अApnaFunda

TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES LIMITED (TRAVELFOOD)

Consumer Services · Restaurants · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.85 / 100
Profitability 92Balance sheet 78
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.37 / 100
Price 26Earnings 48

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitableLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,191.8 latest close · −9.1% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,200₹1,300₹1,400Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,200₹1,300₹1,400Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,191.8 month-end · −11.4% over 12 months

₹1,100₹1,200₹1,300Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,100₹1,200₹1,300Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,191.8 month-end · +14.0% since Jul '25

₹1,100₹1,200₹1,300Jul '25Oct '25Jan '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹1,100₹1,200₹1,300Jul '25Mar '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹1035.30 to ₹1470.90 · 1-year volatility 28.9%

Was the rally earned?

-11%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 17 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 44.4x to 33.0x), which took 28 points back.
  • The share count fell 4%.
Net profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4 ptsShare count changeShare price: −11%−11%Share priceNet profit growth: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+13ProfitP/E change: −28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−28P/EShare count change: +4 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+4SharesShare price: −11%−11%Share price
Net profit growth+13 ptsNet profit rose about 15%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-28 ptsThe P/E fell from 44.4x to 33.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+4 ptsShare count fell 4%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with JUBILANT FOODWORKS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-24.8%recovered 2026-08
1-year volatility28.9%annualised
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%2026−23.3% 0%−10%−20%2026−23.3%
Largest drawdowns

-24.8% (2025-10 peak to 2026-01 low, recovered 2026-08)

-20.5% (2026-08 peak to 2026-10 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-29: 12.4x the 50-day median, price -0.5% that day

2026-08-27: 19.9x the 50-day median, price +3.6% that day

2026-08-13: 5.2x the 50-day median, price +0.3% that day

Where does it rank among Consumer Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE95thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin90thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth45th
  • EPS growth76th
  • Debt/equity ↓57th▲ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓97thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓35th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum72nd

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Services sector page Watch it move against Consumer Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~27%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 57.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 26.6%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered52.4%/yrEPS, last 8 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−25.8 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank805thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%30%59% Jun 2024Nov 2026 0%30%59% Jun 2024Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x28.1%29.2%30.4%
15x25.5%26.6%27.7%
20x22.2%23.3%24.4%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 26.6%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1191.80
P/E
33.0x
ROCE
42.0%
Market Cap
₹15704 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1725 cr
P/S
9.1x
P/B
10.9x
ROE
33.0%
Operating Margin
36.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
86.2%
12M Momentum
-11.5%

52-week range

₹1035.30₹1470.90
36% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
28.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.51

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
11.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.12x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 5checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance30%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 30.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate24%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 23.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.12xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.12x (cash from operations ₹1,261 cr, net profit ₹1,130 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress10% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 10% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Sep 2025, DIIs added 2.0 pts; FIIs trimmed 1.1 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 65,301 to 52,997 (-19%) between Sep 2025 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '25Jun '26Change
Promoters86.2%86.2%0.0 pts
FIIs2.8%1.6%-1.1 pts
DIIs8.0%10.0%+2.0 pts
Public and others3.0%2.1%-0.9 pts

Number of shareholders

52,997shareholders-19% since Sep '25
53k57k61k65k Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 65,301
Dec '25: 57,736
Mar '26: 54,057
Jun '26: 52,997
53k57k61k65k Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 65,301
Dec '25: 57,736
Mar '26: 54,057
Jun '26: 52,997

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−7.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +12% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−5.9%, 80% range −13.0% to +6.0%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
MANYAVAR · Feb 2025: −60.8% vs market
TARSONS · Jan 2023: −49.7% vs market
SANOFI · Jun 2025: −46.6% vs market
SUMICHEM · Mar 2023: −45.1% vs market
KKCL · Apr 2020: −35.8% vs market
IPL · Jul 2022: −34.7% vs market
PGHL · Apr 2023: −28.7% vs market
ORIENTELEC · Aug 2021: −26.7% vs market
ACCELYA · Sep 2020: −25.2% vs market
EMAMILTD · Aug 2024: −23.5% vs market
ROLEXRINGS · Jul 2023: −23.4% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Apr 2021: −23.2% vs market
MSUMI · Aug 2023: −23.0% vs market
CROMPTON · Mar 2021: −22.9% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Jun 2023: −21.2% vs market
LTTS · May 2023: −19.9% vs market
EIHOTEL · Jul 2025: −17.3% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · May 2025: −17.0% vs market
DEEPAKNTR · Mar 2022: −13.5% vs market
RELAXO · Sep 2021: −12.1% vs market
BHARATRAS · Aug 2021: −11.8% vs market
PAGEIND · Oct 2025: −11.5% vs market
COFORGE · Jul 2023: −9.1% vs market
ERIS · Mar 2020: −8.8% vs market
HEIDELBERG · Jul 2020: −8.8% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Jun 2024: −6.4% vs market
GARFIBRES · Apr 2021: −5.9% vs market
OFSS · Nov 2020: +1.1% vs market
ABBOTINDIA · Jul 2022: +4.8% vs market
TTKPRESTIG · May 2020: +6.5% vs market
MARICO · Nov 2024: +7.1% vs market
BLUEJET · Nov 2024: +7.2% vs market
UNITDSPR · Jun 2024: +9.6% vs market
RATNAMANI · Mar 2021: +10.4% vs market
GALAXYSURF · Jan 2021: +11.1% vs market
CRISIL · Dec 2022: +11.3% vs market
BIKAJI · Jul 2024: +11.4% vs market
NH · Feb 2024: +12.2% vs market
KIMS · Feb 2023: +12.4% vs market
LALPATHLAB · Jun 2025: +17.5% vs market
NATCOPHARM · Jan 2020: +18.0% vs market
FINEORG · Apr 2021: +26.7% vs market
LUXIND · Apr 2020: +26.9% vs market
ECLERX · Dec 2024: +27.7% vs market
CAMS · Nov 2023: +36.1% vs market
AJANTPHARM · Oct 2025: +50.4% vs market
SFL · Nov 2020: +50.9% vs market
INOXINDIA · Jun 2025: +58.9% vs market
COHANCE · Mar 2024: +64.1% vs market
KFINTECH · Dec 2023: +170.9% vs market
Similar setups −7.6%All companies −1.7%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 2 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−7.6%
All companies' median
−1.7%
Beat the market
46% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ALKYLAMINE
Process Industries
May 2025 49x41% +3%−19% −17%
KIMS
Health Services
Feb 2023 32x34% +6%−17% +12%
CAMS
Technology Services
Nov 2023 48x46% +22%−2% +36%
CROMPTON
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2021 50x35% +88%−10% −23%
MANYAVAR
Retail Trade
Feb 2025 51x— −18%−41% −61%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CRISIL
Commercial Services
Dec 2022 48x38% +6%−19% +11%
MARICO
Consumer Non-Durables
Nov 2024 55x43% +20%−9% +7%
LALPATHLAB
Health Services
Jun 2025 48x29% +1%−22% +18%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and P/E. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Commercial Services
68%similar
promoter holdingROCE
Retail Trade
68%similar
operating marginmarket cap
Health Technology
62%similar
operating marginmarket cap
Process Industries
60%similar
market cappromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
60%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
Consumer Services
38%similar
P/Evolatility
Consumer Services
35%similar
ROCEoperating margin
Consumer Services
28%similar
promoter holdingoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

5 events since Mar '26

  1. SepResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹1,725 cr.
  2. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. AugPriceVolume reached 45.5x its 50-day median on 2026-08-07; price +6.8% that day.
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 6.6x its 50-day median on 2026-05-22; price +6.5% that day.
  5. MarPriceVolume reached 9.9x its 50-day median on 2026-03-18; price +0.1% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history17 months · 2025-07 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1133.0x₹1725 cr33.0%42.0%0.2x
2026-1031.9x₹1725 cr33.7%42.0%0.2x
2026-0933.2x₹1725 cr33.7%42.0%0.2x
2026-0838.8x₹1648 cr31.4%42.0%0.2x
2026-0738.9x₹1648 cr31.4%42.0%0.2x
2026-0639.5x₹1648 cr31.4%42.0%0.2x
2026-0538.1x₹1554 cr41.5%41.0%0.3x
2026-0439.2x₹1554 cr41.5%41.0%0.3x
2026-0339.3x₹1554 cr41.5%41.0%0.3x
2026-0241.9x₹1509 cr38.3%41.0%0.3x
2026-0136.2x₹1509 cr38.3%41.0%0.3x
2025-1239.8x₹1509 cr38.3%41.0%0.3x
2025-1144.4x₹1653 cr39.4%41.0%0.3x
2025-1043.5x₹1653 cr39.4%41.0%0.3x
2025-0943.6x₹1653 cr39.4%41.0%0.3x
2025-0845.4x₹1688 cr36.1%41.0%0.3x
2025-0737.9x₹1688 cr36.1%41.0%0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback