अApnaFunda

BELRISE INDUSTRIES LIMITED (BELRISE)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.56 / 100
Profitability 51Balance sheet 60
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.39 / 100
Price 27Earnings 50

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹217.46 latest close · −5.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹220₹240₹260Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹220₹240₹260Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹217.46 month-end · +29.8% over 12 months

₹175₹200₹225Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹175₹200₹225Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹217.46 month-end · +131.9% since May '25

₹100₹150₹200₹250May '25Sep '25Dec '25Apr '26Jul '26Nov '26 ₹100₹150₹200₹250May '25Feb '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹142.59 to ₹268.20 · 1-year volatility 37.4%

Was the rally earned?

+30%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 29.8x to 38.2x); per-share earnings added 1 point.
  • The share count rose 27%.
Net profit growth: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+28 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+29 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−27 ptsShare count changeShare price: +30%+30%Share priceNet profit growth: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+28ProfitP/E change: +29 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+29P/EShare count change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−27SharesShare price: +30%+30%Share price
Net profit growth+28 ptsNet profit rose about 28%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+29 ptsThe P/E rose from 29.8x to 38.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-27 ptsShare count rose 27%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-22.5%not yet recovered
1-year volatility37.4%annualised
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%2026−21.9% 0%−10%−20%2026−21.9%
Largest drawdowns

-22.5% (2026-08 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE50th▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin53rdflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth41st
  • EPS growth43rd
  • Debt/equity ↓46th▲ 36 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓77thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓35th▼ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum79th

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~23%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 38.2x, the price would imply about 23.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹217.46
P/E
38.2x
ROCE
15.0%
Market Cap
₹21077 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹9794 cr
P/S
2.2x
P/B
4.0x
ROE
10.6%
Operating Margin
12.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
66.5%
12M Momentum
29.8%

52-week range

₹142.59₹268.20
60% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
37.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.00

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.85x
Share count, 1Y
+36.5%

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 5checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance13%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 13.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.85xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.85x (cash from operations ₹2,162 cr, net profit ₹1,166 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow3 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 3. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress8% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 8% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Jun 2025, promoters trimmed 6.6 pts; DIIs added 2.9 pts; FIIs added 2.6 pts.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '25Jun '26Change
Promoters73.0%66.5%-6.6 pts
FIIs6.8%9.4%+2.6 pts
DIIs7.1%10.0%+2.9 pts
Public and others13.1%14.1%+1.1 pts

Number of shareholders

2.2 lakhshareholders-3% since Jun '25
2.0L2.1L2.2L2.2L Jun '25Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Jun '25: 2.2 lakh
Sep '25: 2.1 lakh
Dec '25: 2.1 lakh
Mar '26: 2.0 lakh
Jun '26: 2.2 lakh
2.0L2.1L2.2L2.2L Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '25: 2.2 lakh
Sep '25: 2.1 lakh
Dec '25: 2.1 lakh
Mar '26: 2.0 lakh
Jun '26: 2.2 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BELRISE INDUSTRIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +21% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.2%, 80% range −7.2% to +5.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
EPL · Nov 2020: −46.2% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Dec 2021: −46.1% vs market
VTL · Jan 2022: −36.5% vs market
DALBHARAT · Aug 2021: −34.8% vs market
SIS · May 2020: −32.9% vs market
EXIDEIND · Jun 2024: −32.7% vs market
CYIENT · Oct 2021: −32.4% vs market
CROMPTON · Feb 2025: −32.0% vs market
NILKAMAL · Aug 2021: −31.0% vs market
DCMSHRIRAM · Oct 2025: −27.9% vs market
GODREJAGRO · May 2025: −26.1% vs market
RKFORGE · Jun 2024: −25.8% vs market
APLLTD · Jun 2025: −21.0% vs market
HUHTAMAKI · Jul 2020: −20.6% vs market
ASTERDM · Mar 2020: −19.6% vs market
HSCL · Oct 2024: −18.0% vs market
JUBLINGREA · Aug 2025: −13.6% vs market
GREENLAM · Dec 2021: −12.7% vs market
JKCEMENT · Apr 2023: −9.6% vs market
BAJAJELEC · Jul 2021: −8.6% vs market
TCI · Nov 2021: −7.7% vs market
GUFICBIO · Jul 2025: −6.8% vs market
BALRAMCHIN · Mar 2025: −6.7% vs market
CEATLTD · May 2020: −6.3% vs market
JUBLPHARMA · Sep 2025: −5.2% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · Apr 2023: −3.4% vs market
MINDACORP · Apr 2025: +0.2% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Mar 2021: +0.5% vs market
FSL · Oct 2024: +1.4% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Feb 2024: +2.5% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Jun 2025: +3.9% vs market
UNOMINDA · Jun 2022: +5.0% vs market
SUDARSCHEM · Oct 2024: +7.1% vs market
ZENSARTECH · Nov 2023: +9.0% vs market
ORIENTCEM · Dec 2023: +16.2% vs market
KNRCON · Apr 2020: +19.1% vs market
GLENMARK · Aug 2025: +19.7% vs market
RADICO · Apr 2020: +20.8% vs market
BEML · Aug 2022: +22.0% vs market
WABAG · Aug 2025: +26.1% vs market
AEGISLOG · May 2023: +37.3% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Jan 2025: +39.6% vs market
KEI · May 2023: +43.0% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Jul 2021: +57.1% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Feb 2021: +61.5% vs market
TRIDENT · Aug 2021: +65.8% vs market
TIINDIA · May 2020: +85.4% vs market
KPITTECH · Sep 2021: +92.4% vs market
SANSERA · Jun 2025: +131.2% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · May 2021: +222.6% vs market
Similar setups −4.3%All companies −4.1%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.3%
All companies' median
−4.1%
Beat the market
48% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
MINDACORP
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2025 42x15% +19%−23% 0%
BAJAJELEC
Consumer Durables
Jul 2021 47x12% +172%−3% −9%
FSL
Commercial Services
Oct 2024 45x16% +118%−9% +1%
CROMPTON
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2025 41x16% +10%−33% −32%
TIINDIA
Non-Energy Minerals
May 2020 29x20% −6%−35% +85%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
APLLTD
Health Technology
Jun 2025 35x13% +19%−17% −21%
CENTURYPLY
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2021 45x14% +95%−4% +62%
CYIENT
Technology Services
Oct 2021 32x15% +171%−13% −32%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BELRISE INDUSTRIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Technology
68%similar
market caprevenue
Industrial Services
60%similar
P/Erevenue
Non-Energy Minerals
59%similar
debt/equityROCE
Technology Services
56%similar
market capdebt/equity
TTK PRESTIGETTKPRESTIG
Consumer Durables
56%similar
volatilityP/E
Producer Manufacturing
71%similar
market cappromoter holding
COCHIN SHIPYARDCOCHINSHIP
Producer Manufacturing
68%similar
debt/equitypromoter holding
UNO MindaUNOMINDA
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
promoter holdingrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

13 events since Jun '25

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. AugPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  3. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.29x.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  5. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.29x).
  6. JunSharesShare count is up 36.5% over 12 months.
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 10.0x its 50-day median on 2026-06-09; price +8.8% that day.
  8. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 6.6 pts to 66.5%.
Show 5 earlier events
  1. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 6.5 pts over 1 quarter to 18.2%.
  2. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. DecPriceVolume reached 25.2x its 50-day median on 2025-12-23; price +6.2% that day.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2025-07-08; price +9.7% that day.
  5. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 10% of profit).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history19 months · 2025-05 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1138.2x₹9794 cr10.6%15.0%0.3x
2026-1036.3x₹9794 cr10.6%15.0%0.3x
2026-0942.2x₹9794 cr10.6%15.0%0.3x
2026-0841.6x₹9510 cr10.3%15.0%0.3x
2026-0742.4x₹9510 cr10.3%15.0%0.3x
2026-0642.8x₹9510 cr10.3%15.0%0.3x
2026-0537.3x₹9231 cr19.2%14.0%1.1x
2026-0436.6x₹9231 cr19.2%14.0%1.1x
2026-0332.0x₹9231 cr19.2%14.0%1.1x
2026-0231.3x₹9057 cr18.4%14.0%1.1x
2026-0128.5x₹9057 cr18.4%14.0%1.1x
2025-1230.9x₹9057 cr18.4%14.0%1.1x
2025-1129.8x₹8772 cr16.0%14.0%1.1x
2025-1026.7x₹8772 cr16.0%14.0%1.1x
2025-0928.0x₹8772 cr16.0%14.0%1.1x
2025-0825.5x₹8291 cr14.4%14.0%1.1x
2025-0725.3x₹8291 cr14.4%14.0%1.1x
2025-0619.2x₹8291 cr14.4%14.0%1.1x
2025-0523.3x₹7543 cr12.2%14.0%1.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback