year daily, correlation 0.50
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−56.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−56.1%
Largest drawdowns

-59.2% (2024-07 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-25.8% (2024-02 peak to 2024-03 low, recovered 2024-05)

-18.4% (2022-06 peak to 2022-10 low, recovered 2023-01)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-24: 5.4x the 50-day median, price +1.0% that day

2026-07-06: 6.8x the 50-day median, price +1.5% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

44.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history75th percentile
CheapestMedian 38.0xDearest

Usual range 24.5x to 49.8x since 2022-04.

Against Producer Manufacturing44.3x vs 29.6x
This company
44.3x
Sector median
29.6x

50% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

21.5x32.9x44.2x55.6xApr '22Mar '23Feb '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '2621.5x32.9x44.2x55.6xApr '22Nov '23Jun '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE50th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin88thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth13th▼ 38 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth22nd▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓63rd▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓1st▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓29th▼ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum61st▲ 30 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~22%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 38.2x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 22.1%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered18.2%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+4.0 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank456thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%27%53% Jun 2020Nov 2026 0%27%53% Jun 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x23.6%24.8%25.9%
15x21.0%22.1%23.2%
20x17.7%18.8%19.9%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 22.1%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹65.15
P/E
44.3x
ROCE
15.0%
Market Cap
₹1228 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹294 cr
P/S
4.2x
P/B
5.1x
ROE
11.5%
Operating Margin
20.1%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
66.8%
12M Momentum
5.1%

52-week range

₹47.50₹80.77
53% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
43.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.94

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
13.8x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.14x
Share count, 1Y
+200.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range3 near a threshold
Other income reliance11%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 11.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate27%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.9%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.14xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.14x (cash from operations ₹112 cr, net profit ₹98 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+16 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 16 days (96 vs 80). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress16% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 16% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+435 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +435 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 6.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 20,684 to 69,840 (+238%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters67.3%66.8%-0.5 pts
FIIs6.2%0.2%-6.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.1%+0.1 pts
Public and others26.5%32.9%+6.4 pts

Number of shareholders

69,840shareholders+238% since Sep '23
21k37k53k70k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 20,684
Dec '23: 24,862
Mar '24: 26,741
Jun '24: 27,119
Sep '24: 39,374
Dec '24: 41,875
Mar '25: 44,104
Jun '25: 48,500
Sep '25: 56,668
Dec '25: 67,947
Mar '26: 64,755
Jun '26: 69,840
21k37k53k70k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 20,684
Dec '23: 24,862
Mar '24: 26,741
Jun '24: 27,119
Sep '24: 39,374
Dec '24: 41,875
Mar '25: 44,104
Jun '25: 48,500
Sep '25: 56,668
Dec '25: 67,947
Mar '26: 64,755
Jun '26: 69,840

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−10.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ROTO PUMPS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −34% to +9% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −7.3%, 80% range −14.6% to −1.6%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
BLISSGVS · Nov 2020: −59.1% vs market
KABRAEXTRU · Jan 2025: −58.4% vs market
FMGOETZE · Feb 2020: −56.7% vs market
SMSPHARMA · May 2021: −55.3% vs market
VAIBHAVGBL · Aug 2023: −51.3% vs market
NGLFINE · Mar 2024: −47.8% vs market
SHALBY · Aug 2021: −40.3% vs market
NINSYS · Feb 2025: −39.9% vs market
ADOR · Nov 2023: −39.9% vs market
MOLDTKPAC · Apr 2023: −39.2% vs market
VIDHIING · Apr 2025: −35.1% vs market
MATRIMONY · Aug 2021: −34.9% vs market
ORIENTHOT · Feb 2025: −34.5% vs market
THEMISMED · Feb 2024: −30.4% vs market
ACI · Oct 2025: −29.4% vs market
GUFICBIO · Apr 2025: −27.4% vs market
SHILPAMED · Mar 2020: −24.1% vs market
IPL · May 2025: −22.8% vs market
CHEMCON · Oct 2025: −19.0% vs market
GREENLAM · Apr 2022: −16.6% vs market
ADFFOODS · Aug 2023: −16.4% vs market
BHARATRAS · Aug 2024: −15.1% vs market
TTKHLTCARE · Apr 2020: −15.0% vs market
RUPA · May 2021: −11.7% vs market
XPROINDIA · Mar 2025: −11.2% vs market
CONFIPET · Feb 2022: −10.5% vs market
STERTOOLS · Jul 2020: −7.6% vs market
BEML · Aug 2025: −6.4% vs market
SILVERTUC · Mar 2024: −5.4% vs market
GENUSPOWER · May 2022: −4.7% vs market
BOROLTD · Jun 2023: −1.1% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Jun 2022: +2.3% vs market
THEJO · Aug 2023: +4.9% vs market
AVTNPL · Mar 2020: +5.8% vs market
MIDHANI · Aug 2025: +6.4% vs market
KRSNAA · Dec 2023: +6.7% vs market
ACE · May 2021: +8.4% vs market
AUTOAXLES · Feb 2021: +9.1% vs market
KOTHARIPET · Jul 2023: +21.2% vs market
CARERATING · Apr 2023: +26.7% vs market
THYROCARE · Apr 2024: +34.0% vs market
JAMNAAUTO · Jun 2021: +44.2% vs market
SUPRIYA · Apr 2024: +60.0% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Jul 2023: +62.0% vs market
HINDCOPPER · Jan 2023: +68.6% vs market
KKCL · May 2022: +83.3% vs market
KPITTECH · Sep 2021: +92.4% vs market
ARVSMART · Nov 2023: +100.4% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Dec 2022: +109.9% vs market
HBLENGINE · Jun 2023: +120.2% vs market
Similar setups −10.8%All companies −3.5%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−10.8%
All companies' median
−3.5%
Beat the market
38% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NGLFINE
Health Technology
Mar 2024 63x12% +74%−12% −48%
RUPA
Consumer Non-Durables
May 2021 50x14% +170%−4% −12%
ADFFOODS
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2023 43x17% +51%−3% −16%
NINSYS
Technology Services
Feb 2025 39x— −9%−31% −40%
VIDHIING
Consumer Non-Durables
Apr 2025 52x17% −6%−24% −35%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MOLDTKPAC
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2023 44x22% +24%−12% −39%
KOTHARIPET
Process Industries
Jul 2023 61x18% +24%−3% +21%
BHARATRAS
Process Industries
Aug 2024 56x12% +37%−4% −15%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, P/E and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ROTO PUMPS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
73%similar
P/Eoperating margin
EMSEMSLIMITED
Industrial Services
63%similar
debt/equitypromoter holding
Finance
63%similar
volatilityrevenue
MATRIMONY.COMMATRIMONY
Technology Services
60%similar
market capoperating margin
Consumer Non-Durables
60%similar
volatilitypromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
67%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Producer Manufacturing
65%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
debt/equityROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  2. JulPriceVolume reached 6.8x its 50-day median on 2026-07-06; price +1.5% that day.
  3. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (55.0x).
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. JunSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 231.3x its 50-day median on 2026-06-24; price +7.9% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 59% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 40.5x its 50-day median on 2026-03-11; price +12.1% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPriceVolume reached 363.6x its 50-day median on 2025-12-18; price +7.5% that day.
  2. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹302 cr.
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  5. MayValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (50.0x).
  6. AprPriceVolume reached 21.3x its 50-day median on 2025-04-17; price +5.2% that day.
  7. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. JanPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2025-01-06; price -2.5% that day.
  9. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (50.3x).
  10. DecPriceVolume reached 21.0x its 50-day median on 2024-12-09; price +7.9% that day.
  11. JulPriceVolume reached 23.1x its 50-day median on 2024-07-01; price +20.0% that day.
  12. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹275 cr.
  13. MayPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  14. MayPriceVolume reached 30.2x its 50-day median on 2024-05-16; price +8.7% that day.
  15. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (39.7x).
  16. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.5 pts over 1 quarter to 2.7%.
  17. MarPriceFell 26% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  18. JanPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2024-01-29; price +8.8% that day.
  19. OctPriceVolume reached 57.9x its 50-day median on 2023-10-19; price +8.6% that day.
  20. AugPriceVolume reached 17.3x its 50-day median on 2023-08-17; price +10.3% that day.
  21. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹226 cr.
  22. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history56 months · 2022-04 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1144.3x₹294 cr11.5%15.0%0.1x
2026-1040.0x₹294 cr11.6%15.0%0.1x
2026-0943.9x₹294 cr11.6%15.0%0.1x
2026-0848.0x₹285 cr10.3%15.0%0.1x
2026-0751.5x₹285 cr10.3%15.0%0.1x
2026-0655.0x₹285 cr10.3%15.0%0.1x
2026-0533.2x₹282 cr14.3%19.0%0.2x
2026-0434.4x₹282 cr14.3%19.0%0.2x
2026-0328.4x₹282 cr14.3%19.0%0.2x
2026-0237.0x₹282 cr13.0%19.0%0.2x
2026-0136.4x₹282 cr13.0%19.0%0.2x
2025-1244.7x₹282 cr13.0%19.0%0.2x
2025-1133.9x₹302 cr15.5%19.0%0.2x
2025-1038.3x₹302 cr15.5%19.0%0.2x
2025-0942.2x₹302 cr15.5%19.0%0.2x
2025-0846.9x₹294 cr15.2%19.0%0.2x
2025-0749.7x₹294 cr15.2%19.0%0.2x
2025-0655.6x₹294 cr15.2%19.0%0.2x
2025-0550.0x₹297 cr17.4%25.0%0.3x
2025-0441.2x₹297 cr17.4%25.0%0.3x
2025-0338.4x₹297 cr17.4%25.0%0.3x
2025-0234.4x₹281 cr18.6%25.0%0.3x
2025-0148.6x₹281 cr18.6%25.0%0.3x
2024-1250.3x₹281 cr18.6%25.0%0.3x
2024-1143.9x₹278 cr19.2%25.0%0.3x
2024-1047.0x₹278 cr19.2%25.0%0.3x
2024-0948.3x₹278 cr19.2%25.0%0.3x
2024-0846.8x₹275 cr20.2%25.0%0.3x
2024-0755.3x₹275 cr20.2%25.0%0.3x
2024-0642.4x₹275 cr20.2%25.0%0.3x
2024-0540.3x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2024-0439.7x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2024-0333.6x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2024-0236.3x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2024-0141.1x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-1240.1x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-1137.7x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-1035.2x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-0933.3x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-0834.1x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-0731.9x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-0635.9x₹226 cr20.4%26.0%0.3x
2023-0536.4x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2023-0432.6x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2023-0330.1x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2023-0229.7x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2023-0130.4x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-1224.1x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-1124.3x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-1021.5x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-0922.6x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-0822.8x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-0724.3x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-0624.8x₹176 cr22.4%30.0%0.3x
2022-0540.7x₹127 cr17.5%24.0%0.1x
2022-0435.6x₹127 cr17.5%24.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback