अApnaFunda
Menu

PRAKASH PIPES LIMITED (PPL)

Producer Manufacturing · Miscellaneous Manufacturing · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.52 / 100
Profitability 32Growth 23Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.34 / 100
Price 34Earnings 22FII/DII 46

Passes these screensValue Pick

Compare withSUPREME INDUSTRIESASTRALGARDEN REACH SHIPBUILD ENG

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹230.29 latest close · −19.3% over the last 90 sessions

₹200₹250Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹200₹250Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹230.29 month-end · −7.2% over 12 months

₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹150₹200₹250₹300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹230.29 month-end · −42.9% over 3 years

₹200₹400₹600Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹200₹400₹600Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹230.29 month-end · +164.5% since Jun '19

₹0₹200₹400₹600Jun '19Dec '20Jun '22Nov '23May '25Nov '26 ₹0₹200₹400₹600Jun '19Mar '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹163.21 to ₹334.40 · 1-year volatility 46.0%

Was the rally earned?

-7%share price, 1 yearEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 31 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 8.7x to 11.2x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+24 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −7%−7%Share priceNet profit growth: −29 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−29ProfitP/E change: +24 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+24P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −7%−7%Share price
Net profit growth-29 ptsNet profit fell about 26%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+24 ptsThe P/E rose from 8.7x to 11.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-43%share price, 3 yearsEarnings and multiple

Both mattered.

  • Per-share earnings took off 28 points and the multiple took off 15 points (P/E 13.5x to 11.2x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−28 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−15 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −43%−43%Share priceNet profit growth: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−28ProfitP/E change: −15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−15P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −43%−43%Share price
Net profit growth-28 ptsNet profit fell about 31%, which lowers the price.
P/E change-15 ptsThe P/E fell from 13.5x to 11.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+56%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly yes.

  • Per-share earnings added 41 points to the rise, while the multiple moved less (P/E 9.8x to 11.2x).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +40 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+40 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+16 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +56%+56%Share priceNet profit growth: +40 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+40ProfitP/E change: +16 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+16P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +56%+56%Share price
Net profit growth+40 ptsNet profit rose about 37%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+16 ptsThe P/E rose from 9.8x to 11.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SUPREME INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-79.2%recovered 2020-12
1-year volatility46.0%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.243-year daily, correlation 0.55
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−78.1% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−78.1%
Largest drawdowns

-79.2% (2019-06 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2020-12)

-74.7% (2024-09 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-32.9% (2021-06 peak to 2021-12 low, recovered 2022-04)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

11.2xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history64th percentile
CheapestMedian 10.4xDearest

Usual range 6.9x to 13.6x since 2019-06.

Against Producer Manufacturing11.2x vs 29.6x
This company
11.2x
Sector median
29.6x

62% below the Producer Manufacturing median.

4.5x17.7x30.9x44.0xJun '19Dec '20Jun '22Dec '23Jun '25Nov '264.5x17.7x30.9x44.0xJun '19Dec '21Jun '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE36th▼ 47 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin28thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth30th▼ 26 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth19thflat vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓79th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓71st▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓90th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum49th▲ 45 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~5%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 8.0x, the price would imply about 4.6%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹230.29
P/E
11.2x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹550 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹826 cr
P/S
0.7x
P/B
1.1x
ROE
10.3%
Operating Margin
8.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
44.5%
12M Momentum
-7.2%

52-week range

₹163.21₹334.40
39% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
46.0%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.25

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
22.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.99x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance24%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 24.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.99xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.99x (cash from operations ₹213 cr, net profit ₹216 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+4 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 4 days (45 vs 41). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress13% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 13% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+1 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +1 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 77,493 to 81,998 (+6%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters44.3%44.5%+0.2 pts
FIIs0.3%0.9%+0.6 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others55.4%54.6%-0.8 pts

Number of shareholders

81,998shareholders+6% since Sep '23
77k81k84k87k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 77,493
Dec '23: 80,014
Mar '24: 81,854
Jun '24: 79,849
Sep '24: 81,132
Dec '24: 86,610
Mar '25: 87,151
Jun '25: 87,284
Sep '25: 82,997
Dec '25: 82,050
Mar '26: 84,720
Jun '26: 81,998
 77k81k84k87k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 77,493
Dec '23: 80,014
Mar '24: 81,854
Jun '24: 79,849
Sep '24: 81,132
Dec '24: 86,610
Mar '25: 87,151
Jun '25: 87,284
Sep '25: 82,997
Dec '25: 82,050
Mar '26: 84,720
Jun '26: 81,998

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+0.7%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like PRAKASH PIPES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +46% vs the market, against −3% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+3.9%, 80% range −3.9% to +7.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
ALANKIT · Jan 2025: −54.7% vs market
NIRAJ · Jun 2025: −45.8% vs market
HMVL · May 2021: −38.4% vs market
IOLCP · Nov 2023: −36.9% vs market
PLASTIBLEN · Sep 2024: −35.0% vs market
GTPL · May 2024: −34.6% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Dec 2022: −34.1% vs market
UDS · Jul 2025: −33.3% vs market
KAKATCEM · Mar 2023: −28.9% vs market
DALMIASUG · Jun 2023: −24.7% vs market
CHEMBOND · Aug 2021: −24.3% vs market
PPAP · Mar 2020: −22.7% vs market
EKC · Mar 2025: −21.2% vs market
BALMLAWRIE · Nov 2024: −19.4% vs market
LINC · Feb 2025: −15.2% vs market
PTL · Jul 2024: −9.2% vs market
VETO · May 2025: −8.8% vs market
ALPA · May 2023: −8.5% vs market
INSECTICID · Mar 2025: −8.1% vs market
IFBAGRO · Jul 2021: −7.6% vs market
GHCLTEXTIL · Mar 2025: −7.0% vs market
BLISSGVS · Apr 2024: −5.4% vs market
JMA · Mar 2020: −3.4% vs market
CLSEL · Oct 2025: −0.6% vs market
MUNJALSHOW · May 2020: +0.4% vs market
PYRAMID · Mar 2025: +1.1% vs market
ALBERTDAVD · Mar 2022: +1.7% vs market
CENTENKA · Oct 2025: +2.9% vs market
MODISONLTD · Oct 2022: +3.3% vs market
ADSL · Feb 2023: +5.5% vs market
BODALCHEM · Nov 2020: +6.4% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Jan 2024: +24.7% vs market
MANAKSIA · May 2021: +28.4% vs market
FIEMIND · Mar 2021: +31.0% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Jul 2020: +38.3% vs market
PASUPTAC · Aug 2025: +39.0% vs market
LGBBROSLTD · Mar 2021: +42.3% vs market
MINDTECK · May 2023: +47.2% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · May 2023: +48.0% vs market
GAEL · Sep 2025: +50.5% vs market
EVERESTIND · Apr 2022: +52.3% vs market
DLINKINDIA · May 2022: +63.5% vs market
GRWRHITECH · May 2023: +86.4% vs market
TNPETRO · Mar 2021: +89.3% vs market
MMP · May 2021: +97.9% vs market
DBCORP · Feb 2023: +109.6% vs market
IFGLEXPOR · Jan 2023: +127.4% vs market
WINDLAS · Oct 2023: +139.2% vs market
GOLDIAM · Jun 2020: +167.6% vs market
MANALIPETC · Jun 2020: +172.8% vs market
Similar setups +0.7%All companies −3.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+0.7%
All companies' median
−3.2%
Beat the market
52% vs 46%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VETO
Producer Manufacturing		 May 2025 15x12% +9%−31% −9%
PLASTIBLEN
Process Industries		 Sep 2024 21x11% +29%−19% −35%
GTPL
Communications		 May 2024 16x15% +54%−22% −35%
MANAKSIA
Non-Energy Minerals		 May 2021 7x9% +107%−7% +28%
DLINKINDIA
Electronic Technology		 May 2022 14x16% +22%−29% +64%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
INSECTICID
Process Industries		 Mar 2025 13x13% +22%−42% −8%
IOLCP
Process Industries		 Nov 2023 19x14% +33%−13% −37%
MINDTECK
Technology Services		 May 2023 10x12% 0%−20% +47%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to PRAKASH PIPES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

THE ANDHRA SUGARSANDHRSUGAR
Process Industries
60%similar
P/EEPS growth
IRM ENERGYIRMENERGY
Energy Minerals
60%similar
volatilityrevenue growth
KELLTON TECH SOLUTIONSKELLTONTEC
Technology Services
60%similar
market capP/E
LINCOLN PHARMACEUTICALSLINCOLN
Health Technology
57%similar
P/Erevenue
AMBIKA COTTON MILLSAMBIKCO
Process Industries
55%similar
ROCErevenue
MAZDAMAZDA
Producer Manufacturing
65%similar
market cappromoter holding
ORIENT BELLORIENTBELL
Producer Manufacturing
51%similar
market capoperating margin
PRECISION CAMSHAFTSPRECAM
Producer Manufacturing
48%similar
volatilityrevenue

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Aug '22

  1. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹788 cr.
  3. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (17.9x).
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  5. JunPriceVolume reached 37.1x its 50-day median on 2026-06-29; price +16.3% that day.
  6. MarPriceFell 75% from the Sep 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2026-03-11; price +5.0% that day.
  8. DecPriceVolume reached 12.9x its 50-day median on 2025-12-10; price +4.7% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2025-08-18; price -0.7% that day.
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 8.2x its 50-day median on 2025-05-30; price -11.7% that day.
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  7. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹728 cr.
  8. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  9. AugPriceVolume reached 12.1x its 50-day median on 2024-08-14; price +12.4% that day.
  10. JulPriceRegained the 2024-01 peak, 4 months after the low.
  11. MayPriceVolume reached 9.6x its 50-day median on 2024-05-27; price +2.7% that day.
  12. AprValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (13.0x).
  13. MarPriceFell 31% from the Jan 2024 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  14. NovValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (13.5x).
  15. OctPriceVolume reached 18.5x its 50-day median on 2023-10-16; price +20.0% that day.
  16. AugPriceRegained the 2022-04 peak, 5 months after the low.
  17. AugPriceVolume reached 51.6x its 50-day median on 2023-08-04; price +4.8% that day.
  18. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹709 cr.
  19. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (5.9x).
  20. MayPriceVolume reached 16.3x its 50-day median on 2023-05-12; price +9.1% that day.
  21. MarPriceFell 32% from the Apr 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  22. AugPriceVolume reached 8.3x its 50-day median on 2022-08-10; price +6.5% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history90 months · 2019-06 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1111.2x₹826 cr10.3%12.0%0.0x
2026-1010.2x₹826 cr10.0%12.0%0.0x
2026-0912.3x₹826 cr10.0%12.0%0.0x
2026-0814.4x₹788 cr8.8%12.0%0.0x
2026-0714.7x₹788 cr8.8%12.0%0.0x
2026-0617.9x₹788 cr8.8%12.0%0.0x
2026-0512.4x₹748 cr8.8%27.0%0.1x
2026-0412.6x₹748 cr8.8%27.0%0.1x
2026-039.8x₹748 cr8.8%27.0%0.1x
2026-029.2x₹759 cr11.7%27.0%0.1x
2026-019.7x₹759 cr11.7%27.0%0.1x
2025-1210.9x₹759 cr11.7%27.0%0.1x
2025-118.7x₹778 cr15.1%27.0%0.1x
2025-1010.2x₹778 cr15.1%27.0%0.1x
2025-0910.7x₹778 cr15.1%27.0%0.1x
2025-089.0x₹780 cr18.5%27.0%0.1x
2025-0710.5x₹780 cr18.5%27.0%0.1x
2025-0611.5x₹780 cr18.5%27.0%0.1x
2025-059.9x₹762 cr26.6%29.0%0.1x
2025-0410.1x₹762 cr26.6%29.0%0.1x
2025-039.9x₹762 cr26.6%29.0%0.1x
2025-029.8x₹728 cr26.6%29.0%0.1x
2025-0110.9x₹728 cr26.6%29.0%0.1x
2024-1212.4x₹728 cr26.6%29.0%0.1x
2024-1112.7x₹699 cr26.3%29.0%0.1x
2024-1013.6x₹699 cr26.3%29.0%0.1x
2024-0914.4x₹699 cr26.3%29.0%0.1x
2024-0816.6x₹670 cr24.4%29.0%0.1x
2024-0713.7x₹670 cr24.4%29.0%0.1x
2024-0612.1x₹670 cr24.4%29.0%0.1x
2024-0513.2x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2024-0413.0x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2024-0311.8x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2024-0213.8x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2024-0114.9x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-1213.3x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-1113.5x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-1011.4x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-098.9x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-088.8x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-076.3x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-065.9x₹709 cr25.4%29.0%0.0x
2023-058.4x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2023-047.9x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2023-037.1x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2023-027.8x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2023-018.4x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-128.3x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-118.4x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-108.7x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-098.7x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-089.3x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-078.6x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-068.4x₹617 cr20.0%32.0%0.0x
2022-0511.7x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2022-0412.6x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2022-0310.4x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2022-0210.5x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2022-0110.9x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-128.7x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-119.8x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-1010.4x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-0910.6x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-0810.7x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-0711.8x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-0612.2x₹476 cr18.8%32.0%0.0x
2021-0512.8x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2021-0411.2x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2021-0310.5x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2021-029.2x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2021-018.9x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-129.6x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-116.3x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-106.1x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-095.9x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-086.2x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-075.0x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-064.5x₹385 cr18.9%29.0%0.0x
2020-05—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2020-04—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2020-03—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2020-02—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2020-01—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2019-12—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2019-11—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2019-10—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2019-09—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2019-08—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2019-07—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x
2019-06—₹341 cr26.6%70.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback