NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO LTD (NATIONALUM): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

3M1Y3YAll

₹329 latest close · −5.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹329 month-end · +26.5% over 12 months

₹329 month-end · +265.2% over 3 years

₹329 month-end · +463.8% since Jan '19

52-week range ₹228.00 to ₹445.15 · 1-year volatility 43.5%

Was the rally earned?

1 year3 years5 years

+27%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

Per-share earnings added 19 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 8.3x to 8.9x).
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+18 ptsNet profit rose about 18%, which lifts the price.

P/E change+8 ptsThe P/E rose from 8.3x to 8.9x, which lifts the price.

Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

+265%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

Per-share earnings added 317 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 11.5x to 8.9x), which took 52 points back.
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+317 ptsNet profit rose about 370%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-52 ptsThe P/E fell from 11.5x to 8.9x, which lowers the price.

Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

+280%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

Per-share earnings added 346 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 12.2x to 8.9x), which took 66 points back.
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+346 ptsNet profit rose about 419%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-66 ptsThe P/E fell from 12.2x to 8.9x, which lowers the price.

Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with VEDANTA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.0%recovered 2021-05

1-year volatility43.5%annualised

Beta vs sector index1.483-year daily, correlation 0.68

Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-59.0% (2019-01 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2021-05)

-48.4% (2022-04 peak to 2022-09 low, recovered 2023-12)

-43.0% (2024-11 peak to 2025-04 low, recovered 2025-11)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

8.9xP/E todayWithin its usual range

Against its own history42nd percentile

CheapestMedian 11.1xDearest

Usual range 4.6x to 43.0x since 2019-01.

Against Non-Energy Minerals8.9x vs 21.8x

This company

8.9x

Sector median

21.8x

59% below the Non-Energy Minerals median.

P/EP/BP/S

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianNon-Energy Minerals median

How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Non-Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Non-Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Non-Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

ROCE98thflat vs a year ago
Op. margin99thflat vs a year ago
Revenue growth50th▼ 41 pts vs a year ago
EPS growth62nd▼ 35 pts vs a year ago
Debt/equity ↓97thflat vs a year ago
Cash cycle ↓28th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
P/E ↓90thflat vs a year ago
12M momentum83rd▲ 7 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26

Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Non-Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Non-Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~11%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 17.3x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 10.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered20.1%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg

Gap−9.3 ptsimplied minus delivered

Rank697thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return	11%	12%	13%
12x	12.0%	13.0%	14.0%
15x	9.9%	10.9%	11.8%
20x	7.1%	8.1%	9.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Required return 12.0% Years 10 Exit P/E 15x Implied: 10.9%/yr

Looking back

Jan 2020Price implied −3%/yr; EPS has since grown 19%/yr (7.0 yrs)
Jan 2021Price implied 0%/yr; EPS has since grown 87%/yr (6.0 yrs)
Jan 2022Price implied 9%/yr; EPS has since grown 35%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Non-Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov: ₹329.00
P/E: 8.9x
ROCE: 40.0%
Market Cap: ₹60339 cr
Revenue (TTM): ₹19338 cr
P/S: 3.1x
P/B: 2.8x
ROE: 31.2%
Operating Margin: 51.0%
Debt / Equity: 0.0x
Promoter Holding: 51.3%
12M Momentum: 26.6%

52-week range

₹228.00₹445.15

47% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

43.5%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

1.23

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

89.5x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

1.15x

Share count, 1Y

unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold

Other income reliance8%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 8.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.15xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.15x (cash from operations ₹14,963 cr, net profit ₹13,053 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (4 vs 4). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress85% of fixed assetsBeyond threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 85% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-92 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -92 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Over 3 years, FIIs added 8.3 pts; DIIs trimmed 6.2 pts.
The number of shareholders rose from 6.4 lakh to 9.5 lakh (+49%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change

Promoters51.3%51.3%0.0 pts

FIIs13.7%22.0%+8.3 pts

DIIs17.5%11.2%-6.2 pts

Public and others17.6%15.5%-2.1 pts

Number of shareholders

9.5 lakhshareholders+49% since Sep '23

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−6.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −30% to +26% vs the market, against −6% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The gap against the base rate (−0.1%, 80% range −12.5% to +7.3%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median

−6.2%

All companies' median

−6.1%

Beat the market

44% vs 43%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
OFSS Technology Services	Jan 2024	28x	35%	+124%	−5%	+34%
NMDC Non-Energy Minerals	May 2020	2x	28%	−20%	−42%	+31%
BEL Electronic Technology	Jan 2020	12x	30%	+8%	−25%	+21%
CASTROLIND Energy Minerals	May 2024	21x	57%	+74%	−13%	+6%
HAL Electronic Technology	Sep 2023	22x	31%	+65%	−6%	+58%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
GMDCLTD Energy Minerals	Oct 2023	9x	31%	+153%	−14%	−26%
MAITHANALL Non-Energy Minerals	Mar 2020	4x	33%	−30%	−48%	−15%
RITES Commercial Services	Jun 2023	17x	30%	+58%	−12%	+27%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, interest cover and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

ZENSAR TECHNOLOGIESZENSARTECH

Technology Services

52%similar

promoter holdingdebt/equity

ENGINEERS INDIAENGINERSIN

Industrial Services

49%similar

promoter holdingdebt/equity

ECLERX SERVICESECLERX

Commercial Services

47%similar

ROCEpromoter holding

NATCO PHARMANATCOPHARM

Health Technology

46%similar

promoter holdingrevenue growth

BIRLASOFTBSOFT

Technology Services

45%similar

volatilitydebt/equity

HINDUSTAN ZINCHINDZINC

Non-Energy Minerals

45%similar

operating marginrevenue growth

INDIAN METALS & FERRO ALLOYS LIMFA

Non-Energy Minerals

37%similar

P/Eoperating margin

HINDUSTAN COPPERHINDCOPPER

Non-Energy Minerals

35%similar

operating marginROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Nov '21

2026
OctPriceFell 32% from the Apr 2026 peak to the Oct 2026 low.
SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹19,338 cr.
JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
MayPriceVolume reached 10.6x its 50-day median on 2026-05-29; price -2.0% that day.
2025
NovPriceRegained the 2024-11 peak, 7 months after the low.
NovPriceVolume reached 9.2x its 50-day median on 2025-11-10; price +9.6% that day.
JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
AprPriceFell 43% from the Nov 2024 peak to the Apr 2025 low.

Show 22 earlier events

2025
MarResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹15,098 cr.
MarPriceVolume reached 5.0x its 50-day median on 2025-03-21; price -2.6% that day.
2024
DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
NovPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2024-11-18; price +9.1% that day.
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.3 pts over 2 quarters to 27.8%.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
JanPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2024-01-16; price +2.7% that day.
2023
DecPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 15 months after the low.
DecPriceVolume reached 13.7x its 50-day median on 2023-12-15; price +6.2% that day.
JulPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2023-07-17; price +4.4% that day.
JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the top quartile).
MarPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2023-03-17; price +1.3% that day.
FebPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
2022
DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
SepPriceFell 48% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Sep 2022 low.
JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹14,181 cr.
JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (4.2x).
JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Non-Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
FebPriceRegained the 2021-10 peak, 3 months after the low.
2021
NovPriceFell 28% from the Oct 2021 peak to the Nov 2021 low.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-11	8.9x	₹19338 cr	31.2%	40.0%	0.0x
2026-10	8.6x	₹19338 cr	31.2%	40.0%	0.0x
2026-09	9.3x	₹19338 cr	31.2%	40.0%	0.0x
2026-08	12.1x	₹17843 cr	26.8%	40.0%	0.0x
2026-07	11.1x	₹17843 cr	26.8%	40.0%	0.0x
2026-06	10.8x	₹17843 cr	26.8%	40.0%	0.0x
2026-05	12.7x	₹18098 cr	34.5%	44.0%	0.0x
2026-04	11.9x	₹18098 cr	34.5%	44.0%	0.0x
2026-03	11.5x	₹18098 cr	34.5%	44.0%	0.0x
2026-02	10.7x	₹18029 cr	34.3%	44.0%	0.0x
2026-01	11.6x	₹18029 cr	34.3%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-12	9.4x	₹18029 cr	34.3%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-11	8.3x	₹17738 cr	32.2%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-10	7.5x	₹17738 cr	32.2%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-09	6.9x	₹17738 cr	32.2%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-08	6.5x	₹16787 cr	29.6%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-07	6.5x	₹16787 cr	29.6%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-06	6.7x	₹16787 cr	29.6%	44.0%	0.0x
2025-05	7.9x	₹15098 cr	29.2%	17.0%	0.0x
2025-04	6.8x	₹15098 cr	29.2%	17.0%	0.0x
2025-03	7.7x	₹15098 cr	29.2%	17.0%	0.0x
2025-02	10.5x	₹13784 cr	21.6%	17.0%	0.0x
2025-01	11.7x	₹13784 cr	21.6%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-12	12.3x	₹13784 cr	21.6%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-11	19.4x	₹12826 cr	15.6%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-10	18.2x	₹12826 cr	15.6%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-09	16.9x	₹12826 cr	15.6%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-08	16.5x	₹13149 cr	13.8%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-07	17.6x	₹13149 cr	13.8%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-06	16.9x	₹13149 cr	13.8%	17.0%	0.0x
2024-05	24.0x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2024-04	23.2x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2024-03	19.1x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2024-02	19.6x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2024-01	18.7x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-12	16.5x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-11	11.5x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-10	11.6x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-09	12.2x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-08	11.8x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-07	11.9x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-06	10.3x	₹14257 cr	10.9%	14.0%	0.0x
2023-05	5.1x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2023-04	5.1x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2023-03	4.8x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2023-02	4.8x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2023-01	5.1x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-12	4.9x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-11	4.7x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-10	4.3x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-09	4.3x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-08	4.9x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-07	4.7x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-06	4.2x	₹14181 cr	23.5%	34.0%	0.0x
2022-05	13.3x	₹8956 cr	12.2%	13.0%	0.0x
2022-04	14.5x	₹8956 cr	12.2%	13.0%	0.0x
2022-03	16.9x	₹8956 cr	12.2%	13.0%	0.0x
2022-02	16.8x	₹8956 cr	12.2%	13.0%	0.0x
2022-01	15.1x	₹8956 cr	12.2%	13.0%	0.0x
2021-12	14.0x	₹8956 cr	12.2%	13.0%	0.0x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes