SAGILITY LIMITED (SAGILITY): Financials & Fundamentals History

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

3M1YAll

₹44.7 latest close · +9.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹44.7 month-end · −10.7% over 12 months

₹44.7 month-end · +20.7% since Nov '24

52-week range ₹35.83 to ₹54.30 · 1-year volatility 34.5%

Was the rally earned?

-11%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

Per-share earnings added 38 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 35.3x to 21.1x), which took 49 points back.
The share count barely moved.

Net profit growth+38 ptsNet profit rose about 49%, which lifts the price.

P/E change-49 ptsThe P/E fell from 35.3x to 21.1x, which lowers the price.

Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.

What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PINE LABS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-33.4%not yet recovered

1-year volatility34.5%annualised

Beta vs sector index0.673-year daily, correlation 0.34

Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

Largest drawdowns

-33.4% (2025-10 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-29.5% (2025-01 peak to 2025-04 low, recovered 2025-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-30: 57.6x the 50-day median, price -5.8% that day

2026-10-23: 10x the 50-day median, price -2.7% that day

2026-08-26: 5.8x the 50-day median, price +2.3% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

21.1xP/E todayNear its historic low

Against its own history16th percentile

CheapestMedian 30.4xDearest

Usual range 20.5x to 48.6x since 2024-11.

Against Technology Services21.1x vs 21.1x

This company

21.1x

Sector median

21.1x

Close to the Technology Services median.

P/EP/BP/S

P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

ROCE42nd▲ 8 pts vs a year ago
Op. margin77th▲ 3 pts vs a year ago
Revenue growth74th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
EPS growth83rd▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
Debt/equity ↓46th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago
Cash cycle ↓40th▲ 4 pts vs a year ago
P/E ↓49th▲ 7 pts vs a year ago
12M momentum66th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE

Op. margin

Revenue growth

EPS growth

Debt/equity ↓

Cash cycle ↓

P/E ↓

12M momentum

Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26

Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~16%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 21.1x, the price would imply about 15.9%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov: ₹44.70
P/E: 21.1x
ROCE: 13.0%
Market Cap: ₹20916 cr
Revenue (TTM): ₹7616 cr
P/S: 2.7x
P/B: 2.2x
ROE: 10.3%
Operating Margin: 22.0%
Debt / Equity: 0.1x
Promoter Holding: 51.0%
12M Momentum: -10.7%

52-week range

₹35.83₹54.30

48% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility

34.5%

Beta vs sector

1-year daily

0.68

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover

operating profit ÷ interest

15.0x

Cash from profit, 3Y

operating cash flow ÷ net profit

2.00x

Share count, 1Y

unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 6checks within rangeAll clear

Other income reliance4%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 4.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.00xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.00x (cash from operations ₹3,390 cr, net profit ₹1,692 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+6 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 6 days (93 vs 87). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

Over 2 years, promoters trimmed 31.4 pts; DIIs added 14.2 pts; FIIs added 6.2 pts.
The number of shareholders rose from 3.0 lakh to 5.4 lakh (+81%) between Dec 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '24Jun '26Change

Promoters82.4%51.0%-31.4 pts

FIIs3.8%10.0%+6.2 pts

DIIs7.3%21.4%+14.2 pts

Public and others6.6%17.6%+11.1 pts

Number of shareholders

5.4 lakhshareholders+81% since Dec '24

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−3.0%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate

We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SAGILITY LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −15% to +33% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
The gap against the base rate (+1.8%, 80% range −5.1% to +17.8%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median

−3.0%

All companies' median

−4.8%

Beat the market

48% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
APLLTD Health Technology	Jul 2024	38x	13%	+52%	−5%	−12%
ATUL Process Industries	Sep 2025	36x	13%	−21%	−25%	−3%
GLAND Health Technology	Apr 2025	33x	14%	−18%	−35%	+17%
RESPONIND Non-Energy Minerals	Jul 2025	29x	16%	−24%	−26%	−26%
AUROPHARMA Health Technology	Jun 2024	22x	14%	+66%	−5%	−8%

Show the other 3 matches

Company	When	P/E	ROCE	12M mom.	Drawdown	Next 12 months
ENDURANCE Producer Manufacturing	Jul 2024	54x	17%	+54%	−5%	+4%
STARCEMENT Producer Manufacturing	Aug 2024	31x	16%	+45%	−7%	+36%
EMCURE Health Technology	Oct 2025	34x	20%	−8%	−12%	+50%

How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SAGILITY LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

Feature	Weight	Non-financial	Financial
P/E	1	yes	yes
P/S	1	yes	—
P/B	1	—	yes
ROCE	1	yes	—
operating margin	1	yes	—
ROE	1	—	yes
debt/equity	0.75	yes	—
interest cover	0.5	yes	—
revenue growth	0.75	yes	yes
12-month momentum	1	yes	yes
drawdown from 12-month high	0.75	yes	yes
size	0.75	yes	yes
volatility	0.5	yes	yes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

P I INDUSTRIESPIIND

Process Industries

77%similar

operating marginrevenue

CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIACONCOR

Transportation

74%similar

ROCErevenue

DEEPAK NITRITEDEEPAKNTR

Process Industries

72%similar

market caprevenue

ATULATUL

Process Industries

69%similar

revenueoperating margin

NAVANAVA

Utilities

68%similar

ROCEpromoter holding

INTELLECT DESIGN ARENAINTELLECT

Technology Services

52%similar

P/Eoperating margin

CYIENTCYIENT

Technology Services

49%similar

revenuevolatility

MPHASISMPHASIS

Technology Services

48%similar

P/Emarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

19 events since Dec '24

2026
OctPriceVolume reached 57.6x its 50-day median on 2026-10-30; price -5.8% that day.
JulPriceVolume reached 6.9x its 50-day median on 2026-07-27; price +7.1% that day.
JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 11.8 pts over 2 quarters to 32.3%.
JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 8% of profit).
MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 16.4 pts to 51.0%.
MarPriceFell 33% from the Oct 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
MarPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2026-03-04; price +6.4% that day.
2025
DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).

Show 11 earlier events

2025
NovDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.17x.
NovSharesShare count is up 9.2% over 12 months.
NovPriceVolume reached 44.0x its 50-day median on 2025-11-14; price +5.6% that day.
OctPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 6 months after the low.
SepPromoterPromoter holding fell 15.0 pts to 67.4%.
SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 9.2 pts over 1 quarter to 20.1%.
JulPriceVolume reached 9.7x its 50-day median on 2025-07-02; price +6.2% that day.
JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
MayPriceVolume reached 26.5x its 50-day median on 2025-05-28; price -1.9% that day.
AprPriceFell 30% from the Jan 2025 peak to the Apr 2025 low.
2024
DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Technology Services on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history25 months · 2024-11 to 2026-11

Month	P/E	Revenue (TTM)	ROE	ROCE	Debt / Equity
2026-11	21.1x	₹7616 cr	10.3%	13.0%	0.1x
2026-10	19.8x	₹7616 cr	10.3%	13.0%	0.1x
2026-09	20.1x	₹7616 cr	10.3%	13.0%	0.1x
2026-08	23.8x	₹7192 cr	9.6%	13.0%	0.1x
2026-07	21.9x	₹7192 cr	9.6%	13.0%	0.1x
2026-06	19.9x	₹7192 cr	9.6%	13.0%	0.1x
2026-05	22.5x	₹6736 cr	10.2%	10.0%	0.2x
2026-04	22.9x	₹6736 cr	10.2%	10.0%	0.2x
2026-03	22.0x	₹6736 cr	10.2%	10.0%	0.2x
2026-02	23.1x	₹6218 cr	9.6%	10.0%	0.2x
2026-01	29.2x	₹6218 cr	9.6%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-12	30.4x	₹6218 cr	9.6%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-11	35.3x	₹5885 cr	8.0%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-10	37.0x	₹5885 cr	8.0%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-09	30.0x	₹5885 cr	8.0%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-08	38.1x	₹5569 cr	6.5%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-07	40.5x	₹5569 cr	6.5%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-06	35.8x	₹5569 cr	6.5%	10.0%	0.2x
2025-05	41.6x	₹5284 cr	6.8%	5.0%	0.4x
2025-04	43.2x	₹5284 cr	6.8%	5.0%	0.4x
2025-03	45.2x	₹5284 cr	6.8%	5.0%	0.4x
2025-02	49.8x	₹5091 cr	4.5%	5.0%	0.4x
2025-01	57.7x	₹5091 cr	4.5%	5.0%	0.4x
2024-12	58.7x	₹5091 cr	4.5%	5.0%	0.4x
2024-11	46.9x	₹4860 cr	3.2%	5.0%	0.4x

Methodology and data notes