अApnaFunda

BF UTILITIES LIMITED (BFUTILITIE)

Industrial Services · Engineering & Construction · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.44 / 100
Profitability 92Growth 39Balance sheet 1
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.36 / 100
Price 12Earnings 45FII/DII 53

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹442.05 latest close · −24.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹400₹500₹600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹400₹500₹600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹442.05 month-end · −30.1% over 12 months

₹400₹500₹600Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500₹600Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹442.05 month-end · −32.2% over 3 years

₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹442.05 month-end · +120.2% since Jan '19

₹500₹1,000Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹368.70 to ₹736.00 · 1-year volatility 44.8%

Was the rally earned?

-30%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Mostly the multiple.

  • Most of the fall came from investors paying a lower multiple (P/E 16.1x to 11.3x); per-share earnings added 0 points.
  • The share count rose 2%.
Net profit growth: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+2 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −30 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−30 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −30%−30%Share priceNet profit growth: +2 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+2ProfitP/E change: −30 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−30P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −30%−30%Share price
Net profit growth+2 ptsNet profit rose about 2%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-30 ptsThe P/E fell from 16.1x to 11.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count rose 2%, which lowers the price.
-32%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 19 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 21.0x to 11.3x), which took 52 points back.
  • The share count rose 15%.
Net profit growth: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+31 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −52 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−52 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−11 ptsShare count changeShare price: −32%−32%Share priceNet profit growth: +31 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+31ProfitP/E change: −52 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−52P/EShare count change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−11SharesShare price: −32%−32%Share price
Net profit growth+31 ptsNet profit rose about 45%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-52 ptsThe P/E fell from 21.0x to 11.3x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-11 ptsShare count rose 15%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LARSEN AND TOUBRO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-66.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility44.8%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.083-year daily, correlation 0.49
Volume spikes7last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−65.1% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−65.1%
Largest drawdowns

-66.6% (2024-10 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-61.2% (2019-12 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2021-06)

-49.8% (2021-06 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2023-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-11: 6.3x the 50-day median, price +0.8% that day

2026-09-10: 11x the 50-day median, price +4.3% that day

2026-09-04: 6.2x the 50-day median, price -0.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

11.3xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history5th percentile
CheapestMedian 21.1xDearest

Usual range 13.4x to 45.7x since 2019-01.

Against Industrial Services11.3x vs 14.0x
This company
11.3x
Sector median
14.0x

20% below the Industrial Services median.

8.0x24.4x40.9x57.4xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '268.0x24.4x40.9x57.4xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Industrial Services is valued

Where does it rank among Industrial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Industrial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE86thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin98thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth26th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth46thflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓1stflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓80th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓62nd▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum41st▲ 10 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Industrial Services sector page Watch it move against Industrial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~15%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 19.4x, the price would imply about 14.9%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Earnings figures have not updated recently, so the company is left out of the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Industrial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹442.05
P/E
11.3x
ROCE
30.0%
Market Cap
₹1665 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹870 cr
P/S
1.9x
P/B
8.2x
ROE
73.3%
Operating Margin
73.0%
Debt / Equity
4.6x
Promoter Holding
56.7%
12M Momentum
-30.1%

52-week range

₹368.70₹736.00
20% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
44.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.03

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.73x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 6checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance5%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 5.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.73xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.73x (cash from operations ₹1,559 cr, net profit ₹899 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (3 vs 1). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress6% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 6% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 0.7 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 44,259 to 46,840 (+6%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters56.7%56.7%0.0 pts
FIIs0.9%1.6%+0.7 pts
DIIs0.1%0.1%-0.1 pts
Public and others42.2%41.6%-0.6 pts

Number of shareholders

46,840shareholders+6% since Sep '23
44k49k53k57k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 44,259
Dec '23: 46,044
Mar '24: 54,730
Jun '24: 57,038
Sep '24: 50,588
Dec '24: 51,117
Mar '25: 50,640
Jun '25: 50,315
Sep '25: 48,876
Dec '25: 48,542
Mar '26: 47,824
Jun '26: 46,840
44k49k53k57k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 44,259
Dec '23: 46,044
Mar '24: 54,730
Jun '24: 57,038
Sep '24: 50,588
Dec '24: 51,117
Mar '25: 50,640
Jun '25: 50,315
Sep '25: 48,876
Dec '25: 48,542
Mar '26: 47,824
Jun '26: 46,840

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+10.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like BF UTILITIES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −17% to +45% vs the market, against +1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+9.3%, 80% range −4.4% to +17.7%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
BEWLTD · Aug 2024: −52.1% vs market
MUFTI · Mar 2025: −46.1% vs market
RADIOCITY · Mar 2024: −46.0% vs market
TRF · May 2025: −38.8% vs market
BBTCL · Oct 2023: −36.5% vs market
BAJAJHCARE · May 2023: −32.8% vs market
ESTER · Apr 2023: −27.8% vs market
KAMATHOTEL · May 2025: −26.1% vs market
JMFINANCIL · Apr 2021: −22.7% vs market
ASHOKA · Sep 2021: −20.8% vs market
INDIANHUME · Mar 2020: −20.3% vs market
DHAMPURSUG · Feb 2020: −20.3% vs market
EMBDL · Apr 2020: −17.0% vs market
VISHNU · Aug 2023: −16.3% vs market
GRINFRA · Mar 2023: −12.4% vs market
NILAINFRA · Apr 2020: −12.2% vs market
GVT&D · Apr 2021: −10.9% vs market
KESORAMIND · Jan 2022: −10.5% vs market
FILATEX · Aug 2023: −8.9% vs market
MOTILALOFS · Jul 2022: −3.9% vs market
BHARATWIRE · Aug 2025: −1.3% vs market
YASHO · Aug 2024: −1.2% vs market
RUCHINFRA · May 2023: −0.6% vs market
AJMERA · Mar 2020: +1.2% vs market
CANTABIL · Apr 2024: +7.7% vs market
STEELXIND · Aug 2025: +12.5% vs market
SWSOLAR · Feb 2021: +16.7% vs market
PNCINFRA · May 2022: +17.4% vs market
SANSTAR · Jul 2025: +17.8% vs market
BIRLAMONEY · Mar 2020: +18.3% vs market
ROHLTD · Jul 2024: +25.7% vs market
ARIHANTSUP · Jul 2023: +26.2% vs market
DBL · Jul 2020: +28.4% vs market
HCC · Dec 2020: +36.3% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Aug 2020: +39.7% vs market
JKLAKSHMI · Jun 2022: +42.4% vs market
HGINFRA · Oct 2022: +43.5% vs market
TATACOMM · Jun 2022: +45.3% vs market
STLTECH · Jun 2020: +46.9% vs market
YASHOPTICS · May 2025: +54.6% vs market
IIFLCAPS · Jan 2021: +55.3% vs market
HINDWAREAP · Aug 2022: +64.5% vs market
SOBHA · Oct 2020: +65.5% vs market
NDTV · Oct 2020: +69.8% vs market
ICIL · Feb 2023: +76.1% vs market
TRIVENI · Apr 2020: +106.2% vs market
POKARNA · Aug 2020: +132.7% vs market
EVEREADY · Apr 2020: +174.6% vs market
PURVA · May 2023: +239.3% vs market
FACT · Sep 2022: +326.3% vs market
Similar setups +10.1%All companies +0.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+10.1%
All companies' median
+0.8%
Beat the market
54% vs 51%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TRF
Producer Manufacturing
May 2025 15x38% −31%−40% −39%
RADIOCITY
Consumer Services
Mar 2024 9x22% +50%−34% −46%
STEELXIND
Non-Energy Minerals
Aug 2025 32x— −38%−39% +13%
BIRLAMONEY
Finance
Mar 2020 11x— −59%−65% +18%
NDTV
Consumer Services
Oct 2020 11x24% −11%−42% +70%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ASHOKA
Industrial Services
Sep 2021 10x20% +53%−16% −21%
FACT
Process Industries
Sep 2022 20x33% −15%−28% +326%
BHARATWIRE
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2025 12x19% −40%−43% −1%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to BF UTILITIES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

EFC IEFCIL
Distribution Services
75%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
Producer Manufacturing
65%similar
revenue growthP/E
Retail Trade
63%similar
market caprevenue growth
Commercial Services
60%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
Retail Trade
48%similar
promoter holdingP/E
Industrial Services
43%similar
operating marginP/E
Industrial Services
39%similar
volatilityP/E
Industrial Services
35%similar
market capoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '23

  1. SepPriceVolume reached 101.9x its 50-day median on 2026-09-03; price +8.7% that day.
  2. JulValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (14.5x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 11.4x its 50-day median on 2026-06-12; price +7.5% that day.
  5. MarPriceFell 67% from the Oct 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 17.7x its 50-day median on 2026-03-04; price -4.1% that day.
  8. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 4.61x.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (16.1x).
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 93.8x its 50-day median on 2025-09-23; price +10.2% that day.
  4. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 4.61x.
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 13.0x its 50-day median on 2025-06-10; price +5.0% that day.
  6. MarPriceVolume reached 21.9x its 50-day median on 2025-03-27; price +18.5% that day.
  7. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (15.3x).
  8. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. OctPriceVolume reached 15.1x its 50-day median on 2024-10-04; price +4.4% that day.
  10. SepPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. SepPriceVolume reached 24.3x its 50-day median on 2024-09-24; price +6.4% that day.
  12. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  13. MayPriceRegained the 2024-03 peak, 2 months after the low.
  14. MayPriceVolume reached 12.5x its 50-day median on 2024-05-30; price +2.3% that day.
  15. MarPriceFell 27% from the Mar 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  16. FebPriceRegained the 2023-09 peak, 1 month after the low.
  17. FebPriceVolume reached 21.4x its 50-day median on 2024-02-07; price +10.7% that day.
  18. JanPriceFell 29% from the Sep 2023 peak to the Jan 2024 low.
  19. AugPriceRegained the 2021-06 peak, 14 months after the low.
  20. AugPriceVolume reached 21.1x its 50-day median on 2023-08-18; price +3.5% that day.
  21. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  22. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (11.1x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1111.3x₹870 cr73.3%30.0%4.6x
2026-1010.9x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0912.9x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0812.8x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0714.5x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0615.5x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0514.5x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0414.2x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-039.5x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0212.9x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2026-0113.2x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-1216.9x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-1116.1x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-1018.7x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-0919.9x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-0820.5x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-0719.1x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-0620.1x₹870 cr71.6%30.0%4.6x
2025-0519.0x₹870 cr258.3%28.0%23.2x
2025-0418.0x₹870 cr258.3%28.0%23.2x
2025-0319.1x₹870 cr258.3%28.0%23.2x
2025-0215.3x₹906 cr252.1%28.0%23.2x
2025-0120.1x₹906 cr252.1%28.0%23.2x
2024-1224.4x₹906 cr252.1%28.0%23.2x
2024-1124.1x₹903 cr249.0%28.0%23.2x
2024-1020.8x₹903 cr249.0%28.0%23.2x
2024-0923.1x₹903 cr249.0%28.0%23.2x
2024-0820.2x₹969 cr235.1%28.0%23.2x
2024-0720.7x₹969 cr235.1%28.0%23.2x
2024-0623.0x₹969 cr235.1%28.0%23.2x
2024-0524.9x₹959 cr—26.0%—
2024-0423.6x₹959 cr—26.0%—
2024-0321.1x₹959 cr—26.0%—
2024-0225.1x₹879 cr—26.0%—
2024-0117.2x₹879 cr—26.0%—
2023-1216.8x₹879 cr—26.0%—
2023-1121.0x₹822 cr—26.0%—
2023-1020.1x₹822 cr—26.0%—
2023-0921.0x₹822 cr—26.0%—
2023-0820.9x₹753 cr—26.0%—
2023-0711.4x₹753 cr—26.0%—
2023-0611.1x₹753 cr—26.0%—
2023-0526.7x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2023-0425.0x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2023-0322.0x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2023-0224.7x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2023-0127.3x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-1228.7x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-1129.7x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-1029.0x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-0930.1x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-0829.9x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-0724.2x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-0622.3x₹513 cr—16.0%—
2022-05—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2022-04—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2022-03—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2022-02—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2022-01—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-12—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-11—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-10—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-09—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-08—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-07—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-06—₹370 cr—11.0%—
2021-0557.4x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2021-0454.3x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2021-0347.0x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2021-0252.3x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2021-0151.5x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-1255.6x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-1149.1x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-1045.8x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-0945.4x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-0849.0x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-0741.8x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-0639.0x₹535 cr—15.0%—
2020-0515.2x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2020-0417.0x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2020-0314.2x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2020-0226.8x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2020-0129.7x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-1231.0x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-1126.1x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-1026.4x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-0917.6x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-0815.8x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-0717.5x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-0617.5x₹448 cr—18.0%—
2019-0532.2x₹401 cr—16.0%—
2019-0428.9x₹401 cr—16.0%—
2019-0330.7x₹401 cr—16.0%—
2019-0228.2x₹401 cr—16.0%—
2019-0131.5x₹401 cr—16.0%—

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback