अApnaFunda
Menu

COMPUTER AGE MANAGEMENT SERV (CAMS)

Technology Services · Data Processing Services · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.86 / 100
Profitability 97Growth 62Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.36 / 100
Price 39Earnings 43FII/DII 26

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Compare withSAGILITYPINE LABSBLS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹711.15 latest close · −10.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹650₹700₹750₹800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹650₹700₹750₹800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹711.15 month-end · −8.1% over 12 months

₹700₹800Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹700₹800Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹711.15 month-end · +26.9% over 3 years

₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹711.15 month-end · +174.2% since Oct '20

₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Oct '20Jan '22Mar '23Jun '24Aug '25Nov '26 ₹250₹500₹750₹1,000Oct '20Nov '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹611.40 to ₹844.90 · 1-year volatility 30.9%

Was the rally earned?

-8%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 4 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 40.6x to 35.6x), which took 13 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+6 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−13 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: −8%−8%Share priceNet profit growth: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+6ProfitP/E change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−13P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: −8%−8%Share price
Net profit growth+6 ptsNet profit rose about 6%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-13 ptsThe P/E fell from 40.6x to 35.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+27%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 61 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 48.1x to 35.6x), which took 34 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +63 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+63 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −34 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−34 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +27%+27%Share priceNet profit growth: +63 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+63ProfitP/E change: −34 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−34P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: +27%+27%Share price
Net profit growth+63 ptsNet profit rose about 74%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-34 ptsThe P/E fell from 48.1x to 35.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+16%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 93 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 73.2x to 35.6x), which took 77 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +95 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+95 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −77 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−77 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2 ptsShare count changeShare price: +16%+16%Share priceNet profit growth: +95 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+95ProfitP/E change: −77 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−77P/EShare count change: −2 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−2SharesShare price: +16%+16%Share price
Net profit growth+95 ptsNet profit rose about 142%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-77 ptsThe P/E fell from 73.2x to 35.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-2 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAGILITY

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-49.1%recovered 2024-07
1-year volatility30.9%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.633-year daily, correlation 0.34
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%202120222023202420252026−48.7% 0%−20%−40%20232025−48.7%
Largest drawdowns

-49.1% (2021-09 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-07)

-41.0% (2024-12 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-17.4% (2024-07 peak to 2024-08 low, recovered 2024-10)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-30: 6.4x the 50-day median, price -6.2% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

35.6xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history8th percentile
CheapestMedian 42.4xDearest

Usual range 36.6x to 65.4x since 2020-10.

Against Technology Services35.6x vs 21.1x
This company
35.6x
Sector median
21.1x

69% above the Technology Services median.

15.0x40.3x65.5x90.8xOct '20Jan '22Apr '23Jul '24Oct '25Nov '2615.0x40.3x65.5x90.8xOct '20Nov '22Dec '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianTechnology Services median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Technology Services is valued

Where does it rank among Technology Services peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Technology Services peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE95thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin99thflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth38th▼ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth42nd▼ 24 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓62nd▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓87th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓29th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum68th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Technology Services sector page Watch it move against Technology Services in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~22%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 47.0x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 22.3%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered19.1%/yrEPS, last 9 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+3.2 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank469thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%17%34% Oct 2020Nov 2026 0%17%34% Oct 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x23.5%24.6%25.7%
15x21.2%22.3%23.4%
20x18.2%19.3%20.4%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 22.3%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2021Price implied 25%/yr; EPS has since grown 18%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 29%/yr; EPS has since grown 18%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Technology Services The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹711.15
P/E
35.6x
ROCE
47.0%
Market Cap
₹17662 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1557 cr
P/S
11.3x
P/B
13.4x
ROE
37.5%
Operating Margin
46.0%
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Promoter Holding
0.0%
12M Momentum
-8.1%

52-week range

₹611.40₹844.90
43% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
30.9%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.56

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
94.9x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.14x
Share count, 1Y
+2.0%

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 6checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance8%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 8.4%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.14xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.14x (cash from operations ₹1,462 cr, net profit ₹1,288 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history-7 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 7 days (14 vs 21). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress22% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 22% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 19.9 pts; DIIs added 7.5 pts; FIIs added 6.3 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 4.4 lakh to 5.3 lakh (+20%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters19.9%0.0%-19.9 pts
FIIs38.6%44.9%+6.3 pts
DIIs16.1%23.5%+7.5 pts
Public and others25.5%31.6%+6.1 pts

Number of shareholders

5.3 lakhshareholders+20% since Sep '23
3.8L4.3L4.9L5.4L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 4.4 lakh
Dec '23: 4.5 lakh
Mar '24: 4.1 lakh
Jun '24: 3.8 lakh
Sep '24: 4.0 lakh
Dec '24: 4.1 lakh
Mar '25: 4.6 lakh
Jun '25: 4.7 lakh
Sep '25: 4.8 lakh
Dec '25: 5.1 lakh
Mar '26: 5.4 lakh
Jun '26: 5.3 lakh
 3.8L4.3L4.9L5.4L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 4.4 lakh
Dec '23: 4.5 lakh
Mar '24: 4.1 lakh
Jun '24: 3.8 lakh
Sep '24: 4.0 lakh
Dec '24: 4.1 lakh
Mar '25: 4.6 lakh
Jun '25: 4.7 lakh
Sep '25: 4.8 lakh
Dec '25: 5.1 lakh
Mar '26: 5.4 lakh
Jun '26: 5.3 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−16.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like COMPUTER AGE MANAGEMENT SERV today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +5% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −14.7%, 80% range −21.0% to −10.2%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%
TARSONS · Jan 2023: −49.7% vs market
BAJAJCON · Mar 2021: −49.1% vs market
SANOFI · Jun 2025: −46.6% vs market
SUMICHEM · Mar 2023: −45.1% vs market
INDIAMART · Aug 2025: −37.2% vs market
IRCTC · Oct 2025: −35.9% vs market
CASTROLIND · Feb 2020: −35.0% vs market
CLEAN · Apr 2025: −34.6% vs market
SUNTV · Sep 2020: −33.7% vs market
SAREGAMA · May 2022: −31.2% vs market
IGL · Nov 2020: −30.9% vs market
MARICO · Mar 2023: −30.3% vs market
GRINDWELL · Dec 2023: −29.9% vs market
PGHL · Sep 2023: −26.9% vs market
SANOFICONR · Oct 2025: −24.9% vs market
EMAMILTD · Aug 2024: −23.5% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Apr 2021: −23.2% vs market
CROMPTON · Mar 2021: −22.9% vs market
AIAENG · Jul 2020: −22.8% vs market
GLAXO · May 2022: −20.9% vs market
OFSS · Jun 2020: −20.4% vs market
LTTS · Sep 2023: −19.5% vs market
AJANTPHARM · Sep 2024: −18.6% vs market
3MINDIA · Feb 2020: −18.5% vs market
EIHOTEL · Jul 2025: −17.3% vs market
HONAUT · Dec 2020: −15.8% vs market
INGERRAND · Oct 2024: −13.3% vs market
DIVISLAB · May 2023: −12.9% vs market
ERIS · Jun 2022: −12.8% vs market
COHANCE · Jun 2022: −12.5% vs market
ALKYLAMINE · Sep 2025: −8.5% vs market
SCHAEFFLER · May 2024: −6.0% vs market
CGPOWER · Jul 2024: −4.5% vs market
VINATIORGA · Dec 2021: −3.2% vs market
PAGEIND · Apr 2020: +2.1% vs market
EICHERMOT · Apr 2020: +3.1% vs market
PGHH · Aug 2022: +4.2% vs market
ABBOTINDIA · Jul 2022: +4.8% vs market
IEX · Jun 2024: +4.8% vs market
CRISIL · Mar 2023: +6.0% vs market
BLUEJET · Nov 2024: +7.2% vs market
ATUL · Jan 2021: +10.3% vs market
KIMS · Feb 2023: +12.4% vs market
GILLETTE · Apr 2024: +18.6% vs market
FINEORG · Apr 2021: +26.7% vs market
LALPATHLAB · Oct 2025: +28.5% vs market
ESABINDIA · Feb 2022: +33.9% vs market
THYROCARE · Jan 2020: +36.1% vs market
CDSL · Sep 2023: +45.6% vs market
INOXINDIA · Jun 2025: +58.9% vs market
Similar setups −16.6%All companies −1.9%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−16.6%
All companies' median
−1.9%
Beat the market
32% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 37 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CRISIL
Commercial Services		 Mar 2023 42x41% −2%−15% +6%
COHANCE
Health Technology		 Jun 2022 26x41% −4%−26% −13%
PGHL
Health Technology		 Sep 2023 36x45% +25%−6% −27%
IRCTC
Consumer Services		 Oct 2025 43x49% −13%−16% −36%
OFSS
Technology Services		 Jun 2020 15x40% −11%−17% −20%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
INGERRAND
Producer Manufacturing		 Oct 2024 59x51% +53%−13% −13%
EICHERMOT
Consumer Durables		 Apr 2020 18x41% −28%−37% +3%
ABBOTINDIA
Health Technology		 Jul 2022 52x38% +5%−14% +5%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, 12-month momentum and P/S. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to COMPUTER AGE MANAGEMENT SERV. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

CENTRAL DEPOSITORY SER INDCDSL
Finance
73%similar
EPS growthoperating margin
EIHEIHOTEL
Consumer Services
69%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
INDIAMART INTERMESHINDIAMART
Retail Trade
64%similar
revenuerevenue growth
NEULAND LABORATORIESNEULANDLAB
Health Technology
64%similar
operating marginmarket cap
S.J.S. ENTERPRISESSJS
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
KFIN TECHNOLOGIESKFINTECH
Technology Services
81%similar
EPS growthmarket cap
AFFLE 3IAFFLE
Technology Services
48%similar
market capEPS growth
PERSISTENT SYSTEMSPERSISTENT
Technology Services
47%similar
debt/equityROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jul '21

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2026-10-30; price -6.2% that day.
  2. SepValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (33.6x).
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  4. MayPriceVolume reached 11.2x its 50-day median on 2026-05-05; price +9.1% that day.
  5. MarPriceFell 41% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  6. MarPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2026-03-05; price +3.6% that day.
  7. JanValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (37.1x).
  8. OctPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2025-10-29; price -3.2% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.5 pts over 2 quarters to 71.7%.
  2. FebValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (36.5x).
  3. JulPriceRegained the 2021-09 peak, 16 months after the low.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 10.6x its 50-day median on 2024-07-30; price +9.6% that day.
  5. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  7. AprPriceVolume reached 5.5x its 50-day median on 2024-04-02; price +6.5% that day.
  8. MarPromoterPromoter holding fell 19.9 pts to 0.0%.
  9. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 16.1 pts over 1 quarter to 70.8%.
  10. NovPriceVolume reached 14.2x its 50-day median on 2023-11-15; price +4.5% that day.
  11. JulPriceVolume reached 9.4x its 50-day median on 2023-07-03; price +4.3% that day.
  12. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  13. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Technology Services on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. AprPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2023-04-25; price +0.6% that day.
  15. MarPriceFell 49% from the Sep 2021 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  16. NovValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (39.2x).
  17. AugPriceVolume reached 18.2x its 50-day median on 2022-08-19; price -5.2% that day.
  18. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹910 cr.
  19. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 150% to 66% of profit.
  20. JunPriceVolume reached 6.2x its 50-day median on 2022-06-09; price +5.7% that day.
  21. DecPriceVolume reached 22.4x its 50-day median on 2021-12-13; price -5.3% that day.
  22. JulPriceVolume reached 15.2x its 50-day median on 2021-07-15; price -2.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history74 months · 2020-10 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1135.6x₹1557 cr37.5%47.0%0.0x
2026-1032.7x₹1557 cr37.2%47.0%0.0x
2026-0933.6x₹1557 cr37.2%47.0%0.0x
2026-0840.7x₹1516 cr35.7%47.0%0.0x
2026-0741.4x₹1516 cr35.7%47.0%0.0x
2026-0641.5x₹1516 cr35.7%47.0%0.0x
2026-0542.3x₹1477 cr41.1%54.0%0.1x
2026-0439.4x₹1477 cr41.1%54.0%0.1x
2026-0333.4x₹1477 cr41.1%54.0%0.1x
2026-0236.2x₹1457 cr41.1%54.0%0.1x
2026-0137.1x₹1457 cr41.1%54.0%0.1x
2025-1239.5x₹1457 cr41.1%54.0%0.1x
2025-1140.6x₹1445 cr41.7%54.0%0.1x
2025-1041.3x₹1445 cr41.7%54.0%0.1x
2025-0939.4x₹1445 cr41.7%54.0%0.1x
2025-0838.9x₹1422 cr41.6%54.0%0.1x
2025-0739.2x₹1422 cr41.6%54.0%0.1x
2025-0645.0x₹1422 cr41.6%54.0%0.1x
2025-0542.5x₹1376 cr49.8%48.0%0.1x
2025-0441.9x₹1376 cr49.8%48.0%0.1x
2025-0339.9x₹1376 cr49.8%48.0%0.1x
2025-0236.5x₹1296 cr46.0%48.0%0.1x
2025-0141.9x₹1296 cr46.0%48.0%0.1x
2024-1259.0x₹1296 cr46.0%48.0%0.1x
2024-1162.9x₹1206 cr41.9%48.0%0.1x
2024-1056.7x₹1206 cr41.9%48.0%0.1x
2024-0956.2x₹1206 cr41.9%48.0%0.1x
2024-0859.2x₹1137 cr38.4%48.0%0.1x
2024-0763.0x₹1137 cr38.4%48.0%0.1x
2024-0650.2x₹1137 cr38.4%48.0%0.1x
2024-0559.8x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2024-0455.0x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2024-0350.1x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2024-0252.8x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2024-0149.8x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-1245.6x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-1148.1x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-1038.6x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-0943.1x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-0840.8x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-0740.5x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-0637.8x₹972 cr36.4%46.0%0.1x
2023-0537.8x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2023-0435.1x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2023-0334.6x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2023-0238.5x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2023-0138.8x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-1237.8x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-1139.2x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-1043.4x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-0943.1x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-0839.3x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-0741.9x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-0638.5x₹910 cr44.3%56.0%0.1x
2022-0555.3x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2022-0458.9x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2022-0355.1x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2022-0259.3x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2022-0164.1x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-1263.4x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-1173.2x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-1071.6x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-0972.2x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-0890.8x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-0779.5x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-0666.4x₹706 cr39.7%42.0%0.2x
2021-0571.0x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x
2021-0465.9x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x
2021-0352.4x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x
2021-0251.8x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x
2021-0150.4x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x
2020-1251.2x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x
2020-1141.0x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x
2020-1036.8x₹700 cr31.3%44.0%0.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback