अApnaFunda

JYOTI CNC AUTOMATION LIMITED (JYOTICNC)

Producer Manufacturing · Metal Fabrication · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.63 / 100
Profitability 81Balance sheet 45
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.67 / 100
Price 95Earnings 24FII/DII 80

Passes these screensDebt-light & profitablePrice ahead of business

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,036.4 latest close · +34.5% over the last 90 sessions

₹800₹1,000Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹800₹1,000Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,036.4 month-end · +2.6% over 12 months

₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800₹1,000Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,036.4 month-end · +87.1% since Jan '24

₹500₹750₹1,000₹1,250Jan '24Aug '24Mar '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹750₹1,000₹1,250Jan '24Jun '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹580.10 to ₹1134.60 · 1-year volatility 47.6%

Was the rally earned?

+3%share price, 1 yearRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 1 year (+3%).
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+7 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +3%+3%Share priceNet profit growth: −4 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−4ProfitP/E change: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+7P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +3%+3%Share price
Net profit growth-4 ptsNet profit fell about 4%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+7 ptsThe P/E rose from 68.3x to 73.3x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with BHARAT FORGE

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-59.2%not yet recovered
1-year volatility47.6%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.183-year daily, correlation 0.48
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−58.5% 0%−20%−40%−60%20252026−58.5%
Largest drawdowns

-59.2% (2024-12 peak to 2026-06 low, not yet recovered)

-26.9% (2024-06 peak to 2024-10 low, recovered 2024-12)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-03: 8.7x the 50-day median, price +2.8% that day

2026-09-21: 7.1x the 50-day median, price +6.1% that day

2026-09-18: 5.1x the 50-day median, price +7.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

73.3xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history53rd percentile
CheapestMedian 70.8xDearest

Usual range 52.0x to 129.3x since 2024-01.

Against Producer Manufacturing73.3x vs 29.6x
This company
73.3x
Sector median
29.6x

148% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

25.3x82.7x140.1x197.4xJan '24Aug '24Mar '25Oct '25May '26Nov '2625.3x82.7x140.1x197.4xJan '24Jan '25Jan '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE72nd▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin90th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth57th▼ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth32nd▼ 53 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓35th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓7th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓12th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum58th▲ 12 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~42%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 157.8x, the price would imply about 41.7%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1036.40
P/E
73.3x
ROCE
21.0%
Market Cap
₹23559 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹2191 cr
P/S
10.8x
P/B
11.8x
ROE
16.1%
Operating Margin
21.0%
Debt / Equity
0.4x
Promoter Holding
62.5%
12M Momentum
2.6%

52-week range

₹580.10₹1134.60
82% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
47.6%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.25

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
6.4x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.12x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance10%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 9.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.12xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.12x (cash from operations ₹-99 cr, net profit ₹803 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+21 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 21 days (104 vs 83). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress16% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 16% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-3 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -3 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 6.7 pts; FIIs added 0.5 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 36,870 to 89,711 (+143%) between Mar 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupMar '24Jun '26Change
Promoters62.5%62.5%0.0 pts
FIIs5.8%6.3%+0.5 pts
DIIs5.9%12.6%+6.7 pts
Public and others25.8%18.6%-7.2 pts

Number of shareholders

89,711shareholders+143% since Mar '24
37k54k72k90k Mar '24Sep '24Mar '25Sep '25Mar '26Jun '26
Mar '24: 36,870
Jun '24: 45,162
Sep '24: 49,323
Dec '24: 56,461
Mar '25: 62,550
Jun '25: 61,957
Sep '25: 72,243
Dec '25: 70,225
Mar '26: 73,051
Jun '26: 89,711
37k54k72k90k Mar '24Dec '24Sep '25Jun '26
Mar '24: 36,870
Jun '24: 45,162
Sep '24: 49,323
Dec '24: 56,461
Mar '25: 62,550
Jun '25: 61,957
Sep '25: 72,243
Dec '25: 70,225
Mar '26: 73,051
Jun '26: 89,711

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−13.9%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like JYOTI CNC AUTOMATION LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +10% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −8.7%, 80% range −14.8% to −0.1%), but the matches cluster in only 5 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
ASIANTILES · Oct 2020: −65.2% vs market
SULA · Jan 2024: −51.1% vs market
KAYNES · Oct 2025: −50.6% vs market
TATVA · Sep 2022: −45.8% vs market
THEJO · Apr 2024: −42.7% vs market
ASTEC · Jul 2022: −41.6% vs market
TARIL · May 2025: −39.9% vs market
LTTS · Dec 2021: −36.5% vs market
VENUSPIPES · May 2024: −36.3% vs market
MTARTECH · May 2023: −34.0% vs market
BECTORFOOD · Oct 2024: −30.9% vs market
OLECTRA · Sep 2025: −27.4% vs market
BORORENEW · Jan 2024: −22.5% vs market
NEOGEN · Mar 2022: −22.3% vs market
SRF · Jul 2022: −22.1% vs market
SONACOMS · Dec 2023: −21.5% vs market
UNITDSPR · Jan 2020: −21.5% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · May 2023: −20.4% vs market
METROBRAND · Feb 2025: −19.9% vs market
RAINBOW · Nov 2024: −18.1% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Oct 2022: −17.3% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Aug 2022: −16.8% vs market
MEDANTA · Feb 2025: −16.1% vs market
DOMS · Aug 2025: −14.8% vs market
KIMS · Aug 2023: −14.0% vs market
HESTERBIO · Oct 2020: −13.8% vs market
EMAMILTD · Oct 2020: −8.1% vs market
UNOMINDA · Sep 2022: −7.6% vs market
ETHOSLTD · Nov 2024: −7.2% vs market
ATGL · Sep 2025: −5.6% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Dec 2023: −3.7% vs market
EMUDHRA · May 2024: −3.1% vs market
AARTIIND · Jan 2020: −1.2% vs market
FINEORG · Apr 2022: 0% vs market
POWERINDIA · Sep 2022: +1.3% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · Aug 2022: +1.7% vs market
POLYMED · Aug 2023: +8.4% vs market
TBOTEK · Sep 2025: +9.9% vs market
MAXHEALTH · Oct 2024: +10.0% vs market
TEGA · Sep 2025: +10.8% vs market
BIKAJI · Nov 2023: +11.3% vs market
TI · Nov 2024: +12.1% vs market
RADICO · Mar 2020: +16.2% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · May 2025: +25.2% vs market
SOLARINDS · May 2022: +31.2% vs market
ASTRAL · Nov 2020: +41.0% vs market
VIJAYA · Sep 2025: +43.0% vs market
ACUTAAS · Dec 2024: +50.3% vs market
VBL · Aug 2022: +58.9% vs market
KPITTECH · Dec 2022: +69.3% vs market
Similar setups −13.9%All companies −5.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−13.9%
All companies' median
−5.2%
Beat the market
32% vs 44%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 28 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SOLARINDS
Process Industries
May 2022 86x19% +69%−14% +31%
RAINBOW
Health Services
Nov 2024 75x19% +48%−4% −18%
ASTRAMICRO
Electronic Technology
May 2025 77x19% +27%−6% +25%
KPITTECH
Technology Services
Dec 2022 70x24% +15%−6% +69%
ELGIEQUIP
Producer Manufacturing
May 2023 95x19% +55%−6% −20%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SULA
Process Industries
Jan 2024 67x20% +75%−1% −51%
TEGA
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2025 63x18% +1%−14% +11%
ASTRAL
Producer Manufacturing
Nov 2020 90x21% +30%−2% +41%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: P/E, 12-month momentum and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to JYOTI CNC AUTOMATION LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Health Technology
73%similar
market caprevenue
Electronic Technology
65%similar
market capdebt/equity
Consumer Non-Durables
62%similar
debt/equityvolatility
Electronic Technology
50%similar
operating margindebt/equity
Non-Energy Minerals
48%similar
market cappromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
59%similar
operating marginROCE
Producer Manufacturing
53%similar
revenuepromoter holding
Producer Manufacturing
52%similar
P/Eoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

25 events since Jun '24

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 8.7x its 50-day median on 2026-11-03; price +2.8% that day.
  2. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  3. SepInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 4.2 pts over 2 quarters to 18.9%.
  4. SepPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2026-09-21; price +6.1% that day.
  5. JunPriceFell 59% from the Dec 2024 peak to the Jun 2026 low.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  7. AprPriceVolume reached 23.5x its 50-day median on 2026-04-20; price +5.1% that day.
  8. MarPriceVolume reached 43.6x its 50-day median on 2026-03-17; price +6.1% that day.
Show 17 earlier events
  1. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 5.2 pts over 2 quarters to 22.8%.
  2. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  3. OctPriceVolume reached 53.2x its 50-day median on 2025-10-10; price +5.5% that day.
  4. JulPriceVolume reached 6.2x its 50-day median on 2025-07-21; price +5.3% that day.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 80.3x its 50-day median on 2025-06-30; price -5.9% that day.
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 20.2x its 50-day median on 2025-03-04; price +11.7% that day.
  8. JanDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.22x.
  9. JanSharesShare count is up 36.4% over 12 months.
  10. DecPriceRegained the 2024-06 peak, 2 months after the low.
  11. DecInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 5.4 pts over 1 quarter to 16.8%.
  12. DecPriceVolume reached 16.1x its 50-day median on 2024-12-17; price +10.8% that day.
  13. OctPriceFell 27% from the Jun 2024 peak to the Oct 2024 low.
  14. JulPriceVolume reached 13.6x its 50-day median on 2024-07-29; price -0.8% that day.
  15. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  16. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  17. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.22x).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history35 months · 2024-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1173.3x₹2191 cr16.1%21.0%0.4x
2026-1064.0x₹2191 cr16.1%21.0%0.4x
2026-0973.5x₹2191 cr16.1%21.0%0.4x
2026-0867.4x₹2093 cr16.8%21.0%0.4x
2026-0754.7x₹2093 cr16.8%21.0%0.4x
2026-0652.5x₹2093 cr16.8%21.0%0.4x
2026-0538.3x₹2070 cr21.1%24.0%0.3x
2026-0448.1x₹2070 cr21.1%24.0%0.3x
2026-0346.3x₹2070 cr21.1%24.0%0.3x
2026-0253.9x₹1944 cr20.5%24.0%0.3x
2026-0153.0x₹1944 cr20.5%24.0%0.3x
2025-1265.0x₹1944 cr20.5%24.0%0.3x
2025-1168.3x₹1867 cr19.9%24.0%0.3x
2025-1058.4x₹1867 cr19.9%24.0%0.3x
2025-0957.4x₹1867 cr19.9%24.0%0.3x
2025-0865.6x₹1819 cr18.7%24.0%0.3x
2025-0773.4x₹1819 cr18.7%24.0%0.3x
2025-0676.2x₹1819 cr18.7%24.0%0.3x
2025-0596.0x₹1693 cr22.5%21.0%0.2x
2025-0479.8x₹1693 cr22.5%21.0%0.2x
2025-0378.5x₹1693 cr22.5%21.0%0.2x
2025-0264.4x₹1621 cr20.2%21.0%0.2x
2025-0186.8x₹1621 cr20.2%21.0%0.2x
2024-12108.9x₹1621 cr20.2%21.0%0.2x
2024-11125.2x₹1492 cr15.8%21.0%0.2x
2024-10105.7x₹1492 cr15.8%21.0%0.2x
2024-09115.4x₹1492 cr15.8%21.0%0.2x
2024-08181.1x₹1338 cr11.1%21.0%0.2x
2024-07166.3x₹1338 cr11.1%21.0%0.2x
2024-06197.4x₹1338 cr11.1%21.0%0.2x
2024-05—₹929 cr-6.1%8.0%10.2x
2024-04—₹929 cr-6.1%8.0%10.2x
2024-03—₹929 cr-6.1%8.0%10.2x
2024-02—₹929 cr-6.1%8.0%10.2x
2024-01—₹929 cr-6.1%8.0%10.2x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback