अApnaFunda

UTTAM SUGAR MILLS LIMITED (UTTAMSUGAR)

Process Industries · Agricultural Commodities/Milling · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.30 / 100
Profitability 34Balance sheet 26
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.59 / 100
Price 97Earnings 31FII/DII 47

Passes these screensCash RichHigh MomentumPrice ahead of business

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹359.4 latest close · +51.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹250₹300₹350₹400Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹250₹300₹350₹400Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹359.4 month-end · +56.3% over 12 months

₹200₹250₹300₹350Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹200₹250₹300₹350Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹359.4 month-end · +4.2% since Jun '24

₹200₹300Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Nov '25May '26Nov '26 ₹200₹300Jun '24Sep '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹181.10 to ₹401.00 · 1-year volatility 54.3%

Was the rally earned?

+56%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 9.0x to 15.8x); per-share earnings took off 14 points.
  • The share count rose 3%.
Net profit growth: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−10 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +70 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+70 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3 ptsShare count changeShare price: +56%+56%Share priceNet profit growth: −10 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−10ProfitP/E change: +70 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+70P/EShare count change: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−3SharesShare price: +56%+56%Share price
Net profit growth-10 ptsNet profit fell about 8%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+70 ptsThe P/E rose from 9.0x to 15.8x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-3 ptsShare count rose 3%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PATANJALI FOODS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-72.9%recovered 2021-05
1-year volatility54.3%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.223-year daily, correlation 0.44
Volume spikes18last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−69.4% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−69.4%
Largest drawdowns

-72.9% (2019-03 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-05)

-66.0% (2023-11 peak to 2025-03 low, not yet recovered)

-46.0% (2021-06 peak to 2021-11 low, recovered 2022-04)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-21: 5.6x the 50-day median, price +7.9% that day

2026-10-14: 8x the 50-day median, price +1.6% that day

2026-10-13: 13.2x the 50-day median, price +10.8% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

15.8xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history93rd percentile
CheapestMedian 10.3xDearest

Usual range 8.4x to 15.4x since 2024-06.

Against Process Industries15.8x vs 18.1x
This company
15.8x
Sector median
18.1x

13% below the Process Industries median.

6.7x15.4x24.1x32.7xJun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26Nov '266.7x15.4x24.1x32.7xJun '24Apr '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE49thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin18th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth51st▲ 26 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth29th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓22nd▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓25th▲ 14 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓56th▼ 33 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum91st▲ 42 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~10%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 12.9x, the price would imply about 9.6%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹359.40
P/E
15.8x
ROCE
11.0%
Market Cap
₹1372 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2179 cr
P/S
0.6x
P/B
1.6x
ROE
9.9%
Operating Margin
4.3%
Debt / Equity
0.8x
Promoter Holding
74.7%
12M Momentum
56.3%

52-week range

₹181.10₹401.00
81% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
54.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.98

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.27x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance6%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.4%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.27xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.27x (cash from operations ₹405 cr, net profit ₹319 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 3 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 3: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (8 vs 10). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress1% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 1% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-3 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -3 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters added 1.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 20,633 to 29,632 (+44%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters72.8%74.7%+1.9 pts
FIIs0.4%0.0%-0.4 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others26.8%25.3%-1.5 pts

Number of shareholders

29,632shareholders+44% since Sep '23
21k25k29k32k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 20,633
Dec '23: 24,540
Mar '24: 27,811
Jun '24: 29,909
Sep '24: 31,880
Dec '24: 32,450
Mar '25: 31,749
Jun '25: 29,932
Sep '25: 30,421
Dec '25: 29,388
Mar '26: 29,238
Jun '26: 29,632
21k25k29k32k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 20,633
Dec '23: 24,540
Mar '24: 27,811
Jun '24: 29,909
Sep '24: 31,880
Dec '24: 32,450
Mar '25: 31,749
Jun '25: 29,932
Sep '25: 30,421
Dec '25: 29,388
Mar '26: 29,238
Jun '26: 29,632

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+14.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketAbove the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like UTTAM SUGAR MILLS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −16% to +59% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat above that base rate (gap +16.7%, 80% range +3.1% to +32.9%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
PRECOT · Feb 2022: −58.0% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Mar 2024: −53.8% vs market
INDORAMA · Apr 2022: −41.9% vs market
MARALOVER · Dec 2021: −40.8% vs market
RGL · Jan 2025: −39.8% vs market
AVADHSUGAR · Mar 2022: −36.8% vs market
TBZ · Oct 2024: −34.9% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Jun 2025: −32.4% vs market
MUNJALAU · Oct 2024: −29.9% vs market
BANSWRAS · Jan 2020: −27.5% vs market
SANGAMIND · Jan 2024: −23.5% vs market
JSL · Sep 2021: −22.9% vs market
GOODLUCK · Dec 2023: −16.0% vs market
DCMSRIND · Jan 2024: −14.5% vs market
RICOAUTO · Jun 2023: −10.9% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · Sep 2023: −10.3% vs market
ELECTCAST · Apr 2021: −10.2% vs market
UNIVCABLES · Oct 2023: −6.7% vs market
PENIND · Jan 2024: −0.7% vs market
SURYAROSNI · Jan 2021: +0.1% vs market
MANINDS · Oct 2023: +1.6% vs market
PARAGMILK · Sep 2025: +4.0% vs market
PARADEEP · Mar 2025: +6.6% vs market
TIMETECHNO · Aug 2022: +13.1% vs market
JKTYRE · Jul 2023: +13.3% vs market
ARVIND · May 2021: +15.9% vs market
TRANSWORLD · Aug 2021: +22.7% vs market
RAIN · Aug 2020: +26.9% vs market
INDIANHUME · May 2024: +29.2% vs market
PASUPTAC · Oct 2025: +32.4% vs market
PATELENG · Jun 2023: +33.1% vs market
HITECH · Feb 2021: +40.9% vs market
TCPLPACK · Jul 2022: +43.2% vs market
SALZERELEC · May 2023: +44.3% vs market
SPAL · May 2021: +48.8% vs market
FILATEX · Mar 2021: +53.3% vs market
USHAMART · Oct 2021: +54.7% vs market
KIRLOSENG · Dec 2022: +60.0% vs market
GOKEX · Oct 2021: +64.1% vs market
LTFOODS · May 2020: +64.2% vs market
GPTINFRA · Oct 2023: +73.0% vs market
SARDAEN · Nov 2020: +78.0% vs market
GRMOVER · Feb 2025: +85.9% vs market
PGIL · Feb 2024: +113.3% vs market
PITTIENG · Jun 2021: +119.4% vs market
HPL · Jun 2023: +127.9% vs market
JINDALSAW · Apr 2023: +129.6% vs market
GPIL · Oct 2020: +150.2% vs market
JWL · Jun 2022: +163.9% vs market
VISHNU · Jun 2021: +167.2% vs market
Similar setups +14.6%All companies −2.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+14.6%
All companies' median
−2.1%
Beat the market
62% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 40 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
LTFOODS
Process Industries
May 2020 7x12% −11%−17% +64%
TCPLPACK
Commercial Services
Jul 2022 20x14% +83%−5% +43%
GRMOVER
Process Industries
Feb 2025 21x14% +19%−22% +86%
PITTIENG
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2021 16x— +344%0% +119%
GOODLUCK
Non-Energy Minerals
Dec 2023 29x16% +145%0% −16%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SALZERELEC
Producer Manufacturing
May 2023 24x9% +92%0% +44%
INDIANHUME
Producer Manufacturing
May 2024 27x12% +125%−10% +29%
INDORAMA
Process Industries
Apr 2022 18x11% +115%−5% −42%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/S, interest cover and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to UTTAM SUGAR MILLS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
73%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
Retail Trade
60%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
NELCASTNELCAST
Non-Energy Minerals
58%similar
ROCEmarket cap
Electronic Technology
57%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Consumer Durables
55%similar
operating marginmarket cap
Process Industries
67%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Process Industries
64%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Process Industries
58%similar
debt/equityoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jul '22

  1. OctValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (14.4x).
  2. OctPriceVolume reached 14.8x its 50-day median on 2026-10-12; price +13.3% that day.
  3. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. AugPriceVolume reached 30.4x its 50-day median on 2026-08-20; price +11.7% that day.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.82x).
  8. AprPriceVolume reached 26.5x its 50-day median on 2026-04-30; price -0.7% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. MarPriceVolume reached 17.4x its 50-day median on 2026-03-20; price +11.5% that day.
  3. FebPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. DecResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. DecPriceVolume reached 16.9x its 50-day median on 2025-12-10; price +8.9% that day.
  7. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  8. SepPriceVolume reached 63.9x its 50-day median on 2025-09-02; price +1.9% that day.
  9. MarPriceFell 66% from the Nov 2023 peak to the Mar 2025 low.
  10. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  11. MarPriceVolume reached 29.4x its 50-day median on 2025-03-19; price +9.4% that day.
  12. DecPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  13. OctPriceVolume reached 8.4x its 50-day median on 2024-10-01; price +5.3% that day.
  14. AugPriceVolume reached 16.1x its 50-day median on 2024-08-30; price +3.2% that day.
  15. JunPriceVolume reached 19.5x its 50-day median on 2024-06-13; price +7.5% that day.
  16. DecPriceVolume reached 16.8x its 50-day median on 2023-12-07; price -8.4% that day.
  17. JulPriceVolume reached 11.6x its 50-day median on 2023-07-24; price +5.9% that day.
  18. JunPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 13 months after the low.
  19. JunPriceVolume reached 36.4x its 50-day median on 2023-06-22; price +11.6% that day.
  20. JanPriceVolume reached 13.6x its 50-day median on 2023-01-11; price +0.8% that day.
  21. DecPriceVolume reached 25.5x its 50-day median on 2022-12-19; price +8.0% that day.
  22. JulPriceVolume reached 6.7x its 50-day median on 2022-07-08; price +12.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history30 months · 2024-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1115.8x₹2179 cr9.9%11.0%0.8x
2026-1014.4x₹2179 cr10.0%11.0%0.8x
2026-0912.6x₹2179 cr10.0%11.0%0.8x
2026-0811.9x₹2202 cr11.5%11.0%0.8x
2026-078.5x₹2202 cr11.5%11.0%0.8x
2026-068.7x₹2202 cr11.5%11.0%0.8x
2026-058.1x₹2298 cr14.0%11.0%1.1x
2026-048.8x₹2298 cr14.0%11.0%1.1x
2026-038.6x₹2298 cr14.0%11.0%1.1x
2026-026.7x₹2202 cr13.9%11.0%1.1x
2026-017.3x₹2202 cr13.9%11.0%1.1x
2025-128.6x₹2202 cr13.9%11.0%1.1x
2025-119.0x₹2021 cr12.0%11.0%1.1x
2025-109.7x₹2021 cr12.0%11.0%1.1x
2025-099.7x₹2021 cr12.0%11.0%1.1x
2025-0811.6x₹1846 cr10.9%11.0%1.1x
2025-0711.3x₹1846 cr10.9%11.0%1.1x
2025-0613.0x₹1846 cr10.9%11.0%1.1x
2025-0518.1x₹1744 cr9.2%—1.1x
2025-0416.8x₹1744 cr9.2%—1.1x
2025-0315.4x₹1744 cr9.2%—1.1x
2025-029.2x₹1837 cr11.1%—1.1x
2025-0111.0x₹1837 cr11.1%—1.1x
2024-1212.9x₹1837 cr11.1%—1.1x
2024-1110.5x₹2041 cr15.4%—1.1x
2024-1011.5x₹2041 cr15.4%—1.1x
2024-0913.2x₹2041 cr15.4%—1.1x
2024-0810.1x₹2047 cr19.0%—1.1x
2024-079.9x₹2047 cr19.0%—1.1x
2024-0610.0x₹2047 cr19.0%—1.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback