अApnaFunda

SUYOG TELEMATICS LIMITED (SUYOG)

Industrial Services · Engineering & Construction · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.48 / 100
Profitability 72Balance sheet 24
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.25 / 100
Price 0Earnings 53FII/DII 21

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹512.45 latest close · −41.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹400₹600₹800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹400₹600₹800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹512.45 month-end · −21.9% over 12 months

₹400₹600₹800Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹512.45 month-end · −69.2% since Aug '24

₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Aug '24Jan '25Jul '25Dec '25Jun '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500₹2,000Aug '24Oct '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹404.75 to ₹921.15 · 1-year volatility 46.1%

Was the rally earned?

-22%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 29 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 17.4x to 9.8x), which took 50 points back.
  • The share count rose 11%.
Net profit growth: +38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+38 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−9 ptsShare count changeShare price: −22%−22%Share priceNet profit growth: +38 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+38ProfitP/E change: −50 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−50P/EShare count change: −9 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−9SharesShare price: −22%−22%Share price
Net profit growth+38 ptsNet profit rose about 53%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-50 ptsThe P/E fell from 17.4x to 9.8x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-9 ptsShare count rose 11%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LARSEN AND TOUBRO

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-77.0%not yet recovered
1-year volatility46.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.833-year daily, correlation 0.39
Volume spikes2last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−77.0% 0%−25%−50%−75%20252026−77.0%
Largest drawdowns

-77.0% (2024-12 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-02: 5.7x the 50-day median, price +2.2% that day

2026-10-01: 5.3x the 50-day median, price -0.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.8xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history7th percentile
CheapestMedian 20.2xDearest

Usual range 12.3x to 27.7x since 2024-08.

Against Industrial Services9.8x vs 14.0x
This company
9.8x
Sector median
14.0x

30% below the Industrial Services median.

8.5x16.6x24.7x32.9xAug '24Feb '25Aug '25Feb '26Aug '26Nov '268.5x16.6x24.7x32.9xAug '24May '25Feb '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianIndustrial Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Industrial Services is valued

Where does it rank among Industrial Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Industrial Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE48th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin96thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth56th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth75th▲ 52 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓22nd▼ 17 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓98th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓70th▲ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum52nd▲ 47 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Industrial Services sector page Watch it move against Industrial Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~8%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 10.6x, the price would imply about 8.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Industrial Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹512.45
P/E
9.8x
ROCE
15.0%
Market Cap
₹601 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹251 cr
P/S
2.4x
P/B
1.2x
ROE
12.5%
Operating Margin
59.0%
Debt / Equity
0.8x
Promoter Holding
51.6%
12M Momentum
-21.9%

52-week range

₹404.75₹921.15
21% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.73

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.1x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.30x
Share count, 1Y
+9.1%

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance6%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.30xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.30x (cash from operations ₹217 cr, net profit ₹167 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 3 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 3: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-9 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 9 days (102 vs 111). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress15% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 15% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+631 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +631 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, promoters added 4.3 pts; FIIs trimmed 4.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 6,615 to 12,196 (+84%) between Mar 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupMar '24Jun '26Change
Promoters47.4%51.6%+4.3 pts
FIIs4.7%0.7%-4.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others47.9%47.7%-0.2 pts

Number of shareholders

12,196shareholders+84% since Mar '24
7k10k13k16k Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Mar '24: 6,615
Jun '24: 8,062
Sep '24: 11,640
Dec '24: 15,806
Mar '25: 15,204
Jun '25: 14,733
Sep '25: 13,738
Dec '25: 13,103
Mar '26: 12,796
Jun '26: 12,196
7k10k13k16k Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Mar '24: 6,615
Jun '24: 8,062
Sep '24: 11,640
Dec '24: 15,806
Mar '25: 15,204
Jun '25: 14,733
Sep '25: 13,738
Dec '25: 13,103
Mar '26: 12,796
Jun '26: 12,196

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SUYOG TELEMATICS LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −22% to +45% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−3.2%, 80% range −10.6% to +4.9%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
BEWLTD · Aug 2024: −52.1% vs market
MUFTI · Apr 2025: −43.0% vs market
SPECIALITY · Aug 2023: −39.2% vs market
MONTECARLO · Aug 2023: −36.4% vs market
DYNPRO · May 2022: −33.6% vs market
SATIA · May 2023: −30.2% vs market
SHREEKARNI · Aug 2025: −27.9% vs market
ZEELEARN · Jul 2020: −27.2% vs market
KAMATHOTEL · May 2025: −26.1% vs market
RPSGVENT · Jun 2022: −25.6% vs market
CROWN · Sep 2025: −24.8% vs market
INDIANHUME · Dec 2020: −23.7% vs market
RAMANEWS · Feb 2020: −22.2% vs market
WELENT · May 2021: −20.5% vs market
AJMERA · Apr 2020: −18.5% vs market
JKPAPER · May 2023: −18.4% vs market
ZIMLAB · Mar 2024: −18.1% vs market
NAVA · Feb 2020: −17.7% vs market
NILAINFRA · Apr 2020: −12.2% vs market
TIIL · Jan 2020: −11.2% vs market
ALICON · Jan 2020: −10.9% vs market
HINDOILEXP · May 2025: −9.3% vs market
AEROENTER · May 2024: −7.4% vs market
FAZE3Q · Mar 2024: −6.8% vs market
MMFL · Sep 2023: −5.8% vs market
HIMATSEIDE · Jan 2020: −2.3% vs market
RUCHINFRA · May 2023: −0.6% vs market
AWHCL · Mar 2022: +0.3% vs market
AHLEAST · Jun 2024: +2.8% vs market
ARIHANTCAP · Jan 2023: +5.4% vs market
NIPPOBATRY · Jan 2020: +7.0% vs market
NRBBEARING · Apr 2022: +24.8% vs market
ARIHANTSUP · Jul 2023: +26.2% vs market
SANGHIIND · Feb 2022: +28.1% vs market
NAVKARCORP · Jun 2021: +28.8% vs market
TAJGVK · Jul 2024: +33.1% vs market
RKFORGE · Feb 2020: +39.8% vs market
JKIL · Jul 2020: +46.8% vs market
SPAL · Dec 2022: +46.8% vs market
TALBROAUTO · May 2020: +50.2% vs market
MANGLMCEM · Jul 2020: +51.4% vs market
SOBHA · Apr 2020: +51.7% vs market
GNA · Jul 2022: +57.0% vs market
SAKAR · Apr 2022: +59.3% vs market
ARVSMART · Feb 2021: +65.3% vs market
SHAKTIPUMP · Feb 2020: +88.7% vs market
ABSMARINE · Sep 2025: +88.8% vs market
POKARNA · Apr 2024: +89.2% vs market
THEMISMED · Dec 2020: +93.2% vs market
SALASAR · Mar 2022: +97.0% vs market
Similar setups −4.0%All companies −0.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−4.0%
All companies' median
−0.8%
Beat the market
46% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SATIA
Process Industries
May 2023 11x16% −6%−28% −30%
ARIHANTSUP
Finance
Jul 2023 17x14% +8%−31% +26%
SPECIALITY
Consumer Services
Aug 2023 10x18% 0%−26% −39%
CROWN
Industrial Services
Sep 2025 16x19% −35%−45% −25%
RPSGVENT
Finance
Jun 2022 10x12% −12%−54% −26%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TIIL
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2020 7x15% −36%−42% −11%
POKARNA
Producer Manufacturing
Apr 2024 22x15% +34%−20% +89%
AJMERA
Finance
Apr 2020 4x11% −50%−54% −19%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and size. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SUYOG TELEMATICS LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Services
73%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Retail Trade
64%similar
market capP/E
Health Technology
61%similar
ROCErevenue
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
P/Evolatility
Finance
53%similar
revenueoperating margin
Industrial Services
55%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
Industrial Services
53%similar
P/Edebt/equity
BF UTILITIESBFUTILITIE
Industrial Services
43%similar
operating marginP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

19 events since Nov '24

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2026-11-02; price +2.2% that day.
  2. OctPriceFell 77% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
  3. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (13.4x).
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2026-07-02; price +4.1% that day.
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  7. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  8. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 5% to 2% of profit.
Show 11 earlier events
  1. JunSharesShare count is up 9.1% over 12 months.
  2. AprPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2026-04-08; price +14.2% that day.
  3. MarPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.2 pts to 52.0% (largest rise in the history since 2019-01).
  4. JanPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2026-01-19; price -1.5% that day.
  5. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JulPriceVolume reached 30.1x its 50-day median on 2025-07-21; price +5.0% that day.
  7. JunPromoterPromoter holding rose 2.2 pts to 49.5%.
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Industrial Services on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  9. JunPriceVolume reached 28.8x its 50-day median on 2025-06-10; price +5.0% that day.
  10. FebPriceVolume reached 10.4x its 50-day median on 2025-02-12; price -3.9% that day.
  11. NovPriceVolume reached 8.8x its 50-day median on 2024-11-07; price +9.6% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history28 months · 2024-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.8x₹251 cr12.5%15.0%0.8x
2026-108.5x₹251 cr12.2%15.0%0.8x
2026-0913.3x₹251 cr12.2%15.0%0.8x
2026-0813.4x₹247 cr12.9%15.0%0.8x
2026-0715.7x₹247 cr12.9%15.0%0.8x
2026-0615.1x₹247 cr12.9%15.0%0.8x
2026-0525.7x₹228 cr8.8%14.0%0.5x
2026-0425.1x₹228 cr8.8%14.0%0.5x
2026-0320.2x₹228 cr8.8%14.0%0.5x
2026-0220.9x₹221 cr9.3%14.0%0.5x
2026-0116.2x₹221 cr9.3%14.0%0.5x
2025-1218.2x₹221 cr9.3%14.0%0.5x
2025-1117.4x₹214 cr10.0%14.0%0.5x
2025-1020.3x₹214 cr10.0%14.0%0.5x
2025-0920.3x₹214 cr10.0%14.0%0.5x
2025-0821.0x₹193 cr10.0%14.0%0.5x
2025-0722.5x₹193 cr10.0%14.0%0.5x
2025-0623.4x₹193 cr10.0%14.0%0.5x
2025-0512.4x₹188 cr23.4%—0.5x
2025-0414.0x₹188 cr23.4%—0.5x
2025-0312.2x₹188 cr23.4%—0.5x
2025-0217.3x₹167 cr21.1%—0.5x
2025-0125.6x₹167 cr21.1%—0.5x
2024-1229.7x₹167 cr21.1%—0.5x
2024-1132.0x₹167 cr21.1%—0.5x
2024-1027.6x₹167 cr21.1%—0.5x
2024-0926.9x₹167 cr21.1%—0.5x
2024-0828.0x₹167 cr21.1%—0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback