अApnaFunda

SURAKSHA DIAGNOSTIC LIMITED (SURAKSHA)

Health Services · Medical Laboratories · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.55 / 100
Profitability 77Balance sheet 34
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.71 / 100
Price 96Earnings 49FII/DII 67

Passes these screensNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹350.4 latest close · +28.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹250₹300₹350Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹250₹300₹350Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹350.4 month-end · +19.7% over 12 months

₹250₹300₹350Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹250₹300₹350Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹350.4 month-end · −6.7% since Dec '24

₹250₹300₹350Dec '24May '25Sep '25Feb '26Jun '26Nov '26 ₹250₹300₹350Dec '24Dec '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹224.10 to ₹360.00 · 1-year volatility 35.2%

Was the rally earned?

+20%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 43.0x to 50.9x); per-share earnings added 1 point.
  • The share count rose 11%.
Net profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+18 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−11 ptsShare count changeShare price: +20%+20%Share priceNet profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13ProfitP/E change: +18 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+18P/EShare count change: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−11SharesShare price: +20%+20%Share price
Net profit growth+13 ptsNet profit rose about 12%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+18 ptsThe P/E rose from 43.0x to 50.9x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-11 ptsShare count rose 11%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-45.6%not yet recovered
1-year volatility35.2%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.723-year daily, correlation 0.34
Volume spikes11last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%20252026−43.7% 0%−20%−40%2026−43.7%
Largest drawdowns

-45.6% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-26: 7.6x the 50-day median, price +6.6% that day

2026-08-21: 5.1x the 50-day median, price +6.8% that day

2026-08-18: 7.2x the 50-day median, price +3.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

50.9xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history88th percentile
CheapestMedian 44.2xDearest

Usual range 39.2x to 51.4x since 2024-12.

Against Health Services50.9x vs 50.9x
This company
50.9x
Sector median
50.9x

Close to the Health Services median.

35.7x46.0x56.3x66.6xDec '24May '25Oct '25Mar '26Aug '26Nov '2635.7x46.0x56.3x66.6xDec '24Aug '25Apr '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianHealth Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Health Services is valued

Where does it rank among Health Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Health Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE59th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin94thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth73rd
  • EPS growth28th
  • Debt/equity ↓31stflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓87th▲ 25 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓51st▼ 25 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum77th

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Health Services sector page Watch it move against Health Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~32%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 77.5x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 32.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered10.2%/yrEPS, last 7 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+21.8 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank119thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%18%36% Dec 2024Nov 2026 0%18%36% Dec 2024Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x33.8%35.0%36.2%
15x30.8%32.0%33.2%
20x27.1%28.2%29.4%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 32.0%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Health Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹350.40
P/E
50.9x
ROCE
17.0%
Market Cap
₹1827 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹326 cr
P/S
5.6x
P/B
7.5x
ROE
14.7%
Operating Margin
35.0%
Debt / Equity
0.5x
Promoter Holding
49.1%
12M Momentum
19.7%

52-week range

₹224.10₹360.00
93% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
35.2%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.61

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
4.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
2.41x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 5checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance8%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 8.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion2.41xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 2.41x (cash from operations ₹205 cr, net profit ₹85 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress12% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 12% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 2.8 pts; FIIs trimmed 1.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 98,662 to 64,866 (-34%) between Dec 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '24Jun '26Change
Promoters48.8%49.1%+0.3 pts
FIIs15.4%13.5%-1.9 pts
DIIs20.4%23.2%+2.8 pts
Public and others15.4%14.2%-1.2 pts

Number of shareholders

64,866shareholders-34% since Dec '24
65k76k87k99k Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '24: 98,662
Mar '25: 87,275
Jun '25: 79,670
Sep '25: 75,304
Dec '25: 70,963
Mar '26: 67,107
Jun '26: 64,866
65k76k87k99k Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '24: 98,662
Mar '25: 87,275
Jun '25: 79,670
Sep '25: 75,304
Dec '25: 70,963
Mar '26: 67,107
Jun '26: 64,866

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−8.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like SURAKSHA DIAGNOSTIC LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −31% to +32% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−6.6%, 80% range −15.9% to +1.1%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
ASIANTILES · Aug 2020: −60.3% vs market
TASTYBITE · Jun 2023: −46.6% vs market
GREENPANEL · Feb 2022: −40.9% vs market
CCL · Jun 2023: −39.3% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Jan 2022: −38.3% vs market
PVRINOX · Jan 2020: −38.0% vs market
CARYSIL · Nov 2023: −35.6% vs market
GUFICBIO · Jan 2025: −35.6% vs market
NEOGEN · Apr 2023: −33.6% vs market
GREENLAM · Jan 2020: −32.6% vs market
ANURAS · Mar 2023: −32.3% vs market
JKCEMENT · Mar 2021: −32.1% vs market
STYLAMIND · May 2023: −31.1% vs market
5PAISA · Dec 2023: −29.7% vs market
VENUSPIPES · Feb 2024: −26.3% vs market
SHK · May 2021: −25.9% vs market
IRISDOREME · Apr 2023: −25.0% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Jun 2022: −24.8% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · May 2023: −21.0% vs market
CAMLINFINE · Feb 2021: −19.4% vs market
CANTABIL · Mar 2025: −15.6% vs market
BHAGCHEM · May 2023: −15.2% vs market
HESTERBIO · Oct 2020: −13.8% vs market
MEDANTA · Nov 2023: −13.1% vs market
RAINBOW · Jun 2025: −9.6% vs market
SIRCA · Jul 2025: −8.3% vs market
EPL · Jun 2020: −4.8% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Jul 2024: −3.8% vs market
AARTIIND · Jan 2020: −1.2% vs market
SUDARSCHEM · Apr 2020: +0.3% vs market
RADICO · Feb 2020: +2.0% vs market
TEGA · Jul 2024: +6.0% vs market
VMART · Dec 2020: +8.8% vs market
NH · Nov 2020: +9.4% vs market
METROPOLIS · Aug 2024: +10.9% vs market
VIJAYA · Sep 2024: +13.0% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · May 2025: +25.2% vs market
ETHOSLTD · Aug 2023: +34.1% vs market
PRIVISCL · Jul 2025: +34.4% vs market
ASTEC · Mar 2020: +43.8% vs market
JASH · Apr 2023: +45.4% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Apr 2021: +46.7% vs market
CHOICEIN · Sep 2023: +52.8% vs market
POLYMED · Jan 2020: +56.2% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Nov 2021: +58.0% vs market
SANGHVIMOV · Dec 2022: +98.6% vs market
SHAILY · Jun 2024: +103.2% vs market
PGEL · Jun 2024: +107.9% vs market
SAKAR · Jun 2025: +137.2% vs market
AARTIDRUGS · Apr 2020: +148.6% vs market
Similar setups −8.9%All companies −2.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 4 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−8.9%
All companies' median
−2.3%
Beat the market
42% vs 47%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 36 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CHOICEIN
Finance
Sep 2023 70x16% +84%0% +53%
ASTEC
Process Industries
Mar 2020 24x20% −28%−29% +44%
CRAFTSMAN
Producer Manufacturing
May 2023 48x18% +57%0% −21%
ETHOSLTD
Retail Trade
Aug 2023 68x18% +61%0% +34%
VENUSPIPES
Non-Energy Minerals
Feb 2024 84x23% +153%0% −26%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CARYSIL
Consumer Durables
Nov 2023 47x18% +87%0% −36%
GREENLAM
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2020 32x19% +21%−1% −33%
VIJAYA
Health Services
Sep 2024 79x20% +92%0% +13%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/E, ROCE and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to SURAKSHA DIAGNOSTIC LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Commercial Services
57%similar
market capdebt/equity
Health Technology
54%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin
MATRIMONY.COMMATRIMONY
Technology Services
48%similar
ROCEvolatility
Non-Energy Minerals
48%similar
promoter holdingmarket cap
Finance
46%similar
revenuedebt/equity
Health Services
46%similar
ROCEvolatility
Health Services
45%similar
operating margindebt/equity
Health Services
35%similar
ROCEdebt/equity

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

11 events since Mar '25

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Health Services on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 126.7x its 50-day median on 2026-08-13; price +12.6% that day.
  4. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 1% of profit).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2026-05-21; price +4.9% that day.
  6. MarPriceFell 46% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 7.3x its 50-day median on 2026-03-27; price -5.1% that day.
  8. DecSharesShare count is up 42.9% over 12 months.
Show 3 earlier events
  1. OctPriceVolume reached 5.2x its 50-day median on 2025-10-27; price +4.6% that day.
  2. SepPriceVolume reached 8.7x its 50-day median on 2025-09-19; price -1.2% that day.
  3. MarPriceVolume reached 5.0x its 50-day median on 2025-03-04; price +2.4% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history24 months · 2024-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1150.9x₹326 cr14.7%17.0%0.5x
2026-1046.0x₹326 cr14.3%17.0%0.5x
2026-0951.7x₹326 cr14.3%17.0%0.5x
2026-0854.8x₹311 cr12.7%17.0%0.5x
2026-0740.8x₹311 cr12.7%17.0%0.5x
2026-0644.2x₹311 cr12.7%17.0%0.5x
2026-0544.7x₹295 cr15.2%18.0%0.4x
2026-0444.4x₹295 cr15.2%18.0%0.4x
2026-0335.7x₹295 cr15.2%18.0%0.4x
2026-0244.3x₹277 cr14.7%18.0%0.4x
2026-0143.4x₹277 cr14.7%18.0%0.4x
2025-1244.0x₹277 cr14.7%18.0%0.4x
2025-1143.0x₹265 cr15.2%18.0%0.4x
2025-1046.8x₹265 cr15.2%18.0%0.4x
2025-0943.9x₹265 cr15.2%18.0%0.4x
2025-0843.6x₹253 cr14.7%18.0%0.4x
2025-0744.0x₹253 cr14.7%18.0%0.4x
2025-0647.5x₹253 cr14.7%18.0%0.4x
2025-0546.3x₹243 cr16.9%17.0%0.5x
2025-0443.2x₹243 cr16.9%17.0%0.5x
2025-0337.4x₹243 cr16.9%17.0%0.5x
2025-0238.5x₹235 cr16.3%17.0%0.5x
2025-0145.3x₹235 cr16.3%17.0%0.5x
2024-1255.0x₹235 cr16.3%17.0%0.5x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback